Characteristics And Research Approaches To Plant Microbiomes In The Ecological Conditions Of The Kyzylkum Desert

Abstract

The Kyzylkum Desert represents a unique and extreme ecosystem where plants depend critically on their associated microbiomes for survival and adaptation. This review explores the intricate composition, dynamic interactions, and functional roles of plant microbiomes in such harsh environments, emphasizing their ecological importance and potential applications. Despite significant progress in microbiome research, major gaps remain in understanding the specific mechanisms that enable these microbial communities to thrive under extreme abiotic stressors like high salinity, nutrient deficiency, and drought. Advanced molecular approaches, including metagenomics and 16S rRNA sequencing, are highlighted as indispensable tools for unraveling microbial diversity and functionality in desert ecosystems.

Key findings reveal the vital roles of microbial communities—bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and archaea—in enhancing nutrient acquisition, improving drought resilience, and mitigating oxidative stress in desert plants. Notably, symbiotic associations such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing fungi, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are crucial in facilitating plant survival in the nutrient-poor soils of the Kyzylkum Desert. Furthermore, this review underscores the unique adaptive traits of desert microbiomes, including stress-response proteins, exopolysaccharide production, and osmoprotectants, which collectively sustain plant-microbe interactions under challenging conditions.

This review integrates findings from local and international research to bridge critical knowledge gaps and underscores the potential of desert microbiomes for sustainable applications, including bioinoculants, soil health enhancement, and desertification mitigation. These insights pave the way for innovative strategies to harness microbial communities in addressing global challenges in agriculture and ecosystem restoration.

 

American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
HAC
doi
 
CC BY f
44-56
1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
B.Toshbadalov. (2025). Characteristics And Research Approaches To Plant Microbiomes In The Ecological Conditions Of The Kyzylkum Desert. American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology, 5(06), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajast/Volume05Issue06-10
0
Citations
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

The Kyzylkum Desert represents a unique and extreme ecosystem where plants depend critically on their associated microbiomes for survival and adaptation. This review explores the intricate composition, dynamic interactions, and functional roles of plant microbiomes in such harsh environments, emphasizing their ecological importance and potential applications. Despite significant progress in microbiome research, major gaps remain in understanding the specific mechanisms that enable these microbial communities to thrive under extreme abiotic stressors like high salinity, nutrient deficiency, and drought. Advanced molecular approaches, including metagenomics and 16S rRNA sequencing, are highlighted as indispensable tools for unraveling microbial diversity and functionality in desert ecosystems.

Key findings reveal the vital roles of microbial communities—bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and archaea—in enhancing nutrient acquisition, improving drought resilience, and mitigating oxidative stress in desert plants. Notably, symbiotic associations such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing fungi, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are crucial in facilitating plant survival in the nutrient-poor soils of the Kyzylkum Desert. Furthermore, this review underscores the unique adaptive traits of desert microbiomes, including stress-response proteins, exopolysaccharide production, and osmoprotectants, which collectively sustain plant-microbe interactions under challenging conditions.

This review integrates findings from local and international research to bridge critical knowledge gaps and underscores the potential of desert microbiomes for sustainable applications, including bioinoculants, soil health enhancement, and desertification mitigation. These insights pave the way for innovative strategies to harness microbial communities in addressing global challenges in agriculture and ecosystem restoration.

 


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

44

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

VOLUME

Vol.05 Issue 06 2025

PAGE NO.

44-56

DOI

10.37547/ajast/Volume05Issue06-10



Characteristics And Research Approaches To Plant
Microbiomes In The Ecological Conditions Of The
Kyzylkum Desert

B.Toshbadalov

Institute of Fundamental and Applied Research, National Research University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Received:

14 April 2025;

Accepted:

10 May 2025;

Published:

18 June 2025

Abstract:

The Kyzylkum Desert represents a unique and extreme ecosystem where plants depend critically on their

associated microbiomes for survival and adaptation. This review explores the intricate composition, dynamic
interactions, and functional roles of plant microbiomes in such harsh environments, emphasizing their ecological
importance and potential applications. Despite significant progress in microbiome research, major gaps remain in
understanding the specific mechanisms that enable these microbial communities to thrive under extreme abiotic
stressors like high salinity, nutrient deficiency, and drought. Advanced molecular approaches, including
metagenomics and 16S rRNA sequencing, are highlighted as indispensable tools for unraveling microbial diversity
and functionality in desert ecosystems.
Key findings reveal the vital roles of microbial communities

bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and archaea

in

enhancing nutrient acquisition, improving drought resilience, and mitigating oxidative stress in desert plants.
Notably, symbiotic associations such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-solubilizing fungi, and arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi are crucial in facilitating plant survival in the nutrient-poor soils of the Kyzylkum Desert.
Furthermore, this review underscores the unique adaptive traits of desert microbiomes, including stress-response
proteins, exopolysaccharide production, and osmoprotectants, which collectively sustain plant-microbe
interactions under challenging conditions.
This review integrates findings from local and international research to bridge critical knowledge gaps and
underscores the potential of desert microbiomes for sustainable applications, including bioinoculants, soil health
enhancement, and desertification mitigation. These insights pave the way for innovative strategies to harness
microbial communities in addressing global challenges in agriculture and ecosystem restoration.

Keywords:

Kyzylkum Desert, plant microbiome, microbial diversity, metagenomics, bioinoculants, plant-microbe

interactions, desert ecology, microbial adaptation, desertification control, sustainable agriculture.

Introduction:

The Kyzylkum Desert, one of Central Asia's largest arid
regions,

is

characterized

by

its

extreme

environmental

conditions,

including

high

temperatures, minimal annual rainfall (less than 100
mm), and highly saline, nutrient-poor soils. Despite
these harsh conditions, plants in the Kyzylkum Desert
have developed intricate ecological relationships with
their microbiomes, which are crucial for their survival
[1].

Plant

microbiomes,

consisting

of

soil

microorganisms, fungi, bacteria, and archaea, play
essential roles in plant growth, stress tolerance, and
nutrient acquisition [2]. In extreme environments

such as the Kyzylkum Desert, these microbial
communities are vital for plant resilience against
salinity, drought, and nutrient limitations, making
them indispensable for the ecosystem's sustainability
[3]. However, research on the microbiomes in the
Kyzylkum Desert remains limited, leaving significant
gaps in understanding their biodiversity, functional
roles, and adaptation mechanisms. Advanced
molecular technologies, including metagenomics and
16S rRNA sequencing, are powerful tools to elucidate
the biological and ecological significance of these
microbiomes [4].

The primary objective of this study is to


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

45

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

investigate the composition, ecological functions, and
adaptation mechanisms of plant microbiomes in the
Kyzylkum Desert. By addressing these critical research
gaps, this study aims to contribute to a deeper
understanding of desert ecosystems and provide
innovative solutions for sustainable agriculture, such as
bioinoculants and soil improvement strategies [5].

The Kyzylkum Desert, as one of the largest arid

regions in Central Asia, harbors a unique and diverse
range of microbiomes adapted to its harsh
environmental

conditions.

These

microbiomes,

comprising bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and
archaea, play a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem
functionality and ensuring plant survival in nutrient-
poor and saline soils. This section explores the diversity
of microbial communities in the desert, highlighting
their composition, adaptations, and ecological
significance.

Microbial Communities in the Kyzylkum Desert
1.

Bacteria:

Bacteria represent the most abundant and versatile
group in desert microbiomes. Species belonging to the
genera

Bacillus

,

Pseudomonas

, and

Azospirillum

are

particularly notable. These bacteria contribute to
nutrient cycling, nitrogen fixation, and stress
resistance. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria like

Rhizobium

and

Azospirillum

enhance soil fertility by converting

atmospheric nitrogen into plant-available forms, a
critical process in nitrogen-deficient desert soils [6].

2.

Fungi:

Fungi, especially phosphate-solubilizing species such as

Aspergillus

and

Penicillium

, play a vital role in nutrient

mobilization. They secrete organic acids and enzymes
that solubilize insoluble phosphates, making them
available for plant uptake. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)
fungi, such as

Glomus

and

Funneliformis

, form

symbiotic associations with plant roots, enhancing
nutrient and water absorption in arid soils [7].

3.

Actinomycetes:

Actinomycetes, particularly

Streptomyces

species, are

known for their ability to produce secondary
metabolites such as antibiotics and growth-promoting
compounds. These metabolites help plants combat
pathogens and adapt to abiotic stresses like drought
and salinity.

Streptomyces

spp. are abundant in the

Kyzylkum Desert and play a pivotal role in soil health
[8].

4.

Archaea:

Although less studied, archaea in the Kyzylkum Desert
exhibit remarkable adaptations to extreme salinity and
temperature fluctuations. Halophilic archaea, such as

Halobacterium

spp., are crucial for osmotic balance and

nutrient cycling in saline environments [9].

The genetic diversity of desert microbiomes is

vast, with numerous genes encoding for stress-

response proteins, secondary metabolite production,
and nutrient acquisition mechanisms. Metagenomic
studies have revealed genes responsible for the
synthesis of osmoprotectants like glycine betaine and
trehalose, which help microorganisms survive
desiccation and salinity [10]. Functional diversity is
equally significant, as these microorganisms perform
critical roles in nutrient cycling, including carbon,
nitrogen, and phosphorus fluxes, which are essential
for sustaining plant life in arid ecosystems.

Microbial diversity in the Kyzylkum Desert is

influenced by seasonal changes, soil type, and plant
species. During dry seasons, microbial communities
exhibit enhanced production of stress-related
compounds, while wet seasons promote microbial
proliferation and activity

[ref bo’lsa qo’ying]

. Different

plants host unique microbiomes, reflecting a high
degree of habitat specificity. For example, halophilic
bacteria dominate in plants like

Haloxylon spp.

,

whereas phosphate-solubilizing fungi are prevalent in

Salsola spp.

[11].

The ecological significance of microbial

diversity in the Kyzylkum Desert cannot be overstated.
These microbiomes are indispensable for plant survival,
particularly in nutrient-poor soils. They facilitate
nutrient acquisition, improve soil structure, and
provide resilience against abiotic stresses [ref].
Furthermore, microbial communities contribute to the
desert's overall ecosystem stability by driving
biogeochemical cycles and supporting vegetation cover
[12].

