THE GRADUAL DEVELOPMENT OF LITERARY TRADITION AND INNOVATION IN POETRY (From the Post-1960s Period)

Abstract

This article discusses the issues of literary tradition and innovation, concepts with certain theoretical principles in literary studies. When the periods after the 60s of the 20th century are divided into decades and analyzed, the different nature of the work of Uzbek poets, such as Erkin Vahidov, Abdulla Oripov, Omon Matjon, Usman Azim, Fakhriyor, who are considered representatives of different literary generations, is revealed. has been determined.

American Journal of Philological Sciences
Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
HAC
doi
 
CC BY f
86-89
38

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Firuza Buriyeva. (2024). THE GRADUAL DEVELOPMENT OF LITERARY TRADITION AND INNOVATION IN POETRY (From the Post-1960s Period). American Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(11), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue11-16
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

This article discusses the issues of literary tradition and innovation, concepts with certain theoretical principles in literary studies. When the periods after the 60s of the 20th century are divided into decades and analyzed, the different nature of the work of Uzbek poets, such as Erkin Vahidov, Abdulla Oripov, Omon Matjon, Usman Azim, Fakhriyor, who are considered representatives of different literary generations, is revealed. has been determined.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

86


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

86-89

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

This article discusses the issues of literary tradition and innovation, concepts with certain theoretical principles in

literary studies. When the periods after the 60s of the 20th century are divided into decades and analyzed, the

different nature of the work of Uzbek poets, such as Erkin Vahidov, Abdulla Oripov, Omon Matjon, Usman Azim,

Fakhriyor, who are considered representatives of different literary generations, is revealed. has been determined.

KEYWORDS

Traditionalism, innovation, literary period, individual style, classic literature, folklore, modernism, postmodernism,

mythology.

INTRODUCTION

Tradition and innovation are concepts in literary

studies that rely on certain theoretical principles. They

manifest in connection with all matters related to time,

movements and styles, artistry, and, overall, the vitality

and development of literature. This necessitates that

inheritance and succession in national and world

literatures remain a primary focus of research to

enable profound and truthful reflections on literature

and individual creati

vity. Particularly in today’s era of

intensified global connections, the analysis and

interpretation of contemporary works that combine

Research Article

THE GRADUAL DEVELOPMENT OF LITERARY TRADITION AND
INNOVATION IN POETRY (From the Post-1960s Period)

Submission Date:

November 09, 2024,

Accepted Date:

November 14, 2024,

Published Date:

November 19, 2024

Crossref doi

:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue11-16


Firuza Buriyeva

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Philological Sciences at Uzbekistan-Finland Pedagogical Institute, Samarkand,
Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

87


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

86-89

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

traditional, non-traditional, and modern characteristics

make this topic particularly relevant.

The adherence of contemporary Uzbek poetry to

literary traditions is especially evident in the works of

representatives of the 1960s generation. Notable

among them are Erkin Vohidov’s flawless classical

gazals and musammats in the aruz meter; Abdulla

Oripov’s collections such as

Haj Daftari and Hikmat

Sadalari, which emdiv the spirit of arba’in (forty

sayings) and Eastern wisdom traditions; and Omon

Matjon’s Qush Yo‘li, a response to the epic Lison ut

-

Tayr. These works reflect a profound connection to

literary traditions. Unlike later poets, the 1960s poets

distinctly recognized the boundary between tradition

and innovation and expressed this awareness in their

works. For instance, in Omon Matjon’s collection

Ardaxiva, poems are divided into two categories:

“Tradition” and “Non

-Tr

adition.” The “Tradition”

section includes gazal-like rhymed poems and

philosophical quatrains reminiscent of classical poetry,

while the “Non

-

Tradition” section features poems with

unconventional forms and modern poetic techniques.

Similarly, Erkin Vohido

v’s Yoshlik Devoni showcases

classical gazals and musammats, adhering flawlessly to

poetic requirements.

In this context, the poetry of the 1970s generation

demonstrates several distinctive features. These

include the dominant influence of Western poetic

traditions over classical Uzbek literature, an increased

tendency to incorporate elements of folklore, and the

emergence of works with compositional structures

similar to folk epics. A notable figure of this era is

Usmon Azim, whose work reflects the strong influence

of 20th-century literature and oral traditions over

classical forms. His collection includes a mix of ballads,

free verse, and a few classical genres like gazals,

demonstrating the coexistence of tradition and

innovation.

The poetry of the 1980s marks a period when

modernism in world literature began transitioning into

postmodernism. This era saw the broad application of

the term “modern” in literary innovation, though its

meaning varied. While “modernism” refers to a literary

movement with specific rules and principles,

“modern” denotes contemporary literary styles and

methods. In the analysis of post-1980 poetry, it

becomes clear that tradition and innovation are

inherently interconnected. Traditional poetic elements

were not preserved in their purest form but were

transformed and refined through the creativity of

poets. For example, the use of mythological concepts

as poetic tools in modern poetry, such as in the works

of Faxriyor, illustrates the integration of global and

Turkic mythologies int

o poetic forms. Faxriyor’s

poems, rich with mythological figures like Adam,

Hawa, and Icarus, display innovative approaches to

traditional

themes,

presenting

them

with

contemporary relevance and creative reinterpretation.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

88


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

86-89

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Moreover, the innovative use of literary devices like

metaphor, simile, and wordplay characterizes the

poetry of this period. Faxriyor’s skillful wordplay and

original similes reflect his distinct poetic ingenuity. For

instance, his creative adaptation of traditional poetic

forms and concepts into modern contexts reveals the

dynamic interplay of tradition and innovation in his

work.

