Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika
–
Зарубежная
лингвистика
и
лингводидактика
–
Foreign
Linguistics and Linguodidactics
Journal home page:
https://inscience.uz/index.php/foreign-linguistics
Organization and procedure of debate as a group
discussion
Mokhira DJURAEVA
1
Uzbekistan State World Languages University
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received November 2024
Received in revised form
10 December 2024
Accepted 25 December 2024
Available online
25 January 2024
This article examines the organization and procedure of
debate as a structured form of group discussion. It analyzes the
key elements that contribute to effective debates, including
topic definition, team roles, structured formats with time limits,
rules of engagement, and the importance of evidence-based
argumentation. The article explores the sequential stages of a
typical debate, emphasizing the significance of clear
communication, respectful engagement, and the moderator's
role in ensuring fairness. Understanding these organizational
and procedural aspects is essential for both participants and
observers to maximize the learning and engagement potential
of debates.
2181-3701
/©
2024 in Science LLC.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol2-iss1
/S
-pp185-188
This is an open-access article under the Attribution 4.0 International
(CC BY 4.0) license (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru
Keywords:
debate,
group discussion,
argumentation,
communication,
procedure,
organization,
critical thinking,
structured discussion,
rules of engagement,
evidence-based
argumentation.
Guruh muhokamasining bir turi sifatida bahs-munozarani
tashkil etish va o‘tkazish
tartibi
ANNOTATSIYA
Kalit so‘zlar
:
bahs,
guruh muhokamasi,
argumentatsiya,
kommunikatsiya,
tartib-qoida,
tashkilot,
tanqidiy fikrlash,
strukturalangan muhokama,
muhokama qoidalari,
Ushbu maqola bahsni tashkil qilish va uning tartib-
qoidalarini strukturalangan guruh muhokamasi shaklida
o‘rganadi. U samarali bahsga hissa qo‘shuvchi asosiy omillarni
tahlil qiladi, jumladan: mavzuni aniqlash, jamoa rollari, vaqt
chegaralari bilan tuzilgan formatlar, muhokama qoidalari
hamda dalillarga asoslangan argumentatsiyaning muhimligi.
Maqolada odatiy bahs bosqichlari ketma-ket tahlil qilinib, aniq
muloqot, hurmat bilan ishtirok etish va bahsni adolatli olib
borishda moderatorning roli yoritiladi. Ushbu tashkiliy va
1
Teacher, Department of Teaching English Language Methodology Uzbekistan State World Languages University.
Tashkent, Uzbekistan. E-mail: mxdjuraeva@mail.ru
Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika
–
Зарубежная лингвистика
и лингводидактика
–
Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics
Special Issue
–
1 (2025) / ISSN 2181-3701
186
dalillarga asoslangan
argumentatsiya.
protsessual jihatlarni tushunish ishtirokchilar hamda
kuzatuvchilar uchun bahslarning o‘quv va interaktiv
imkoniyatlaridan maksimal darajada foydalanishda muhim
ahamiyatga ega.
Организация и порядок проведения дебатов как
группового обсуждения
АННОТАЦИЯ
Ключевые слова:
дебаты,
групповая дискуссия,
аргументация,
коммуникация,
процедура,
организация,
критическое мышление,
структурированное
обсуждение,
правила ведения
дискуссии,
аргументация на основе
доказательств.
В данной
статье рассматриваются организация и
процедура дебатов как структурированной формы
групповой дискуссии. Анализируются ключевые элементы,
способствующие
эффективным
дебатам,
включая
определение темы, роли команд, структурированные
форматы с временными ограничениями, правила ведения
дискуссии
и
важность
аргументации
на
основе
доказательств. В статье подробно рассматриваются
последовательные
этапы
типичных
дебатов,
подчеркивается значение четкого общения, уважительного
взаимодействия и роли модератора в обеспечении
справедливости. Понимание этих организационных и
процедурных аспектов важно как для участников, так и для
наблюдателей,
чтобы
максимально
использовать
образовательный и интерактивный потенциал дебатов.
INTRODUCTION
Debate, a structured form of group discussion, offers a dynamic platform for
exploring complex issues and fostering critical thinking. Unlike casual conversations,
debates involve pre-defined roles, structured arguments, and a clear process for
presenting and refuting viewpoints. This article examines the organizational structure
and procedural aspects of debate as a group discussion, focusing on the key elements that
contribute to effective and engaging debates. Understanding these procedures is vital for
participants to contribute meaningfully and for audiences to follow the arguments
effectively.
METHODS
This article employs a descriptive and analytical approach. We examine the
established rules and procedures of various debate formats, drawing upon existing
literature on communication, argumentation, and group dynamics. Key elements of
debate organization and procedure are analyzed to identify best practices for successful
debates. Examples from common debate formats, such as parliamentary debate and
Lincoln-Douglas debate, are used to illustrate the key concepts.
