➤

Posstbitities of minilaparotamy choleclntectomy in patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis wift increased surgical risk

Abstract

In modern abdominal surgery, one of the current areas for research continues to be the improvement of various options for plastic surgery of postoperative hernias. More than 2,100,000 operations for ventral hernia are performed annually in the world, and 42% of them are postoperative hernias. In recent years, there has been a clear trend toward the expanded use of various types of biological meshes in hernioplasty. “A pooled analysis of seven PCSTAR studies for incisional hernias using retromuscular mesh showed a hernia recurrence rate of 5.7%”[1]. The use of standard surgical interventions such as alloplasty in the onlay position does not solve the problem of early postoperative complications: seroma discharge, mesh migration, adhesive disease, high frequency of hernia recurrence, etc. At the same time, hernia repair with local tissue creates the problem of increased intra-abdominal pressure and late complications in the form of recurrent hernias. “An increase in postoperative intra-abdominal pressure leads to multiple organ failure, then abdominal compartment syndrome, and even death.” [2]. Currently, there is no consensus on the surgical approach for giant postoperative abdominal wall hernias, and therefore the need to continue to develop new technologies and improve There is no doubt about the tactics. In world practice, at present, the most relevant studies continue to be studies aimed at studying the morphological and functional aspects of recurrent postoperative ventral hernias; electron microscopy reveals ultrastructural destructive changes in skin cells, aponeurosis and muscles, which indicates morphofunctional insufficiency of abdominal wall tissues; issues of cell engineering are discussed new innovative materials, experimental studies are being carried out on animals testing the biotechnical properties, texture and elasticity of new polymers, research is being conducted on open approaches with division of the posterior component with the release of the transverse abdominis muscle and a retrograde mesh, robotic operations have begun. Modern aspects of the development of domestic healthcare include many measures aimed at improving the results of treatment of patients with postoperative ventral hernias and associated pathological conditions through the introduction of modern principles of intensive care and surgical tactics. The development strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026 in seven priority areas includes tasks to improve the quality of provision of qualified medical services to the population[3]. The implementation of these tasks, including by optimizing tactical and technical approaches to the choice of hernioplasty method, as well as the development of methods for the prevention of purulent-inflammatory complications in the field of alloplastic material, is one of the current areas of abdominal surgery and medicine in general, due to the high medical and social the significance of this pathology.

This dissertation research to a certain extent serves to fulfill the tasks approved by the Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On comprehensive measures to radically improve the healthcare system of the Republic of Uzbekistan” No. UP-5590 dated December 17, 2018, the Resolutions of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On measures to transform the surgical service, improving the quality and expanding the scale of surgical operations in the regions" for No. PP-5254 dated October 4, 2021 and "On additional measures to ensure public health by further increasing the efficiency of medical prevention work" for No. PP-4891 dated November 12, 2020, and as well as other regulatory documents adopted in this area. Compliance of the research with the priority directions of development of science and technology of the republic. The dissertation research was carried out in accordance with the priority direction of development of science and technology of the VI Republic “Medicine and Pharmacology”. Review of foreign scientific research on the topic of the dissertation.[4] Research work aimed at improving the quality of therapeutic and preventive care for patients with ventral hernias, carried out by many leading scientific centers and higher educational institutions in the world, including the Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå (Sweden), Department of Surgery, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston (Sweden). nada), Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki ( Finland), Service de chirurgie digestive et oncologique, CHU d'Amiens (France), Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Tulsa (USA), Department of Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington (USA) , Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (Singapore), Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Calgary, Calgary (Canada), Division of Plastic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia (USA), Brigham and Women's/Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (USA) , Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala (Sweden), Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston (USA), Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam (Netherlands), Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka (Japan), National Medical Research Center for Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky" (Russia), Republican Scientific Center for Emergency Medical Care (Uzbekistan), Tashkent Medical Academy (Uzbekistan), Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Surgery named after Academician V. Vakhidov (Uzbekistan).

As a result of studies conducted around the world to increase the effectiveness of alloplasty for postoperative ventral hernias and reduce the risk of complications in the postoperative period, a number of scientific results were obtained, including: it was determined that patients who underwent reconstruction of the abdominal wall have an increased risk of postoperative respiratory failure, understanding the epidemiology of this complication can improve prevention (the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, USA); It has been proven that the larger the hernia, the higher the risk of early surgical complications, including such as respiratory decompensation, since hernias often increase in size over time, delaying surgery can lead to an increase in the size of the hernia and, therefore, a greater risk of complications (CentreforDigestiveDiseases, KarolinskaUniversityHospital, Stockholm, Sweden); it has been shown that the ratio of the hernia volume to the volume of the abdominal cavity <20% is an independent factor in tension-free closure, which justifies the interest in preoperative volumetry to adapt the tactics of surgical care (Servicedechirurgiegénérale, digestiveetendocrinienne, CHU LyonSud, HospicescivilsdeLyon, France); It has been determined that in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic hernia repair, predictors of mortality are older age and certain concomitant diseases: congestive heart failure, pulmonary circulatory disorders, coagulopathy, liver disease, metastatic cancer, neurological disorders and paralysis (Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa , USA); Older age, ascites, preoperative renal and pulmonary insufficiency have been found to be independent predictors of 30-day mortality, and in the presence of these risk factors, conservative treatment should be seriously considered (Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, USA); The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Universal Surgical Risk Calculator has been shown to accurately predict thirty-day outcomes, including major complications: venous thromboembolism, medical morbidity, surgical site infection, unplanned reoperation, mortality, and length of hospital stay (Department of Plastic Surgery, Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA). At the present time in the world, the most relevant research in surgery continues to be the development of new methods of hernioplasty for large and giant ventral hernias, each of which has its own pros and cons depending on the complexity of implementation, the risk of postoperative complications and relapse, large randomized clinical trials are being conducted, comparing existing methods of traditional hernioplasty with laparoscopic access and robotic surgery, which has become increasingly widespread in the last 10 years, a search is being made for new synthetic and biological materials developed for the production and use of composite meshes that have the necessary strength and the ability to prevent fatal local complications in a contaminated environment. However, despite technical advances in this field, no modern hernia repair method or prosthesis meets all the requirements. One of the key problems is that existing synthetic endoprostheses do not have sufficient elasticity, resistance to infection, high mechanical strength and integrity over a long period of time. Further research into these clinical aspects will undoubtedly improve the current understanding of the capabilities of biocompatible endoprostheses and will make it possible to develop an optimal method for their placement during allohernioplasty. The degree of knowledge of the problem. The current period of development of abdominal surgery is characterized by an emphasis on the problems of the effectiveness of introducing new installation methods and techniques for attaching bioprostheses, options for various suture materials to determine the most promising directions for the development of these technologies [5]. Researchers led by BittnerR.[6] (2019) state that a giant postoperative abdominal wall hernia, the maximum diameter of which exceeds 12 cm or the ratio of the volume of the hernial sac to the abdominal cavity more than 20%, is difficult to treat, with a high recurrence rate and a large number of complications. One of the most challenging problems is that after the hernia contents return to the abdominal cavity, postoperative intra-abdominal pressure will increase, leading to multiple organ failure, then abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), and even death. There is currently no agreement on the surgical approach for these giant incisional abdominal wall hernias. To prevent recurrences, some articles recommend placing the hernia mesh in the sublayer position and or linings (KirkpatrickAW.)[7]. According to CornetteB.[8], to prevent recurrence, it is recommended to place the hernia mesh in a sublayer or underlay position, and to achieve better mesh expansion, a component separation technique (CST) may be a suitable solution, but with a significant risk of complications and recurrence. JensenKK, et al. believe that truly successful giant hernia repair requires effective bridging or augmentation that will prevent recurrence with an acceptable risk of complications[9]. Another pressing issue in abdominal surgery is that patients with incisional hernias are extremely difficult to treat due to a number of factors including obesity, previous hernia repair, previous mesh placement, domain loss, and other variables.

The approach to patients with incisional hernias has changed significantly over the past 20 years due to both advances in mesh technology and surgical approaches. Key factors for successful outcome include modification of risk factors preoperatively, such as smoking cessation and weight loss, selection of mesh appropriate for the type of hernia and planned mesh location, and wide mesh coverage beyond the hernia defect. New techniques such as transabdominal muscle release and component separation with retrograde mesh placement and robotic approaches to abdominal wall hernia are increasingly being used in these patients[10]. Recent years have seen an increase in the number of biological meshes available for abdominal wall hernia repair. Biological meshes typically consist of materials obtained from humans, pigs, or cattle. The rationale for using biological meshes is that they can act as a scaffold for the growth of natural tissues. In addition, there are absorbable synthetic meshes that have properties similar to those of biological meshes, but with theoretically less risk because they are not derived from animal or human material. The choice of mesh for a ventral hernia depends on many factors, which include both the properties of the mesh and its location, for example, whether it should be placed intraperitoneally, preperitoneally, or retrorectus. BaierKF[11](2021) believes that the guiding principle should be to avoid placing uncoated polypropylene mesh in an intraperitoneal location where it may be in direct contact with internal organs. In addition, the type of hernia defect is another risk factor, such as whether the wound is clean or dirty, and whether the repair is performed with a bridge or abutment. Lightweight or biologic meshes to bridge the defect should be avoided due to increased recurrence rates. Holihan JL [12] (2016), Hodgkinson JD [13] (2018) believe that the principle of anatomical restoration to achieve a reliable, tension-free repair with reinforced mesh reduces the incidence of early postoperative complications and late recurrence of hernia compared with bridging mesh. The analysis of the literature concerning the theoretical aspects and clinical experience of using technologies for improving modern synthetic and biological prostheses that can provide a better plastic effect, as well as methods for preventing recurrence of ventral hernias, indicates that this is one of the priority areas in modern abdominal surgery. An unresolved issue remains the choice of the optimal endoprosthesis, which is highly effective and meets international standards for such properties as biological inertness and mechanical strength, as well as the method of positioning the mesh in relation to the layers of the abdominal wall. Considering that many of the allohernioplasty methods used today are not without drawbacks, the current direction is the development of new methods of repair for giant ventral hernias and methods for the prevention of postoperative complications in conditions of a contaminated wound, with justification of their effectiveness in a clinical experimental study. The connection between the dissertation research and the research plans of the research institution where the dissertation was completed. The dissertation research was carried out within the framework of the research work plan of the State Institution “RSNPMCH named after. acad. V. Vakhidov" under the project AL-422105574 "Development of new biocompatible mesh implants made of composite materials for reconstructive surgery of abdominal and diaphragmatic hernias" (2022-2024).

