CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (ISSN: 2767-3758)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps
1
VOLUME:
Vol.06 Issue03 2025
Page: - 01-07
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Enhancing Injection Molding Quality through Scientific
Molding and Adaptive Process Control with External Sensors
Zhao Yi
College of Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
Received:
03 January 2025
Accepted:
02 February 2025
Published:
01 March 2025
INTRODUCTION
The injection molding process is a widely used
manufacturing method for producing high-precision,
complex plastic parts in various industries such as
automotive, consumer electronics, medical devices, and
packaging. The process involves injecting molten plastic
material into a mold cavity under high pressure, where it is
allowed to cool and solidify, forming a finished part. Due
to its versatility, high throughput, and ability to produce
intricate designs with tight tolerances, injection molding
has become the preferred method for mass production of
plastic components. However, achieving consistent,
defect-free parts remains a significant challenge due to the
complex interactions between various process variables.
A key challenge in injection molding is maintaining the
quality and consistency of the molded parts, particularly in
high-volume production environments. Factors such as
variations in raw material properties, machine behavior,
mold temperature, and environmental conditions can cause
defects such as warping, short shots, sink marks, flash, and
other surface imperfections. These defects not only
compromise the final product quality but also lead to
increased waste, rework, and operational inefficiencies,
thus affecting the overall cost-effectiveness of the process.
Scientific molding, an approach that applies a data-driven,
empirical understanding of injection molding processes,
aims to address these challenges by systematically
optimizing process parameters. Scientific molding utilizes
a controlled set of process parameters, such as injection
speed, packing pressure, cooling time, and mold
temperature, based on a deep understanding of material
behavior and machine characteristics. Through data
collection and analysis, scientific molding enables the
identification and control of critical parameters that
influence part quality, providing manufacturers with the
tools to predict and optimize the molding process with
greater precision.
Incorporating adaptive process control using external
sensors adds an additional layer of precision and flexibility
to the scientific molding approach. External sensors, such
as temperature sensors, pressure sensors, and flow meters,
ABSTRACT
The injection molding process is crucial in manufacturing industries, particularly for producing complex, high-volume plastic
parts. Ensuring high-quality output and reducing defects in the final product remain key challenges in injection molding. Scientific
molding, coupled with adaptive process quality control using external sensors, provides an effective solution. This study explores
the integration of external sensors in the injection molding process to enable real-time monitoring and adaptive control of critical
parameters. The research investigates the impact of sensor-based feedback on the accuracy of process control, reduction in defects,
and overall production efficiency. The findings show that the combination of scientific molding principles and external senso rs
results in significant improvements in product quality and process optimization, providing valuable insights into future
advancements in the injection molding industry.
Keywords:
Injection molding, scientific molding, adaptive process control, external sensors, process optimization, quality control, manufacturing, plastic
molding, real-time monitoring, defect reduction.
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (ISSN: 2767-3758)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps
2
provide real-time feedback during the injection molding
process, allowing for continuous monitoring of the most
critical parameters. These sensors can detect even the
smallest fluctuations in conditions, such as temperature
variations,
pressure
changes,
and
material
flow
inconsistencies, and provide the data needed for timely
adjustments to the process. This real-time feedback loop
allows for immediate corrections, ensuring that the process
stays within optimal parameters and minimizing the
occurrence of defects.
The integration of external sensors and adaptive control is
especially
beneficial
in
high-speed
production
environments, where maintaining process stability can be
difficult due to fluctuations in machine performance, raw
material properties, or environmental factors. By enabling
dynamic, real-time adjustments, external sensors ensure
that the injection molding process operates at its most
efficient, reducing cycle times, minimizing waste, and
increasing throughput without compromising on part
quality.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of
external sensors when integrated with scientific molding
principles in injection molding processes. This research
focuses on how these sensors can provide real-time data
that allows for adaptive control, ensuring optimal
processing conditions throughout production. By exploring
the combination of scientific molding and adaptive process
control, this study seeks to highlight the potential for
improving
the
overall
efficiency,
precision,
and
sustainability of injection molding, with direct benefits for
manufacturers seeking to optimize production processes,
reduce defect rates, and improve product quality.
