BIOMASS BOUNTY: HARNESSING [FEEDSTOCK] FOR SUSTAINABLE BIO-ETHANOL AND BIOGAS PRODUCTION

Abstract

This study investigates the viability of utilizing [Feedstock] as a renewable resource for the production of bio-ethanol and biogas. The research assesses the composition, availability, and potential yield of [Feedstock] in biofuel generation processes. Various conversion technologies and their efficiencies are explored, considering their environmental impact and economic feasibility. The findings highlight the promising prospects of [Feedstock] as a sustainable feedstock for bioenergy production, contributing to the transition towards greener energy alternatives.

American Journal of Agriculture and Horticulture Innovations
Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
HAC
doi
 
CC BY f
01-07
11

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Rashid khan. (2024). BIOMASS BOUNTY: HARNESSING [FEEDSTOCK] FOR SUSTAINABLE BIO-ETHANOL AND BIOGAS PRODUCTION. American Journal of Agriculture and Horticulture Innovations, 4(05), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajahi/Volume04Issue05-01
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

This study investigates the viability of utilizing [Feedstock] as a renewable resource for the production of bio-ethanol and biogas. The research assesses the composition, availability, and potential yield of [Feedstock] in biofuel generation processes. Various conversion technologies and their efficiencies are explored, considering their environmental impact and economic feasibility. The findings highlight the promising prospects of [Feedstock] as a sustainable feedstock for bioenergy production, contributing to the transition towards greener energy alternatives.

References

Black W, 1950. The seasonal variation in weight and chemical composition of the common British Laminariaceae. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 29:45-72.

Bruhn A, Dahl J, Nielsen HB, Nikolaisen L, Rasmussen MB, Markager S, Olesen B, Arias C and Jensen PD, 2011. Bioenergy potential of Ulva lactuca: Biomass yield, methane production and combustion. Biores. Technol. 102 (3):2595-2604.

Cecchi F, Pavan P and Mata-Alvarez J, 1996. Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge:application to the macroalgae from the Venice lagoon. Res. Conser. Recycl. 17:57-66.

Chandini SK, Ganesan P, Suresh P and Bhaskar N, 2008. Seaweeds as a source of nutritionally beneficial compounds-A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 45:1-13. Choi W, Han J, Lee C, Song C, Kim J, Seo Y, Lee S, Jung K, Kang D and Heo S, 2012.

Bioethanol Production from Ulva pertusa Kjellman by High-temperature Liquefaction. Chem. Biochem. Engineer. Quarterly. 26:15-21.

Cromey C and Nickell T, 2009. Modelling the impact of cod (Gadus morhua L.) farming in the marine environment: CODMOD. Aquaculture. 289:42-53.

Demirbas A, 2007. Progress and recent trends in biofuels. Prog. Energ. Comb. Sci. 33:1-18.

Demirbas A, 2009. Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: A review. Appl. Ener. 86: 108-117.

FAO F, 2000. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture.

Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, OConnell C, Ray DK and West PC, 2011.

Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 478:337-342.

Frank ED, Han J, Palou-Rivera I, Elgowainy A and Wang MQ, 2012. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions affect the life-cycle analysis of algal biofuels. Environ. Res. Let. 7:014030.

Gao K and McKinley KR, 1994. Use of macroalgae for marine biomass production and CO2 remediation: a review. J. Appl. Phycol. 6:45-60.

Georgianna DR and Mayfield SP, 2012. Exploiting diversity and synthetic biology for the production of algal biofuels. Nature. 488:329-335.