RESULTS
Effective debate organization hinges on several critical components:
Defining the Topic and Scope:
A clear and concise debate topic is paramount.
Ambiguous topics can lead to unproductive discussions. The scope of the debate should
be clearly defined to prevent discussions from straying into irrelevant areas.
Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika
–
Зарубежная лингвистика
и лингводидактика
–
Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics
Special Issue
–
1 (2025) / ISSN 2181-3701
187
Team Formation and Roles:
Debates typically involve two or more teams, each
with specific roles. These roles might include a proposition team (arguing in favor of a
resolution), an opposition team (arguing against it), and potentially judges or
moderators. Each team member should have a defined speaking role and responsibility.
Structure and Time Limits:
A structured format is crucial for maintaining order
and ensuring all sides are heard. This involves pre-determined speaking times for each
participant, allowing for rebuttals and summaries. Timekeeping is critical to ensuring
fairness and preventing one side from dominating the discussion.
Rules of Engagement:
Clear rules of engagement are essential. These rules govern
acceptable forms of argumentation, evidence presentation, and conduct. Rules might
prohibit personal attacks, require evidence-based arguments, or specify the format for
rebuttals and cross-examination.
Evidence and Argumentation:
Effective debates rely on strong arguments
supported by credible evidence. Participants should be prepared to present logical
reasoning, relevant data, and compelling examples to support their claims. The quality of
arguments and evidence significantly impacts the persuasiveness of a team's position.
Here we can deliver an example debate:
Debate Topic: "Is Online Learning as Effective as Traditional Classroom
Learning?"
Setting: A high school auditorium with students, teachers, and parents present for
the debate.
Characters:
1. Speaker A (Pro-Online Learning)
–
Emily
2. Speaker B (Pro-Traditional Learning)
–
James
Speaker A: Emily (Pro-Online Learning)
Opening Statement:
Ladies and gentlemen, today we raise the question of whether online learning is as
effective as traditional classroom learning. We beg to differ with the notion that only
traditional classrooms can provide quality education. We believe online learning can
succeed in achieving educational goals by offering flexibility and accessibility.
Main Argument:
Firstly, let’s learn about the advantages of online platforms. They consist of various
interactive tools that engage students in ways that traditional methods may not. For
instance, students can access resources side by side with their coursework, allowing for a
more comprehensive understanding of the material.
Counterargument:
Now, some may complain about the lack of face-to-face interaction in online
learning. However, we argue that this format is suitable for many learners who thrive in
independent study environments. Studies show that many students are happy with the
online format because it allows them to learn at their own pace.
Supportive Evidence:
Moreover, online learning can account for diverse learning styles. Those who are
visual or auditory learners often find that digital content is more engaging than
traditional textbooks. Additionally, online courses are capable of reaching students who
may have difficulties attending physical classes due to geographical or personal
constraints.
Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika
–
Зарубежная лингвистика
и лингводидактика
–
Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics
Special Issue
–
1 (2025) / ISSN 2181-3701
188
Conclusion of the Debate:
In conclusion, while traditional learning has its merits, we must take into account
of the benefits that online learning provides. It offers a sense of autonomy and flexibility
that can lead to successful educational outcomes. I encourage you all to consider these
points as we continue this debate.
DISCUSSION
The procedure of a debate involves a carefully sequenced series of speeches,
rebuttals, and cross-examination (depending on the debate format). This sequence
ensures a structured flow of information and facilitates a comprehensive exploration of
the topic. The effectiveness of the debate depends not only on the procedural elements
but also on the participants' abilities to articulate their arguments clearly, present
compelling evidence, and effectively address counterarguments. Furthermore, the role of
the moderator or judge in ensuring fairness and upholding the rules is crucial for
maintaining the integrity of the debate process. The ability to listen actively and engage
respectfully with opposing viewpoints is also an essential skill for successful
participation in debates.
CONCLUSION
The organization and procedure of debate are fundamental to its effectiveness as a
group discussion. By following a structured format, with clear roles, rules, and time
limits, debates provide a valuable mechanism for analyzing complex issues, promoting
critical thinking, and enhancing communication skills. The successful execution of a
debate requires careful planning, preparation, and adherence to established procedures,
ensuring a productive and engaging experience for all participants and observers.
REFERENCES:
1.
James Cook University. (2012). Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic (VAK) learning
style model. Retrieved September 5, 2013, from <http://www.jcu.edu.au/wiledpack/
modules/fsl/JCU_090460.html>
2.
Krieger, D. (2005). Teaching debate to ESL students: A six class unit. The
Internet TESL Journal, 11(2), Retrieved August 20, 2013, from <http://iteslj.org/
Techniques/KriegerDebate.html>