This study also explores the broader implications of
applying these techniques across various production
environments, particularly in industries that demand high-
precision parts, such as medical device manufacturing and
automotive components. Through this investigation, the
study contributes to the ongoing search for more
sustainable,
efficient,
and
reliable
methods
of
manufacturing in the injection molding industry, with an
emphasis on innovative technologies such as external
sensors and real-time adaptive controls.
Injection molding is one of the most widely used
manufacturing processes for producing plastic parts in a
variety of industries, including automotive, electronics,
consumer goods, and medical devices. It is highly favored
due to its ability to produce high volumes of parts with
consistent dimensions and surface finishes. However,
achieving high-quality products with minimal defects is a
constant challenge in injection molding.
The traditional approach to injection molding involves
setting fixed process parameters based on trial-and-error
methods or expert knowledge. However, this method does
not account for variations in material properties, machine
behavior, or environmental factors, all of which can lead to
product defects. Scientific molding, a methodology that
applies data-driven analysis and process optimization,
aims to address these issues by controlling and monitoring
critical process variables based on real-time feedback. The
integration of external sensors further enhances the
precision of the process by providing continuous data on
factors such as temperature, pressure, and flow rate, which
are vital to the injection molding process.
This study explores the role of external sensors in scientific
molding, focusing on their ability to monitor critical
process variables in real-time and adapt the process
dynamically. The use of sensors offers a promising
approach to achieving adaptive process control, where
adjustments to the process can be made instantaneously,
reducing defects and improving overall efficiency. By
investigating the integration of external sensors into the
injection molding process, this study aims to highlight the
potential benefits of this approach and its future
applications in industrial manufacturing.
METHODS
Study Design
The study was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting
using an industrial injection molding machine equipped
with external sensors. The experiment aimed to evaluate
the effectiveness of external sensors in monitoring and
controlling the injection molding process using scientific
molding principles. Several key process parameters were
monitored in real-time, including injection pressure, melt
temperature, mold temperature, and cycle time.
Injection Molding Process Setup
•
Injection Molding Machine: A state-of-the-art,
fully electric injection molding machine with adjustable
settings was used for the study.
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (ISSN: 2767-3758)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps
3
•
Materials: Standard thermoplastic materials such
as polypropylene (PP) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene
(ABS) were chosen to represent common injection-molded
plastics in the industry.
•
External Sensors: The system incorporated a
variety of sensors, including temperature sensors (infrared
and thermocouples), pressure sensors, and flow meters, all
connected to a central data acquisition system.
•
Scientific Molding Principles: Scientific molding
parameters, including the injection speed, packing
pressure, and cooling time, were adjusted based on sensor
feedback to optimize the process.
Experimental Procedure
1.
Sensor Calibration: The external sensors were
calibrated to ensure accurate readings of the critical
process parameters.
2.
Injection Molding Process Control: The injection
molding process was run with real-time data collection,
where the sensors continuously monitored temperature,
pressure, and flow rate.
3.
Data Analysis: The data collected from the sensors
were analyzed to identify correlations between process
parameters and part quality. Adjustments were made to the
process based on real-time sensor feedback to minimize
defects such as warpage, sink marks, and short shots.
4.
Adaptive Control Mechanism: The system was
designed to adapt process parameters in real-time based on
sensor feedback. If any deviation from the desired values
was detected, the system automatically adjusted the
machine settings to maintain optimal conditions.
Quality Evaluation
Part quality was assessed based on the following criteria:
•
Dimensional Accuracy: Measurement of part
dimensions before and after molding.
•
Surface Finish: Visual inspection of part surface
for defects such as discoloration, streaks, or sink marks.
•
Mechanical Properties: Tensile and impact testing
were conducted to assess the mechanical properties of the
molded parts.
•
Defects: The number of defects per batch was
recorded, including short shots, air traps, and warpage.
RESULTS
Effectiveness of External Sensors
The integration of external sensors in the injection molding
process significantly improved process control. Real-time
monitoring of temperature and pressure allowed for more
precise adjustments, resulting in fewer defects and better-
quality parts. In particular, the ability to monitor the melt
temperature and pressure during injection and packing
stages helped optimize the fill time and packing pressure,
leading to fewer short shots and voids in the molded parts.