The purpose of the study is to improve the results of surgical treatment of large and giant postoperative ventral hernias by introducing new laser technologies and improving the tactical and technical aspects of surgical treatment. Objectives of the study: to study the structure of immediate complications after various types of prosthetic plastic surgery; to clarify the influence of obesity factors, primary or repeat hernioplasty on the incidence of immediate and long-term complications; to evaluate the role of the immediate complicated course of the postoperative period in the incidence of long-term complications of hernioplasty; to improve the technical aspects of alloplasty for large and giant postoperative ventral hernias (POVH); to improve the technique of photodynamic therapy (PDT) of the wound surface after prosthetic plastic surgery; to study in an experiment the effectiveness of using the proposed technique of alloplasty and PDT; evaluate the morphological features of the condition of tissues during prosthetic plastic surgery using the proposed method; in a comparative aspect, evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the proposed alloplasty options in the immediate and long-term periods. The object of the study was the results of allohernioplasty in 448 patients with extensive (large) and giant POVH, who were operated on at the surgical department of the 1st clinic of the Samarkand State Medical Institute in the period from 2012 to 2021, as well as experimental animals on which the effectiveness was assessed developed a technique for prosthetic repair of postoperative ventral hernias and applied the technique of photodynamic therapy.

The subject of the study is to analyze the effectiveness of the developed alloplasty of postoperative ventral hernias and intraoperative photodynamic therapy in abdominal surgery in experiments and in the clinic. Research methods. To achieve the goal of the study and solve the assigned problems, general clinical, instrumental, biotechnological, experimental, histomorphological, microbiological and statistical research methods were used. The scientific novelty of the study is as follows: it was established that the need for extensive tissue mobilization and, as a consequence, the intersection of lymphatic capillaries during implantation of the prosthesis in the onlay position, as well as the lack of sufficient resorption function of the hernial sac in the inlay position causes a high risk of the formation of clinically significant seromas; It was determined that with prosthetic hernioplasty, along with the volume of the defect, the type of plastic surgery and the degree of obesity, the most significant predictor of the risk of developing immediate complications is the factor of re-intervention in case of recurrent hernia with the presence of a “dormant infection” hidden in the remaining ligature granulomas or scar tissue; the structure and clinical features of the course of long-term complications of hernioplasty for giant and extensive hernias were clarified, taking into account the results of the immediate postoperative period, as well as the option of fixing the prosthesis, primary or repeated hernioplasty and the degree of obesity; the method of surgery for large hernias of the anterior abdominal wall has been improved, characterized by a combination of factors such as the formation of tension-free prosthetic repair, preservation of local resorptive function to prevent the development of fluid accumulations and reducing the risk of infection; the method of preventing the development or progression of wound infection during alloplasty of ventral hernias has been improved, aimed at enhancing the antibacterial effect and stimulating reparative activity through the photosensitizing and photodynamic effect of low-energy laser radiation; It was determined in an experimental model of prosthetic plastic surgery that the proposed method of fixing the prosthesis in combination with the use of the effect of photodynamic therapy through laser radiation helps to enhance reparative processes with a reduced risk of wound complications; It has been proven that all methods of antiseptic exposure and laser stimulation of the wound surface after prosthetic plastic surgery enhance preventive measures against the development of local infection, but are ineffective in the case of an already developed purulent-inflammatory process against the background of the use of alloplastic material. The practical results of the study are as follows: it has been determined that the implantation of synthetic materials for giant and extensive hernias is accompanied by a significant number of wound complications caused by both the surgical technique itself and the reaction of surrounding tissues to a foreign body, requiring improvement of tactical and technical approaches when performing hernioplasty; it was clarified that scar-degenerative changes in the tissues of the aponeurosis in giant and extensive hernias are a predisposing factor to the occurrence of post-prosthetic hernias, especially when implanting the prosthesis in the “inlay” position and, accordingly, require increasing the efficiency of their fixation and engraftment, as well as reducing the risk of developing local complications; it was determined based on the data of an experimental study that the proposed method of alloplasty for large ventral hernias makes it possible to achieve adequate reconstruction of the anterior abdominal wall, reduce the incidence of infection in the wound, and also use a smaller size of prosthetic material; it was determined that the proposed method of tension-free repair of large hernias of the anterior abdominal wall with strengthening of the aponeurosis with a mesh implant allows maintaining physiology, reducing the number of complications, shortening treatment time and reducing the risk of hernia recurrence; It has been determined that the proposed method for preventing the development or progression of wound infection during alloplasty of ventral hernias can reduce the frequency of suppuration, shorten the treatment time and the likelihood of relapse; It has been proven that the use of the proposed tactical and technical aspects of prosthetic repair for postoperative ventral hernias can reduce the incidence of specific complications, reduce rehabilitation time and the risk of hernia recurrence. Reliability of the research results. The reliability of the results is justified by the use of objective criteria for assessing the condition of patients, modern methods of diagnosis and treatment, the correct application of methodological approaches and sets of statistical analysis, methods for solving the problems discussed in the dissertation are based on modern scientific and practical concepts and approaches to the diagnosis and surgical treatment of patients with giant postoperative hernias. Scientific and practical significance of the research results. The results obtained make a significant contribution to the expansion of irradiation of existing ideas about the structure and clinical features of complications of hernioplasty for giant and extensive ventral hernias by identifying the morphological features of the development of a purulent-inflammatory process against the background of the use of alloplastic material, studying predictors of the risk of developing immediate complications, mechanisms for enhancing reparative processes through the use of an improved method of fixing the prosthesis in together using the effect of photodynamic therapy through laser radiation, which made it possible to enhance the antibacterial effect and improve the wound healing process. The practical significance of the study is that, based on the results obtained, the tactical and technical aspects of prosthetic hernioplasty have been optimized, the features of methods of antiseptic exposure and laser stimulation of the wound surface after prosthetic repair have been revealed, enhancing preventive measures for the development of local infection, and the method of surgery for large anterior abdominal hernias has been improved walls, characterized by a combination of factors such as the formation of tension-free prosthetic plasty, preservation of local resorptive function to prevent the development of fluid accumulations, thereby reducing the risk of developing postoperative complications, reducing the frequency of unsatisfactory results, length of hospitalization and the likelihood of relapse. Implementation of research results. According to the results of a scientific study to optimize the tactical and technical aspects of surgical treatment of large and giant postoperative ventral hernias: the “method for plastic surgery of giant hernias of the anterior abdominal wall” has been improved (invention patent No. IAP 2022 0148 dated April 18, 2022). The proposed method of tension-free repair of large hernias of the anterior abdominal wall with strengthening of the aponeurosis with a mesh implant made it possible to reduce the number of complications, shorten the treatment time and reduce the risk of hernia recurrence; the “method for preventing the progression of infection during alloplasty of infected hernias” has been improved (certificate of the Ministry of Health No. 08-32071 dated October 17, 2022). The proposed method made it possible to reduce the frequency of wound purulent-inflammatory complications and shorten the period of rehabilitation of patients after allohernioplasty; methodological recommendations “Tactical and technical aspects of prosthetic repair for large and giant postoperative ventral hernias” have been developed (certificate of the Ministry of Health No. 08-32071 dated October 17, 2022) . The developed recommendations made it possible to optimize the tactical and technical aspects of allohernioplasty in patients with large and giant postoperative ventral hernias; The scientific results obtained were introduced into the practical activities of healthcare, in particular, in the departments of surgery of the Khorezm and Andijan regional multidisciplinary medical centers, the clinic of the Samarkand State Medical University (certificate of the Ministry of Health No. 08-32071 dated October 17, 2022). Improving the tactical and technical aspects of prosthetic repair for postoperative ventral hernias has made it possible to reduce the incidence of specific immediate complications from 40.9% to 15.6%, to reduce rehabilitation time from 8.6±2.7 to 7.1±1.5 days, and also reduce the likelihood of long-term complications from 11.7% to 3.1%. Approbation of research results. The results of this study were discussed at 8 scientific and practical conferences, including 5 international and 3 republican ones. Publication of research results. 26 scientific works have been published on the topic of the dissertation, including 9 journal articles, 4 of which in republican and 5 in foreign journals recommended by the Higher Attestation Commission of the Republic of Uzbekistan for publication of the main scientific results of doctoral dissertations. Structure and scope of the dissertation. The dissertation consists of an introduction, seven chapters, a conclusion, conclusions, practical recommendations and a list of cited literature. The volume of work is 200 pages.

