Authors

  • Abdusalom Mahsutaliyev
    Tashkent State University of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.107984

Abstract

This article examines foreign experiences in identifying factors affecting the level of poverty from a theoretical and practical perspective, and provides recommendations on the application of classical economists' theoretical views on the factors that cause poverty, its impact on the economy, its elimination, and their aspects suitable for the conditions of Uzbekistan.

 

 

background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2080

FOREIGN EXPERIENCES IN IDENTIFYING FACTORS AFFECTING THE LEVEL

OF POVERTY

Mahsutaliyev Abdusalom Hasanovich

Associate Professor, Tashkent State University of Economics

Abstract:

This article examines foreign experiences in identifying factors affecting the level of

poverty from a theoretical and practical perspective, and provides recommendations on the

application of classical economists' theoretical views on the factors that cause poverty, its

impact on the economy, its elimination, and their aspects suitable for the conditions of

Uzbekistan.

Keywords:

income level, consumer basket, social protection, minimum consumption

expenditure, daily consumption rate

In the last century, more precisely on January 8, 1964, the President of the United States

of America L. Johnson declared “America’s War on Poverty”. Some time later, on August 20,

this “war” became law. This law, based on the capabilities of the United States economy,

determined the government’s directions for preventing and reducing poverty. This is referred to

in the history of the United States as a grand strategy under the name “War on Poverty”. One of

its practical works is that everyone works, works, uses their intellectual potential and tries not

to lag behind society on the path of “building a great society”. The relevant representatives of

the government will help the lagging strata of the population in the manner prescribed by law.

This law has already shown its strength in 1965. The reason for achieving results that had not

been achieved since the 1930s in just one year was a complex socio-economic state policy and

liberalism. The achievement of property rights occurred through the creation of freedom and

privileges, as stipulated in the law. It was during these years that the number of low-income and

poor people in the country decreased, and due to the gratuitous assistance provided by the state

- subsidies and preferential loans, the number of small businesses and entrepreneurs increased

almost 3 times.

1

.

Poverty in Europe, its consequences, and the factors that reduce it were reflected in the

works of Adam Smith. According to him, poverty is a condition associated with human nature,

and a process that creates feelings of discrimination, shame, and alienation among the

population in society. Here, it is said that the lack of ability to create material well-being is not

a hereditary trait, but rather a fundamental line or feature that arises between social standards

and material well-being in this society.

2

Based on the work of Adam Smith, the poverty line was

created in the 19th century by calculating the family budget, that is, their income and expenses,

especially those spent on goods and services in the consumer basket.

1

Raitsin V.Ya. Modeli planirovaniya urovnya jizni. - M. "Economics", 1987, pp. 42-60

2

A. Smith. Investigation of nature and wealth. - M. 1962


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2081

Since then, according to the World Bank, the absolute poverty line has been calculated at

$1.25 per day. Today, due to the increase in the variety of products in the consumer basket, if

the daily norm is less than $3.7, the owner of this income is considered poor. Interestingly,

given that more than 70 percent of daily income is spent on minimal consumption, mainly on

food, poverty is a condition that negatively affects the economy, since the inability to save

money and invest is a process that is contrary to the prosperity of the country's economy.

Later, European economists established that the daily norm for the poorest countries is

1.25 US dollars, while the poverty line is 2.15 US dollars per day. Today, this figure is

equivalent to 5.6 US dollars. Also, the population groups with a daily income of more than 2

US dollars and less than 4 US dollars began to be considered the economically disadvantaged

population.

The table below presents poverty levels in some foreign countries using different

concepts.

Table 1.2

Some foreign countries with poverty levels (2014-2021)

3

Country name

Absolute

poverty (in %)

Relative

poverty (in %)

Poverty rate (in %) when anti-

poverty concepts are applied

Russia

29

6.1

12.2

USA

24

7.3

14.3

Japan

26

6.7

14.7

China

43

5.2

15.2

European countries

27

7.1

13.2

Some European countries, seeing the benefits of these anti-poverty concepts, have begun

to set their own poverty lines as part of their reforms. For example, in China, where the number

of poor people increased from 26 million to 128 million when the daily income was 55 cents to

1 US dollar, Scandinavian countries such as Luxembourg, Austria, Germany, and Norway set

the daily income at 60 dollars, which reduced the number of poor people in households with 4

members from 960,000 to 450,000. In the United States, daily income also increased from 5.7

dollars to 61 dollars, and here the number of poor people also decreased by an average of 3.5-4

times.