The real-time data allowed for immediate corrective
actions in response to deviations from ideal conditions,
which reduced cycle times and minimized the occurrence
of defects. The sensor feedback also facilitated better
cooling control, which is crucial in preventing issues like
warpage and sink marks. Overall, parts produced using
sensor-based adaptive control exhibited better dimensional
accuracy, improved surface finish, and higher mechanical
strength.
Adaptive Control and Quality Improvement
The adaptive process control enabled by external sensors
led to significant improvements in product consistency.
For example, the automated adjustments in injection speed
and packing pressure resulted in reduced variation between
molded parts, even across different production batches.
The parts exhibited higher dimensional stability and
surface quality, with fewer visible defects.
Additionally, the adaptive control system minimized
downtime by automatically adjusting the process
parameters in response to changes in environmental
conditions, such as fluctuations in room temperature or
material moisture content. This resulted in a more stable
and efficient production process, reducing the need for
manual intervention and minimizing the potential for
human error.
Defect Reduction
The most noticeable improvement was the reduction in
defects such as warpage, short shots, and sink marks. With
real-time adjustments to temperature, pressure, and
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (ISSN: 2767-3758)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps
4
cooling, the number of defective parts was significantly
reduced, resulting in higher yield and reduced scrap rates.
The parts produced under adaptive control conditions met
the desired specifications more consistently, with minimal
variation from batch to batch.
DISCUSSION
The integration of external sensors in the injection molding
process, when combined with scientific molding principles
and adaptive process quality control, offers a revolutionary
approach to ensuring high-quality production while
minimizing defects and optimizing efficiency. The
following discussion delves deeper into the findings of this
study, the challenges encountered, and the potential
benefits of using external sensors for adaptive control in
the injection molding process. Several aspects, including
process stability, defect reduction, and scalability, are
examined, alongside real-world examples that demonstrate
the practical applications of these innovations.
Impact of External Sensors on Process Stability and
Consistency
One of the most significant contributions of external
sensors is their ability to continuously monitor critical
process parameters and provide real-time feedback. In
traditional injection molding processes, process parameters
such as injection pressure, melt temperature, and cooling
rate are typically set at the beginning of production and
remain constant throughout the cycle. However, as raw
material properties, mold conditions, and machine
behavior can fluctuate over time, this fixed setting
approach often leads to instability and variability in the
final part quality.
For instance, during the injection phase, slight fluctuations
in injection pressure or mold temperature can result in the
incomplete filling of the mold, leading to short shots or air
traps. By utilizing external sensors such as pressure sensors
and thermocouples, manufacturers can detect these
changes in real-time and adjust the process parameters on-
the-fly to maintain optimal conditions. In this study, when
the system identified a drop in injection pressure, it
immediately adjusted the injection speed, resulting in a
more consistent and complete fill. This real-time feedback
loop improved the overall stability of the process, ensuring
that each part produced met the desired specifications
without requiring manual intervention.
An example from the automotive industry illustrates the
effectiveness of external sensors in stabilizing the injection
molding process. In the production of automotive
components such as dashboard panels, even minor defects
can be costly due to the stringent quality standards in the
automotive sector. In this scenario, the integration of
external sensors to monitor mold temperature and pressure
resulted in more stable and consistent production cycles,
reducing defects such as warpage, which can occur when
there are fluctuations in mold temperature during cooling.
By adjusting the cooling time and mold temperature
dynamically, the system minimized warping and improved
the dimensional accuracy of the parts.
Defect Reduction through Adaptive Control
The key advantage of adaptive control using external
sensors is its ability to dynamically adjust the injection
molding process to minimize common defects such as
short shots, sink marks, warping, and flash. These defects
are often the result of a mismatch between the actual
process conditions and the pre-set parameters, which may
no longer be optimal due to changes in material properties,
ambient temperature, or machine behavior.
In this study, adaptive control using external sensors led to
significant reductions in common injection molding
defects. For example, sink marks, which occur when the
material cools unevenly, were minimized by using
temperature sensors to monitor the mold surface
temperature
and
adjusting
the
packing
pressure
accordingly. The sensors allowed for the detection of
insufficient packing pressure during the holding phase,
which is critical for filling any remaining voids in the part
and preventing sink marks. By adjusting the packing
pressure in real-time, the study demonstrated a reduction
in the occurrence of sink marks, resulting in a smoother
surface finish and higher-quality parts.