Source type: Dissertations
Years of coverage from 2000
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Catalog of dissertations and abstracts
Issue:
Branch of knowledge
CC BY f
3-237
99

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Login

Payment is required for access to scientific work - 80 000 UZS
To make a payment, log in with your username.

Khuzhabaev С. (2023). Posstbitities of minilaparotamy choleclntectomy in patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis wift increased surgical risk. Catalog of Dissertations and Abstracts, 1(1), 3–237. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/dissertations/article/view/24840
1
Citations
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus
Google
Google

Keywords:

abdominal hernia / abdominal surgery / ventral hernia / PCSTAR

Abstract

In modern abdominal surgery, one of the current areas for research continues to be the improvement of various options for plastic surgery of postoperative hernias. More than 2,100,000 operations for ventral hernia are performed annually in the world, and 42% of them are postoperative hernias. In recent years, there has been a clear trend toward the expanded use of various types of biological meshes in hernioplasty. “A pooled analysis of seven PCSTAR studies for incisional hernias using retromuscular mesh showed a hernia recurrence rate of 5.7%”[1]. The use of standard surgical interventions such as alloplasty in the onlay position does not solve the problem of early postoperative complications: seroma discharge, mesh migration, adhesive disease, high frequency of hernia recurrence, etc. At the same time, hernia repair with local tissue creates the problem of increased intra-abdominal pressure and late complications in the form of recurrent hernias. “An increase in postoperative intra-abdominal pressure leads to multiple organ failure, then abdominal compartment syndrome, and even death.” [2]. Currently, there is no consensus on the surgical approach for giant postoperative abdominal wall hernias, and therefore the need to continue to develop new technologies and improve There is no doubt about the tactics. In world practice, at present, the most relevant studies continue to be studies aimed at studying the morphological and functional aspects of recurrent postoperative ventral hernias; electron microscopy reveals ultrastructural destructive changes in skin cells, aponeurosis and muscles, which indicates morphofunctional insufficiency of abdominal wall tissues; issues of cell engineering are discussed new innovative materials, experimental studies are being carried out on animals testing the biotechnical properties, texture and elasticity of new polymers, research is being conducted on open approaches with division of the posterior component with the release of the transverse abdominis muscle and a retrograde mesh, robotic operations have begun. Modern aspects of the development of domestic healthcare include many measures aimed at improving the results of treatment of patients with postoperative ventral hernias and associated pathological conditions through the introduction of modern principles of intensive care and surgical tactics. The development strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026 in seven priority areas includes tasks to improve the quality of provision of qualified medical services to the population[3]. The implementation of these tasks, including by optimizing tactical and technical approaches to the choice of hernioplasty method, as well as the development of methods for the prevention of purulent-inflammatory complications in the field of alloplastic material, is one of the current areas of abdominal surgery and medicine in general, due to the high medical and social the significance of this pathology.

This dissertation research to a certain extent serves to fulfill the tasks approved by the Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On comprehensive measures to radically improve the healthcare system of the Republic of Uzbekistan” No. UP-5590 dated December 17, 2018, the Resolutions of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On measures to transform the surgical service, improving the quality and expanding the scale of surgical operations in the regions" for No. PP-5254 dated October 4, 2021 and "On additional measures to ensure public health by further increasing the efficiency of medical prevention work" for No. PP-4891 dated November 12, 2020, and as well as other regulatory documents adopted in this area. Compliance of the research with the priority directions of development of science and technology of the republic. The dissertation research was carried out in accordance with the priority direction of development of science and technology of the VI Republic “Medicine and Pharmacology”. Review of foreign scientific research on the topic of the dissertation.[4] Research work aimed at improving the quality of therapeutic and preventive care for patients with ventral hernias, carried out by many leading scientific centers and higher educational institutions in the world, including the Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå (Sweden), Department of Surgery, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston (Sweden). nada), Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki ( Finland), Service de chirurgie digestive et oncologique, CHU d'Amiens (France), Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Tulsa (USA), Department of Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington (USA) , Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (Singapore), Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Calgary, Calgary (Canada), Division of Plastic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia (USA), Brigham and Women's/Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (USA) , Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala (Sweden), Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston (USA), Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam (Netherlands), Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka (Japan), National Medical Research Center for Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky" (Russia), Republican Scientific Center for Emergency Medical Care (Uzbekistan), Tashkent Medical Academy (Uzbekistan), Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Surgery named after Academician V. Vakhidov (Uzbekistan).

As a result of studies conducted around the world to increase the effectiveness of alloplasty for postoperative ventral hernias and reduce the risk of complications in the postoperative period, a number of scientific results were obtained, including: it was determined that patients who underwent reconstruction of the abdominal wall have an increased risk of postoperative respiratory failure, understanding the epidemiology of this complication can improve prevention (the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, USA); It has been proven that the larger the hernia, the higher the risk of early surgical complications, including such as respiratory decompensation, since hernias often increase in size over time, delaying surgery can lead to an increase in the size of the hernia and, therefore, a greater risk of complications (CentreforDigestiveDiseases, KarolinskaUniversityHospital, Stockholm, Sweden); it has been shown that the ratio of the hernia volume to the volume of the abdominal cavity <20% is an independent factor in tension-free closure, which justifies the interest in preoperative volumetry to adapt the tactics of surgical care (Servicedechirurgiegénérale, digestiveetendocrinienne, CHU LyonSud, HospicescivilsdeLyon, France); It has been determined that in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic hernia repair, predictors of mortality are older age and certain concomitant diseases: congestive heart failure, pulmonary circulatory disorders, coagulopathy, liver disease, metastatic cancer, neurological disorders and paralysis (Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa , USA); Older age, ascites, preoperative renal and pulmonary insufficiency have been found to be independent predictors of 30-day mortality, and in the presence of these risk factors, conservative treatment should be seriously considered (Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, USA); The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Universal Surgical Risk Calculator has been shown to accurately predict thirty-day outcomes, including major complications: venous thromboembolism, medical morbidity, surgical site infection, unplanned reoperation, mortality, and length of hospital stay (Department of Plastic Surgery, Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA). At the present time in the world, the most relevant research in surgery continues to be the development of new methods of hernioplasty for large and giant ventral hernias, each of which has its own pros and cons depending on the complexity of implementation, the risk of postoperative complications and relapse, large randomized clinical trials are being conducted, comparing existing methods of traditional hernioplasty with laparoscopic access and robotic surgery, which has become increasingly widespread in the last 10 years, a search is being made for new synthetic and biological materials developed for the production and use of composite meshes that have the necessary strength and the ability to prevent fatal local complications in a contaminated environment. However, despite technical advances in this field, no modern hernia repair method or prosthesis meets all the requirements. One of the key problems is that existing synthetic endoprostheses do not have sufficient elasticity, resistance to infection, high mechanical strength and integrity over a long period of time. Further research into these clinical aspects will undoubtedly improve the current understanding of the capabilities of biocompatible endoprostheses and will make it possible to develop an optimal method for their placement during allohernioplasty. The degree of knowledge of the problem. The current period of development of abdominal surgery is characterized by an emphasis on the problems of the effectiveness of introducing new installation methods and techniques for attaching bioprostheses, options for various suture materials to determine the most promising directions for the development of these technologies [5]. Researchers led by BittnerR.[6] (2019) state that a giant postoperative abdominal wall hernia, the maximum diameter of which exceeds 12 cm or the ratio of the volume of the hernial sac to the abdominal cavity more than 20%, is difficult to treat, with a high recurrence rate and a large number of complications. One of the most challenging problems is that after the hernia contents return to the abdominal cavity, postoperative intra-abdominal pressure will increase, leading to multiple organ failure, then abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), and even death. There is currently no agreement on the surgical approach for these giant incisional abdominal wall hernias. To prevent recurrences, some articles recommend placing the hernia mesh in the sublayer position and or linings (KirkpatrickAW.)[7]. According to CornetteB.[8], to prevent recurrence, it is recommended to place the hernia mesh in a sublayer or underlay position, and to achieve better mesh expansion, a component separation technique (CST) may be a suitable solution, but with a significant risk of complications and recurrence. JensenKK, et al. believe that truly successful giant hernia repair requires effective bridging or augmentation that will prevent recurrence with an acceptable risk of complications[9]. Another pressing issue in abdominal surgery is that patients with incisional hernias are extremely difficult to treat due to a number of factors including obesity, previous hernia repair, previous mesh placement, domain loss, and other variables.