Despite their importance, the microbiomes of

the Kyzylkum Desert remain underexplored. Challenges
such as the harsh environment, limited accessibility,
and lack of advanced research facilities hinder
comprehensive studies. Understanding the diversity
and functionality of these microbiomes requires the
integration of traditional microbiological techniques
with modern molecular approaches like metagenomics
and transcriptomics [13].

Future

research

should

prioritize

the

characterization of novel microbial species and their
ecological roles. Identifying and harnessing stress-
resilient microorganisms can pave the way for
sustainable applications in agriculture, such as the
development of bioinoculants and biostimulants
tailored

to

arid

environments.

Additionally,

comparative studies across different arid regions can
provide broader insights into the adaptive mechanisms
of desert microbiomes and their potential in combating
desertification [14].

The plant microbiomes in the Kyzylkum Desert

perform vital ecological functions that sustain plant life
in extreme environmental conditions. These functions
include nutrient acquisition, stress alleviation,


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

46

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

biocontrol mechanisms, and contributions to overall
ecosystem stability. This section explores the specific
roles of these microbiomes and their impact on desert
ecosystems.

Role in Nutrient Acquisition
1.

Nitrogen

Fixation:

Microbial

communities, particularly nitrogen-fixing bacteria like

Rhizobium

and

Azospirillum

, are crucial for improving

soil fertility in nitrogen-deficient soils. These microbes
convert atmospheric nitrogen into plant-available
ammonium through nitrogenase activity, addressing
one of the primary nutrient limitations in arid
environments [15].

2.

Phosphate Solubilization: Phosphate is

often unavailable in desert soils due to its fixation in
insoluble forms. Phosphate-solubilizing microbes, such
as

Aspergillus

and

Penicillium

species, secrete organic

acids and phosphatases that mobilize these bound
phosphates, making them accessible to plants [16].

3.

Enhancement

of

Micronutrient

Uptake: Microorganisms like siderophore-producing
bacteria (e.g.,

Pseudomonas

spp.) chelate essential

micronutrients such as iron, zinc, and manganese,
enhancing their bioavailability for plant uptake [17].

Stress Alleviation
1.

Abiotic Stress Mitigation:

o

Microbiomes alleviate drought stress

by producing osmoprotectants like proline and
trehalose, which help plants maintain cellular integrity
and water balance under limited water availability [18].

o

Rhizosphere

bacteria

secrete

exopolysaccharides that improve soil aggregation and
moisture retention, providing a stable environment for
plant roots [19].

2.

Salinity

Tolerance:

Halotolerant

microbes, such as

Bacillus

and

Microbacterium

species,

aid in osmotic balance by producing compatible solutes
and enzymes that combat ionic stress. These
adaptations are crucial for plant survival in saline soils
typical of the Kyzylkum Desert [20].

Biocontrol Mechanisms
1.

Pathogen

Suppression:

Beneficial

microbes act as natural biocontrol agents by inhibiting

plant pathogens. For example,

Pseudomonas

and

Bacillus

species produce antimicrobial compounds like

antibiotics, lipopeptides, and siderophores that restrict
pathogen proliferation [21].

2.

Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR):

Certain rhizosphere bacteria and fungi prime plants for
defense against biotic stress by triggering ISR, which

enhances the plant’s ability to resist subsequent

pathogen attacks [22].

3.

Protection

Against

Herbivores:

Microbes contribute to plant defense against
herbivorous pests by producing volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) that deter insects and enhance
plant resistance [23].

Contribution to Ecosystem Stability
1.

Nutrient

Cycling:

Microbial

communities play a central role in cycling key nutrients
like nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon, ensuring their
availability for plant and microbial use. These cycles are
essential for maintaining the functional integrity of
desert ecosystems [24].

2.

Soil Fertility and Structure:

o

Microbial exudates, including glomalin

secreted by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, improve soil
structure and stability, reducing erosion risks.

o

These activities enhance the water-

holding capacity and nutrient availability of soils,
promoting vegetation cover [25].

3.

Resilience Against Desertification:

Microbiomes contribute to ecosystem stability by
supporting plant growth and vegetation cover,
mitigating desertification processes and enhancing the
resilience of arid landscapes [26].

Despite significant progress in understanding

the ecological functions of microbiomes, gaps remain
in elucidating their full potential in arid regions like the
Kyzylkum Desert. Future research should focus on
integrating molecular and ecological studies to uncover
the specific interactions between plants and their
microbiomes. Additionally, exploring the use of
microbiomes in developing bioinoculants and
sustainable agricultural practices could significantly
benefit desert ecosystems [27].

Table 1. Key Microbial Groups and Their Functional Roles in the Kyzylkum Desert Ecosystem

Microbial

Group

Dominant Genera

Functional Role

Adaptation to Desert

Conditions

Reference

Nitrogen-Fixing

Bacteria

Rhizobium

,

Azospirillum

Fixation of

atmospheric nitrogen

into bioavailable

forms for plants

Production of stress-

tolerant enzymes and

nitrogenase activity under

low moisture levels

Vessey (2003);

Bashan et al.

(2004)

Phosphate-

Solubilizing

Fungi

Aspergillus

,

Penicillium

Solubilization of

insoluble phosphates

to increase

Secretion of organic acids

and phosphatases

Khan et al.

(2010); Mora-

Ruiz et al. (2016)


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

47

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

phosphorus

availability in soil

Halophilic

Bacteria

Bacillus

,

Microbacterium

Water retention and

osmotic balance in

saline environments

Exopolysaccharide

production and synthesis

of osmoprotectants

Ruppel et al.

(2013); Oren

(2011)

Mycorrhizal

Fungi

Glomus

,

Funneliformis

Enhanced nutrient

absorption and soil

stabilization

Formation of extensive

hyphal networks and
secretion of glomalin

Egamberdieva et

al. (2015); Singh

et al. (2021)

Actinomycetes

Streptomyces

,

Micromonospora

Production of

bioactive compounds

and plant growth

promotion

Synthesis of antibiotics

and secondary

metabolites

Sathya et al.

(2017); Gonzalez

et al. (2018)

Endophytic

Bacteria

Pseudomonas

,

Bacillus

Biocontrol against

plant pathogens

through antimicrobial

compound

production

Siderophore secretion to

limit pathogen access to

essential nutrients

Hartmann et al.

(2014); Gonzalez

et al. (2018)

Table 1 summarizes the key microbial groups found in
the Kyzylkum Desert and their functional roles in
supporting plant survival and maintaining ecosystem
stability. The table highlights their dominant genera,
primary ecological functions, and the specific
adaptations that enable their survival in extreme desert
conditions.
For instance, nitrogen-fixing bacteria such as

Rhizobium

and

Azospirillum

enhance soil nitrogen

availability, while phosphate-solubilizing fungi like

Aspergillus

and

Penicillium

address phosphorus

limitations

through

solubilization

mechanisms.

Additionally, halophilic bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi
contribute to osmotic regulation and nutrient uptake,
respectively. These functional roles underscore the
critical contribution of microbial communities to desert
ecosystem resilience.
Such findings emphasize the need for further
exploration of these microbial groups, particularly their
genetic and metabolic capabilities, which could have
significant

implications

for

biotechnological

applications and sustainable agriculture in arid
environments.
Microbial communities in the Kyzylkum Desert have
developed remarkable adaptation mechanisms to
survive and thrive under extreme environmental
stressors, including high temperatures, salinity, and
nutrient scarcity. This section delves into the
physiological, biochemical, and genetic adaptations of
these microbiomes, illustrating their resilience and
ecological importance.


Physiological Adaptations

1.

Exopolysaccharide (EPS) Production: Many desert
microbes produce exopolysaccharides, which
improve soil aggregation and help retain moisture

around plant roots. This adaptation is particularly
crucial in the sandy, porous soils of the Kyzylkum
Desert, where water is a limiting factor [28]. EPS
also facilitates microbial adhesion to plant roots,
enhancing nutrient exchange.

2.

Osmoprotectant Synthesis: Microbial synthesis of
osmoprotectants like proline, glycine betaine, and
trehalose is a key adaptation to salinity and
drought. These compounds stabilize cellular
proteins and membranes, preventing damage from
osmotic stress caused by high salt concentrations
in the soil [29].

3.

Heat-Shock Proteins (HSPs): Heat-shock proteins
protect microbial cells from damage during
extreme temperature fluctuations. These proteins
refold denatured proteins and ensure cellular
functionality under heat stress, a frequent
condition in desert ecosystems [30].

Biochemical Adaptations

1.

Production of Antioxidative Enzymes: Reactive
oxygen species (ROS) accumulate under abiotic
stresses like drought and salinity. Desert microbes
produce antioxidative enzymes such as superoxide
dismutase (SOD) and catalase, which neutralize
ROS and protect cellular components from
oxidative damage [31].

2.

Secondary Metabolites: Actinomycetes, especially

Streptomyces

species, produce a wide range of

secondary metabolites, including antibiotics and
siderophores. These metabolites not only protect
microbes from competitors but also enhance plant
growth by inhibiting pathogens and increasing iron
availability [32].

3.

Pigment Production: Carotenoids and melanin are
common pigments synthesized by desert microbes.
These pigments protect cells from ultraviolet (UV)


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

48

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

radiation, a significant stressor in open desert
environments. They also play roles in ROS
scavenging and membrane stabilization [33].

Genetic Adaptations

1.

Stress-Responsive

Genes:

Desert

microbes possess genes encoding for proteins that
confer resistance to abiotic stresses. For example,
genes involved in the synthesis of osmoprotectants,
EPS, and HSPs are upregulated in response to
environmental triggers [34].

2.

Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT):

Horizontal gene transfer is a common mechanism
among desert microbes, enabling the rapid acquisition
of stress-resistance traits. This genetic exchange
fosters

microbial

community

resilience

and

adaptability [35].

3.

Unique

Genomic

Features:

Comparative genomics reveals that desert microbes
have smaller, streamlined genomes with a high
proportion of genes dedicated to stress tolerance and
resource efficiency. These adaptations reflect
evolutionary

pressures

in

resource-scarce

environments like the Kyzylkum Desert [36].

Microbial adaptation mechanisms in the

Kyzylkum Desert show striking similarities with those
observed in other arid regions worldwide, such as the
Atacama and Thar Deserts. Shared traits include EPS
production,

osmoprotectant

synthesis,

and

antioxidative enzyme activity. However, unique
adaptations in the Kyzylkum Desert, such as the
prevalence of halophilic bacteria, highlight the
ecological specificity of this region [37].

Ecological and Practical Significance

1.