An example from the consumer electronics industry further
highlights the benefits of adaptive control. When molding
intricate plastic parts for smartphones, even minor defects
can result in the rejection of an entire production batch. In
this case, integrating pressure sensors to monitor cavity
pressure during injection and holding phases helped detect
any potential underfilling or air entrapment. Real-time
pressure data allowed for immediate corrective actions,
such as adjusting the injection speed or holding pressure,
to ensure the mold was completely filled and void-free,
reducing the likelihood of defects such as short shots and
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (ISSN: 2767-3758)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps
5
air traps.
Efficiency Gains and Reduction of Cycle Times
Another critical benefit of integrating external sensors with
adaptive process control is the potential for reducing cycle
times, which directly contributes to cost savings and
increased throughput. Traditional injection molding
processes often involve significant downtime for machine
setup and troubleshooting, particularly when defects or
inconsistencies arise. These challenges are exacerbated
when machine performance is not continuously monitored
and adjusted, leading to unnecessary delays in production.
With the implementation of external sensors, the system
can continuously monitor the key parameters of the
molding process, such as melt temperature, mold
temperature, and injection pressure. As soon as any
deviation from the optimal conditions is detected, the
system can automatically adjust the process parameters,
eliminating the need for manual intervention. This real-
time
adaptive
control
reduces
the
time
spent
troubleshooting issues, such as adjusting pressure settings
or recalibrating machines, and minimizes production
stoppages due to defects.
A specific example can be found in the medical device
manufacturing sector, where high precision is paramount,
and cycle time reductions are vital for maintaining cost-
effectiveness. In the production of medical components
like syringes or IV parts, even small process variations can
lead to large defects, which may result in costly rework or
scrapping. By incorporating external sensors to monitor
mold and melt temperatures, real-time adjustments were
made to cooling times, resulting in a more uniform cooling
process and faster cycle times. This not only increased
throughput but also reduced the need for manual
interventions, ultimately improving the overall efficiency
of the production process.
Scalability and Integration Challenges
While the benefits of external sensors and adaptive process
control are clear, there are challenges related to the
scalability and integration of these technologies into
existing
injection
molding
systems.
For
smaller
manufacturers or those with limited resources, the initial
investment in sensors, data acquisition systems, and
process control systems may pose a barrier to adoption.
Additionally, retrofitting older machines with external
sensors
can
be
complex,
requiring
significant
modifications to integrate the sensors with existing
equipment and control systems.
An example of this challenge can be seen in smaller
molders who struggle to adopt these technologies due to
financial constraints. In one instance, a small manufacturer
of consumer goods was unable to invest in an adaptive
control system with external sensors, despite recognizing
the potential benefits. The lack of a structured plan for
integration, along with concerns over the high cost of the
system, delayed their adoption of these technologies. This
highlights the need for cost-effective, scalable solutions
that can be implemented in both small and large-scale
production environments.
Future Directions and Research
While the current study has shown promising results,
further research is needed to explore the full potential of
external sensors in the injection molding process. Future
studies should focus on the development of more
affordable and versatile sensor systems, as well as the
integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine
learning to enhance the predictive capabilities of adaptive
process control. AI-powered systems could analyze sensor
data in real-time, predict potential defects before they
occur, and make proactive adjustments to prevent issues,
thus taking process optimization to the next level.
Moreover, expanding research to explore the effectiveness
of these systems in a broader range of materials and
complex mold designs would be valuable. For example, the
application of adaptive control in the injection molding of
bioplastics or high-performance thermoplastics, which
have different processing requirements compared to
traditional materials, could further expand the utility of this
technology.
The integration of external sensors in conjunction with
scientific molding and adaptive process control has
demonstrated clear advantages in enhancing the quality,
stability, and efficiency of the injection molding process.
Real-time feedback and adjustments based on sensor data
help maintain optimal processing conditions, reduce
defects, minimize cycle times, and increase throughput.
However, challenges related to cost and system integration
must be addressed to make these technologies more
accessible,
especially
for
smaller
manufacturers.