The approach to patients with incisional hernias has changed significantly over the past 20 years due to both advances in mesh technology and surgical approaches. Key factors for successful outcome include modification of risk factors preoperatively, such as smoking cessation and weight loss, selection of mesh appropriate for the type of hernia and planned mesh location, and wide mesh coverage beyond the hernia defect. New techniques such as transabdominal muscle release and component separation with retrograde mesh placement and robotic approaches to abdominal wall hernia are increasingly being used in these patients[10]. Recent years have seen an increase in the number of biological meshes available for abdominal wall hernia repair. Biological meshes typically consist of materials obtained from humans, pigs, or cattle. The rationale for using biological meshes is that they can act as a scaffold for the growth of natural tissues. In addition, there are absorbable synthetic meshes that have properties similar to those of biological meshes, but with theoretically less risk because they are not derived from animal or human material. The choice of mesh for a ventral hernia depends on many factors, which include both the properties of the mesh and its location, for example, whether it should be placed intraperitoneally, preperitoneally, or retrorectus. BaierKF[11](2021) believes that the guiding principle should be to avoid placing uncoated polypropylene mesh in an intraperitoneal location where it may be in direct contact with internal organs. In addition, the type of hernia defect is another risk factor, such as whether the wound is clean or dirty, and whether the repair is performed with a bridge or abutment. Lightweight or biologic meshes to bridge the defect should be avoided due to increased recurrence rates. Holihan JL [12] (2016), Hodgkinson JD [13] (2018) believe that the principle of anatomical restoration to achieve a reliable, tension-free repair with reinforced mesh reduces the incidence of early postoperative complications and late recurrence of hernia compared with bridging mesh. The analysis of the literature concerning the theoretical aspects and clinical experience of using technologies for improving modern synthetic and biological prostheses that can provide a better plastic effect, as well as methods for preventing recurrence of ventral hernias, indicates that this is one of the priority areas in modern abdominal surgery. An unresolved issue remains the choice of the optimal endoprosthesis, which is highly effective and meets international standards for such properties as biological inertness and mechanical strength, as well as the method of positioning the mesh in relation to the layers of the abdominal wall. Considering that many of the allohernioplasty methods used today are not without drawbacks, the current direction is the development of new methods of repair for giant ventral hernias and methods for the prevention of postoperative complications in conditions of a contaminated wound, with justification of their effectiveness in a clinical experimental study. The connection between the dissertation research and the research plans of the research institution where the dissertation was completed. The dissertation research was carried out within the framework of the research work plan of the State Institution “RSNPMCH named after. acad. V. Vakhidov" under the project AL-422105574 "Development of new biocompatible mesh implants made of composite materials for reconstructive surgery of abdominal and diaphragmatic hernias" (2022-2024).

The purpose of the study is to improve the results of surgical treatment of large and giant postoperative ventral hernias by introducing new laser technologies and improving the tactical and technical aspects of surgical treatment. Objectives of the study: to study the structure of immediate complications after various types of prosthetic plastic surgery; to clarify the influence of obesity factors, primary or repeat hernioplasty on the incidence of immediate and long-term complications; to evaluate the role of the immediate complicated course of the postoperative period in the incidence of long-term complications of hernioplasty; to improve the technical aspects of alloplasty for large and giant postoperative ventral hernias (POVH); to improve the technique of photodynamic therapy (PDT) of the wound surface after prosthetic plastic surgery; to study in an experiment the effectiveness of using the proposed technique of alloplasty and PDT; evaluate the morphological features of the condition of tissues during prosthetic plastic surgery using the proposed method; in a comparative aspect, evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the proposed alloplasty options in the immediate and long-term periods. The object of the study was the results of allohernioplasty in 448 patients with extensive (large) and giant POVH, who were operated on at the surgical department of the 1st clinic of the Samarkand State Medical Institute in the period from 2012 to 2021, as well as experimental animals on which the effectiveness was assessed developed a technique for prosthetic repair of postoperative ventral hernias and applied the technique of photodynamic therapy.

The subject of the study is to analyze the effectiveness of the developed alloplasty of postoperative ventral hernias and intraoperative photodynamic therapy in abdominal surgery in experiments and in the clinic. Research methods. To achieve the goal of the study and solve the assigned problems, general clinical, instrumental, biotechnological, experimental, histomorphological, microbiological and statistical research methods were used. The scientific novelty of the study is as follows: it was established that the need for extensive tissue mobilization and, as a consequence, the intersection of lymphatic capillaries during implantation of the prosthesis in the onlay position, as well as the lack of sufficient resorption function of the hernial sac in the inlay position causes a high risk of the formation of clinically significant seromas; It was determined that with prosthetic hernioplasty, along with the volume of the defect, the type of plastic surgery and the degree of obesity, the most significant predictor of the risk of developing immediate complications is the factor of re-intervention in case of recurrent hernia with the presence of a “dormant infection” hidden in the remaining ligature granulomas or scar tissue; the structure and clinical features of the course of long-term complications of hernioplasty for giant and extensive hernias were clarified, taking into account the results of the immediate postoperative period, as well as the option of fixing the prosthesis, primary or repeated hernioplasty and the degree of obesity; the method of surgery for large hernias of the anterior abdominal wall has been improved, characterized by a combination of factors such as the formation of tension-free prosthetic repair, preservation of local resorptive function to prevent the development of fluid accumulations and reducing the risk of infection; the method of preventing the development or progression of wound infection during alloplasty of ventral hernias has been improved, aimed at enhancing the antibacterial effect and stimulating reparative activity through the photosensitizing and photodynamic effect of low-energy laser radiation; It was determined in an experimental model of prosthetic plastic surgery that the proposed method of fixing the prosthesis in combination with the use of the effect of photodynamic therapy through laser radiation helps to enhance reparative processes with a reduced risk of wound complications; It has been proven that all methods of antiseptic exposure and laser stimulation of the wound surface after prosthetic plastic surgery enhance preventive measures against the development of local infection, but are ineffective in the case of an already developed purulent-inflammatory process against the background of the use of alloplastic material. The practical results of the study are as follows: it has been determined that the implantation of synthetic materials for giant and extensive hernias is accompanied by a significant number of wound complications caused by both the surgical technique itself and the reaction of surrounding tissues to a foreign body, requiring improvement of tactical and technical approaches when performing hernioplasty; it was clarified that scar-degenerative changes in the tissues of the aponeurosis in giant and extensive hernias are a predisposing factor to the occurrence of post-prosthetic hernias, especially when implanting the prosthesis in the “inlay” position and, accordingly, require increasing the efficiency of their fixation and engraftment, as well as reducing the risk of developing local complications; it was determined based on the data of an experimental study that the proposed method of alloplasty for large ventral hernias makes it possible to achieve adequate reconstruction of the anterior abdominal wall, reduce the incidence of infection in the wound, and also use a smaller size of prosthetic material; it was determined that the proposed method of tension-free repair of large hernias of the anterior abdominal wall with strengthening of the aponeurosis with a mesh implant allows maintaining physiology, reducing the number of complications, shortening treatment time and reducing the risk of hernia recurrence; It has been determined that the proposed method for preventing the development or progression of wound infection during alloplasty of ventral hernias can reduce the frequency of suppuration, shorten the treatment time and the likelihood of relapse; It has been proven that the use of the proposed tactical and technical aspects of prosthetic repair for postoperative ventral hernias can reduce the incidence of specific complications, reduce rehabilitation time and the risk of hernia recurrence. Reliability of the research results. The reliability of the results is justified by the use of objective criteria for assessing the condition of patients, modern methods of diagnosis and treatment, the correct application of methodological approaches and sets of statistical analysis, methods for solving the problems discussed in the dissertation are based on modern scientific and practical concepts and approaches to the diagnosis and surgical treatment of patients with giant postoperative hernias. Scientific and practical significance of the research results. The results obtained make a significant contribution to the expansion of irradiation of existing ideas about the structure and clinical features of complications of hernioplasty for giant and extensive ventral hernias by identifying the morphological features of the development of a purulent-inflammatory process against the background of the use of alloplastic material, studying predictors of the risk of developing immediate complications, mechanisms for enhancing reparative processes through the use of an improved method of fixing the prosthesis in together using the effect of photodynamic therapy through laser radiation, which made it possible to enhance the antibacterial effect and improve the wound healing process. The practical significance of the study is that, based on the results obtained, the tactical and technical aspects of prosthetic hernioplasty have been optimized, the features of methods of antiseptic exposure and laser stimulation of the wound surface after prosthetic repair have been revealed, enhancing preventive measures for the development of local infection, and the method of surgery for large anterior abdominal hernias has been improved walls, characterized by a combination of factors such as the formation of tension-free prosthetic plasty, preservation of local resorptive function to prevent the development of fluid accumulations, thereby reducing the risk of developing postoperative complications, reducing the frequency of unsatisfactory results, length of hospitalization and the likelihood of relapse. Implementation of research results. According to the results of a scientific study to optimize the tactical and technical aspects of surgical treatment of large and giant postoperative ventral hernias: the “method for plastic surgery of giant hernias of the anterior abdominal wall” has been improved (invention patent No. IAP 2022 0148 dated April 18, 2022). The proposed method of tension-free repair of large hernias of the anterior abdominal wall with strengthening of the aponeurosis with a mesh implant made it possible to reduce the number of complications, shorten the treatment time and reduce the risk of hernia recurrence; the “method for preventing the progression of infection during alloplasty of infected hernias” has been improved (certificate of the Ministry of Health No. 08-32071 dated October 17, 2022). The proposed method made it possible to reduce the frequency of wound purulent-inflammatory complications and shorten the period of rehabilitation of patients after allohernioplasty; methodological recommendations “Tactical and technical aspects of prosthetic repair for large and giant postoperative ventral hernias” have been developed (certificate of the Ministry of Health No. 08-32071 dated October 17, 2022) . The developed recommendations made it possible to optimize the tactical and technical aspects of allohernioplasty in patients with large and giant postoperative ventral hernias; The scientific results obtained were introduced into the practical activities of healthcare, in particular, in the departments of surgery of the Khorezm and Andijan regional multidisciplinary medical centers, the clinic of the Samarkand State Medical University (certificate of the Ministry of Health No. 08-32071 dated October 17, 2022). Improving the tactical and technical aspects of prosthetic repair for postoperative ventral hernias has made it possible to reduce the incidence of specific immediate complications from 40.9% to 15.6%, to reduce rehabilitation time from 8.6±2.7 to 7.1±1.5 days, and also reduce the likelihood of long-term complications from 11.7% to 3.1%. Approbation of research results. The results of this study were discussed at 8 scientific and practical conferences, including 5 international and 3 republican ones. Publication of research results. 26 scientific works have been published on the topic of the dissertation, including 9 journal articles, 4 of which in republican and 5 in foreign journals recommended by the Higher Attestation Commission of the Republic of Uzbekistan for publication of the main scientific results of doctoral dissertations. Structure and scope of the dissertation. The dissertation consists of an introduction, seven chapters, a conclusion, conclusions, practical recommendations and a list of cited literature. The volume of work is 200 pages.