Plant Resilience: These adaptations directly benefit
desert plants by improving nutrient availability,
water retention, and stress tolerance. For instance,
mycorrhizal fungi extend plant root networks,
enhancing water and nutrient uptake even in saline
soils [38].

2.

Soil Stability: EPS production and microbial
exudates improve soil structure, reducing erosion
and enhancing fertility. This contributes to desert
ecosystem

sustainability

and

mitigates

desertification [39].

3.

Potential

for

Agricultural

Applications:

Understanding microbial adaptations can inform
the

development

of

bioinoculants

and

biostimulants tailored for arid agriculture. These
products could enhance crop productivity in saline
and drought-prone soils [40].

Further exploration of the genetic and

biochemical

pathways

underlying

microbial

adaptations is necessary to unlock their full potential.

Integrating metagenomics, transcriptomics, and
proteomics will provide deeper insights into microbial
resilience. Additionally, field studies comparing
microbial communities across different microhabitats
within the Kyzylkum Desert can reveal novel adaptive
traits [41].

The unique adaptations and functional roles of

microbiomes in the Kyzylkum Desert open significant
opportunities for practical applications in agriculture,
biotechnology, and ecological restoration. Harnessing
these microbial communities can address challenges
such as soil degradation, desertification, and climate
change impacts on agriculture.

Bioinoculants for Sustainable Agriculture

1.

Nitrogen Fixation and Soil Fertility Improvement:
Nitrogen-fixing bacteria such as

Azospirillum

and

Rhizobium

can be developed into bioinoculants to

improve nitrogen availability in nutrient-deficient
soils. These bioinoculants reduce the dependency
on chemical fertilizers, promoting eco-friendly
agricultural practices [42].

2.

Phosphate Solubilization for Crop Enhancement:
Microbial strains such as

Aspergillus

spp. and

Bacillus

spp. can solubilize bound phosphate in arid

soils, making it available to plants. These
bioinoculants

enhance

plant

growth

and

productivity in phosphorus-limited environments
[43].

3.

Stress

Tolerance

Promotion:

Microbial

bioinoculants producing osmoprotectants like
proline and trehalose can improve plant resilience
against drought and salinity, ensuring sustainable
crop yields in arid regions [44].

Bioremediation and Soil Restoration

1.

Improving Soil Structure: Exopolysaccharide-
producing microbes enhance soil aggregation and
stability. Their application in degraded lands can
prevent erosion and restore soil fertility, crucial for
combating desertification in the Kyzylkum Desert
[45].

2.

Halophilic Microbial Consortia: Halophilic and
halotolerant

microbes

can

be

used

for

phytoremediation of saline soils, improving soil
health and enabling the cultivation of salt-tolerant
crops [46].

Development of Drought-Resistant Crops

1.

Mycorrhizal

Fungi

for

Water

Uptake:

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, such as

Glomus

spp., enhance root water absorption by extending
the root network into deeper soil layers. This
symbiosis increases the drought resistance of
crops, particularly in arid zones like the Kyzylkum
Desert [47].

2.

Gene Transfer Technology: Understanding the
genetic basis of stress tolerance in desert microbes


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

49

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

can inform genetic engineering approaches to
develop drought-resistant crops. Genes encoding
osmoprotectants and antioxidative enzymes can
be transferred to crop plants, improving their
performance under abiotic stress [48].

Eco-Friendly Pest Management
1.

Biological Control Agents: Desert

microbes such as

Bacillus

and

Pseudomonas

species

produce antimicrobial peptides and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) that suppress plant pathogens and
herbivorous pests. These microbes can serve as eco-
friendly alternatives to chemical pesticides [49].

2.

Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR):

Certain

microbial strains can prime plants’ immune

systems, enhancing their natural defenses against
biotic stressors. ISR-inducing microbes reduce the
incidence of diseases in crops while minimizing
environmental impacts [50].

Combating Desertification

1.

Vegetation Restoration: Microbial

consortia from the Kyzylkum Desert can support the
growth of native desert plants, stabilizing soil and
promoting vegetation cover. This approach mitigates
desertification and improves ecosystem health [51].

2.

Carbon

Sequestration:

Microbial

activity in desert soils contributes to carbon cycling,
capturing atmospheric CO2 and storing it in soil organic
matter. This process has implications for global climate
change mitigation efforts [52].

Despite

these

promising

applications,

significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the
scalability and long-term impacts of utilizing desert
microbiomes in agriculture and environmental
restoration. Future studies should focus on field trials,
cost-effective production methods for bioinoculants,
and understanding the ecological balance of
introduced microbial strains [53].


Table 2. Functional Roles and Adaptation Mechanisms of Microbial Groups in the Kyzylkum Desert

Microbial Group

Primary Ecological Roles

Adaptation Mechanisms to Desert Conditions

Bacteria

Rhizobium

,

Azospirillum

Nitrogen fixation, enhancing soil

fertility

Utilizing nitrogenase enzyme to assimilate

atmospheric nitrogen

Bacillus

,

Pseudomonas

Biocontrol against pathogens,

siderophore production

Exopolysaccharide production, osmoprotectants

(trehalose, proline)

Microbacterium

Phosphorus mobilization,

solubilizing phosphates in the soil

Production of organic acids

Fungi

Aspergillus

,

Penicillium

Mobilizing phosphorus and

micronutrients

Exopolysaccharide production, hydrolytic

enzymes

Glomus

(arbuscular

mycorrhizae)

Enhancing water and nutrient

uptake

Symbiotic integration into root cells, creating an

extensive root network

Actinomycetes

Streptomyces

Producing antibiotics,

suppressing pathogens

Production of secondary metabolites (antibiotics,

siderophores)

Archaea

Halobacterium

Ion balance and stress tolerance

Producing halophilic pigments, maintaining

osmotic balance via glycine-betaine and trehalose

Table 2 highlights the key microbial groups in the
Kyzylkum Desert, emphasizing their functional roles
and unique adaptations to extreme environmental
conditions. The table categorizes microbes into
bacteria,

fungi,

actinomycetes,

and

archaea,

showcasing their contributions to desert ecosystems:

1.

Bacteria:

Essential

for

nitrogen

fixation, phosphorus mobilization, and biocontrol
activities, bacteria like

Rhizobium

and

Bacillus

enhance

soil fertility and plant health. Their ability to produce
osmoprotectants and exopolysaccharides ensures
survival in saline and nutrient-poor soils.

2.

Fungi: Mycorrhizal fungi, particularly

Glomus

, form symbiotic associations with plant roots,

enhancing water and nutrient uptake. Phosphate-
solubilizing fungi like

Aspergillus

play a crucial role in

mobilizing bound nutrients, improving plant growth in
arid soils.

3.

Actinomycetes: Known for producing

secondary metabolites,

Streptomyces

species are vital

for pathogen suppression and improving soil health
through antibiotic and siderophore production.

4.

Archaea: Halophilic archaea like

Halobacterium

exhibit remarkable adaptations to


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

50

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

salinity, utilizing pigments and osmotic regulators to
maintain cellular stability under extreme conditions.
These microbial groups collectively support plant
resilience and soil sustainability in the Kyzylkum Desert,
offering potential applications in bioinoculant
development, soil restoration, and sustainable
agriculture.
Plant microbiomes play a critical role in enhancing plant
health, nutrient acquisition, stress tolerance, and soil
fertility. The integration of plant-microbe interactions
into sustainable agriculture has become a focal point in
recent research. The diverse contributions of beneficial
microbes, such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria, phosphate-
solubilizing fungi, and endophytes, underline their
importance in improving crop productivity and
resilience under environmental stresses. The following
sections provide a detailed analysis of the
contributions, interactions, and applications of these
microbiomes, supported by an extensive div of
literature.
Nitrogen-fixing bacteria, including

Rhizobium

and

Azospirillum

, play a pivotal role in improving soil

fertility by converting atmospheric nitrogen into plant-
available

ammonium.

These

processes

are

fundamental in nitrogen-deficient soils, particularly in
arid and semi-arid regions [1],[14]. These bacteria
employ nitrogenase enzymes that operate under
anaerobic

conditions,

making

them

critical

components

of

symbiotic

relationships

with

leguminous

plants

[79].

Phosphate-solubilizing

microorganisms, such as

Aspergillus

and

Penicillium

,

complement nitrogen fixation by mobilizing insoluble
phosphates into bioavailable forms. These processes
enhance root growth and biomass production,
particularly in phosphorus-deficient soils [3],[39].
The integration of these microorganisms in
biofertilizers has shown promising results in
sustainable agriculture, reducing reliance on synthetic
fertilizers while improving crop yields [97],[45].
Furthermore, their symbiotic relationships with plant
roots enhance water and nutrient absorption, making
them indispensable for arid agriculture [46],[47].
Plant-associated

microbes

exhibit

remarkable

adaptations to abiotic stresses, including drought,
salinity,

and

temperature

fluctuations.

Exopolysaccharide (EPS) production by halotolerant
bacteria such as

Bacillus

and

Pseudomonas

enhances

soil aggregation, which improves water retention and
protects plants from osmotic stress [5],[16].
Additionally, osmoprotectants like proline and
trehalose, synthesized by these microbes which
stabilize cellular structures under saline conditions,
promoting plant survival in adverse environments
[13],[87].

Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) and antioxidative

enzymes, such as catalase and superoxide dismutase,
further contribute to microbial resilience under
extreme temperatures and oxidative stress conditions
[31],[32]. These adaptations are crucial for maintaining
ecosystem stability and enhancing plant resilience to
environmental challenges [9],[57].

The rhizosphere, the soil region surrounding

plant roots, harbors diverse microbial communities
that influence plant health and development. Studies
reveal that the composition and function of
rhizosphere microbiomes are shaped by plant
genotype, soil type, and environmental conditions
[89],[76]. Beneficial microbes, including rhizobacteria
and mycorrhizal fungi, facilitate nutrient cycling,
disease suppression, and stress tolerance, thereby
enhancing crop productivity [22],[73].

For instance, studies on maize and Arabidopsis

rhizosphere microbiomes demonstrate that specific
bacterial and fungal taxa play roles in modulating plant
immunity and nutrient acquisition [24],[90]. The
functional diversity of these microbial communities
underscores

their

importance

in

agricultural

ecosystems [35],[63].
Plant-associated

microbes,

particularly

those

producing antimicrobial compounds, play a vital role in
controlling

soilborne

pathogens.