According to the latest statistics, Belarus, as well as Moldova, are recognized as the

poorest countries in Europe. Most of the population of these territories earns no more than two

thousand euros per year. In Liechtenstein or Switzerland, one person can earn up to 60 thousand

3

wseitz@worldbank.org


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2082

euros per year. Serbia, which is not able to overcome the post-crisis period, has experienced

serious financial difficulties. In this regard, the average salary is about three thousand euros.

The poorest country in the European Union is Bulgaria, where one person earns no more than

2,800 euros per year. We would also like to mention the Republic of Haiti, which has a

population of about 10 million. Since it was a French colony in the past, the state is still French.

Together, it is the poorest country in the Americas. The population of Haiti constantly suffers

from natural disasters and mass epidemics. That is why this country is on the list of the poorest

countries in the world. Gross domestic product is the main and main macroeconomic indicator -

the regulator, by which it is determined which country is the richest or the poorest. Its value

depends on a number of factors, including the level of population growth. It is quite logical that

the country somehow absorbs the "new" people born at a high rate. Unfortunately, the poorest

countries in Africa and Asia cannot fundamentally solve these problems, so the situation of the

population is worsening from year to year. These countries occupy high places in the world

ranking in terms of the number of poor people. More than 63% of their population is recognized

as poor. Although GDP per capita is often used as a criterion for determining poor countries,

the use of purchasing power parity (PPP) allows for a more accurate assessment of the

purchasing power of an individual in each country. According to the rating, Uzbekistan ranked

67th out of 190. The GDP per capita per year was $10.9 thousand. The higher the rank, the

poorer the country. Among the Central Asian countries, Tajikistan ranked 43rd ($5.8 thousand),

Kyrgyzstan ranked 48th ($6.8 thousand), Turkmenistan ranked 101st ($19.7 thousand), and

Kazakhstan ranked 128th ($34.5 thousand). The poorest countries in the world are South Sudan

($455), Burundi ($916), and the Central African Republic ($1,132).

It is noted that the international poverty line is a concept published by the World Bank in

September 2022, which is set at $2.15 per person per day in purchasing power parity terms.

It is noted that this calculation is irrelevant for the poverty line in Uzbekistan.
It is also noted that there are other poverty lines, which are:
-$3.2 for countries with lower-middle income levels;
-$5.6 for upper-middle-income countries;
For reference, today Indonesia is home to more than 270 million people. This country is

also currently implementing extensive reforms to reduce poverty. In recent years, the poverty

rate has decreased from 12% to 9.6%. It is noted that there is enough wealth and resources in

the world to ensure a decent standard of living for all humanity. Despite this, people in

countries such as South Sudan, Burundi and the Central African Republic continue to live in

desperate poverty. The poorest countries in the world also include Afghanistan, Syria and

Eritrea, which have been experiencing political instability and conflict for years. The top ten

also include the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mozambique, Niger, Malawi, Liberia,

Madagascar and Yemen.

According to a UN report, the poverty rate in Uzbekistan has decreased by 12.5%

​ ​ over the past 20 years.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2083

Approximately 18.4% of the adult population in Uzbekistan (4.2 million citizens) live

below the poverty line.

The estimated minimum consumption expenditure in Uzbekistan for 2025 is 669,000

soums per person per month.

In world practice, the use of the minimum consumption expenditure indicator as a poverty

line is widespread, and this indicator is used to:

identifying the target group of the population in need of material and other social

support from the state;

increasing the effectiveness and targeting of tasks and measures set out in the poverty

reduction strategy and programs, as well as conducting their constant monitoring;

It is used as a criterion for determining the minimum amount of pensions and benefits,

as well as for providing other types of material assistance to poor families.

Resolution No. 544 of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated

August 27, 2021 “On the introduction into practice of the procedure for calculating the cost of

minimum consumption expenses” It has been determined thatStarting from 2022, the monthly

per capita income criterion used in the process of recognizing a family as low-income through

the Unified Register of Social Protection information system will be equal to the minimum

consumption expenditure, and the Ministry of Economic Development and Poverty Reduction

of the Republic of Uzbekistan will calculate the forecast parameters of the value of the

minimum consumption expenditure by August each year based on inflation expectations.

