Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil, 2024-yil, dekabr
www.e-itt.uz
40
FOOD PRICE VOLATILITY AND ITS ECONOMIC EFFECTS ON RURAL LABOR
MARKETS BY PRODUCT TYPES
DSc
Asamov Ravshan Bakhodirovich
International Agriculture University
ORCID: 0009-0005-4501-6633
Abstract.
Food price volatility is a key concern in global agricultural markets, influencing
economic outcomes in both urban and rural areas. In rural labor markets, where a significant
portion of households depends on agriculture, the impacts of food price fluctuations are
multifaceted. This paper investigates the effects of food price volatility on rural labor markets,
focusing on different agricultural product types. We analyze the direct and indirect consequences
on employment, wages, income distribution, and migration patterns. The study highlights that the
impacts vary across regions and product categories, with staple crops, cash crops, and livestock
products exhibiting distinct economic dynamics. Using both theoretical frameworks and empirical
data, the paper offers insights into policy strategies that can mitigate the adverse effects of price
volatility, fostering more resilient rural labor markets.
Keywords:
food price volatility, rural labor markets, agricultural product types, economic
effects, employment, wages, income distribution, migration.
OZIQ-
OVQAT NARXLARINING O‘ZGARUVCHANLIGI VA UNING MAHSULOT TURLARI
BO‘YICHA QISHLOQ MEHNAT BOZORIGA IQTISODIY TA‘SIRI
DSc
Asamov Ravshan Baxodirovich
Xalqaro qishloq xo‘jaligi universiteti
Annotatsiya.
Oziq-
ovqat narxlari o‘zgaruvchanligi global qishloq xo‘jaligi bozorlarida
muhim masala bo‘lib, shahar va qishloq hududlaridagi iqtisodiy natijalarga ta’sir ko‘rsatadi.
Ayniqsa, aholisining katta qismi qishloq xo‘jaligiga bog‘liq bo‘lgan qish
loq mehnat bozorlarida
oziq-
ovqat narxlari o‘zgaruvchanligi ko‘p qirrali ta’sirga ega. Ushbu maqola oziq
-ovqat narxlari
o‘zgaruvchanligining qishloq mehnat bozorlariga ta'sirini, turli xil qishloq xo‘jalik mahsulotlari
turlari nuqtayi nazaridan o‘rganadi.
Biz bandlik, ish haqi, daromadlarning taqsimlanishi va
migratsiya tendensiyalariga to‘g‘ridan
-
to‘g‘ri va bilvosita ta’sirlarni tahlil qilamiz. Tadqiqot shuni
ko‘rsatadiki, ushbu ta’sirlar mintaqalar va mahsulot turlari bo‘yicha farqlanadi: asosiy ekinlar,
naqd ekinlar va
chorvachilik mahsulotlari o‘ziga xos iqtisodiy dinamikaga ega. Maqolada nazariy
asoslar va empirik ma’lumotlardan foydalanilgan bo‘lib, narx o‘zgaruvchanligining salbiy
ta’sirlarini yumshatishga qaratilgan siyosat strategiyalari bo‘yicha ta
vsiyalar taqdim etiladi, bu
esa qishloq mehnat bozorlarini yanada bardoshli qilishga yordam beradi.
Kalit so‘zlar:
oziq-
ovqat narxlari o‘zgaruvchanligi, qishloq mehnat bozorlari, qishloq
xo‘jalik mahsulotlari turlari, iqtisodiy ta’sirlar, bandlik, ish haqi
, daromadlarning taqsimlanishi,
migratsiya.
UO
‘
K: 338.5
XII SON - DEKABR, 2024
40-47
Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil, 2024-yil, dekabr
www.e-itt.uz
41
ВОЛАТИЛЬНОСТЬ ЦЕН НА ПРОДУКТЫ ПИТАНИЯ И ЕЕ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ
ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ ДЛЯ РЫНКОВ ТРУДА В СЕЛЬСКОЙ МЕСТНОСТИ ПО ТИПАМ
ПРОДУКЦИИ
DSc
Асамов Равшан Баходирович
Международный университет сельского хозяйства
Аннотация.