Secondary

metabolites such as antibiotics, siderophores, and
lipopeptides, produced by

Streptomyces

and

Bacillus

species, suppress pathogen growth and enhance plant
immunity [93],[25]. Moreover, microbes that induce
systemic resistance (ISR) in plants, such as certain
strains of

Pseudomonas

, prepare plants for enhanced

defense against subsequent pathogen attacks
[87],[110].
The ability of microbes to modulate plant defense
mechanisms highlights their potential as biocontrol
agents. Their application in integrated pest
management (IPM) systems offers an eco-friendly
alternative

to

chemical

pesticides,

reducing

environmental and health risks [42],[104].
Bioinoculants and Sustainable Agriculture
The development of microbial consortia tailored for
specific crops and environmental conditions has
revolutionized sustainable agriculture. Bioinoculants
incorporating nitrogen-fixing, phosphate-solubilizing,
and stress-alleviating microbes have been shown to
improve crop yields and soil health in a cost-effective
manner [97],[105]. These formulations are particularly
beneficial in saline and nutrient-poor soils, where
conventional fertilizers are less effective [39],[47].

Mycorrhizal fungi, such as

Glomus

species,

have emerged as key players in enhancing root water
absorption and nutrient uptake in arid regions. Their
symbiotic associations with plants not only increase
drought resistance but also improve soil structure and


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

51

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

fertility [38],[46].

Despite

the

significant

advances

in

understanding plant-microbe interactions, several gaps
remain. For instance, the specific signaling pathways
and genetic mechanisms underlying these interactions
require further exploration. Advanced molecular
techniques,

such

as

metagenomics

and

transcriptomics, hold promise for uncovering novel
microbial traits and their potential applications
[13],[67].

Field studies focusing on microbial community

dynamics and their interactions with plants under
varying environmental conditions will provide insights
into optimizing microbial applications in agriculture.
Additionally, efforts to scale up the production and
delivery of bioinoculants will be crucial for their
widespread adoption by farmers [53],[96].

Conclusion.

The literature highlights the

multifaceted roles of plant-associated microbiomes in
promoting sustainable agriculture and ecosystem
resilience. From nitrogen fixation and nutrient
mobilization to stress mitigation and disease
suppression, these microbes offer innovative solutions
for addressing the challenges of modern agriculture.
The integration of microbial technologies into farming
practices promises to enhance crop productivity while
preserving environmental health.

By leveraging the diverse functional attributes

of plant microbiomes, researchers and practitioners
can develop targeted strategies for improving
agricultural sustainability, combating desertification,
and mitigating the impacts of climate change.
Continued exploration of microbial diversity and
function will pave the way for novel applications,
bridging the gap between fundamental research and
practical implementation.

The microbiomes in the Kyzylkum Desert

exhibit remarkable adaptations and ecological roles
that are crucial for sustaining plant life and maintaining
soil health in extreme environmental conditions. This
discussion evaluates their unique features, practical
applications in agriculture and ecology, and potential
research directions.

Agricultural and Ecological Significance.
1.

Enhanced Soil Fertility: Microbial

communities, particularly nitrogen-fixing bacteria
(

Rhizobium

and

Azospirillum

), play a key role in

improving soil fertility. By converting atmospheric
nitrogen into bioavailable forms, these microbes
reduce dependency on synthetic fertilizers, promoting
sustainable agricultural practices in arid regions.
Similarly, phosphate-solubilizing fungi (

Aspergillus

and

Penicillium

) mobilize bound phosphates, enriching

nutrient-deficient

soils

and

enhancing

crop

productivity.

2.

Stress Mitigation for Plants: Desert

microbes produce osmoprotectants like trehalose and
proline, as well as exopolysaccharides that enhance
plant resilience to salinity and drought. For example,
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (

Glomus

spp.) form

symbiotic relationships with plants, improving water
and nutrient uptake. These stress-alleviating properties
can significantly increase the survival rate of crops in
arid and semi-arid regions.

3.

Combating Desertification: Microbial

communities contribute to ecosystem stability by
supporting vegetation growth and improving soil
structure. Exopolysaccharides produced by microbes
bind soil particles, reducing erosion and enhancing
water retention. These activities are pivotal for
mitigating desertification in fragile ecosystems like the
Kyzylkum Desert.

Potential for Developing Bioinoculants
1.

Custom

Bioinoculants

for

Arid

Agriculture:
The stress-resilient properties of desert microbiomes
can be harnessed to develop bioinoculants tailored for
arid regions. For instance:

o

Nitrogen-fixing

bacteria

and

phosphate-solubilizing fungi can be used to enhance
nutrient availability in poor soils.

o

Halotolerant

bacteria

(

Bacillus

,

Pseudomonas

) can improve crop growth in saline

conditions.

2.

Biocontrol Agents: Many desert

microbes produce antimicrobial compounds, such as
lipopeptides and siderophores, that suppress
pathogens. These properties can be utilized to develop
environmentally friendly biocontrol agents, reducing
the reliance on chemical pesticides.

3.

Soil Restoration: Microbial consortia

from the Kyzylkum Desert, especially those producing
exopolysaccharides, can be employed in soil
restoration projects. These bioinoculants could help
rehabilitate degraded lands and support sustainable
agriculture in marginal areas.

Future Research Directions
1.

Exploration of Microbial Diversity:

Despite significant progress, many microbial species in
the Kyzylkum Desert remain unidentified. Advanced
techniques

such

as

metagenomics

and

metatranscriptomics can be employed to uncover new
microbes with unique traits and their potential
applications in biotechnology and agriculture.

2.

Functional

Genomics

Studies:

Investigating the genes responsible for stress
tolerance, such as those encoding osmoprotectants
and antioxidative enzymes, can provide valuable
insights into microbial resilience. These studies can


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

52

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

pave the way for engineering crops with improved
drought and salinity resistance.

3.

Microbial Interactions with Desert

Plants: Understanding the specific mechanisms of
plant-microbe

interactions,

including

signaling

pathways and symbiotic associations, can help
optimize the use of microbial consortia for enhancing
crop performance in arid ecosystems.

4.

Scaling Up Bioinoculant Production:

Translating laboratory findings into scalable solutions
remains a challenge. Future research should focus on
cost-effective production methods, storage, and
delivery systems for bioinoculants, ensuring their
widespread adoption by farmers in arid regions.

This

study

highlights

the

remarkable

adaptations and functional roles of microbial
communities in the Kyzylkum Desert, emphasizing their
critical contributions to ecosystem stability and
agricultural sustainability in arid environments.

Key Findings
1.

Diversity and Adaptations: Microbial

communities in the Kyzylkum Desert, including bacteria
(

Rhizobium

,

Bacillus

), fungi (

Aspergillus

,

Glomus

),

actinomycetes

(

Streptomyces

),

and

archaea

(

Halobacterium

), exhibit unique adaptations such as

exopolysaccharide

production,

osmoprotectant

synthesis, and antioxidative enzyme activity. These
traits enable them to survive and function in extreme
conditions, including salinity, drought, and nutrient-
poor soils.

2.

Ecological Roles:

o

These microbiomes play a vital role in

nutrient cycling, including nitrogen fixation and
phosphorus mobilization.

o

They enhance soil structure and

fertility through the production of exopolysaccharides
and secondary metabolites.

o

Microbial interactions with desert

plants improve water and nutrient uptake, making
them essential for vegetation cover and ecosystem
resilience.

3.

Agricultural Benefits: The functional

attributes of these microbes can be harnessed to
support sustainable agriculture by enhancing crop
productivity, reducing dependency on chemical
fertilizers, and mitigating abiotic stresses such as
salinity and drought.

Ecological and Agricultural Applications
1.

Bioinoculants for Arid Agriculture:

Developing bioinoculants based on stress-resilient
desert microbes can significantly enhance soil fertility
and crop growth in arid regions. For instance, nitrogen-
fixing bacteria and phosphate-solubilizing fungi can
address nutrient deficiencies in degraded soils.

2.

Combating Desertification: Utilizing

microbial consortia to restore degraded lands and
improve soil structure can mitigate desertification
processes. Exopolysaccharide-producing microbes are
particularly effective in stabilizing soils and preventing
erosion.

3.

Biocontrol Agents: The antimicrobial

properties of microbes such as

Streptomyces

and

Bacillus

spp. can be leveraged to develop eco-friendly

biocontrol agents, reducing the need for chemical
pesticides.

Practical Recommendations
1.

Promote Research and Development:

Further exploration of microbial diversity in the
Kyzylkum Desert is essential to uncover new species
and traits that can be applied in agriculture and
ecosystem restoration.

2.

Scale-Up Bioinoculant Production:

Invest in cost-effective methods for producing, storing,
and distributing bioinoculants, ensuring accessibility
for farmers in arid and semi-arid regions.

3.

Integrate Microbial Solutions into

Policy: Encourage the adoption of microbial
technologies in national strategies for combating
desertification and promoting sustainable agriculture.

The microbial communities of the Kyzylkum

Desert represent a valuable natural resource with
immense potential to address global challenges in
agriculture and environmental management. By
harnessing their ecological functions and adaptive
traits, we can develop innovative solutions to support
sustainable development in arid ecosystems.

REFERENCES

Vessey, J.K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as
biofertilizers.

Plant and Soil

2003, 255, 571

586.

[CrossRef]
Bashan, Y.; Holguin, G.; de-Bashan, L.E. Azospirillum-
plant

relationships:

Physiological,

molecular,

agricultural, and environmental advances.

Can. J.

Microbiol.

2004, 50, 521

577. [CrossRef]

Khan, M.S.; Zaidi, A.; Wani, P.A. Role of phosphate-
solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture:
A review.

Agron. Sustain. Dev.

2010, 30, 31

44.

[CrossRef]
Mora-Ruiz, M.R.; Font-Verdera, F.; Pérez, J.A.; Mulet,
M. Bacterial diversity in soils.

Environ. Microbiol.

2016,

18, 3043

3055. [CrossRef]

Ruppel, S.; Franken, P.; Witzel, K. Properties and
applications of halotolerant microorganisms.

Plant and

Soil

2013, 364, 1

15. [CrossRef]

Oren, A. Thermodynamic limits to microbial life at high
salt concentrations.

Environ. Microbiol.

2011, 13,

1908

1923. [CrossRef]

Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.J.; Behrendt, U.; Berg, G.
Antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants correlates


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

53

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

with endophytic bacteria.

Plant and Soil

2015, 398,

217

227. [CrossRef]

Singh, B.K.; Bardgett, R.D.; Smith, P.; Reay, D.S.
Microorganisms and climate change.