Payment is required for access to scientific work - 80 000 UZS
To make a payment, log in with your username.

Login

References

Алексеев А.К. и др. Патент №2325856 «Способ реконструкции боковой стенки живота при послеоперационной грыже».

Алексеев А.К., Ермолов А.С. Хирургическое лечение пациентов с большими и гигантскими послеоперационными вентральными грыжами. Хирургия. Ж. Им. Н.И. Пирогова, 2019;9-38-43

Белоконев В.И., Белоусов Д.В., Александров И.К., Грачев Б.Д., Махова А.Н. Способ герниопластики при срединных грыжах живота. Патент РФ на изобретение №95108583/27.02.97 Бюл.№6.

Белоконев В.И., Пушкин С.Ю. Способ герниопластики при больших и гигантских грыжах по В.И. Белоконеву. Патент РФ на изобретение №98103281/20.09.99 Бюл. №26.

Белоконев В.И., Федорина Т.А., Ковалева З.В., Пушкин С.Ю. Патогенез и хирургическое лечение послеоперационных грыж. Самара: ГП «Перспектива». 2005.

Биряльцев В.Н., Шаймарданов Р.Ш., Филиппов В.А., Халилов Х.М. Герниоабдоминапластика: Руководство для врачей. - Казань: Идел-пресс, 2008. - 102 с.

Винник Ю.С., Чайкин А.А., Назарьянц Ю.А., Петрушко С.И. Современный взгляд на проблему лечения больных с послеоперационными вентральными грыжами. Сибирское медицинское обозрение. 2014;6(90):5-13.

Гостевской А.А. Нерешенные вопросы протезирования передней брюшной стенки при грыжах // Вестник хирургии. - 2007. - Т 166, № 4. - С. 114-117.

Егиев В.Н., Лядов К.В., Воскресенский П.К. Атлас оперативной хирургии грыж. - М.: Медпрактика-М, 2003. - 228 c.

Егиев В.Н. Ненатяжнаягерниопластика. - М.: Медпрактика, 2002. - 120 с.

Ермолов А.С., Корошвили В.Т., Ярцев П.А., Шляховский И.А. Послеоперационные грыжи живота: распространенность и этиопатогенез. Хирургия. Журнал Хирургия им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2017;(5):76-82.

Ермолов А.С., Корошвили В.Т., Благовестнов Д.А. Послеоперационные вентральные грыжи - нерешенные вопросы хирургической тактики. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2018;10: 81-86.

Иванов И.С. Стратегия выбора способа пластики грыж передней брюшной стенки (экспериментально-клиническое исследование): Дис. Курск. 2013.

Ланг Т.А., Сесик М. Как описывать статистику в медицине. М.: Практическая медицина; 2016.

Литвицкий П. Ф. и др. Патофизиология //Т. – 2002. – Т. 1. – С. 422-452; Цыган В. и др. (ред.). Патофизиология. Клиническая патофизиология. Том I.

Паршиков В.В., Логинов В.И. Техника разделения компонентов брюшной стенки в лечении пациентов с вентральными и послеоперационными грыжами. Современные технологии в медицине. 2016;8(1):183-194.

Суковатых Б.С. Валуйская Н.М., Праведникова Н.В., Герасимчук Е.В., Мутова Т.В. Профилактика послеоперационных вентральных грыж: современное состояние проблемы. Хирургия. 2016;76-79.

Тимербулатов В.М., Попов О.С., Попова О.В. Абдоминопластика при операциях по поводу вентральных грыж // Хирургия. - 2006. - № 4. - С. 24-27.

Тимошин АД, Юрасов А.В., Шестаков А.Л. Хирургическое лечение паховых и послеоперационных грыж брюшной стенки. М.: Триада-X, 2003. - 144 с.

Фелештинский Я.П., Петрович С.М., Чиньба О.В. Осложнения после алогерниопластики их профилактика и лечения // Материалы II Всеукраинской научно-практической конференции «Хирургическое лечение грыж живота с использованием современных пластических материалов», 24-25 вер., 2004. - С. 65-69

Целуйко, Сергей Семенович, Надежда Павловна Красавина, Дмитрий Александрович Семенов. "Регенерация тканей." (2016): 1-136.

Черепанин А.И., Доброшицкая Ю.А. Послеоперационные вентральные грыжи: актуальная проблема для хирурга и анестезиолога. Герниология. 2009;1:49.

Чистяков А.А., Богданов Д.Ю. Хирургическое лечение послеоперационных вентральных грыж. - М.: МИА, 2005. - 104 с

Aasvang EK, Jensen K-E, Fiirgaard B, Kehlet H. MRI and pathology in persistent postherniotomy pain. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208:1023–1028; discussion, 1028–1029

Aganovic L, Ishioka KM, Cassidy FH, Chu PK, Cosman BC. Plugoma: CT findings after prosthetic plug inguinal hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211:481–484

Al Chalabi H, Larkin J, Mehigan B, McCormick P. A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2015 Aug;20:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.050. Epub 2015 Jun 12. PMID: 26074289.

Alam NN, Narang SK, Pathak S, Daniels IR, Smart NJ. Methods of abdominal wall expansion for repair of incisional herniae: a systematic review. Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):191-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1463-0.

Amid P.K. Biomaterials - classification, technical and experimental aspects. In: Schumpelick V. and Kingsnorth A.N. (eds). Incisional hernia. - Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1999. - P. 160-165

A. Moreno-Egea, L.Carrasco, E.Girela, J.G. Martin, M.CanterasOpen vs laparoscopic repair of spigelian hernia: a prospective randomised trial Arch. Surg., 137(2002), pp. 1266-1268

A. Park, D.W. Birch, P.Lovrics. Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a comparison study Surgery, 124(4) (1998), pp. 816-821

Arcerito M, Changchien E, Bernal O, Moon J. Robotic inguinal hernia repair: technique and early experience. Am Surg 2016; 82: 1014-1017.

Atema J.J., De Vries F.E., Boermeester M.A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of potentially contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall defects. Am J Surg 2016; 212: 982-995.

A. Toniato, C. Pagetta, P. BernanteIncisional hernia treatment with progressive pneumoperitoneum and retromuscular prosthetic herniplastLagenbecks Arch. Surg.,387(2002), pp. 246-248

B. Cornette, D. De Bacquer, F. Berrevoet. Component separation technique for giant incisional hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg, 215 (2018), pp. 719-726

Bachman S, Ramshow B. Prosthetic material in ventral hernia repair: how do I choose? Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88:101–112

Basta MN, Bauder AR, Kovach SJ, Fischer JP. Assessing the predictive accuracy of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Surgical Risk Calculator in open ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2016 Aug;212(2):272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.034.

Basta MN, Fischer JP, Wink JD, Kovach SJ. Mortality after inpatient open ventral hernia repair: developing a risk stratification tool based on 55,760 operations. Am J Surg. 2016 Jun;211(6):1047-57.

Belokonev VI, Ponomareva YV, Pushkin SY, Kovaleva ZV, Terekhin AA. Prospects of combined anterior prosthetic hernia repair in treatment of large and giant ventral hernias. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2018;(5):45-50. Russian. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2018545-50. PMID: 29798991.

Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Poulose BK. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia vs computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernia. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216: 447-453.

Bellows CF, Smith A, Malsbury J, Helton WS (2013). Repair of incisional hernias with biological prosthesis: a systematic review of current evidence. Am J Surg 205(1):85-101.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.019

Bittner R, Biongener-Casey J, Dietz U. et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society IEHS) - Part 1. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 2-29.

Blair LJ, Ross SW, Huntington CR, Watkins JD, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT. Computed tomographic measurements predict component separation in ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res 2015; 199: 420-427

Blatnik J.A., Krpata D.M., Novitsky Y.W. Transversus abdominus release as an alternative component separation technique for ventral hernia repair. JAMA Surg 2016; 151:383-384.

Blatnik JA, Michael Brunt L. Controversies and Techniques in the Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Apr;23(4):837-845. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3989-1. Epub 2018 Oct 18. PMID: 30338444

Burger RW, et al. Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Suture Versus Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia. Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):578-585. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7

B.T. Heniford, A.Park, B.J. Ramshaw. Laparosopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients J. Am. Col. Surg., 14 (2000), pp. 419-423

Capitano S. Totally extraperitoneal approach for ventral hernia. Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1585. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5761-0. Epub 2017 Jul 21. PMID: 28733728.

