Авторы

  • Zavqiddin Nigmatov
    Independent Researcher, Navoi State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.arims.128014

Ключевые слова:

logical thinking laundry detergent thawed meat vitamin C tablets

Аннотация

This article addresses the issue of developing students' logical thinking abilities in the process of teaching chemistry. Specifically, it analyzes methods for cultivating students' intellectual skills, such as analysis, drawing conclusions, and understanding cause-and-effect relationships through solving exercises and problems. The article presents examples of tasks that stimulate logical thinking based on real-life and engaging chemical problems, revealing their educational significance. It also substantiates the effectiveness of teaching methods that encourage students to be active, conduct research, and think independently.


background image

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

48

DEVELOPING STUDENTS' INTELLECTUAL ABILITIES THROUGH

LOGICAL THINKING TASKS AND PROBLEMS IN CHEMISTRY

Nigmatov Zavqiddin Muyitdinovich

Independent Researcher, Navoi State University

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16352488

Annotation:

This article addresses the issue of developing students' logical

thinking abilities in the process of teaching chemistry. Specifically, it analyzes
methods for cultivating students' intellectual skills, such as analysis, drawing
conclusions, and understanding cause-and-effect relationships through solving
exercises and problems. The article presents examples of tasks that stimulate
logical thinking based on real-life and engaging chemical problems, revealing
their educational significance. It also substantiates the effectiveness of teaching
methods that encourage students to be active, conduct research, and think
independently.

Key words:

logical thinking, laundry detergent, thawed meat, vitamin C

tablets

In modern education, it is not enough to simply provide students with

knowledge. It is equally important to develop their ability to think
independently, analyze, solve problems, and engage in logical reasoning. Among
natural sciences, the subject of chemistry holds a special place in this regard.
Understanding complex phenomena in chemistry, recognizing cause-effect
relationships, and applying formulas in practice requires a high level of thinking
from students. This article discusses the role of logical thinking tasks and
problems in chemistry education and their impact on developing students’
intellectual potential.

Intellect is the highest form of theoretical comprehension of reality

and is manifested through human thinking ability.

The key indicators of

intellect are independent thinking, critical analysis, adaptability, and
consistency. Logical thinking activity in students represents a combination of
psychological and physical actions that help them assimilate knowledge, develop
thinking, and enhance their intellectual culture.

In the process of logical thinking, it is essential to develop students'

reasoning and cognitive abilities. Analytical thinking, comparison,
generalization, identifying cause-effect relationships, classification, and
systematization exercises play a crucial role in this development.

1. Concepts of Logical Thinking and Intellectual Development:

Logical

thinking is a type of cognitive activity that involves reasoning based on
established rules, analyzing causes and effects, and drawing correct conclusions.


background image

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

49

Intellectual ability refers to a person's capacity to acquire new knowledge,
process it, generate new ideas, and adapt to changing conditions.

According to psychological research, tasks that encourage logical thinking

play an important role in developing students’ intellectual potential. Chemistry,
by its very nature, offers wide opportunities for implementing such tasks.

2. The Impact of Chemistry on Students’ Thinking:

Chemistry is an

experimental science that requires both theoretical knowledge and practical
skills. Understanding chemical processes always involves analyzing causes and
consequences. For instance, under what conditions will a substance react? What
products will be formed? Will energy be absorbed or released?

To answer these questions, students must engage in analytical thinking,

comparison, classification, and generalization. Writing and understanding
chemical reactions requires them to work with formulas and recognize
interconnections among concepts.

3. Activating Thinking Through Exercises and Problems
a) Step-by-step approach from simple to complex:

In teaching

chemistry, starting with simple examples and gradually progressing to complex
problems helps develop students’ thinking. For example:

Simple example:

Calculate the mass of substances in the reaction

2H₂ + O₂ → 2H₂O.

Complex problem:

Analyze pressure, volume, and temperature changes

using gas laws.

b) Tasks that stimulate logical thinking:

Logical thinking can be

enhanced through carefully structured questions and tasks. For example:

“What happens if sodium is added to water?”