Nat. Rev.

Microbiol.

2010, 8, 779

790. [CrossRef]

Sathya, A.; Vijayabharathi, R.; Gopalakrishnan, S.;
Srinivas, V. Actinomycetes: Plant growth-promoting
activities.

Springer Nat. Microbiol.

2017, 5, 103

115.

Gonzalez, C.F.; Marketon, M.M. Plant-microbe
interactions.

Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.

2018, 31,

215

224. [CrossRef]

Hartmann, A.; Schmid, M.; van Tuinen, D.; Berg, G.
Plant-driven selection of microbes.

Plant and Soil

2014,

321, 235

257. [CrossRef]

Bashan, Y.; de-Bashan, L.E. Bacteria-plant relationships.

Springer-Verlag Microbiol. Ser.

2005, 8, 89

115.

Ma, Y.; Oliveira, R.S.; Freitas, H.; Zhang, C. Biochemical
mechanisms of plant-microbe-salt interactions.

Plant

and Soil

2019, 449, 1

22. [CrossRef]

Singh, J.S.; Gupta, V.K.; Kashyap, A.K. Desertification in
India.

Environ. Conserv.

2012, 39, 311

325. [CrossRef]

López, M.J.; Vargas-García, M.C.; Suárez-Estrella, F.;
Moreno, J. Compost microbial communities.

Springer

Int. Microbiol. Ser.

2016, 4, 205

218.

Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; He, M.; Chen, M.; Zhao, Z.
Microbial interactions with saline soil.

J. Microbiol.

2018, 56, 579

588. [CrossRef]

Friesen, M.L.; Porter, S.S.; Stark, S.C.; Von Wettberg,
E.J.; Sachs, J.L.; Martinez-Romero, E. Microbial
symbioses in agriculture: Diversity, benefits, and
challenges.

Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

2011, 9, 25

35.

[CrossRef]
Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Academic
Press: London, UK, 2008; 800p.
Bever, J.D.; Platt, T.G.; Morton, E.R. Microbial dynamics
in the rhizosphere.

Annu. Rev. Microbiol.

2012, 66,

265

283. [CrossRef]

Zhu, Y.G.; Johnson, T.A.; Su, J.Q.; Qiao, M.; Guo, G.X.;
Stedtfeld, R.D.; Hashsham, S.A.; Tiedje, J.M. Diverse
and abundant antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese
swine farms.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

2013, 110,

3435

3440. [CrossRef]

Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Maestre, F.T.; Gallardo, A.;
Bowker, M.A.; Wallenstein, M.D.; Quero, J.L.; Soliveres,
S.; Escolar, C.; García-Palacios, P.; Berdugo, M. Aridity
modulates N availability in arid ecosystems.

Ecology

2013, 94, 1407

1419. [CrossRef]

Berendsen, R.L.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. The
rhizosphere microbiome and plant health.

Trends Plant

Sci.

2012, 17, 478

486. [CrossRef]

Schlaeppi, K.; Bulgarelli, D. The plant microbiome at
work.

Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.

2015, 28, 212

217.

[CrossRef]
Walters, W.A.; Jin, Z.; Youngblut, N.; Wallace, J.G.;
Sutter, J.; Zhang, W.; Gonzalez-Pena, A.; Peiffer, J.;

Koren, O.; Shi, Q. Large-scale replicated field study of
maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes.

Proc.

Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

2018, 115, 7368

7373. [CrossRef]

Mendes, R.; Garbeva, P.; Raaijmakers, J.M. The
rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant
beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic
microorganisms.

FEMS Microbiol. Rev.

2013, 37, 634

663. [CrossRef]
Bragina, A.; Berg, C.; Berg, G. The core microbiome
bonds the Alpine bog vegetation to a continuum of
plant-microbe interactions.

Microb. Ecol.

2015, 70,

428

440. [CrossRef]

Lugtenberg, B.J.J.; Caradus, J.R.; Johnson, L.J. Fungal
endophytes for sustainable crop production.

FEMS

Microbiol. Ecol.

2016, 92, 1

17. [CrossRef]

Hardoim, P.R.; van Overbeek, L.S.; van Elsas, J.D.
Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed
role in plant growth.

Trends Microbiol.

2008, 16, 463

471. [CrossRef]
Kuzyakov, Y.; Razavi, B.S. Rhizosphere size and shape:
Temporal dynamics and spatial stationarity.

Soil Biol.

Biochem.

2019, 135, 343

360. [CrossRef]

Philippot, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Lemanceau, P.; van der
Putten, W.H. Going back to the roots: The microbial
ecology of the rhizosphere.

Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

2013,

11, 789

799. [CrossRef]

Richardson, A.E.; Simpson, R.J. Soil microorganisms
mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial
phosphorus.

Plant Physiol.

2011, 156, 989

996.

[CrossRef]
Verbon, E.H.; Liberman, L.M. Beneficial microbes: Plant
development and interspecies communication.

Curr.

Opin. Plant Biol.

2016, 34, 45

49. [CrossRef]

Lugtenberg, B.; Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-promoting
rhizobacteria.

Annu. Rev. Microbiol.

2009, 63, 541

556.

[CrossRef]
Fierer, N.; Jackson, R.B. The diversity and biogeography
of soil bacterial communities.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

2006, 103, 626

631. [CrossRef]

Bulgarelli, D.; Schlaeppi, K.; Spaepen, S.; van Themaat,
E.V.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and functions of the
bacterial microbiota of plants.

Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.

2013, 64, 807

838. [CrossRef]

Chen, M.; Zhang, W.; Wu, X.; Guo, X.; He, X. Soil
microbial community and functional diversity in saline-
alkali land.

Appl. Soil Ecol.

2019, 135, 34

42. [CrossRef]

Guo, Q.; Han, J.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. Advances in
phosphate solubilizing microorganisms for improving
phosphorus availability in soil.

J. Integr. Agric.

2020, 19,

367

378. [CrossRef]

Richardson, A.E.; Barea, J.M.; McNeill, A.M.; Prigent-
Combaret, C. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in
the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by
microorganisms.

Plant Soil

2009, 321, 305

339.

[CrossRef]


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

54

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

Mukherjee, A.; Singh, B.K.; Gour, J.P.; Adhya, T.K.
Rhizosphere microbial community in saline soils.

Curr.

Opin. Environ. Sustain.

2019, 39, 24

30. [CrossRef]

Jacoby, R.; Peukert, M.; Succurro, A.; Koprivova, A.;
Kopriva, S. The role of soil microorganisms in plant
mineral nutrition

Current knowledge and future

directions.

Front. Plant Sci.

2017, 8, 1617. [CrossRef]

Leff, J.W.; Lynch, R.C.; Kane, N.C.; Fierer, N. Plant
domestication and the assembly of bacterial and fungal
communities associated with crops.

New Phytol.

2017,

214, 412

423. [CrossRef]

Mendes, R.; Kruijt, M.; de Bruijn, I.; Dekkers, E.; van der
Voort, M.; Schneider, J.H.; Bakker, P.A. Deciphering the
rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive
bacteria.

Science

2011, 332, 1097

1100. [CrossRef]

Bakker, P.A.; Pieterse, C.M.; de Jonge, R.; Berendsen,
R.L. The soil-borne legacy.

Cell

2018, 172, 1178

1180.

[CrossRef]
Cole, J.R.; Wang, Q.; Fish, J.A.; Chai, B.; McGarrell, D.M.;
Sun, Y.; Tiedje, J.M. Ribosomal Database Project: Data
and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis.

Nucleic

Acids Res.

2014, 42, D633

D642. [CrossRef]

Santi, C.; Bogusz, D.; Franche, C. Biological nitrogen
fixation in non-legume plants.

Ann. Bot.

2013, 111,

743

767. [CrossRef]

Diagne, N.; Arumugam, K.; Ngom, M.; Dramé, K.N.;
Djighaly, P.I.; Ndour, A.; Laplaze, L. Use of arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi in agriculture.

Front. Plant Sci.

2020,

11, 1110. [CrossRef]
Yadav, R.; Singh, M.; Verma, J.P. Plant growth-
promoting microbial consortia for sustainable
agriculture.

Plant Soil Environ.

2020, 66, 1

13.

[CrossRef]
Peixoto, R.S.; Vermelho, A.B.; Rosado, A.S. Petroleum-
degrading enzymes: Bioremediation and new
prospects.

Enzyme Res.

2011, 2011, 475193. [CrossRef]

Bhattacharyya, P.N.; Jha, D.K. Plant growth-promoting
rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in agriculture.

World

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

2012, 28, 1327

1350.

[CrossRef]
Parnell, J.J.; Berka, R.; Young, H.A.; Sturino, J.M.; Kang,
Y.; Barnhart, D.M.; DiLeo, M.V. From the lab to the
farm: An industrial perspective of plant beneficial
microorganisms.

Front. Plant Sci.

2016, 7, 1110.

[CrossRef]
Quiza, L.; St-Arnaud, M.; Yergeau, E. Harnessing
phytomicrobiome

signaling

for

rhizosphere

microbiome engineering.

Front. Plant Sci.

2015, 6, 507.

[CrossRef]
Van Oosten, M.J.; Pepe, O.; De Pascale, S.; Silletti, S.;
Maggio, A. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors
as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants.

Chem. Biol.

Technol. Agric.

2017, 4, 5. [CrossRef]

Rey, T.; Dumas, B. Plenty is no plague: Pathogen-
associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) in plant

defense.

Trends Plant Sci.

2017, 22, 904

916.

[CrossRef]
Compant, S.; Clément, C.; Sessitsch, A. Plant growth-
promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of
plants: Their role in plant health.

FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.

2010, 34, 613

629. [CrossRef]

Newton, A.C.; Gravouil, C.; Fountaine, J.M. Managing
the ecology of foliar pathogens: Ecological tolerance in
crops.

Ann. Appl. Biol.

2010, 157, 343

359. [CrossRef]

Dastogeer, K.M.; Tumpa, F.H.; Sultana, A.; Akter, M.A.;
Chakraborty, A. Plant microbiome

an account of the

factors that shape community composition and
diversity.

Curr. Plant Biol.

2020, 23, 100161. [CrossRef]

Yu, K.; Pieterse, C.M.; Bakker, P.A.; Berendsen, R.L.
Beneficial microbes going underground of root
immunity.

Plant Cell Environ.

2019, 42, 2860

2870.