Carbonell A, Criss CN, Cobb WS, Rosen MJ. Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J AmCollSurg 2013; 217: 991-998.

Carter PR, LeBlanc KA, Hausmann MG, et al. Does expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh really shrink after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair? Hernia 2012; 16:321–325

Charleux-Muller D, Romain B, Boisson C, Velten M, Brigand C, Lejeune C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of resorbable biosynthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repair. J Visc Surg. 2021 Jun 8:S1878-7886(21)00093-X.

Chevrel JP, Rath AM. Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia. 2000;4:7-11.

Cheesborough JE, Liu J, Hsu D, Dumanian GA (2016) Prospective repair of Ventral Hernia Working Group type 3 and 4 abdominal wall defects with condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (MotifMESH) mesh. Am J Surg 211(1):1-10.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.033

C.Fink, P.Baumann, M.N. Wente, P.Knebel, J.Werner, M.W. Büchler, M.K. Diener Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br. J. Surg., 101 (2) (2014), pp. 51-54

C.L. Hubley-Kozey, M.J. Vezina. Muscle activation during exercises to improve trunk stability in men with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83 (2002), pp. 1100-1108

Cobb WS, Warren JA, Ewing JA, Burnikel A, Merchant M, Carbonell AM. Open retromuscular repair of complex incisional hernia: predictors of wound events and recurrence. J AM Coll Surg 2015; 220: 606-616.

Coccolini F, Agresta F, Bassi A, et al. (2012). Italian Biological Prosthesis Work-Group (IBPWG): proposal for a decisional model in using biological prosthesis. World journal of emergency surgery: WJES 7(1):34. 10.1186/1749-7922-7-34

Coccolini F, Poiasina E, Bertoli P, Gossetti F, Agresta F, Dassatti MR, Riccio P, Campanelli G, Ansaloni L, Catena F (2013). The Italian Register of Biological Prostheses. Eur Surg Res 50(3-4):262-272. 10.1159/000351333

Cornette B, De Bacquer D, Berrevoet F. Component separation technique for giant incisional hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 2018;215:719-26.

C.M. Pring, V.Tran, N.O'Rourke, I.J. Martin Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: a randomized controlled trialAust. N. Z. J. Surg., 78(10) (2008), pp. 903-906

C.W. Iqbal, T.H. Pham, A. Joseph, J. Mai, G.B. Thompson, M.G. Sarr. Long-term outcome of 254 complex incisional hernia repairs using the modified Rives-Stoppa technique.World J Surg, 31 (2007), pp. 2398-2404

Demetrashvili Z, Pipia I, Loladze D, Khutsishvili K. Open retromuscular mesh repair versus onlay technique of incisional hernia: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2017;37:65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.008

De Silva GS, Krpata DM, Hicks CW, Criss CN, Gao Y, Rosen MJ, Novitsky YW. Comparative analysis of changes in abdominal wall musculature morphology after open posterior component separation or bridging laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J AmCollSurg 2014; 218: 353-357.

Devlin Brendan. Management of Abdominal Hernias / B.H. Devlin. - London etc.: Butterworths, 2000. - 430 р.

De Vries Reiling T.S., van Gelder D., van Goor H., Bleichrodt R.P. Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques // Hernia. 2004 Feb. Vol. 8 (1). - P. 56-59.

D.Earle, N.Seymour, E.Fellinger, A.Perez. Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: a single-institution analysis of hospital resource utilization for 884 consecutive cases Surg. Endosc., 20 (2006), pp. 71-75

Dietz UA, et al. The Treatment of incisional hernia. DtschArztebl Int. 2018 Jan;115(3):31-37.

Ditzel M, Deerenberg EB, et al. (2013). Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation. Surg Endosc 27(10):3654-3662.10.1007/s00464-013-2939-y

D.Flum, K.Horvath, T.Koepsell. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysisAnn. Surg., 237 (1) (2003), pp. 129-135

D. Maman, D. Greenwald, J. Kreniske, A. Royston, S. Powerd, J. Bauer. Modified Rives-Stoppa technique for repair of complex incisional hernias in 59 patients.Ann Plast Surg, 68 (2012), pp. 190-193

Dolin S. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data / S. Dolin, J. Cashman, J. Bland // Br. J. Anaesth. - 2002. - № 89. - Р 409-423.

DuBay DA, Wang X, Adamson B, Kuzon WM, Dennis RG, Franz MG. Progressive fascial wound failure impairs subsequent abdominal wall repairs: A new model of incisional hernia formation. Surgery 2005;137(4):463-71.

Earle D, Roth S, Saber A, Haggerty S, Bradley JF III, Fanelli R, Price R, Richardson WS, Stefandis D, and the SAGES Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

E.J. DeMaria, J.M. Moss, H.J. Sugerman. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repairSurg. Endosc., 14(4) (2000), pp. 326-329

Ennis LS, Young JS, Gampper TJ, Drake DB. The «open-book» variation of component separation for repair of massive midline abdominal wall hernia. Am Surg. 2003;69(9):733-42; discussion 742-743.

Eriksson A, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 2014;18:31-8. 10.1007/s10029-013-1066-y.

Ermolov AS, Blagovestnov DA, Alekseev AK, Upyrev AV, Yartsev PA, Burbu AV. Optimized approach to the surgical treatment of patients with large and giant postoperative ventral hernia. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2019;(9):38-43. Russian. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia201909138. PMID: 31532165.

Escobar Dominguez JE, Gonzalez A, Donkor C. Robotic inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Oncol 2015; 112: 310-314.

F.Asencio, J.Aguiló, S.Peiró, J.Carbó, R.Ferri, F.Caro, M. Ahmad. Open randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repairSurg. Endosc., 23 (7) (2009 Jul), pp. 1441-1448

F. Azar, T. Crawford, K. Poruk, et al. Ventral hernia repair in patients with abdominal loss of domain: an observational study of one institution's experience.Hernia, 21 (2017), pp. 245-252

Ferguson DH, Smith CG, Olufajo OA, Zeineddin A, Williams M. Risk Factors Associated With Adverse Outcomes After Ventral Hernia Repair With Component Separation. J Surg Res. 2021 Feb;258:299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.063. Epub 2020 Oct 8. PMID: 33039639.

Fischer JP, Basta MN, Krishnan NM, Wink JD, Kovach SJ (2016). A cost-utility assessment of mesh selection in clean-contaminated ventral hernia repair. PlastReconstr Surg 137(2):647-659.10.1097/01.prs.0000475775.44891.56

Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? Ann Surg 2003; 237: 129-135.

F. Köckerling. What do we know about the Chevrel technique in ventral incisional hernia repair?Front Surg, 17 (2019), pp. 6-15

F. Muysoms, M. Miserez, F. Berrevoet, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias.Hernia, 13 (2009), pp. 407-414

Franklin MEJ, Gonzalez JJJ, Michaelson RP, Glass JL, Chock DA (2002) Preliminary experience with new bioactive prosthetic material for repair of hernias in infected fields. Hernia: the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 6(4):171-174. 10.1007/s10029-002-0078-9

Franklin MEJ, Trevino JM, Portillo G, Vela I, Glass JL, Gonzalez JJ (2008) The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 22(9):1941-1946. 10.1007/s00464-008-0005-y

Fülöp ZZ, Ifj Bara T, Simu P, Szilveszter M, Drágus E, Bara T. Számítógépestomográfiaéshasűrinyomás-mérésalkalmazásaazóriásmediánhegsérvekkezelésében [Application of CT and abdominal pressure measurement in the treatment of giant incisional hernias]. Orv Hetil. 2020 Mar;161(9):347-353. Hungarian. doi: 10.1556/650.2020.31667.

Gogiya BS, Chekmareva IA, Paklina OV, Alyautdinov RR, Kopyl'tsov AA, Tokareva TV, Gordienko EN. Morphological and functional aspects of recurrent postoperative ventral hernias. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2016;(12):55-60. Russian. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20161255-60. PMID: 28091458.

G. Misuri, S. Colagrande, M. Gorini, et al. In vivo ultrasound assessment of respiratory function of abdominal muscles in normal subjects.Eur Respir J, 10 (1997), pp. 2861-2867

G.Navarra, C.Musolino, M.L. De Marco, M. Bartolotta, T. Centorrino. Retromuscular sutured incisional hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial to compare open and laparoscopic approach. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech., 17(2007), pp. 86-90

Gogiya BS, Chekmareva IA, Paklina OV, Alyautdinov RR, Kopyl'tsov AA, Tokareva TV, Gordienko EN. Morfofunktsional'nyeaspektyretsidivaposleoperatsionnykhventral'nykhgryzh [Morphological and functional aspects of recurrent postoperative ventral hernias]. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2016;(12):55-60. Russian. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20161255-60).

Gruber-Blum S, Brand J, Keibl C, Fortelny RH, Redl H, Mayer F, Petter-Puchner AH (2016) Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices. Hernia: the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery.10.1007/s10029-016-1556-9

Gupta A, Zahriya K, Mullens PL, Salmassi S, Keshishian A (2006). Ventral herniorrhaphy: experience with two different biosynthetic mesh materials, Surgisis and Alloderm. Hernia: the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 10(5):419-425.10.1007/s10029-006-0130-2

Harris HW, Primus F, et all. Preventing Recurrence in Clean and Contaminated Hernias Using Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):648-655.

