ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
106
EFFICIENCY OF USING SCAMPER TECHNOLOGY IN LEARNING
PROCESS
Zubaydullayeva Zarina Erkinovna
Tashkent Academic Lyceum No.2 of the Ministry
of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15771390
Annotation.
This article deals with the importance of SCAMPER technology
in education and how it can be used more effectively in learning process.
Keywords:
SCAMPER strategy, Classroom action research, motivation
The SCAMPER is an innovative technique that can be implemented in
learning process broadly and effectively. These technique is helpful in creating
highly motivated classroom environment and increase learning efficiency among
students. SCAMPER derived from a brainstorming technique initially proposed
by Osborne (1993) which was further developed and introduced to education by
Eberle (1997). SCAMPER is an acronym that combines seven words: S for
Substitute, C for Combine, A for Adapt, M for Magnify, P for Put to other use, E
for Eliminate, and R for Reverse. This technique can help teachers to
incorporate more classroom activities and creative, practical lessons, so that
students find it easier to comprehend the concepts better.
Substitute - replacing it with something else, analyzing, observing the
results. Testing with an alternative always helps you to understand which one
works better for you.
Combine – Sometimes, combining two different kinds of teaching processes
might turn out to be a great idea generating better processes results. Or
combining different ideas and knowledge during the brainstorming can give
better understanding.
Adapt –Adapting from surroundings and the environment helps to develop
solutions way earlier and quickly. For instance, adapting different types of
games from the environment will help students relate to lessons in a far better
manner. It demands from student to think deeply and critically.
Modify/Magnify –modify or add or remove any aspect in the teaching
process to give you a new perspective that will help you look at things
differently. It is also names ad magnify or minify.
Put to use – putting into practice what has been learned.
SCAMPER strategy develops learners' thinking , encourages them to enrich
their ideas and improve them to discover new alternatives to solve problems. In
addition to, SCAMPER strategy works to support and strengthen the levels of
creativity for students when dealing with difficulties and thinking of solutions.
ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
107
Eberel (2008,p. 8) demonstrated many characteristics of SCAMPER strategy
as follow:
1-
Activating the role of the student in educational situations.
2-
Motivating students to generate ideas about any topic.
3-
Developing thinking skills in general and productive thinking in
particular for learners.
4-
Stimulating curiosity and taking risks.
5- Developing the student's skill in raising different motivational questions.
6- Developing imagination, especially the creative imagination for learners. 7-
Creating positive attitudes among learners towards learning subject matter,
thinking, imagination and innovation
Used literature:
1.
Gubaydullin, D. (2025). INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES IN THE TROOPS
JALOLIDDIN MANGUBERDI. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 1(4),
422-426.
2.
Ismailov, R. (2025). MILITARY EDUCATION SYSTEM: FORMATION OF
PROFESSIONAL MILITARY PERSONNEL. Journal of Applied Science and Social
Science, 1(4), 427-429.
3.
Anarbayev, O. (2025). SYNERGETIC ANALYSIS AND DIALECTIC CULTURAL
UNDERSTANDING OF HISTORY. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science,
1(4), 430-434.
4.
Toshtemirov, I. (2025). THE AFRICAN CONTINENT IN THE 60S AND 70S
OF THE 20TH CENTURY EMERGENCE. Journal of Applied Science and Social
Science, 1(4), 441-443.
5.
Turaev, S. (2025). MILITARY HISTORY OF THE SHAYBANID STATE IN THE
STRUGGLE AGAINST THE TIMURIDS. Journal of Applied Science and Social
Science, 1(4), 444-447.
6.
Uktamovna, B. G. (2024). Sportning Inson Hayot Tarziga Ta’sir Effektlari.
Miasto Przyszłości, 55, 541-543.
7.
Furqat o’g’li, E. S., & Shuxrat o’g’li, M. S. (2025). O’ZBEKISTON
SPORTCHILARINING SPORT SOHASIDA ERISHGAN YUTUQLARI. Лучшие
интеллектуальные исследования, 39(1), 127-131.
8.
Mannapovna, G. O. G. (2025). INGLIZ TILINI IKKINCHI TILI SIFATIDA
O'RGANISHNING MUAMMOLARI. ИКРО журнал, 14(02), 1298-1299.
9.
Mannapovna, G. O. G. (2023). Methodology of Teaching English in Higher
Educational Institutions Not Related to Philology. International Journal of
Scientific Trends, 2(2), 61-64.
ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
108
10.
Тухтаева, К. Д. (2020). SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF THE PHRASEOLOGICAL
UNITS OF THE ENGLISH, UZBEK AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES WITH THE NAMES
OF VEGETABLES AND FRUITS. ИННОВАЦИИ В ПЕДАГОГИКЕ И
ПСИХОЛОГИИ,(SI-3).
11.
Xamdamovna, I. M. (2022). Stylistic features of the use of asindetone in
languages of different systems. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE
& INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH ISSN: 2277-3630 Impact factor: 8.036, 11,
30-33.
12.
Ibrakhimovna, K. G. (2024). GAMES AS AN EFFECTIVE WAY OF
DEVELOPING YOUNG LEARNERS’COMMUNICATIVE SKILLS. International
Journal of Pedagogics, 4(03), 97-104.
13.
Муминова, Н. А. (2016). Эстетическое воспитание студентов
посредством народного искусства. Образование и воспитание, (4), 6-7.
14.
Муминова, Н. А. (2014). Формирование гармонично развитой
личности как цель воспитания в современном демократическом обществе.
Молодой ученый, (9), 502-505.
15.
Uralova, G. (2023, September). SWOT TAHLILIDAN FOYDALANIB BO
‘LAJAK BOSHLANG ‘ICH SINF O ‘QITUVCHILARIDA EKOLOGIK-VALEOLOGIK
MADANIYATNI
RIVOJLANTIRISH.
In
International
conference
on
multidisciplinary science (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 49-52).
16.
Dhabliya, D., Ugli, I. S. M., Murali, M. J., Abbas, A. H., & Gulbahor, U. (2023).
Computer vision: Advances in image and video analysis. In E3S Web of
Conferences (Vol. 399, p. 04045). EDP Sciences.
17.
Гафуров, Б. З. (2021). АНАЛИЗ ЛИНГВОСТАТИСТИЧЕСКОЙ
ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ
АКЦЕНТНЫХ
ФОНОВАРИАНТОВ
ИМЕН
СУЩЕСТВИТЕЛЬНЫХ РУССКОГО ЯЗЫКА. МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ
ИСКУССТВО СЛОВА, 4(1-1).
18.
Гафуров, Б. З. (2009). Роль сокращения фонемного состава слова в
образовании сегментных фоновариантов существительных русского,
узбекского и английского языков. Современные гуманитарные
исследования, (6), 124-126.
19.
ГАФУРОВ, Б. (2014). Проблематика фоностилистики в русском,
узбекском и английском языкознании. Узбекистонда хорижий тиллар.
Илмий–методик электрон журнал.-Тошкент, 3, 125-133.
20.
Sadikov, E. T. (2021). SPECIFIC PECULIARITIES OF TEACHING AND
EVALUATING PRAGMATIC SPEECH ACTS THROUGH THE LISTENING SKILLS.
EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD), 6(12), 1-1.