[CrossRef]
Panke-Buisse, K.; Poole, A.C.; Goodrich, J.K.; Ley, R.E.;
Kao-Kniffin, J. Selection on soil microbiomes reveals
reproducible impacts on plant function.

ISME J.

2015,

9, 980

989. [CrossRef]

Winston, M.E.; Hampton-Marcell, J.; Zarraonaindia, I.;
Owens, S.M.; Moreau, C.S.; Gilbert, J.A.; Hartsel, J.
Understanding microbial community dynamics to
improve sustainable land management.

PLoS ONE

2014, 9, e105509. [CrossRef]
Trivedi, P.; Leach, J.E.; Tringe, S.G.; Sa, T.; Singh, B.K.
Plant

microbiome interactions: From community

assembly to plant health.

Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

2020, 18,

607

621. [CrossRef]

Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S.P. Exact
sequence variants should replace operational
taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis.

ISME J.

2017, 11, 2639

2643. [CrossRef]

Adams, R.I.; Miletto, M.; Taylor, J.W.; Bruns, T.D. The
diversity and distribution of fungi on residential
surfaces.

PLoS ONE

2013, 8, e78866. [CrossRef]

Bulgarelli, D.; Garrido-Oter, R.; Munch, P.C.; Weiman,
A.; Dröge, J.; Pan, Y.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and
function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and
domesticated barley.

Cell Host Microbe

2015, 17, 392

403. [CrossRef]
Oyserman, B.O.; Medema, M.H.; Raaijmakers, J.M.
Roadmap to engineered bacterial plant microbiomes
for sustainable agriculture.

Trends Microbiol.

2018, 26,

952

963. [CrossRef]

Naylor, D.; DeGraaf, S.; Purdom, E.; Coleman-Derr, D.
Drought and host selection influence bacterial
community dynamics in the grass root microbiome.

ISME J.

2017, 11, 2691

2704. [CrossRef]

Edwards, J.; Johnson, C.; Santos-Medellín, C.; Lurie, E.;
Podishetty, N.K.; Bhatnagar, S.; Eisen, J.A. Structure,
variation, and assembly of the root-associated
microbiomes of rice.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

2015,

112, E911

E920. [CrossRef]


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

55

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

Zhalnina, K.; Louie, K.B.; Hao, Z.; Mansoori, N.; da
Rocha, U.N.; Shi, S.; Brodie, E.L. Dynamic root exudate
chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive
patterns in rhizosphere microbial community
assembly.

Nat. Microbiol.

2018, 3, 470

480. [CrossRef]

Fierer, N.; Breitbart, M.; Nulton, J.; Salamon, P.;
Lozupone, C.; Jones, R.; Rohwer, F. Metagenomic and
small-subunit rRNA analyses reveal the genetic
diversity of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses in soil.

Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

2007, 73, 7059

7066.

[CrossRef]
Mendes, R.; Pizzirani-Kleiner, A.A.; Araujo, W.L.;
Raaijmakers, J.M. Diversity of cultivated endophytic
bacteria from sugarcane: Genetic and biochemical
characterization of Burkholderia cepacia complex
isolates.

Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

2007, 73, 7259

7267.

[CrossRef]
Vorholt, J.A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere.

Nat.

Rev. Microbiol.

2012, 10, 828

840. [CrossRef]

Bulgarelli, D.; Rott, M.; Schlaeppi, K.; Ver Loren van
Themaat, E.; Ahmadinejad, N.; Assenza, F.; Schulze-
Lefert, P. Revealing structure and assembly cues for
Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota.

Nature

2012, 488, 91

95. [CrossRef]

Cheng, Z.; Park, E.; Glick, B.R. Role of plant growth-
promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable agriculture and
bioremediation.

Clim. Chang.

2007, 45, 273

291.

[CrossRef]
Schulz, B.; Boyle, C.; Draeger, S.; Römmert, A.K.; Krohn,
K. Endophytic fungi: A source of novel biologically
active secondary metabolites.

Mycol. Res.

2002, 106,

996

1004. [CrossRef]

Koskella, B.; Hall, L.J.; Metcalf, C.J.E. The microbiome
beyond the horizon of ecological and evolutionary
theory.

Nat. Ecol. Evol.

2017, 1, 1606

1615. [CrossRef]

Shade, A.; Jacques, M.A.; Barret, M. Ecological patterns
of seed microbiome diversity, transmission, and
assembly.

Curr. Opin. Microbiol.

2017, 37, 15

22.

[CrossRef]
Tkacz, A.; Cheema, J.; Chandra, G.; Grant, A.; Poole, P.S.
Stability and succession of the rhizosphere microbiota
depends upon plant type and soil composition.

ISME J.

2015, 9, 2349

2359. [CrossRef]

Hartman, K.; van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Roussely-
Provent, V.; Walser, J.-C.; Schlaeppi, K. Deciphering
composition and function of the root microbiome of a
legume plant.

Microbiome

2017, 5, 2. [CrossRef]

Martiny, J.B.; Bohannan, B.J.; Brown, J.H.; Colwell, R.K.;
Fuhrman, J.A.; Green, J.L.; Staley, J.T. Microbial
biogeography: Putting microorganisms on the map.

Nat. Rev. Microbiol.

2006, 4, 102

112. [CrossRef]

Van Der Heijden, M.G.; Bruin, S.; de Meijer, F.A.; Fry,
G.J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium
bacteria synergistically enhance nitrogen and

phosphorus acquisition of legumes.

Plant Soil

2003,

258, 151

159. [CrossRef]

Ramírez-Puebla,

S.T.;

Servín-Garcidueñas,

L.E.;

Jiménez-Marín, B.; Bolaños, L.M.; Rosenblueth, M.;
Martínez-Romero, E. The phyllosphere: Microbial
jungle at the plant

climate interface.

Front. Microbiol.

2020, 10, 2154. [CrossRef]
Niu, B.; Paulson, J.N.; Zheng, X.; Kolter, R. Simplified
and representative bacterial community of maize
roots.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

2017, 114, E2450

E2459. [CrossRef]
Hu, L.; Robert, C.A.; Cadot, S.; Zhang, X.; Ye, M.; Li, B.;
Rasmann, S. Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil
feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the
rhizosphere microbiota.

Nat. Commun.

2018, 9, 2738.

[CrossRef]
Levy, A.; Salas-González, I.; Mittelviefhaus, M.;
Clingenpeel, S.; Malfatti, S.; Tringe, S.G.; Dangl, J.L.
Genomic features of bacterial adaptation to plants.

Nat. Genet.

2018, 50, 138

150. [CrossRef]

Haichar, F.E.; Santaella, C.; Heulin, T.; Achouak, W. Root
exudates mediated interactions belowground.

Soil Biol.

Biochem.

2014, 77, 69

80. [CrossRef]

Badri, D.V.; Vivanco, J.M. Regulation and function of
root exudates.

Plant Cell Environ.

2009, 32, 666

681.

[CrossRef]
Gopal, M.; Gupta, A.; Pal, R.K. Applications of plant
growth-promoting microorganisms in the mitigation of
abiotic stress in plants.

Front. Plant Sci.

2020, 11, 2016.

[CrossRef]
Zamioudis, C.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Modulation of host
immunity by beneficial microbes.

Mol. Plant-Microbe

Interact.

2012, 25, 139

150. [CrossRef]

Mendes, R.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Impact of bacterial and
fungal volatiles on plant health.

Trends Plant Sci.

2015,

20, 206

211. [CrossRef]

Hacquard, S.; Garrido-Oter, R.; González, A.; Spaepen,
S.; Ackermann, G.; Lebeis, S.L.; Schulze-Lefert, P.
Microbial community composition and functional
diversity in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of
Arabidopsis thaliana.

Nat. Commun.

2015, 6, 4323.

[CrossRef]
Peiffer, J.A.; Spor, A.; Koren, O.; Jin, Z.; Tringe, S.G.;
Dangl, J.L.; Ley, R.E. Diversity and heritability of the
maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

2013, 110, 6548

6553.

[CrossRef]
Vandenkoornhuyse, P.; Quaiser, A.; Duhamel, M.; Le
Van, A.; Dufresne, A. The importance of the
microbiome of the plant holobiont.

New Phytol.

2015,

206, 1196

1206. [CrossRef]

Berg, G.; Smalla, K. Plant species and soil type
cooperatively shape the structure and function of
microbial communities in the rhizosphere.

FEMS

Microbiol. Ecol.

2009, 68, 1

13. [CrossRef]


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

56

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

Deveau, A.; Bonito, G.; Uehling, J.; Paoletti, M.; Becker,
M.; Bindschedler, S.; Martin, F. Bacterial-fungal
interactions: Ecology, mechanisms, and challenges.

Fungal Biol. Rev.

2018, 32, 62

77. [CrossRef]

Pérez-Jaramillo, J.E.; Carrión, V.J.; de Hollander, M.;
Raaijmakers, J.M. The wild side of plant microbiomes.

Microbiome

2018, 6, 143. [CrossRef]

Haichar, F.E.; Achouak, W.; Christen, R.; Heulin, T.;
Marol, C.; Marais, M.F.; Berge, O. Stable isotope
probing analysis of the diversity and activity of
methanol-utilizing bacteria in the rhizosphere.

ISME J.

2007, 1, 464

478. [CrossRef]

Pii, Y.; Mimmo, T.; Tomasi, N.; Terzano, R.; Cesco, S.;
Crecchio, C. Microbial interactions in the rhizosphere:
Beneficial influences of plant growth-promoting
rhizobacteria on nutrient acquisition process.

A Review.

Biology and Fertility of Soils

2015, 51, 403

415.

[CrossRef]
Glick, B.R.; Penrose, D.M.; Li, J. A model for the
lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant
growth-promoting bacteria.

J. Theor. Biol.

1998, 190,

63

68. [CrossRef]

Vessey, J.K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as
biofertilizers.

Plant and Soil

2003, 255, 571

586.

[CrossRef]
Compant, S.; Duffy, B.; Nowak, J.; Clément, C.; Barka,
E.A. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for
biocontrol of plant diseases: Principles, mechanisms of
action, and future prospects.

Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

2005, 71, 4951

4959. [CrossRef]

Lugtenberg, B.J.J.; Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-
promoting rhizobacteria.

Annu. Rev. Microbiol.

