THE EFFECTIVE WAYS OF DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING IN CLASSES

Abstract

Critical thinking needs to be taught and implemented in higher education, especially in teacher education program.  It is because student teachers are going to teach this skill to their students at school as well. The critical, higher-order thinking and reading-for-meaning skills development are imperative to allow learners to become active participants in this changing world. In this work, we paid attention teachers’ responses and strategies to improve learners’ comprehension through developing critical, higher-order thinking skills.

American Journal of Philological Sciences
Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
HAC
doi
 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Baymuratova Saltanat Jaksimbaevna. (2024). THE EFFECTIVE WAYS OF DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING IN CLASSES. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(08), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue08-11
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

Critical thinking needs to be taught and implemented in higher education, especially in teacher education program.  It is because student teachers are going to teach this skill to their students at school as well. The critical, higher-order thinking and reading-for-meaning skills development are imperative to allow learners to become active participants in this changing world. In this work, we paid attention teachers’ responses and strategies to improve learners’ comprehension through developing critical, higher-order thinking skills.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 08-2024

69


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

08

P

AGES

:

69-73

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

Critical thinking needs to be taught and implemented in higher education, especially in teacher education program. It

is because student teachers are going to teach this skill to their students at school as well. The critical, higher-order

thinking and reading-for-meaning skills development are imperative to allow learners to become active participants in

this changing world. In this work, we paid attention teachers’ responses and strategies to improve learners’

comprehension through developing critical, higher-order thinking skills.

KEYWORDS

Critical thinking, strategies, techniques, comprehension.

INTRODUCTION

Most students still find challenges in developing critical

thinking in English language. Specifically, in reading

and writing skill, students encounter barriers to figure

out information embedded on the passages and

experience problems to elaborate the intended

information into written text. In order to overcome

those challenges, it is stated that critical thinking skill

in reading and writing can be used as students’

knowledge, skills and attitudes in reading and writing.

It is because describing and explaining what critical

thinking is can be done by seeing it from the

perspectives of metacognitive strategies. In reading

and writing, the correlation between metacognition,

critical thinking and text understanding cannot be

Research Article

THE EFFECTIVE WAYS OF DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING IN CLASSES

Submission Date:

Aug 18, 2024,

Accepted Date:

Aug 23, 2024,

Published Date:

Aug 28, 2024

Crossref doi

:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue08-11


Baymuratova Saltanat Jaksimbaevna

MA student of KarSU, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 08-2024

70


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

08

P

AGES

:

69-73

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

separated. Further, it is stated that critical thinking in

reading can be grouped into three phases of

metacognition, namely planning, monitoring, and

evaluating. They are explained using the three types of

knowledge namely declarative, procedural and

conditional knowledge. Students need critical thinking

abilities in English language learning to read beyond

the literal, write persuasive essays, communicate their

ideas with sufficient supporting evidence, and

question the opinion of others.

Critical and higher-order thinking and reading for

meaning

The mastery of reading comprehension in the 21st

century requires students to develop their critical

comprehension skills. This would allow them to think

more deeply about texts, enabling them to answer

more complex questions which calls for independent

integration, interpretation, critique and evaluation of

texts. The introduction of various strategies to create

meaningful reading experiences is necessary to

promote

lasting

and

continual

growth

and

development in reading as well as further improve the

academic performance of learners [6]. In their study,

found that deficient readers lack critical reading and

thinking skills and concurred that the use of reading

strategies can lead to proficient reading and promote

academic success. In this paper we try to present three

instructional strategies that used to assist teachers in

developing critical thinking and comprehension skills in

their classrooms, namely anticipation guides.

My turn, your turn; and P4C thinking moves. In these

three strategies learners are required to respond to

questions and at the same time learn to question

thoughts and ideas that have been taken for granted.

These questioning techniques play a vital role in

developing higher-order thinking skills. Learners are

expected to disrupt the common way of thinking,

engage in more thoughtful ways, dig deeply and

develop the ability to inquire and be more reflexive.