By the 1990s, the poets of the 1980s generation, such

as Abduvali Qutbiddin, Shavkat Rahmon, and

Muhammad Yusuf, had reached their creative

maturity. The poetry of the independence era is

characterized by several features:

Traditional and innovative

: Expansion of

religious and mystical themes, renewal of Sufi symbols,

and the expression of classical national literary

features in modern Western genres.

Modern

: Emphasis on observation and cold

intuition, divergence from traditional poetic principles,

prioritization of intertextuality, and integration of

literature with science and art.

It is evident that contemporary literary works, which

exhibit diverse artistic features, require analysis based

on the interplay of tradition and innovation. This

approach aligns with global literary trends, as Uzbek

national literature, being an invaluable and inseparable

part of world culture, reflects all cultural, spiritual, and

intellectual transformations.

REFERENCES

1.

Абдулла Орипов. Сурат ва сийрат. Достон ва

шеърлар. –

Тошкент, 1981. –

152 бет.

2.

Д.

Қ

уронов,

З.Мамажонов,

М.Шералиева.

Адабиётшунослик

лу

ғ

ати

.

Тошкент

.

Akademnashr

, 2010-yil.

400

бет

.

3.

Омон Матжон. Иймон ё

ғ

дуси

.

Шеърлар

,

достонлар

.

Т

.:

Адабиёт

ва

санъат

нашриёти

.

1995.

384

бет

.

4.

Омон Матжон. Ардахива. Янги шеърлар,

драматик

қ

исса. –

Т.:

Ғ

.

Ғ

улом

номидаги

Адабиёт

ва

санъат

нашриёти

. 2000.

96

бет

.

5.

Эркин Во

ҳ

идов

.

Ёшлик

девони

.

Т

.:

Ғ

афур

Ғ

улом

номидаги

бадиий

адабиёт

нашриёти

, 1969.

146

бет

.

6.

Фахриёр. Аёл

ғ

у

.

Шеърлар

ва

достонлар

.

Т

.,

“Шар

қ

нашриёти

, 2000.

256

бет

.

7.

F.Buriyeva. Hozirgi o‘zbek she’riyatida janrlar va

shakllar rang-

barangligi. Filol. fanlari bo‘yicha

falsafa doktori(PhD) diss., Samarqand, 2023.

141

bet.

8.

www.ziyouz.com kutubxonasi. Абдулла Орипов.

Ҳ

аж

дафтари

.

Ҳ

икмат

садолари

.

Тошкент

, 1992

28-

бет

.

9.

https://quronov.uz. 11.07.2019

10.

https://kh-davron.uz/yangiliklar/ulugbek-hamdam-

70-yillar-avlodi-sheriyati-xurshid-davron.html.

22.02.2022


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

89


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

86-89

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

11.

https://kh-

davron.uz/kutubxona/jahon/muhammadjon-

xolbekov-modern-adabiyoti.html. 10.09.2018

References

Абдулла Орипов. Сурат ва сийрат. Достон ва шеърлар. – Тошкент, 1981. – 152 бет.

Д.Қуронов, З.Мамажонов, М.Шералиева. Адабиётшунослик луғати. – Тошкент. “Akademnashr”, 2010-yil. – 400 бет.

Омон Матжон. Иймон ёғдуси. Шеърлар, достонлар. – Т.: Адабиёт ва санъат нашриёти. 1995. – 384 бет.

Омон Матжон. Ардахива. Янги шеърлар, драматик қисса. – Т.: Ғ.Ғулом номидаги Адабиёт ва санъат нашриёти. 2000. – 96 бет.

Эркин Воҳидов. Ёшлик девони. Т.: Ғафур Ғулом номидаги бадиий адабиёт нашриёти, 1969. – 146 бет.

Фахриёр. Аёлғу. Шеърлар ва достонлар. Т., “Шарқ” нашриёти, 2000. – 256 бет.

F.Buriyeva. Hozirgi o‘zbek she’riyatida janrlar va shakllar rang-barangligi. Filol. fanlari bo‘yicha falsafa doktori(PhD) diss., Samarqand, 2023.– 141 bet.

www.ziyouz.com kutubxonasi. Абдулла Орипов. Ҳаж дафтари. Ҳикмат садолари. Тошкент, 1992– 28-бет.

https://quronov.uz. 11.07.2019

https://kh-davron.uz/yangiliklar/ulugbek-hamdam-70-yillar-avlodi-sheriyati-xurshid-davron.html. 22.02.2022

https://kh-davron.uz/kutubxona/jahon/muhammadjon-xolbekov-modern-adabiyoti.html. 10.09.2018