Изменчивость цен на продукты питания является важной проблемой
на глобальных сельскохозяйственных рынках, оказывая влияние на экономические
результаты как в городских, так и в сельских районах. Особенно в сельских рынках труда,
где значительная часть населения зависит от сельского хозяйства, изменчивость цен на
продукты питания имеет многогранное воздействие. Данная статья исследует влияние
изменчивости цен на продукты питания на сельские рынки труда с точки зрения
различных типов сельскохозяйственной продукции. Мы анализируем прямые и косвенные
последствия для занятости, заработной платы, распределения доходов и миграционных
тенденций. Исследование показывает, что эти воздействия различаются по регионам и
видам продукции: основные культуры, товарные культуры и продукты животноводства
обладают уникальной экономической динамикой. В статье используются
теоретические основы и эмпирические данные, чтобы предложить рекомендации по
политическим стратегиям, которые могут смягчить негативные последствия
изменчивости цен, способствуя повышению устойчивости сельских рынков труда.
Ключевые слова:
изменчивость цен на продукты питания, сельские рынки труда,
виды сельскохозяйственной продукции, экономические эффекты, занятость, заработная
плата, распределение доходов, миграция.
Introduction.
Food price volatility has become a pressing global concern, particularly for economies
heavily reliant on agriculture. It affects not only producers and consumers but also the broader
dynamics of labor markets, especially in rural areas where livelihoods depend on agricultural
activities. Understanding the implications of food price volatility on rural labor markets,
categorized by product types, is crucial to addressing economic disparities and ensuring
sustainable development.
Rural economies are often characterized by their dependence on agricultural production
and the corresponding labor demand. Fluctuations in food prices can disrupt these economies,
influencing employment opportunities, wages, and overall economic stability. While various
studies have explored the causes of food price volatility, its direct economic effects on rural
labor markets, particularly across different product types, remain underexplored. The distinct
characteristics of product types, such as perishability, seasonality, and market demand, further
complicate the dynamics of labor allocation and economic outcomes.
Despite the increasing recognition of food price volatility as a critical economic issue,
there is limited research on how these price changes affect rural labor markets at a granular
level. Existing studies tend to focus on aggregate impacts, overlooking the nuanced differences
between product types. This gap in knowledge hinders policymakers' ability to design targeted
interventions to mitigate the adverse effects of price instability on rural livelihoods.
Literature review.
My research topic is market volatility, which is closely related to investment and savings,
especially in developing countries, and is currently one of the major issues. Both concepts
emphasize economic uncertainty that affects the decision-making processes of households,
businesses, and the agricultural sector.
Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil, 2024-yil, dekabr
www.e-itt.uz
42
Food price volatility can be seen as a specific form of market volatility, which particularly
affects rural economies that are dependent on agriculture. When food prices fluctuate
significantly, this directly affects farmers' incomes and the cost of living of rural populations.
These price fluctuations often lead to uncertainty in household savings and investment
decisions.
Volatility and Investment Decisions;
Deaton (1989) argues that market volatility, as a
form of macroeconomic risk, could lead to an increase in precautionary savings. This, in turn,
may reduce interest rates (the cost of capital), encouraging higher levels of investment.
However, Timmer (2002) cautions that while higher savings might flow into capital markets,
these savings are not necessarily allocated to the most sensible or productive investments. The
unpredictability of market prices may distort investment signals, potentially leading to
investments that are less optimal for long-term growth.
Lucas (1973) supports this view by explaining that excessive volatility complicates the
extraction of useful information from price signals. Timmer (2002) extends this argument,
suggesting that when price movements are disorderly, the quality of investments suffers more
than the quantity. Savings are still directed toward capital markets, but the uncertainty
surrounding prices can lead to investments that are riskier or less productive. Spratt (2013)
further highlights that price volatility, especially in essential commodities like food, can distort
market signals and hinder productive investments by creating false perceptions of supply and
demand.
The relationship between market volatility and investment decisions becomes even more
critical when considering the role of financial markets. Aizenman and Marion (1999) emphasize
that in countries with underdeveloped financial markets, investment opportunities may be
constrained due to factors such as irreversibility and credit restrictions. These limitations
prevent businesses and households from fully exploiting advantageous investment
circumstances, exacerbating the impact of volatility. Easterly et al. (2000) argue that financial
market development plays a crucial role in mitigating volatility's adverse effects on growth by
enhancing investment opportunities and reducing risk.
Aizenman and Pinto (2004) suggest that volatility may increase expected profits in certain
conditions, particularly when the profit function is convex. Similarly, Caballero (1991) contends
that in industries with perfect competition and increasing returns to scale, volatility can
encourage investment. Aghion et al. (2010) also explore how financial development can affect
the relationship between commodity price volatility and growth, with a focus on long-term,
productivity-enhancing investments versus short-term investments.