This critical stance is an attitude that needs to be

nurtured continually as they interact with texts and, at

the same time, with life more generally.

Teachers’ understanding of critical thinking in the

classroom

In a study conducted by Choy and Cheah teachers

defined critical thinking to be ‘the impetus to facilitate

thinking among students in the classroom and enable

students to enjoy

the process of learning … involves

analyzing information’, but suggest that students

apply critical thinking only some of the time. However,

Choy and Cheah propose that the lack of

understanding, in their definition of critical thinking,

implies that teachers themselves struggle [1].

Teachers also allude to constraints that hinder the

development of critical thinking which include ‘lack of

time for designing and developing critical thinking


background image

Volume 04 Issue 08-2024

71


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

08

P

AGES

:

69-73

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

activities’ and because of a ‘lack of understanding of

how to develop tools for fostering criticality they find

integration difficult’ Teachers do, however, relate the

importance of teaching critical thinking throughout the

curriculum and with a focus on the use of effective

teaching strategies [8].

Anticipation guide is considered as one of the

beneficial tool in order to develop students’ critical

thinking. The anticipation guide strategy is pre reading

activity using an English first-language text. Teachers

had the opportunity to ask questions for clarification to

ensure that they understood the strategy well.

An anticipation guide is a metacognitive strategy and is

effective in activating prior knowledge, highlighting

misconceptions and promoting reflection while

learning … which provides a foundation for the

assimilation of new knowledge [3].

In addition to these skills, the anticipation guide

encourages learners to improve critical thinking

through increased engagement, making predictions,

arousing curiosity, comparing beliefs and making

assumptions. The anticipation guide is a pre-reading

activity which engages students in discussion in the

class about a text, allowing them to examine their own

thoughts and opinions about. The aim, according to is

to provide a purpose for reading which results in

increased comprehension. The knowledge of what to

expect in the text before reading it, motivates learners

to brainstorm possible or anticipated outcomes. After

this process learners can check whether their thinking

about the text is aligned with what actually occurs in

the text.

My turn your turn

According to Nomlomo, the strategy ‘My turn, your

turn’ is a pedagogical approach which is necessary in

classrooms, to be used in any subject, since it

encourages learner engagement. However, for turn-

taking to be effective, four components are to be

considered which include knowledge of students,

knowledge of context, knowledge of pedagogy and

knowledge of subject matter. These components are

integral in creating an interactive environment within

which turn-taking can flourish [5].

Th

e strategy of ‘My turn, your turn’ started with the

teacher reading a text. Nomlomo posits that turn-

taking (‘my turn, your turn’) uses allocation and

acquisition to manage the strategy. The allocation

refers to giving a learner a turn to speak, while

acquisition informs the speaker to act when it is their

turn. Small bits of the text are revealed at a time with

the teacher modeling a reaction using the cue

My

turn, for example: “What do you think the character

will do next?” My turn [teacher responds]: “

I think he

will go home …” –

Your turn [cue for learner response]

“What do you think?” … the teacher expects learners

to share their thoughts and ideas about possible


background image

Volume 04 Issue 08-2024

72


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

08

P

AGES

:

69-73

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

answers to the question. Dewi, Suharsono and Munir

agree and state that turn-taking as interactional

patterns of interactions might be influenced by the

context where it is employed … [which will] influence

the process of interaction production. [2]. Ryan and

Forrest describe turn-taking to be a greatly

unappreciated strategy, since it allows speakers to

draw from a number of resources to project and co-

ordinate turns to talk, enabling gaps, interruptions and

concurrent talk to be minimized [7].

