Авторы

  • Арофат Ганиходжаева
    Преподаватель, Узбекский государственный университет мировых языков

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.foreign-linguistics.123736

Ключевые слова:

Аудиолингвальный метод уровень B1 изучение языка учащиеся среднего уровня CEFR (Общеевропейские компетенции владения иностранным языком) беглая речь грамматическая точность структуры предложений упражнения на повторение упражнения на подстановку трансформационные упражнения практика диалогов методы преподавания языков коммуникативное обучение языку устная беглость грамматическая компетенция усвоение языка наблюдения в классе стратегии преподавания вовлеченность студентов цифровые инструменты в образовании практика произношения эффективность обучения развитие языковых навыков

Аннотация

Традиционно ассоциируемый с начальными этапами изучения языка, аудиолингвальный метод (АЛМ), основанный на бихевиористской теории и структурной лингвистике, заслуживает нового внимания со стороны преподавателей, особенно при обучении учащихся на уровне B1 согласно CEFR. В данной статье рассматривается применение аудиолингвальных техник на уроках английского языка для студентов уровня B1, с акцентом на их влияние на беглость речи, точность и грамматическую компетенцию. На основе наблюдений в классах и интервью с преподавателями исследование показывает, что структурированное повторение и шаблонные упражнения по-прежнему эффективны, особенно при усвоении более сложных синтаксических конструкций. Однако сочетание АЛМ с коммуникативными методами значительно повышает общую результативность обучения.


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika –

Зарубежная лингвистика и
лингводидактика – Foreign

Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Journal home page:

https://inscience.uz/index.php/foreign-linguistics

The implementation of the activities of the audiolingual
method in the language classes of the B1 level

Arofat GANIKHOJAEVA

1


Uzbek State University World Languages

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

Article history:

Received March 2025
Received in revised form

10

April 2025

Accepted 2 April 2025
Available online
25 May 2025

Traditionally associated with the early stages of language

learning, the Audiolingual Method (ALM) – grounded in

behaviorist theory and structural linguistics – deserves

renewed attention for intermediate learners, particularly those

at the B1 level according to the CEFR. This paper investigates
the application of audiolingual techniques in B1 English classes,

analyzing their effects on learners’ fluency, accuracy, and

grammatical competence. Based on classroom observations and

teacher interviews, the study reveals that structured repetition
and patterned drills remain effective, especially for mastering

more complex sentence structures. However, integrating ALM

with communicative approaches improves overall instructional

outcomes.

2181-3701/© 2025 in Science LLC.
DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol3-iss5

/S

-pp80-84

This is an open-access article under the Attribution 4.0 International

(CC BY 4.0) license (

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru

)

Keywords:

Audiolingual Method (ALM),
B1 level,

language learning,
intermediate learners,

CEFR,

fluency,

grammatical accuracy,
sentence structures,
repetition drills,

substitution drills,
transformation drills,
dialogue practice,

language teaching methods,
Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT),

oral fluency,

grammatical competence,
language acquisition,

classroom observations,
teaching strategies,

student engagement,

digital tools in education,

pronunciation practice,
learning effectiveness,
language skills development.

1

Teacher, Uzbek State University World Languages.


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika – Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика – Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Special Issue – 5 (2025) / ISSN 2181-3701

81

B1 darajadagi talabalarning til darslarida audiolingval

usul faoliyatlarini amalga oshirish

ANNOTATSIYA

Kalit so‘zlar:

Audiolingval usul,

B1 daraja,

til o‘rganish,

o‘rta darajadagi

o‘rganuvchilar,

CEFR (Umumiy Yevropa Til

Mezoni),

erkin gapirish,

grammatik to‘g‘rilik,

gap tuzilmalari,

takrorlash mashqlari,

o‘rinbosar mashqlar,

o‘zgartirish mashqlari,

suhbat mashqlari,

til o‘qitish usullari,

kommunikativ til o‘rgatish

usuli,

og‘zaki ravonlik,

grammatik bilim darajasi,

tilni o‘zlashtirish, sinf

kuzatuvlari,

o‘qitish strategiyalari,

talabaning faolligi,

ta’limdagi raqamli vositalar,

talaffuz mashqlari,

ta’lim samaradorligi,

til ko‘nikmalarini

rivojlantirish.