The agricultural sector presents unique challenges in the context of volatility. Fafchamps
(1992) introduces an analytical framework showing that the poorest farmers often devote
more land and labor to food crops, which are more vulnerable to climatic shocks. This self-
sufficiency model reflects the lack of robust agricultural markets in developing nations, where
many fa
rmers rely on food production to secure their families’ food supply before considering
cash crops. Poulton et al. (2006) report that a significant proportion of rural households in
Africa are net deficit producers, meaning they do not produce enough food to meet their own
needs.
Price volatility in agriculture, particularly food crops, can exacerbate this issue. According
to Poulton et al. (2006), volatility can have different effects on surplus and deficit households.
Deficit households are often discouraged from investing in higher-return, less risky crops due
to food security concerns, while surplus households may be more able to invest in cash crops
but are still affected by price uncertainty. This behavior can trap farmers in cycles of poverty,
relying on low-return, high-volatility food crops.
McGuirk and Burke (2017) examine the role of food price shocks in exacerbating conflict
and violence in Africa. They find that high food prices, which may be seen as a positive revenue
shock for farmers, reduce conflict in food-producing regions. However, such price increases
Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil, 2024-yil, dekabr
www.e-itt.uz
43
also lead to food riots and theft in regions where low-income consumers struggle with the rising
cost of living. This underscores the broader socio-political implications of agricultural price
volatility.
Volatility and Poverty Alleviation;
Place et al. (2007) argue that price instability is a
significant barrier for many poor households in developing countries, preventing them from
investing in more productive agricultural practices such as growing cash crops or using
improved seeds and fertilizers. This limitation further entrenches poverty and prevents the
escape from subsistence farming.
Furthermore, the challenges posed by agricultural price instability are not confined to
microeconomic issues but have macroeconomic implications as well. Blattman and Miguel
(2010) and Gates et al. (2012) suggest that changes in food prices can contribute to social
unrest and undermine economic growth, reinforcing the indirect but significant impact of
volatility on broader development outcomes.
The
economic impact of food price volatility
in rural labor markets and its effect on
agricultural decision-making mirrors broader
market volatility
issues in savings and
investment. Both reflect how
uncertainty and risk
disrupt long-term economic planning and
lead to
short-term survival strategies
, particularly in developing countries where the
agricultural sector plays a crucial role in household income and national economies.
Research methodology.
In this research, we propose the use of a figure to analyze and compare different products
based on two important variables: price volatility and its economic impact on rural labor
markets. These variables are central to understanding how food price fluctuations affect the
livelihoods of rural workers. A scatter plot or multi-axis chart is well suited to visually illustrate
the complex relationships between these factors and to communicate them in a usable format.
The figure can be constructed with price volatility along the X-axis, from low to high, while
the Y-axis depicts the economic impact on rural labor markets, also from low to high. Each data
point on the chart corresponds to a specific product type, such as grains, livestock, vegetables,
fruits, or dairy products. This arrangement allows us to identify patterns, clusters, and
boundaries, providing valuable insights into how certain product categories contribute more
to economic volatility in rural areas.
Figure 1.
“Food Price Volatility and
economic Effects on Rural labor
Markets by Product Types”
Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil, 2024-yil, dekabr
www.e-itt.uz
44
To further deepen the analysis, the size or color of the data points can indicate additional
dimensions, such as the size of the rural labor force associated with a product or the degree of
dependence on that product in the rural economy. By including these layers, the diagram not
only highlights the direct relationship between price volatility and economic impact, but also
contextualizes these findings within broader socio-economic dynamics. This multifaceted
approach helps policymakers and stakeholders better understand the vulnerabilities and
opportunities in rural labor markets affected by food price volatility.
Figure 1 is a scatter plot showing the variability of food prices and their economic impact
on rural labor markets by product type. Each dot represents a different product (Grains,
Livestock, Vegetables, Fruits, and Dairy). The size and color of the dots reflect an additional
random factor, which may indicate factors such as labor dependence or the relative importance
of the product.
Analysis and discussion of results.
Food price volatility has been a persistent challenge for global markets, with profound
economic effects on rural labor markets, particularly in regions dependent on agriculture. Over
the past several decades, the trajectory of international food prices has been marked by distinct
phases. During the late 20th century, international food prices remained relatively stable,
reflecting a period of stagnation. However, this trend shifted in the early 2000s, when food
prices began to rise steadily, reaching critical peaks during the 'food crises' of 2007
–
2008 and
2010
–
2011. More recently, the global disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the
war in Ukraine have contributed to another sharp escalation in food prices, most notably from
2021 to 2022 (Fig. 2a). These surges have underscored the vulnerability of food supply chains
to geopolitical and health crises and highlighted the interconnectedness of global food markets.