“If a reaction is endothermic, what conclusions can be drawn?”

“Which of the following substances acts as a catalyst, and why?”

Real-Life and Engaging Logical Thinking Tasks
1. Explaining a Boiling Kettle Using Le Chatelier's Principle
Task:

The lid of a kettle lifts while water is boiling. Explain this

phenomenon using chemical equilibrium principles. How does increasing or
decreasing heat affect equilibrium?

Thinking Points:

How does heat shift the equilibrium?

Is this an endothermic or exothermic process?

What is the relationship between pressure and vapor amount?


background image

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

50

Why it's useful:

Encourages students to connect a daily event with a

chemical model and analyze the effect of different variables on equilibrium.

2. Why Doesn’t Laundry Detergent Work Well in Cold Water?
Task:

Someone complains that stains aren’t removed in cold water.Explain

this scientifically.What reaction or process failed?

Analysis:

Enzymes (biological catalysts) don't function well in cold temperatures.

Reaction rate depends on temperature.

Factors such as pH, enzymes, and temperature affect the outcome.

Benefit:

Teaches students to analyze real-life problems using chemical

reasoning.

3. Why Does Defrosted Meat Turn Brown?
Task:

After being removed from the freezer, meat turns brown at room

temperature. Explain this chemically.

Logical Analysis:

Oxidation reaction occurs (myoglobin → metmyoglobin).

Contact with oxygen changes color.

Heat accelerates the reaction.

Learning Outcome:

Students understand oxidation, biological reactions,

and visual indicators of chemical change.

4. Fizzing of a Vitamin C Tablet.
Task:

A student drops a vitamin C tablet into water and observes fizzing.

What reaction is happening? What is the gas? Why does the fizz stop?

Logical Elements:

The tablet contains sodium bicarbonate and ascorbic acid.

Reacts with water to produce carbonic acid → CO₂ gas.

Reaction stops when reactants are consumed.

Benefit:

Relates everyday experience to chemical processes.

5. Why Do Apple Slices Turn Brown?
Task:

Sliced apples turn brown quickly. Explain this chemically. How can it

be slowed down?

Analysis:

Phenol compounds are oxidized into quinones.

Enzyme (polyphenol oxidase) facilitates the reaction.

Adding lemon juice changes pH and inhibits the enzyme.

Student learns:

Biochemistry, enzyme activity, pH influence, oxidation.

6. Methods to Assess and Develop Students’ Thinking Abilities


background image

ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE

International scientific-online conference

51

To evaluate students’ thinking skills, the following methods can be used:

Logical tests:

Cause-and-effect questions related to chemical processes.

Problem-based situations:

Predicting reaction outcomes and product

identification.

Group activities:

Collaborative discussions and problem-solving.

Independent projects:

Students conduct small experiments, enhancing

critical and creative thinking.

Identifying and emphasizing the core concept of a topic plays an essential

role in developing logical thinking abilities.

Conclusion:

Chemistry serves as an effective tool for developing logical

thinking and intellectual capacity in students. Lessons that incorporate logical
problems, hands-on exercises, and real-world scenarios help broaden students’
thinking, foster independence, and enhance analytical skills. Therefore, every
chemistry teacher should strive to include more logic-based tasks in their
teaching and actively encourage student engagement and inquiry.

References:

1.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning,

Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives. New York: Longman.
2.

Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry – logical or psychological?

Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–15.
3.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge

University Press.
4.

Taber, K. S. (2013). Modelling learners and learning in science education.

International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1736–1763.
5.

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-

achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning
Sciences, 12(2), 145–181.
6.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The

Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York:
David McKay Company.
7.

Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry

education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4),
548.
8.

Mahdi, O. R. (2014). The impact of inquiry-based learning method on

students’ academic achievement in science courses. International Journal of
Scientific & Technology Research, 3(1), 6–10.

Библиографические ссылки

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry – logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–15.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press.

Taber, K. S. (2013). Modelling learners and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1736–1763.

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company.

Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 548.

Mahdi, O. R. (2014). The impact of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science courses. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 3(1), 6–10.