ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
133
METAPHORS OF TIME: ENGLISH VS. UZBEK AND RUSSIAn
Muslimova Khumora Shavkatjonovna
Fargona city 2- IDUM
English teacher
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16879657
Abstract.
This article examines the conceptual metaphors of time in
English, Uzbek, and Russian, focusing on their cognitive, cultural, and linguistic
aspects. Time, as an abstract category, is often understood and expressed
through metaphorical mappings derived from concrete human experiences. By
comparing these three languages, we identify both universal metaphorical
patterns and culturally specific expressions.
Keywords
: metaphors of time, conceptual metaphor, English, Uzbek,
Russian, cultural linguistics.
Metaphor is for most people a device of the poetic imagination and the
rhetorical flourish—a matter of extraordinary rather than ordinary language.
Moreover, metaphor is typically viewed as characteristic of language alone, a
matter of words rather than thought or action. For this reason, most people
think they can get along perfectly well without metaphor. We have found, on the
contrary, that metaphor is pervasive in everyday life, not just in language but in
thought and action. Our ordinary conceptual system, in terms of which we both
think and act, is fundamentally metaphorical in nature. The idea about usage of
metaphors put forward by Lakoff G. and Johnson M. inspired many linguists to
dive into the investigation of metaphor again and with conscious mind. Since,
they were indeed right when they claimed the aforementioned statement. More
and more scholars and scientists had a stereotypical opinion that only limited
group of people are able to handle with this kind of stylistic device.
The concepts that govern our thought are not just matters of the intellect.
They also govern our everyday functioning, down to the most mundane details.
Our concepts structure what we perceive, how we get around in the world, and
how we relate to other people. Our conceptual system thus plays a central role
in defining our everyday realities. If we are right in suggesting that our
conceptual system is largely metaphorical, then the way we think, what we
experience, and what we do every day is very much a matter of metaphor.
Moreover, they not only suggest that everyone can use them, but they actually
use it subconsciously. Lakoff and Johnson were pioneers to inform that
metaphors are not the result of literary sources, but fruit of mind. Till them
many would argue that this cannot be right. Metaphor is usually investigated by
literature scientists as a linguistic expression. We do not want to oppose of
ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
134
course, we simply going to say that this was only one aspect of investigating it.
The core thing is how we create metaphors, what urges us to produce, what
aspects affect us when we form certain metaphors. These questions were blank.
Time is one of the most abstract yet universally experienced concepts in
human cognition. Because of its abstract nature, languages often rely on
metaphors to conceptualize and express time. These metaphors are not
arbitrary; they reflect cultural values, cognitive patterns, and historical
traditions of the speakers. The comparison of time metaphors in English, Uzbek,
and Russian reveals both universal tendencies and culture-specific nuances.
According to the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980),
humans understand abstract concepts like time by mapping them onto more
concrete domains, such as movement, space, or money. Time metaphors are
deeply embedded in our everyday speech and can influence how speakers of
different languages perceive temporal reality.
In English, time is often conceptualized as money or a valuable resource:
Time is money.
Spend time, save time, waste time.
Another common conceptualization is time as motion along a path:
The future lies ahead; the past is behind.
We are approaching the deadline.
This linear view of time is characteristic of Western cultures, where time is
seen as irreversible, measurable, and tightly connected to productivity.
Uzbek, influenced by Turkic linguistic heritage and Central Asian cultural
traditions, also uses spatial metaphors for time but with some differences in
perspective. Common expressions include:
Kelajak oldinda (“The future is ahead”).
O‘tgan kunlar (“The days that have passed”).
However, unlike English, Uzbek time metaphors often have cyclical or
seasonal associations, reflecting the agricultural roots of the culture:
Yoz keladi (“Summer comes”) – seasonal cycles are a natural way to
measure time.
Proverbs such as Vaqt — oltin (“Time is gold”) echo the value-of-
time metaphor but coexist with a more patient, less productivity-driven view of
life.
Russian shares many metaphorical patterns with both English and Uzbek
but also have its unique traits. Like English, Russian conceptualizes time as a
linear path:
ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
135
Время идет (“Time goes”).
Срок приближается (“The term is approaching”).
Yet, Russian culture often treats time as an active force that impacts
humans:
Время лечит (“Time heals”).
Время покажет (“Time will show”).
Moreover, Russian uses container metaphors, where time is seen as
something that can contain events:
В течение дня (“In the course of the day”).
Table-1. Comparative Analysis
Conceptual
Domain
English
Uzbek
Russian
Time as
money/resource
Spend time, save
time
Vaqt —
oltin
Дорогое время
(“precious time”)
Time as movement
The future lies
ahead
Kelajak
oldinda
Будущее
впереди
Time as a cycle
Less frequent
Strong
seasonal
metaphors
Present in folk
expressions
Time as an active
agent
Rare
Rare
Common
(Время лечит)
The comparison shows that while all three languages share universal
spatial metaphors of time, their frequency and emotional connotations vary.
English is more business-oriented, Uzbek integrates nature and patience, and
Russian blends linearity with a sense of time’s agency over human life.
Metaphors of time in English, Uzbek, and Russian reveal both shared human
cognitive structures and deep cultural distinctions. The English emphasis on
efficiency, the Uzbek connection to seasonal rhythms, and the Russian portrayal
of time as a powerful agent all point to how language encodes cultural attitudes
toward temporality. Understanding these differences is not only important for
ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
136
linguists but also for cross-cultural communication, translation studies, and
intercultural competence.
References:
1. Azizova, N. M. (2021). Comparative analysis of time metaphors in English and
Uzbek. Uzbek Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 88–97.
2. Evans, V. (2024). The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal
Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Kibrik, A. A., & Plungian, V. A. (2022). Metaphors and cognition in Russian
linguistics. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture.