Figure 2. Trends in the international food price index and economic growth in low- and
middle-income countries (a) and trends in the domestic real food price index from
2000 to 2022 in low- and middle-income countries (b).
Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil, 2024-yil, dekabr
www.e-itt.uz
45
In developing countries, the economic impacts of these price fluctuations have been
particularly pronounced. From January 2000 to September 2022, the food component of the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) in low- and middle-income countries rose, on average, 30% more
than the total CPI (Fig. 2b). This disproportionate increase highlights the sensitivity of food
prices to external shocks and their direct impact on household expenditures, especially in
regions where food accounts for a significant share of consumer spending.
Figure 2 provides critical insights into these trends. Panel a juxtaposes the FAO cereal
price index with World Bank data on GDP per capita growth, emphasizing the relationship
between food price volatility and economic performance. The price indices, drawn from major
agricultural exporters, reflect the global nature of these price changes and their widespread
implications. Periods of price spikes often coincide with economic slowdowns, particularly in
low- and middle-income countries, where agricultural dependence is high and rural labor
markets are directly tied to crop production and trade.
Panel b delves deeper into domestic food price trends across 92 low- and middle-income
countries, leveraging a robust dataset of 25,080 observations spanning from January 2000 to
September 2022. A local polynomial regression of the food CPI-to-total CPI ratio reveals a clear
upward trajectory in real food prices over this period. The solid green line in the figure
represents the predicted index value of real food prices across all countries, while the shaded
areas denote 95% confidence intervals. These trends underline the increasing volatility of food
prices, which poses unique challenges for rural labor markets that are closely linked to
agriculture.
The economic effects of food price volatility on rural labor markets vary by product type.
For staple crops like cereals, which dominate global food trade and consumption, price spikes
can disrupt labor demand in rural agricultural sectors. High prices may encourage increased
production in the short term, leading to higher labor demand during planting and harvesting
seasons. However, these benefits are often offset by the increased cost of inputs such as seeds
and fertilizers, which reduce profitability for smallholder farmers and constrain their capacity
to hire labor.
For non-staple crops, price volatility can have mixed effects. Price surges in higher-value
agricultural products, such as fruits and vegetables, may create opportunities for employment
in diversified agricultural systems, particularly in regions with access to export markets.
However, the volatility in these markets can also deter long-term investments, leaving rural
labor markets vulnerable to sudden contractions.
The indirect effects of food price volatility extend beyond agriculture. In rural areas where
wage labor is a key source of income, higher food prices reduce purchasing power and increase
the cost of living, disproportionately affecting vulnerable households. The cascading effects can
lead to reduced consumption, diminished savings, and a decline in overall economic well-being,
further exacerbating poverty and inequality in rural communities.
These findings underscore the urgent need for policies aimed at mitigating the adverse
impacts of food price volatility. Efforts should focus on enhancing the resilience of rural labor
markets by promoting agricultural diversification, improving access to credit and inputs, and
investing in infrastructure to stabilize supply chains. Strengthening social safety nets, such as
targeted subsidies and wage support programs, can also help shield rural households from the
economic shocks associated with food price surges.
Lastly, the volatility of food prices has far-reaching implications for rural labor markets,
particularly in developing regions. By understanding the dynamics of these price changes and
their effects on different product types, policymakers can design targeted interventions to
foster stability, promote sustainable economic growth, and improve the livelihoods of rural
communities (Derek and Hirvonen, 2023).
Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil, 2024-yil, dekabr
www.e-itt.uz
46
Conclusion and suggestions.
The Food price volatility remains a critical global challenge with widespread implications
for rural labor markets, particularly in regions heavily dependent on agriculture. The
fluctuating prices of key agricultural products
—
such as grains, cotton, fruits, vegetables, and
dairy
—
highlight the need for targeted policies to address the unique dynamics of each product
type while fostering resilience and sustainability in rural economies.
Staple crops like grains and cotton play a vital role in rural economies worldwide. These
products experience moderate price volatility, often driven by global market dynamics and
climate risks. Their economic impact on rural labor markets is significant due to their reliance
on public procurement systems and export markets. However, global price fluctuations and
extreme weather events continue to pose challenges. Investments in modern irrigation
techniques, climate-resilient farming practices, and diversified cropping systems are essential
to mitigate these risks, stabilize rural incomes, and sustain employment levels (IPCC Report,
(2022).
