SYNCRETISM AND POLYFUNCTIONALITY OF THE GRAMMATICAL CATEGORY OF MOOD
Аннотация
The article discusses the issues of syncretism and polyfunctionality of verbs in English and Uzbek languages. It reviews different definitions for the category of mood, its various interpretations and types, and presents the results of the functional analysis of forms of the grammatical mood in these languages.
Скачивания
Ключевые слова:
Аннотация
The article discusses the issues of syncretism and polyfunctionality of verbs in English and Uzbek languages. It reviews different definitions for the category of mood, its various interpretations and types, and presents the results of the functional analysis of forms of the grammatical mood in these languages.
Библиографические ссылки
Akhmanova, O.S. (1969) Dictionary of Linguistic Terms (in Russian). Moscow: Sovetskaya ensiklopediya.
Baerman, M., Brown, D., Corbett, G.G. (2005). The Syntax-Morphology Interface.A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.
Chomsky N. (1964). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Mouton&Co.
Bussmann, H. (2006) Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics (translated by G.Trauth and K.Kazzazi). London &New York: Routledge.
Declerck, R. (1991) A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha (e-version).
Ganieva, D.A. (2011). Polyfunctionality of arguments of predicates (in Russian). Bulletin of the South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, (8), 183-190.
Ganieva, D.A. (2019). Semantic Syncretism and Polyfunctionality (in Uzbek). Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State University, (6), 275-278.
Ganieva, D. (2022) On Syncretic and Polyfunctional Properties of Uzbek and English Participles. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, (5), 1040-1046.
Ganieva, Sh.A. (2021). Hypo-Hyperonymic Relationship between Parema and its Units. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences, (2(06)), 84-87.
Gvishiani, N. (1979). Polyfunctional Words in Language and Speech (in Russian). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.
Halliday, M., Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder.
Hojiev, A. (1973). The Verb (in Uzbek). Tashkent: Fan.
Iskandarova, Sh.M. (2020). Gnoseology and the Linguistic Landscape of the World. Theoretical and Applied Science, (4), 19-22.
Jacobson, R. (1936). Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutung der russischen Kasus. In Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague. Berlin.
Kasevich, V.B. (1977). Elements of General Linguistics (in Russian). Moscow.
Khomutova, T. (2014). Mood and modality in English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (154), 395-401.
Krifka, M. (2009). Case Syncretism. De Gruyter Mouton.
Kurylowicz, Y. (1962). Essays on Linguistics (in Russian). Moscow.
Nabieva, D.A., Akhmedov, B.R. (2021) Expressing of Subjective Assessment by Paralinguistic Means and their Gender Pecularities. European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science (1), 9-15.
Pavljukovets, M.A. (2009) Syncretism at the Morphological and Syntactic Levels of the English Language as a Manifestation of Language Economy: A Functional Aspect. Abstract of the PhD Thesis. Rostov-on-Don.
Rakhmatullaev, Sh. (2010) Modern Literary Uzbek Language (in Uzbek). Tashkent: Mumtoz suz.
Sims, A.D. (2017). Syncretism (an example of a form-meaning mismatch). The Ohio State University.
Stump, G. (2014). Polyfunctionality and inflectional economy. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, (11), 73-93.
Tursunov, U., Mukhtorov, A., Rakhmatullaev, Sh. Modern Uzbek Literary Language (in Uzbek). Tashkent: Uzbekistan.