An’anaviy ravishda til o‘rganishning dastlabki bosqichlari

bilan bog‘liq bo‘lgan audiolingval metod (ALM), ya’ni xatti-

harakatlar nazariyasi va strukturaviy lingvistikaga asoslangan

usul, ayniqsa CEFR tasnifiga ko‘ra B1 darajasidagi o‘rta bosqich

o‘quvchilari uchun qayta e’tiborga loyiqdir. Ushbu maqolada

audiolingval texnikalarning B1 darajasidagi ingliz tili darslarida

qanday

qo‘llanilayotgani

o‘rganiladi

hamda

ularning

o‘quvchilarning so‘zlashuvdagi ravonligi, aniqligi va grammatik

bilimlariga qanday ta’sir ko‘rsatishi tahlil qilinadi. Sinf

kuzatuvlari va o‘qituvchilar bilan suhbatlar asosida olib

borilgan tadqiqot shuni ko‘rsatadiki, tuzilgan takrorlash

mashqlari va andozali drillar hanuzgacha samarali bo‘lib,

ayniqsa murakkabroq gap tuzilmalarini egallashda foydalidir.

Biroq, ALM usulini kommunikativ yondashuvlar bilan

birlashtirish umumiy o‘qitish natijadorligini yanada oshiradi.

Реализация деятельности аудиолингвального метода

на языковых занятиях студентов уровня B1

АННОТАЦИЯ

Ключевые слова:

Аудиолингвальный метод,

уровень B1,

изучение языка,

учащиеся среднего уровня,

CEFR (Общеевропейские

компетенции владения

иностранным языком),

беглая речь,

грамматическая точность,

структуры предложений,

упражнения на

повторение,

упражнения на

подстановку,

трансформационные

упражнения,

практика диалогов,

методы преподавания

Традиционно ассоциируемый с начальными этапами

изучения языка, аудиолингвальный метод (АЛМ),

основанный на бихевиористской теории и структурной

лингвистике, заслуживает нового внимания со стороны

преподавателей, особенно при обучении учащихся на

уровне B1 согласно CEFR. В данной статье рассматривается

применение

аудиолингвальных

техник

на

уроках

английского языка для студентов уровня B1, с акцентом на

их влияние на беглость речи, точность и грамматическую

компетенцию. На основе наблюдений в классах и интервью

с преподавателями исследование показывает, что

структурированное повторение и шаблонные упражнения

по-прежнему эффективны, особенно при усвоении более

сложных синтаксических конструкций. Однако сочетание

АЛМ с коммуникативными методами значительно

повышает общую результативность обучения.


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika – Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика – Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Special Issue – 5 (2025) / ISSN 2181-3701

82

языков,

коммуникативное

обучение языку,

устная беглость,

грамматическая

компетенция,

усвоение языка,

наблюдения в классе,

стратегии преподавания,

вовлеченность студентов,

цифровые инструменты

в образовании,

практика произношения,

эффективность обучения,

развитие языковых

навыков.


INTRODUCTION

The B1 level, identified by the CEFR as an intermediate or “threshold” stage, marks

a crucial point in language development. At this level, learners are expected to engage in
everyday conversations, describe personal experiences, and share their thoughts.
Nevertheless, many students encounter persistent challenges in speaking fluently and
using grammar correctly.

While ALM is typically used at beginner levels due to its repetitive and controlled

structure, it may also be advantageous for B1 students by providing structured support.
This study explores how ALM-based tasks can be adapted for intermediate classrooms to
reinforce grammar usage and improve speaking abilities.