Helgstrand F. National results after ventral hernia repair. Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7):B5258. PMID: 27399983.

Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R, Horgan S, Espat NJ, Abcarian H (2005). Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch Surg 140(6):549–560; discussion 560-542.10.1001/archsurg.140.6.549

Hiles M, Record Ritchie RD, Altizer AM (2009). Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? a systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov 16(1):26-37.10.1177/1553350609331397

H.H. Eker, B.M. Hansson, M. Buunen, I.M. Janssen, R.E. Pierik, W.C. Hop, H.J. Bonjer, J.F. Lange. Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trialJAMA Surg., 148(3) (2013), pp. 259-263

Hodgkinson JD, Leo CA, Maeda Y, Bassett P, Oke SM, Vaizey CJ, Warusavitarne J. A meta-analysis comparing open anterior component separation with posterior component separation and transversus abdominis release in the repair of midline ventral hernias. Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):617-626. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1757-5.

Hodgkinson JD, Maeda Y, Leo CA, Warusavitarne J, Vaizey CJ. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of active infection and contamination: a systematic review of hernia and fistula recurrence rates. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Apr;19(4):319-330.

Holihan JL, Bondre I, Askenasy EP, Greenburg JA, Keith JN, Martindale RG, Roth JS, Liang MK. J Surgical Res 2016; 202: 26-32.

Holmdahl V, Stark B, Clay L, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K. One-year outcome after repair of giant incisional hernia using synthetic mesh or full-thickness skin graft: a randomised controlled trial. Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):355-361. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01900-4. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

Howard R, Johnson E, Berlin NL, Fan Z, Englesbe M, Dimick JB, Telem DA. Hospital and surgeon variation in 30-day complication rates after ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2021 Aug;222(2):417-423. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.021. Epub 2020 Dec 11. PMID: 33323274.

Huerta S, Varshney A, Patel PM, Mayo HG, Livingston EH (2016) Biological mesh implants for abdominal hernia repair: US Food and Drug Administration approval process and systematic review of its efficacy. JAMA Surg 151(4):374-381.10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5234

Huether S. E., McCance K. L., Parkinson C. F. Study guide for understanding pathophysiology-E-book. – Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013.

Huntington C, Gamble J, Cox, T, Prasad T, Lincourt A, Augenstein V, Heniford B.T. Quantification of the effect of diabetes mellitus on ventral hernia repair: results from two national registries. Am Surg 2016; 82: 661-671.

J.J. Bauer, M.T. Harris, S.R. Gorfine, I. Kreel. Rives-Stoppa procedure for repair of large incisional hernias: experience with 57 patients.Hernia, 6 (2002), pp. 120-123

J.M. Clarke. Incisional hernia repair by fascial component separation: results in 128 cases and evolution of technique. Am J Surg, 200 (2010), pp. 2-8

Julier Z. et al. Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system //Acta biomaterialia. – 2017. – Т. 53. – С. 13-28.

K.A. LeBlanc, W.V. Booth. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findingsSurg. Laparosc. Endosc., 3(1993), pp. 39-41

K.A. LeBlanc, W.V. Booth, J.M. Whitaker. Laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy: our initial 100 patientsAm. J. Surg., 180(2000), pp. 193-197

K. Cassar, A. Munro. Surgical treatment of incisional herniaBr. J. Surg., 89 (2002), pp. 534-545

K.C. Shestak, H.J. Edington, R.R. Johnson. The separation of anatomic components technique for the reconstruction of massive midline abdominal wall defects: anatomy, surgical technique, applications, and limitations revisited. PlastReconstr Surg, 105 (2000), pp. 731-738

Kesicioglu T, Yildirim K, Yuruker S, Karabicak I, Koc Z, Malazgirt Z. Three-year outcome after anterior component separation repair of giant ventral hernias: A retrospective analysis of the original technique without mesh. Asian J Surg. 2021 Sep 7:S1015-9584(21)00519-4. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.08.017.

K. Harth, M. Rosen. Endoscopic versus open component separation in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.Am J Surg, 199 (2010), pp. 342-346

Khorgami Z, Hui B.Y., Mushtaq N, Chow G.S, Sclabas G.M. Predictors of mortality after elective ventral hernia repair: an analysis of national inpatient sample. Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):979-985. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1841-x.

K.K. Jensen, R.B. Arnesen, J.K. Christensen, T. Bisgaard, L.N. Jørgensen. Large incisional hernias increase in size. J Surg Res, 244 (2019), pp. 160-165

K.M. Itani, K.Hur, L.T. Kim, T.Anthony, D.H. Berger, D.Reda, L.Neumayer, Veterans Affairs Ventral Incisional Hernia Investigators Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trialArch. Surg., 145 (4) (2010), pp. 322-328

K.W. Millikan. Incisional hernia repair.Surg. Clin. N. Am., 83 (2003), pp. 1223-1234

Koscielny A, Widenmayer S, May T, Kalff J, Lingohr P. Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Mar;403(2):255-263. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1639-9.

Kroese L.F. et al. Primary and incisional ventral hernias are different in terms of patient characteristics and postoperative complications - a prospective cohort study of 4,565 patients. Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:114-119.

Kudsi OY, Chang K, Bou-Ayash N, Gokcal F. Hybrid Robotic Hernia Repair for Incisional Hernias: Perioperative and Patient-Reported Outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 May;31(5):570-578. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0657. Epub 2020 Nov 4. PMID: 33147098.

Kuehnert N, Kraemer NA, Otto J, et al. In vivo MRI visualization of mesh shrinkage using surgical implants loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxides. SurgEndosc 2012; 26:1468–1475

LeBlanc K, Allain B. History of Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral Wall Abdominal Hernia, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. Available online: http://laparoscopy.blogs.com/prevention_management_3/2010/10/laparoscopic-repair-of-ventral-wall-abdominal-hernia.html. (accessed 20.04.14.).

Liang MK, Berger RL, Nguyen MT, Hicks SC, Li LT, Leong M (2014). Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair. Surg Infect 15(5):506–512.10.1089/sur.2013.090

Lingmark, M., Strigård, K., Löwenmark, T. et al. Risk Factors for Surgical Complications in Ventral Hernia Repair. World J Surg42, 3528-3536 (2018)

Lindsey J.T Abdominal wall partitioning (the according effect) for reconstruction of major defects: a retrospective review of 10 patients / J.T. Lindsey // Plast.Recontr. Surg. - 2003. - № 112 (2). - Р 477-485.

Lomanto S, Iyer G, A.ShabbirLaparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective studySurg. Endosc., 20 (2006), pp.1030-1035

L. Owei, R.A. Swendiman, R.R. Kelz, D.T. Dempsey, K.R. Dumon. Impact of body mass index on open ventral hernia repair: a retrospective review.Surgery, 162 (2017), pp. 1320-1329

Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:392-398.

L.Bencini, J.Sanchez, B. Bo Incisional hernia repair: retrospective comparison of laparoscopic and opening techniquesSurg. Endosc., 17(2003), pp. 1546-1551

Mancini A, Mougin N, Venchiarutti V, Shen Z, Risse O, Abba J, Arvieux C. Goni Moreno progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum for giant hernias: a monocentric retrospective study of 162 patients. Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):545-550.

Majumder A, Winder JS, Wen Y, Pauli EM, Belyansky, Novitsky YW. Comparative analysis of biologic synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Surgery 2016; 160: 828-838.

M.A. Carbajo, J.C. Martin del Olmo, J.I. Blanco, C. de la Cuesta, M.Toledano, F.MartinLaparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with meshSurg. Endosc., 13(3) (1999), pp. 250-252

Mericli AF, Bell D, De George BR Jr, Drake DB. The single fascial incision modification of the «open-book» component separation repair: a 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(2):203-208.

M.E. Falagas, S.K. KasiakouMesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 11(2005), pp. 3-8

M. Giurgius, L. Bendure, J.S. Roth. The endoscopic component separation technique for hernia repair results in reduced morbidity compared to the open component separation technique.Hernia, 16 (2012), pp. 47-51

M. Lindmark, K. Strigard, T. Löwenmark, U. Dahlstrand, U. Gunnarsson. Risk factors for surgical complications in ventral hernia repair. World J Surg, 42 (2018), pp.3528-3536

M. Mudge, L.E. Hughes Incisional hernia: a 10-year prospective study of incidence and attitudesBr. J. Surg., 72(1985), pp. 70-71

M.McGreevy, P.P. Goodney, C.M. BirkmeyerA prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairsSurg. Endosc., 17(2003), pp. 1778-1780

M.C. Misra, V.K. Bansal, M.P. Kulkarni, D.K. PawarComparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized studySurg. Endosc.,20(12) (2006), pp. 1839-1845

Morris MP, Mellia JA, et all. Ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a contaminated field: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):1035-1050.

M.S. Sajid, S.A. Bokhari, A.S. Mallick, E.Cheek, M.K. BaigLaparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysisAm. J. Surg.,197(1) (2009), pp. 64-72

National Health Service, NHS National Statistics of Operations(2007) Available online at: http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk (accessed 15.02.14.)

N. Blondeel, W.D. Boeckx, G.G. Vanderstraeten, et al. The fate of the oblique abdominal muscles after free TRAM flap surgery. Br J Plast Surg, 50 (1997), pp. 315-321

N.J. Slater, L. Knaapen, W.J.V. Bökkerink, et al. Large contaminated ventral hernia repair using component separation technique with synthetic mesh.PlastReconstr Surg, 136 (2015), pp. 796e-805e

Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Neupane R, Orenstein SB. Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg 2016; 264: 226-232.