Continued innovation in sensor technology, along with
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (ISSN: 2767-3758)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps
6
advancements in data analytics, will likely drive the future
adoption and refinement of these systems, ensuring a more
efficient, sustainable, and defect-free injection molding
process across various industries.
The findings of this study demonstrate that the
combination of scientific molding principles and adaptive
process quality control with external sensors offers
significant advantages for the injection molding process.
Real-time sensor feedback allows for more precise control
of critical process parameters, leading to improved part
quality, fewer defects, and increased efficiency. This
approach addresses some of the key challenges in
traditional injection molding, such as variability in process
conditions, and provides a solution that can be adapted for
different materials and product designs.
One of the most important contributions of external sensors
is their ability to monitor dynamic changes in the process
in real-time, enabling automatic corrections to be made
without interrupting the production cycle. This capability
not only improves product quality but also reduces the need
for manual interventions and trial-and-error methods that
are time-consuming and costly. Furthermore, the
integration
of
adaptive
process
control
allows
manufacturers to optimize their injection molding
processes based on data-driven insights, leading to long-
term improvements in productivity and sustainability.
Despite these promising results, further research is needed
to explore the full potential of external sensors in injection
molding. Specifically, the scalability of this approach for
large-scale production runs and its applicability to a wider
range of materials and product geometries should be
further investigated. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of
implementing external sensor systems in existing injection
molding machines needs to be assessed to ensure that these
technologies are accessible to manufacturers of all sizes.
CONCLUSION
The integration of external sensors into the injection
molding process, combined with the principles of scientific
molding and adaptive process control, has shown
significant potential in improving product quality and
reducing
defects.
The
real-time
monitoring
and
adjustments enabled by these sensors lead to more
consistent, high-quality molded parts with fewer defects
and higher overall efficiency. As manufacturing industries
continue to strive for greater automation and process
optimization, the combination of scientific molding and
adaptive control with external sensors presents a promising
solution to meet these demands. Further advancements in
sensor technology and data analytics will likely enhance
the capabilities of this approach, offering even greater
benefits in terms of product quality, sustainability, and
process efficiency.
REFERENCES
Gao, R.X.; Tang, X.; Gordon, G.; Kazmer, D.O. Online
product
quality
monitoring
through
in-process
measurement. CIRP Ann. 2014, 63, 493–496. [Google
Scholar] [CrossRef]
Su, C.W.; Su, W.J.; Cheng, F.J.; Liou, G.Y.; Hwang, S.J.;
Peng, H.S.; Chu, H.Y. Optimization process parameters
and adaptive quality monitoring injection molding process
for materials with different viscosity. Polym. Test. 2022,
109, 107526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tsou, H.H.; Huang, C.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Shih, S.Y. Online
detection of residual stress near the gate using cavity
pressure for injection molding. J. Polym. Eng. 2023, 43,
89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ke, K.C.; Huang, M.S. Quality prediction for injection
molding by using a multilayer perceptron neural network.
Polymers 2020, 12, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Su, W.J.; Peng, H.S. A real-time clamping force
measurement eigenvalue for prediction, adjustment, and
control of injection product quality. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2020,
61, 420–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chang, Y.H.; Chen, S.C.; Ting, Y.H.; Feng, C.T.; Hsu,
C.C. The Investigation of Novel Dynamic Packing
Technology for Injection Molded Part Quality Control and
Its Production Stability by Using Real-Time PVT Control
Method. Polymers 2022, 14, 2720. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chen, J.Y.; Wong, L.C.; Huang, M.S. Quality monitoring
and control for plasticization of acrylonitrile-butadiene-
styrene regrind polymer in injection molding. Polym. Eng.
Sci. 2024, 64, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chen, J.Y.; Yang, K.J.; Huang, M.S. Online quality
monitoring of molten resin in injection molding. Int. J.
Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 122, 681–693. [Google Scholar]
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (ISSN: 2767-3758)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps
7
[CrossRef]
Liou, G.Y.; Su, W.J.; Cheng, F.J.; Chang, C.H.; Tseng,
R.H.; Hwang, S.J.; Peng, H.S.; Chu, H.Y. Optimize
Injection-Molding Process Parameters and Build an
Adaptive Process Control System Based on Nozzle
Pressure Profile and Clamping Force. Polymers 2023, 15,
610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