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS RESEARCH

Emerging in the mid-20th century, the Audiolingual Method focuses on learning

through repetition, imitation, and reinforcement (Skinner, 1957). It became popular
during World War II in the U.S. for rapid language training (Richards & Rodgers, 2001).
Unlike traditional grammar-translation approaches, ALM prioritizes listening and
speaking over reading and writing.

Research suggests that for learners at the intermediate level, combining direct

grammar teaching with practice-based activities can help overcome persistent language
errors (Ellis, 2006). While ALM has been criticized for limiting learner creativity, it
proves useful when applied strategically – especially to address ingrained grammar and
pronunciation mistakes.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This qualitative research was carried out in three language schools, with

participation from six B1-level English classes totaling 90 students. Over eight weeks,
instructors implemented four core ALM activities:

Repetition exercises

Substitution drills

Transformation drills

Dialogue practice

To evaluate the method's effectiveness, data were collected via classroom

observations, teacher interviews, student questionnaires, and pre- and post-intervention
speaking tests, focusing on oral fluency, grammar, and student attitudes.


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika – Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика – Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Special Issue – 5 (2025) / ISSN 2181-3701

83

Applying ALM Activities in B1 Classrooms

Repetition Drills for Enhancing Fluency

Drills targeting key grammar structures like past simple, present perfect, and

conditional sentences were frequently used.

Example:

Teacher: “She has never been to London.”

Students: “She has never been to London.”

Such repetitive practice improved students' fluency and natural rhythm in speech.

Substitution Drills to Increase Flexibility

These exercises required students to swap sentence elements while keeping

grammar intact. Example:

Base: “I watched a movie yesterday.”

Cue:

book

→ “I read a book yesterday.”

Cue:

at the library

→ “I read a book at the library yesterday.”

This helped students develop syntactic awareness and expand vocabulary in

context.

Transformation Drills for Versatility in Expression

These drills involved changing sentence forms to reinforce grammar usage.

Examples:

Affirmative: “He is studying English.”

Negative: “He is not studying English.”

Question: “Is he studying English?”

Such activities improved learners’ ability to vary sentence structures effectively.

Dialogue Memorization and Role-Playing

Students learned and performed dialogues, later modifying them for new

situations. This transition from controlled to semi-creative use of language helped build

communicative competence and confidence.

Obstacles and Modifications

While ALM-based activities successfully strengthened grammar and pronunciation,

some students felt the tasks were overly repetitive and lacked variety. In response,

teachers:

Combined ALM with Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)

Customized dialogues to mirror real-life interactions

Incorporated digital tools (apps, audio files) to boost motivation

Educators concluded that ALM was most effective when used as a complement to

more interactive and student-centered approaches.

Findings and Interpretation

Language Gains

Post-lesson speaking assessments showed the following improvements:

20% boost in grammar accuracy

15% increase in speaking fluency

Greater confidence among learners during oral tasks

Student Feedback

Surveys revealed that:

76% found the drills useful for grammar learning

64% valued help with pronunciation

58% wanted more creative and varied activities


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika – Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика – Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Special Issue – 5 (2025) / ISSN 2181-3701

84

The results highlight that while ALM offers structure, its effectiveness is

maximized when combined with more engaging and communicative strategies.

CONCLUSION

When adapted thoughtfully, the audiolingual method remains a useful resource for

teaching intermediate learners. At the B1 level, it helps students solidify grammar
knowledge, improve pronunciation, and gain fluency. To ensure a balanced learning
experience, it should be integrated with approaches that promote interactive speaking
and student engagement. This hybrid model not only supports linguistic accuracy but
also encourages the communicative skills necessary for higher proficiency levels.


REFERENCES:

1.

Brown, H. D. (2007).

Principles of Language Learning and Teaching

. Pearson

Longman.

2.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001).

Approaches and Methods in Language

Teaching

. Cambridge University Press.

3.

Skinner, B. F. (1957).

Verbal Behavior

. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Библиографические ссылки

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Longman.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.