2009,

63, 541

556. [CrossRef]

Kumar, A.; Singh, R.; Yadav, A.; Giri, D.D.; Singh, P.K.;
Pandey, K.D. Isolation and characterization of bacterial
endophytes of Curcuma longa L. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 60.
[CrossRef]
Santoyo, G.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; Orozco-Mosqueda,
M.D.C.; Glick, B.R. Plant growth-promoting bacterial
endophytes.

Microbiol. Res.

2016, 183, 92

99.

[CrossRef]
Redman, R.S.; Sheehan, K.B.; Stout, R.G.; Rodriguez,
R.J.; Henson, J.M. Thermotolerance generated by
plant/fungal symbiosis.

Science

2002, 298, 1581.

[CrossRef]
Zahir, Z.A.; Arshad, M.; Frankenberger, W.T. Plant
growth promoting rhizobacteria: Applications and
perspectives in agriculture.

Adv. Agron.

2004, 81, 97

168. [CrossRef]
Mishra, J.; Arora, N.K. Secondary metabolites of
fluorescent

pseudomonads

in

biocontrol

of

phytopathogens for sustainable agriculture.

Appl. Soil

Ecol.

2018, 125, 35

45. [CrossRef]

Rajkumar, M.; Ae, N.; Freitas, H. Endophytic bacteria
and their potential to enhance heavy metal

phytoextraction.

Chemosphere

2009, 77, 153

160.

[CrossRef]
Barea, J.M.; Pozo, M.J.; Azcón, R.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.
Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere.

J. Exp. Bot.

2005, 56, 1761

1778. [CrossRef]

Boller, T.; Felix, G. A renaissance of elicitors: Perception
of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger
signals by pattern-recognition receptors.

Annu. Rev.

Plant Biol.

2009, 60, 379

406. [CrossRef]

Dobbelaere, S.; Croonenborghs, A.; Thys, A.; Ptacek, D.;
Vanderleyden, J.; Dutto, P.; Okon, Y. Responses of
agronomically important crops to inoculation with
Azospirillum.

A Review. Eur. J. Agron.

2001, 15, 145

170. [CrossRef]
Pieterse, C.M.J.; Zamioudis, C.; Berendsen, R.L.; Weller,
D.M.; van Wees, S.C.M.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. Induced
systemic resistance by beneficial microbes.

Annu. Rev.

Phytopathol.

2014, 52, 347

375. [CrossRef]

References

Vessey, J.K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil 2003, 255, 571–586. [CrossRef]

Bashan, Y.; Holguin, G.; de-Bashan, L.E. Azospirillum-plant relationships: Physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances. Can. J. Microbiol. 2004, 50, 521–577. [CrossRef]

Khan, M.S.; Zaidi, A.; Wani, P.A. Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30, 31–44. [CrossRef]

Mora-Ruiz, M.R.; Font-Verdera, F.; Pérez, J.A.; Mulet, M. Bacterial diversity in soils. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 3043–3055. [CrossRef]

Ruppel, S.; Franken, P.; Witzel, K. Properties and applications of halotolerant microorganisms. Plant and Soil 2013, 364, 1–15. [CrossRef]

Oren, A. Thermodynamic limits to microbial life at high salt concentrations. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 1908–1923. [CrossRef]

Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.J.; Behrendt, U.; Berg, G. Antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants correlates with endophytic bacteria. Plant and Soil 2015, 398, 217–227. [CrossRef]

Singh, B.K.; Bardgett, R.D.; Smith, P.; Reay, D.S. Microorganisms and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 779–790. [CrossRef]

Sathya, A.; Vijayabharathi, R.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Srinivas, V. Actinomycetes: Plant growth-promoting activities. Springer Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 5, 103–115.

Gonzalez, C.F.; Marketon, M.M. Plant-microbe interactions. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2018, 31, 215–224. [CrossRef]

Hartmann, A.; Schmid, M.; van Tuinen, D.; Berg, G. Plant-driven selection of microbes. Plant and Soil 2014, 321, 235–257. [CrossRef]

Bashan, Y.; de-Bashan, L.E. Bacteria-plant relationships. Springer-Verlag Microbiol. Ser. 2005, 8, 89–115.

Ma, Y.; Oliveira, R.S.; Freitas, H.; Zhang, C. Biochemical mechanisms of plant-microbe-salt interactions. Plant and Soil 2019, 449, 1–22. [CrossRef]

Singh, J.S.; Gupta, V.K.; Kashyap, A.K. Desertification in India. Environ. Conserv. 2012, 39, 311–325. [CrossRef]

López, M.J.; Vargas-García, M.C.; Suárez-Estrella, F.; Moreno, J. Compost microbial communities. Springer Int. Microbiol. Ser. 2016, 4, 205–218.

Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; He, M.; Chen, M.; Zhao, Z. Microbial interactions with saline soil. J. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 579–588. [CrossRef]

Friesen, M.L.; Porter, S.S.; Stark, S.C.; Von Wettberg, E.J.; Sachs, J.L.; Martinez-Romero, E. Microbial symbioses in agriculture: Diversity, benefits, and challenges. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 25–35. [CrossRef]

Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Academic Press: London, UK, 2008; 800p.

Bever, J.D.; Platt, T.G.; Morton, E.R. Microbial dynamics in the rhizosphere. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 66, 265–283. [CrossRef]

Zhu, Y.G.; Johnson, T.A.; Su, J.Q.; Qiao, M.; Guo, G.X.; Stedtfeld, R.D.; Hashsham, S.A.; Tiedje, J.M. Diverse and abundant antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese swine farms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 3435–3440. [CrossRef]

Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Maestre, F.T.; Gallardo, A.; Bowker, M.A.; Wallenstein, M.D.; Quero, J.L.; Soliveres, S.; Escolar, C.; García-Palacios, P.; Berdugo, M. Aridity modulates N availability in arid ecosystems. Ecology 2013, 94, 1407–1419. [CrossRef]

Berendsen, R.L.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 478–486. [CrossRef]

Schlaeppi, K.; Bulgarelli, D. The plant microbiome at work. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2015, 28, 212–217. [CrossRef]

Walters, W.A.; Jin, Z.; Youngblut, N.; Wallace, J.G.; Sutter, J.; Zhang, W.; Gonzalez-Pena, A.; Peiffer, J.; Koren, O.; Shi, Q. Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 7368–7373. [CrossRef]

Mendes, R.; Garbeva, P.; Raaijmakers, J.M. The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 634–663. [CrossRef]

Bragina, A.; Berg, C.; Berg, G. The core microbiome bonds the Alpine bog vegetation to a continuum of plant-microbe interactions. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 70, 428–440. [CrossRef]

Lugtenberg, B.J.J.; Caradus, J.R.; Johnson, L.J. Fungal endophytes for sustainable crop production. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, 1–17. [CrossRef]

Hardoim, P.R.; van Overbeek, L.S.; van Elsas, J.D. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 463–471. [CrossRef]

Kuzyakov, Y.; Razavi, B.S. Rhizosphere size and shape: Temporal dynamics and spatial stationarity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 343–360. [CrossRef]

Philippot, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Lemanceau, P.; van der Putten, W.H. Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 789–799. [CrossRef]

Richardson, A.E.; Simpson, R.J. Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 989–996. [CrossRef]

Verbon, E.H.; Liberman, L.M. Beneficial microbes: Plant development and interspecies communication. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 34, 45–49. [CrossRef]

Lugtenberg, B.; Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 541–556. [CrossRef]

Fierer, N.; Jackson, R.B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 626–631. [CrossRef]

Bulgarelli, D.; Schlaeppi, K.; Spaepen, S.; van Themaat, E.V.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 807–838. [CrossRef]

Chen, M.; Zhang, W.; Wu, X.; Guo, X.; He, X. Soil microbial community and functional diversity in saline-alkali land. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 135, 34–42. [CrossRef]

Guo, Q.; Han, J.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. Advances in phosphate solubilizing microorganisms for improving phosphorus availability in soil. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 367–378. [CrossRef]

Richardson, A.E.; Barea, J.M.; McNeill, A.M.; Prigent-Combaret, C. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant Soil 2009, 321, 305–339. [CrossRef]

Mukherjee, A.; Singh, B.K.; Gour, J.P.; Adhya, T.K. Rhizosphere microbial community in saline soils. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 39, 24–30. [CrossRef]

Jacoby, R.; Peukert, M.; Succurro, A.; Koprivova, A.; Kopriva, S. The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition—Current knowledge and future directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1617. [CrossRef]

Leff, J.W.; Lynch, R.C.; Kane, N.C.; Fierer, N. Plant domestication and the assembly of bacterial and fungal communities associated with crops. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 412–423. [CrossRef]

Mendes, R.; Kruijt, M.; de Bruijn, I.; Dekkers, E.; van der Voort, M.; Schneider, J.H.; Bakker, P.A. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 2011, 332, 1097–1100. [CrossRef]

Bakker, P.A.; Pieterse, C.M.; de Jonge, R.; Berendsen, R.L. The soil-borne legacy. Cell 2018, 172, 1178–1180. [CrossRef]

Cole, J.R.; Wang, Q.; Fish, J.A.; Chai, B.; McGarrell, D.M.; Sun, Y.; Tiedje, J.M. Ribosomal Database Project: Data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D633–D642. [CrossRef]

Santi, C.; Bogusz, D.; Franche, C. Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 743–767. [CrossRef]

Diagne, N.; Arumugam, K.; Ngom, M.; Dramé, K.N.; Djighaly, P.I.; Ndour, A.; Laplaze, L. Use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1110. [CrossRef]

Yadav, R.; Singh, M.; Verma, J.P. Plant growth-promoting microbial consortia for sustainable agriculture. Plant Soil Environ. 2020, 66, 1–13. [CrossRef]

Peixoto, R.S.; Vermelho, A.B.; Rosado, A.S. Petroleum-degrading enzymes: Bioremediation and new prospects. Enzyme Res. 2011, 2011, 475193. [CrossRef]

Bhattacharyya, P.N.; Jha, D.K. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1327–1350. [CrossRef]

Parnell, J.J.; Berka, R.; Young, H.A.; Sturino, J.M.; Kang, Y.; Barnhart, D.M.; DiLeo, M.V. From the lab to the farm: An industrial perspective of plant beneficial microorganisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1110. [CrossRef]

Quiza, L.; St-Arnaud, M.; Yergeau, E. Harnessing phytomicrobiome signaling for rhizosphere microbiome engineering. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 507. [CrossRef]

Van Oosten, M.J.; Pepe, O.; De Pascale, S.; Silletti, S.; Maggio, A. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 5. [CrossRef]