The use of reasoning words like “think”, “because”,

“agree” and “might” are words that prompt higher

-

order thinking [4]. The modeling of the strategy is

effective because learners will learn from teachers

who share their thinking. The questions posed are

prepared and focus on specific higher-order and critical

thinking skills. The questioning encourages learners to:

predict, infer, connect, clarify, summarize and

paraphrase.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, a major component of critical thinking

understands the perspective of the person you are

communicating with. Teachers should have a firm

grasp of cultural differences and nuances within their

students’ lives. In today’s educational and societal

context, critical thinking has become an important tool

for sorting out information, making decisions, and

solving problems. Critical thinking in language learning

helps students to structure and express their thoughts

effectively. It is an essential skill to ensure students’

personal and professional success.

REFERENCES

1.

Choy, S.C. & Cheah, P.K., 2009, ‘Teacher

perceptions of critical thinking among students

and

its

influence

o

n

higher

education’,

International Journal of Teaching and Learning in

Higher Education 20(2), 198

206.

2.

Dewi, R.F., Suharsono, S. & Munir, A., 2018, ‘Turn

taking strategies and its relations to EFL learners’

personality and power in the interaction of English

conversation class’, English, Teaching, Learning,

and Research Journal 4(2), 288

305. https://

doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V42.2018.A12

3.

Evans, D.R., Kodela, J. & Khan, A., 2022,

‘Anticipation guides: A tool to highlight knowledge

and promote reflect

ion on learning’, PRiMER: Peer

-

Reviewed Reports in Medical Education Jeanne

Ellis Ormrod, Human Learning , 6th ed. (Boston,

MA: Pearson, 2012), 421

4.

Heron, M. & Palfreyman, D.M., 2021, ‘Exploring

higher-order thinking in higher education seminar

talk’, C

ollege Teaching 1

8.

5.

Nomlomo, V., 2010, ‘Classroom interaction: Turn

-

taking as a pedagogical strategy’ Linguam: A

Journal of Language Learning 26(2), 50

66.

https://doi. org/10.5785/26-2-21


background image

Volume 04 Issue 08-2024

73


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

08

P

AGES

:

69-73

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

6.

Ortlieb, E., 2013, ‘Using anticipatory reading guides

to im

prove elementary students’ comprehension’,

International Journal of Instruction 6(2), 145

162.

7.

Ryan, J. & Forrest, L., 2021, ‘No chance to speak:

Developing a pedagogical response to turn-taking

problems’, Innovation in Language Learning and

Teaching 15(2), 103

116.

8.

Toshpulatova, D. & Kiinjerumatova, A., 2020,

‘Teacher perceptions on developing students’

critical thinking skills in Academic English’

References

Choy, S.C. & Cheah, P.K., 2009, ‘Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education’, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 20(2), 198–206.

Dewi, R.F., Suharsono, S. & Munir, A., 2018, ‘Turn taking strategies and its relations to EFL learners’ personality and power in the interaction of English conversation class’, English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal 4(2), 288–305. https:// doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V42.2018.A12

Evans, D.R., Kodela, J. & Khan, A., 2022, ‘Anticipation guides: A tool to highlight knowledge and promote reflection on learning’, PRiMER: Peer-Reviewed Reports in Medical Education Jeanne Ellis Ormrod, Human Learning , 6th ed. (Boston, MA: Pearson, 2012), 421

Heron, M. & Palfreyman, D.M., 2021, ‘Exploring higher-order thinking in higher education seminar talk’, College Teaching 1–8.

Nomlomo, V., 2010, ‘Classroom interaction: Turn-taking as a pedagogical strategy’ Linguam: A Journal of Language Learning 26(2), 50–66. https://doi. org/10.5785/26-2-21

Ortlieb, E., 2013, ‘Using anticipatory reading guides to improve elementary students’ comprehension’, International Journal of Instruction 6(2), 145–162.

Ryan, J. & Forrest, L., 2021, ‘No chance to speak: Developing a pedagogical response to turn-taking problems’, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 15(2), 103–116.

Toshpulatova, D. & Kiinjerumatova, A., 2020, ‘Teacher perceptions on developing students’ critical thinking skills in Academic English’