Novitsky YW, Harrell AG, Hope WM, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. Meshes in hernia repair. Surg Technol Int 2007; 16:123–127

O.M. Ramirez, E. Ruas, A.L. Dellon. Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study.PlastReconstr Surg, 86 (1990), pp. 519-526

Patel NG, Ratanshi I, Buchel EW. The best of abdominal wall reconstruction. PlastReconstr Surg 2018;141:113e-36e. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003976.

Pereira JA, et al. Risk factors for bad outcomes in incisional hernia repair: Lessons learned from the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG). Cir Esp. 2018 May 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.03.008

Pernar LIM, Pernar CH, Brooks DC, Smink DS, Tavakkoli A. What is the BMI threshold for open ventral hernia repair? Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 1311-1317.

P.H. Harris, M. Helfand, S.H. Woolf, K.N. Lohr, C.D. Mulrow, S.M. Teutsch, Methods Work Group, Third US Preventive Services Task Force. Current methods of the US preventive services task force: a review of the processAm. J. Prev. Med., 20(Suppl.l) (2001), pp.21-35

Pierce RA, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Brunt LM. Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 13 years of patient data accrual. SurgEndosc 2007;21:378-386

P.P. Goodney, C.M. Birkmeyer, J.D. Birkmeyer. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysisArch. Surg., 137(10) (2002), pp. 1161-1165

Primus FE, Harris HW (2013). A critical review of biologic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs under contaminated conditions. Hernia: the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 17(1):21-30.10.1007/s10029-012-1037-8

P.Rogmark, U.Petersson, S.Bringman, A.Eklund, E.Ezra, D.Sevonius, S.Smedberg, J.Osterberg, A.Montgomery. Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial:Ann. Surg., 258(1) (2013 Jul), pp. 37-45

R.A. Pierce, J.A. Spitler, M.M. Frisella. Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrualSurg. Endosc., 21(2007), pp. 378-386

P.K. Chowbey, A.Sharma, R. Khullar. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repairLaparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech., 10(2000), pp. 79-84

Poulose BK, Roll S, Murphy JW, Goldblatt MI, Adrales GL, Rosen MJ. Design and implementation of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC): improving value in hernia care. Hernia 2016; 20: 177-189.

Prabhu AS, Dickens EO, Copper CM, Mann JW, Yunis JP, Phillips S, Huang L.C, Poulose BK, Rosen MJ. Laparoscopic vs robotic intraperitoneal mesh repair for incisional hernia: an Americans Hernia Society Quality Collaborative analysis. J AmCollSurg 2017; 1-9.

Punjari R, Shaikh I, Soni V. Component Separation Technique: an Effective Way of Treating Large Ventral Hernia. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(suppl 3):1476-1479

Ramirez O.M. Components separation method for closure of abdominal wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study / O.M. Ramirez, E. Ruas, L. Dcllon // Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery. - 1990. - № 86 (3). - Р 519-526.

Ramshaw BBS (2007) Surgical materials for ventral hernia repair: biological mesh part 2 of 3. General Surgery News 34(2):1-15

R.A. Watson, N.B. Pride, E.L. Thomas, P.W. Ind, J.D. Bell. Relation between trunk fat volume and reduction of total lung capacity in obese men. J Appl Physiol, 112 (2012), pp. 118-126

R.C. Read, G.YoderRecent trends in the management of incisional herniaArch. Surg., 124(1989), pp. 326-329

Reynolds D, Davenport D, Roth JS. Predictors of poor outcomes in functionally dependent patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1099-104. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2587-7.

R. Gonzalez, R.D. Rehnke, A. Ramaswamy, C.D. Smith, J.M. Clarke, B.J. Ramshaw. Components separation technique and laparoscopic approach: a review of two evolving strategies for ventral hernia repair.Am Surg, 71 (2005), pp. 598-605

R.F. Sood, A.B. Lipira, P.C. Neligan, O. Louie, A.S. Wright, N.S. Gibran. Respiratory failure following abdominal wall reconstruction: an analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.PlastReconstr Surg, 143 (2019), pp. 165e-171e

R.W. Luijendijk, W.C. Hop, M.P. van den Tol A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional herniaN. Engl. J. Med., 343(2000), pp. 392-398

S.J. Mathes, P.M. Steinwald, R.D. Foster, et al. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparison of flap and mesh closure.Ann Surg, 232 (2000), pp. 586-596

Slater NJ, van der Kolk M, Hendriks T, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205(2):220-230. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.028

S. Forbes, C. Eskicioglu, R. McLeod, A. Okrainec. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with meshBr. J. Surg., 96(2009), pp. 851-858

S.N. Tank, Y. Shukla. Effect of Janda's approach on pain and function in patients with non-specific low back pain- an interventional study. Int J Sci Healthc Res, 5 (2020), pp. 216-221

S.P. Agnew, W. Small, E. Wang, L.J. Smith, I. Hadad, G.A. Dumanian. Prospective measurements of intra-abdominal volume and pulmonary function after repair of massive ventral hernias with the components separation technique. Ann Surg, 251 (2010), pp. 981-988

S.R. Maloney, K.A. Schlosser, T. Prasad, et al. Twelve years of component separation technique in abdominal wall reconstruction.Surgery, 166 (2019), pp. 435-444

S. Sauerland, M. Walgenbach,B.HabermalzLaparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repairCochrane Database Syst. Rev., 3(2011) CD007781

Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL, Luchette FA. A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. AnnSurg 2011; 253: 16-26.

Schoenmaeckers EJP, van der Valk SBA, van den Hout H, Raymakers JTFJ, Rakic S. Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:1620–1623

Smart NJ, Marshall M, Daniels IR (2012) Biological meshes: a review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs. The surgeon: journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland 10(3):159-171.10.1016/j.surge.2012.02.006

S.Olmi, A.Scaini, G.C. Cesana, L.Erba, E.CroceLaparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled studySurg. Endosc., 21(2007), pp. 555-559

S.Kyzer, M.Alis, Y.Alonilaparoscopic repair of postoperation ventral hernia, early postoperation resultsSurg. Endosc., 13(1999), pp. 928-931

Song YH, Huang WJ, Xie YY, Hada G, Zhang S, Lu AQ, Wang Y, Lei WZ. Application of double circular suturing technique (DCST) in repair of giant incision hernias. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):764. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4572.

Stoppa R. Chemistry, Geometry and Physics of Mesh Materials// R.Stoppa, M.Soler // Expert Meeting on Hernia Surgery. - St. Moritz-Basel: Karger, 1995. - P. 166-171.

Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJR, Nunes QM, Daniels IR, Smart NJ. Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Br J Surgery 2016; 103:1598-1607.

T. Anthony, P.C. Bergen, L.T. Kim Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy World J. Surg., 24(2000), pp. 95-100

The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract – Guidelines in Surgical Repair of Incisional Hernia (2005) Available online http://www.ssat.com/cgi-bin/incisionalhernia.cgi (accessed 20.04.14.)

T. Liakakos, I. Karanikas, H.Panagiotidis. Use of marlex mesh in the repair of recurrent incisional herniaBr. J. Surg., 81(1994), pp. 248-249

Totten CF, Davenport DL, Ward ND, Roth JS (2016). Cost of ventral hernia repair using biologic or synthetic mesh. J Surg Res 203(2):459–465. 10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.040

T.O. Muse, B.A. Zwischenberger, M.T. Miller, D.L. Davenport, J.S. Roth. Outcomes after ventral hernia repair using the Rives-Stoppa, endoscopic, and open component separation techniques.Am Surg, 84 (2018), pp. 433-437

Verhelst J, Timmermans L, van de Velde M, Jairam A, Vakalopoulus KA, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Watchful waiting in incisional hernia: is it safe? Surgery 2015; 157: 297-303.

Waite KE, Herman MA, Doyle PJ. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. J RoboticSurg 2016; 10: 239-244.

Warren JA, Cobb WS, Ewing JA, Carbonell AM. Standard laparoscopic versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 324-332.

Warren JA, McGrath SP, Hale AL, Ewing JA, Carbonell AM 2nd, Cobb WS 4th. Patterns of Recurrence and Mechanisms of Failure after Open Ventral Hernia Repair with Mesh. AmSurg. 2017 Nov 1;83(11):1275-1282. PMID: 29183531.

Wassenaar EB, Schoenmaeckers EJP, Raymakers JTFJ, Rakic S. Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505 repairs. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:825–832

W.B. Saunders Dorland's Pocket Medical Dictionary. Pennsylvania, USA(1995).

Yang GPC. From intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair to preperitoneal onlay mesh repair. Asian J EndoscSurg. 2017;10(2):119-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12388.

inLibrary — is a scientific electronic library built on the paradigm of open science (Open Science), the main tasks of which are the popularization of science and scientific activities, public quality control of scientific publications, the development of interdisciplinary research, a modern institute of scientific review, increasing the citation of Uzbek science and building a knowledge infrastructure.

CONTACTS:

Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Parkent street 51, floor 2

(+998) 99-006-61-10

info@inscience.uz

NAVIGATION:

Journals
Conferences
Organizations
Authors
Blog
Contact
© Copyright 2025 in Science All Rights Reserved | Developed by in Science | Site create by in Designer