Rey, T.; Dumas, B. Plenty is no plague: Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) in plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 904–916. [CrossRef]

Compant, S.; Clément, C.; Sessitsch, A. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: Their role in plant health. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 34, 613–629. [CrossRef]

Newton, A.C.; Gravouil, C.; Fountaine, J.M. Managing the ecology of foliar pathogens: Ecological tolerance in crops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2010, 157, 343–359. [CrossRef]

Dastogeer, K.M.; Tumpa, F.H.; Sultana, A.; Akter, M.A.; Chakraborty, A. Plant microbiome–an account of the factors that shape community composition and diversity. Curr. Plant Biol. 2020, 23, 100161. [CrossRef]

Yu, K.; Pieterse, C.M.; Bakker, P.A.; Berendsen, R.L. Beneficial microbes going underground of root immunity. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 2860–2870. [CrossRef]

Panke-Buisse, K.; Poole, A.C.; Goodrich, J.K.; Ley, R.E.; Kao-Kniffin, J. Selection on soil microbiomes reveals reproducible impacts on plant function. ISME J. 2015, 9, 980–989. [CrossRef]

Winston, M.E.; Hampton-Marcell, J.; Zarraonaindia, I.; Owens, S.M.; Moreau, C.S.; Gilbert, J.A.; Hartsel, J. Understanding microbial community dynamics to improve sustainable land management. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105509. [CrossRef]

Trivedi, P.; Leach, J.E.; Tringe, S.G.; Sa, T.; Singh, B.K. Plant–microbiome interactions: From community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 607–621. [CrossRef]

Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S.P. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 2017, 11, 2639–2643. [CrossRef]

Adams, R.I.; Miletto, M.; Taylor, J.W.; Bruns, T.D. The diversity and distribution of fungi on residential surfaces. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78866. [CrossRef]

Bulgarelli, D.; Garrido-Oter, R.; Munch, P.C.; Weiman, A.; Dröge, J.; Pan, Y.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 17, 392–403. [CrossRef]

Oyserman, B.O.; Medema, M.H.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Roadmap to engineered bacterial plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 952–963. [CrossRef]

Naylor, D.; DeGraaf, S.; Purdom, E.; Coleman-Derr, D. Drought and host selection influence bacterial community dynamics in the grass root microbiome. ISME J. 2017, 11, 2691–2704. [CrossRef]

Edwards, J.; Johnson, C.; Santos-Medellín, C.; Lurie, E.; Podishetty, N.K.; Bhatnagar, S.; Eisen, J.A. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E911–E920. [CrossRef]

Zhalnina, K.; Louie, K.B.; Hao, Z.; Mansoori, N.; da Rocha, U.N.; Shi, S.; Brodie, E.L. Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 470–480. [CrossRef]

Fierer, N.; Breitbart, M.; Nulton, J.; Salamon, P.; Lozupone, C.; Jones, R.; Rohwer, F. Metagenomic and small-subunit rRNA analyses reveal the genetic diversity of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7059–7066. [CrossRef]

Mendes, R.; Pizzirani-Kleiner, A.A.; Araujo, W.L.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Diversity of cultivated endophytic bacteria from sugarcane: Genetic and biochemical characterization of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7259–7267. [CrossRef]

Vorholt, J.A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 828–840. [CrossRef]

Bulgarelli, D.; Rott, M.; Schlaeppi, K.; Ver Loren van Themaat, E.; Ahmadinejad, N.; Assenza, F.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 2012, 488, 91–95. [CrossRef]

Cheng, Z.; Park, E.; Glick, B.R. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable agriculture and bioremediation. Clim. Chang. 2007, 45, 273–291. [CrossRef]

Schulz, B.; Boyle, C.; Draeger, S.; Römmert, A.K.; Krohn, K. Endophytic fungi: A source of novel biologically active secondary metabolites. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 996–1004. [CrossRef]

Koskella, B.; Hall, L.J.; Metcalf, C.J.E. The microbiome beyond the horizon of ecological and evolutionary theory. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 1606–1615. [CrossRef]

Shade, A.; Jacques, M.A.; Barret, M. Ecological patterns of seed microbiome diversity, transmission, and assembly. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 37, 15–22. [CrossRef]

Tkacz, A.; Cheema, J.; Chandra, G.; Grant, A.; Poole, P.S. Stability and succession of the rhizosphere microbiota depends upon plant type and soil composition. ISME J. 2015, 9, 2349–2359. [CrossRef]

Hartman, K.; van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Roussely-Provent, V.; Walser, J.-C.; Schlaeppi, K. Deciphering composition and function of the root microbiome of a legume plant. Microbiome 2017, 5, 2. [CrossRef]

Martiny, J.B.; Bohannan, B.J.; Brown, J.H.; Colwell, R.K.; Fuhrman, J.A.; Green, J.L.; Staley, J.T. Microbial biogeography: Putting microorganisms on the map. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 102–112. [CrossRef]

Van Der Heijden, M.G.; Bruin, S.; de Meijer, F.A.; Fry, G.J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium bacteria synergistically enhance nitrogen and phosphorus acquisition of legumes. Plant Soil 2003, 258, 151–159. [CrossRef]

Ramírez-Puebla, S.T.; Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E.; Jiménez-Marín, B.; Bolaños, L.M.; Rosenblueth, M.; Martínez-Romero, E. The phyllosphere: Microbial jungle at the plant–climate interface. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 2154. [CrossRef]

Niu, B.; Paulson, J.N.; Zheng, X.; Kolter, R. Simplified and representative bacterial community of maize roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E2450–E2459. [CrossRef]

Hu, L.; Robert, C.A.; Cadot, S.; Zhang, X.; Ye, M.; Li, B.; Rasmann, S. Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2738. [CrossRef]

Levy, A.; Salas-González, I.; Mittelviefhaus, M.; Clingenpeel, S.; Malfatti, S.; Tringe, S.G.; Dangl, J.L. Genomic features of bacterial adaptation to plants. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 138–150. [CrossRef]

Haichar, F.E.; Santaella, C.; Heulin, T.; Achouak, W. Root exudates mediated interactions belowground. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 77, 69–80. [CrossRef]

Badri, D.V.; Vivanco, J.M. Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 666–681. [CrossRef]

Gopal, M.; Gupta, A.; Pal, R.K. Applications of plant growth-promoting microorganisms in the mitigation of abiotic stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 2016. [CrossRef]

Zamioudis, C.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Modulation of host immunity by beneficial microbes. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 139–150. [CrossRef]

Mendes, R.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Impact of bacterial and fungal volatiles on plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 206–211. [CrossRef]

Hacquard, S.; Garrido-Oter, R.; González, A.; Spaepen, S.; Ackermann, G.; Lebeis, S.L.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Microbial community composition and functional diversity in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 4323. [CrossRef]

Peiffer, J.A.; Spor, A.; Koren, O.; Jin, Z.; Tringe, S.G.; Dangl, J.L.; Ley, R.E. Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6548–6553. [CrossRef]

Vandenkoornhuyse, P.; Quaiser, A.; Duhamel, M.; Le Van, A.; Dufresne, A. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 1196–1206. [CrossRef]

Berg, G.; Smalla, K. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 68, 1–13. [CrossRef]

Deveau, A.; Bonito, G.; Uehling, J.; Paoletti, M.; Becker, M.; Bindschedler, S.; Martin, F. Bacterial-fungal interactions: Ecology, mechanisms, and challenges. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2018, 32, 62–77. [CrossRef]

Pérez-Jaramillo, J.E.; Carrión, V.J.; de Hollander, M.; Raaijmakers, J.M. The wild side of plant microbiomes. Microbiome 2018, 6, 143. [CrossRef]

Haichar, F.E.; Achouak, W.; Christen, R.; Heulin, T.; Marol, C.; Marais, M.F.; Berge, O. Stable isotope probing analysis of the diversity and activity of methanol-utilizing bacteria in the rhizosphere. ISME J. 2007, 1, 464–478. [CrossRef]

Pii, Y.; Mimmo, T.; Tomasi, N.; Terzano, R.; Cesco, S.; Crecchio, C. Microbial interactions in the rhizosphere: Beneficial influences of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on nutrient acquisition process. A Review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 2015, 51, 403–415. [CrossRef]

Glick, B.R.; Penrose, D.M.; Li, J. A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. J. Theor. Biol. 1998, 190, 63–68. [CrossRef]

Vessey, J.K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil 2003, 255, 571–586. [CrossRef]

Compant, S.; Duffy, B.; Nowak, J.; Clément, C.; Barka, E.A. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: Principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4951–4959. [CrossRef]

Lugtenberg, B.J.J.; Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 541–556. [CrossRef]

Kumar, A.; Singh, R.; Yadav, A.; Giri, D.D.; Singh, P.K.; Pandey, K.D. Isolation and characterization of bacterial endophytes of Curcuma longa L. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 60. [CrossRef]

Santoyo, G.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.D.C.; Glick, B.R. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 183, 92–99. [CrossRef]

Redman, R.S.; Sheehan, K.B.; Stout, R.G.; Rodriguez, R.J.; Henson, J.M. Thermotolerance generated by plant/fungal symbiosis. Science 2002, 298, 1581. [CrossRef]

Zahir, Z.A.; Arshad, M.; Frankenberger, W.T. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Applications and perspectives in agriculture. Adv. Agron. 2004, 81, 97–168. [CrossRef]

Mishra, J.; Arora, N.K. Secondary metabolites of fluorescent pseudomonads in biocontrol of phytopathogens for sustainable agriculture. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 125, 35–45. [CrossRef]

Rajkumar, M.; Ae, N.; Freitas, H. Endophytic bacteria and their potential to enhance heavy metal phytoextraction. Chemosphere 2009, 77, 153–160. [CrossRef]

Barea, J.M.; Pozo, M.J.; Azcón, R.; Azcón-Aguilar, C. Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 1761–1778. [CrossRef]

Boller, T.; Felix, G. A renaissance of elicitors: Perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 379–406. [CrossRef]

Dobbelaere, S.; Croonenborghs, A.; Thys, A.; Ptacek, D.; Vanderleyden, J.; Dutto, P.; Okon, Y. Responses of agronomically important crops to inoculation with Azospirillum. A Review. Eur. J. Agron. 2001, 15, 145–170. [CrossRef]

Pieterse, C.M.J.; Zamioudis, C.; Berendsen, R.L.; Weller, D.M.; van Wees, S.C.M.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2014, 52, 347–375. [CrossRef]