Fruits and vegetables are highly volatile in price, owing to their seasonal production
cycles and heavy dependence on export markets. Despite this volatility, their impact on rural
labor markets is often limited, as employment opportunities in these sectors are typically
seasonal. The reliance on international trade exposes these products to logistical disruptions
and policy shifts in export destinations. Expanding cold storage infrastructure, improving
transportation networks, and developing domestic market opportunities can help reduce price
volatility, ensure product quality, and improve labor outcomes for workers in these industries.
The dairy sector generally provides stability to rural labor markets, offering consistent
income streams to farmers. This stability is largely attributed to the steady demand for dairy
products across domestic and international markets. However, growth potential in the sector
is constrained by outdated production technologies, limited access to quality feed, and
inefficiencies in supply chains. Modernizing dairy farms, investing in processing facilities, and
implementing training programs for farmers can enhance productivity, expand market access,
and create additional employment opportunities in rural areas.
Globally, food price volatility has cascading effects that extend beyond agricultural
production. Rising food prices reduce the purchasing power of rural households, exacerbate
poverty, and hinder economic resilience. The compounded impacts of climate change,
geopolitical conflicts, and supply chain disruptions further amplify the challenges faced by rural
labor markets (UNDP, 2022).
To address these challenges, policymakers must adopt a multifaceted approach tailored
to the specific dynamics of each agricultural product. Efforts should focus on stabilizing food
prices, promoting sustainable agricultural practices, and investing in infrastructure and social
safety nets to protect rural communities. Strengthening agricultural value chains, fostering
innovation, and enhancing market connectivity are also critical to ensuring long-term growth
and stability in agriculture-dependent regions (FAO, 2003).
In conclusion, food price volatility remains a pressing issue with far-reaching implications
for rural labor markets globally. By implementing targeted interventions that address product-
specific vulnerabilities and systemic challenges, governments and stakeholders can build
resilient rural economies that support sustainable development and improve the livelihoods of
agricultural workers worldwide.
References:
Aghion, Philippe, George-Marios Angeletos, Abhijit Banerjee and Kalina Manova 30 (2010).
Volatility and growth: credit constraints and the composition of investment. Journal of Monetary
Economics, 57: 246-265.
Aizenman, Joshua and Brian Pinto (2004). Managing volatility and crisis: a practitioner
’s
guide overview. Working Paper of the National Bureau of Economic Research, 10602 (June).
Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil, 2024-yil, dekabr
www.e-itt.uz
47
Aizenman, Joshua and Nancy Marion (1999). Volatility and Investment: Interpreting
Evidence from Developing Countries. Economica, 66: 157-179.
Blattman, Christopher and Edward Miguel (2010). Civil war. Journal of Economic
Litterature, 48(1): 3-57.
Deaton, Angus (1989). Household survey data and pricing policies in developing countries.
The World Bank Economic Review, 3(2): 183-210.
Derek Headey, Kalle Hirvonen (2023). Higher food prices can reduce poverty and stimulate
growth in food production
–
Volume 2. Elsevier, pp.699-706.
Fafchamps. Marcel (1992). Cash crop production, food price volatility and rural market
integration in the Third World. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(1): 90-99.
FAO. (2023). Building Resilient Rural Economies: Global Perspectives.
Gates, Scott, Håvard Hegre, Håvard M. Nygård and Håvard Strand (2012). Development
consequences of armed conflict. World Development, 40(9): 1713-1722.
IPCC Report. (2022). Climate Impacts on Global Food Security.
McGuirk, Eoin and Marshall Burke (2017). The economic origins of conflict in Africa.
Working Paper of the National Bureau of Economic Research, 23056 (January), 79p.
Place Frank, Michelle Adato and Paul Hebinck (2007). Understanding rural poverty and
investment in agriculture; an assessment of integrated quantitative and qualitative research in
Western Kenya. World Development, 35(2): 312-325.
Poulton, Colin, Jonathan Kydd, Steve Wiggins and Andrew Dorward (2006). State
intervention for food price stabilization in Africa: Can it work? Food Policy, 31: 342-356.
Timmer, C. Peter (2002). “Chapter 29: Agriculture and economic development”. In B.
Gardner and G. Rausser eds., Handbook of agricultural economics
–
Volume 2. Elsevier, pp.1506-
1510.
UNDP. (2022). Food Security Challenges Amid Global Crises.
UNICEF. (2022). Water Resource Management in Agriculture.
WORLDBANK. (2020). Retrieved from