This is an important positive step in determining the minimum consumption expenditure,

as well as the parameters of the standard of living and quality of life of the population, taking

into account the current relevance and complex impact of globalization. However, during the 25

years before the beginning of the qualitative period of independence, the indicators of the

consumer basket were not clearly calculated and were not openly used in official information

sources.

The UN report notes that the largest share of the poor population by all indicators is in the

Republic of Karakalpakstan (29.9%), Namangan region (27.5%), and Tashkent region (26.5%).

The report emphasizes Uzbekistan's goals of halving poverty by 2026 and achieving a

median income by 2030.

The report expresses confidence that Uzbekistan's plan to completely eradicate poverty in

the country by 2030 has deep foundations.

It is ensuring moderate development in the country, which is seen as the biggest factor in

the fight against poverty.

The United Nations uses the official term “least developed countries” to assess the level

of economic development. This “black” list includes countries with a per capita GDP of less

than $750. Currently, there are 52 such countries, and it is no secret that the poorest are African

countries. They are on the UN list from 32 to 34.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2084

The main causes of poverty in these countries are recognized as the constant diseases of

the local population, war or military operations. In addition, in most of these countries, the

population dies of AIDS before the age of forty. As one philosopher said, those who have a

chronic disease in their family will never be rich. Several scientists have also contributed to

science with such thoughts. For example, according to the results of research conducted by

Pakistani scientists Taqid Majid and Noman Malik in 2015, the level of literacy is also included

among the factors causing poverty. The idea is put forward that factors such as the experience,

age, gender and employment of the head of the family affect the poverty of a household. This is

explained by the fact that women do not have high opportunities to get an education and earn an

income. Based on research, it is noted that, firstly, poverty is inversely proportional to the level

of education, secondly, those who have remittances in rural areas are less likely to fall into

poverty, and thirdly, the urbanization process also reduces poverty and increases it in rural areas.

In turn, it is argued that experience, age and employment in agriculture do not cause poverty.

Milton Friedman, one of the founders of effective monetary policy in the United States,

emphasizes that income inequality does not accurately reflect statistical distribution. In his

opinion, the distribution of income in terms of consumption depends on the reasons that give

rise to them. One of the reasons for income inequality is related to the unequal distribution of

people's abilities. This trend was also noted by the scientist H. Stucke, while J. Minser

identified and evaluated the factors of investment in human capital and income inequality. It is

noted that the inequality of people's income depends on investments in human capital, and the

investment process is based on free choice. According to Minser, high wages require a lot of

learning. Therefore, the difference between professions is explained by differences in their

learning, and the absolute difference in the duration of learning causes percentage differences in

annual income. The difference between the incomes of several owners of the same profession is

associated with the extension of the period of investment in human capital experience. In

general, it is argued that factors such as education, age and occupation are the main reasons for

the stratification of people's incomes.

S. Peng et al. in their study analyze the factors that cause poverty. They list the following

as factors that cause the likelihood of poverty: old age, being a woman, not having a spouse,

growing up in a family without a father or mother, unemployment, renting public housing, low

literacy and disease. Also, having a disabled person or a chronic disease in the family. It should

be noted that higher education is said to help avoid poverty and marginal poverty.

Achieving a high level of material well-being, health and safety of the population,

creating guarantees for their implementation, creating political, economic and social conditions

for the population, and reforms aimed at poverty reduction are the main directions of state

social policy today. This direction is being implemented by implementing appropriate socio-

economic policies aimed at ensuring a decent life and free development of every person.

In conclusion, we can say that new approaches to solving problems related to the lifestyle

of the population, labor relations in the enterprise (organization, firm, company), regulation of

labor remuneration, evaluation of employee services, regulation of wages and socio-labor

relations in general, have a direct impact on reducing the concept of so-called poverty.

The poor are those whose average per capita income is less than 1/3 of the national

average wage. In addition, the concept of poverty can be clarified by the share of food expenses


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2085

in family expenses. If food expenses exceed 50 percent, the family is considered poor (in rich

families this amount is 5-6%).

Poverty is both a macroeconomic and social problem, and no society can escape it. For

this reason, national economies cannot always regulate themselves. The level of poverty in

some countries directly affects their ability to establish economic, political, and social relations

with other countries. Poverty is especially evident during periods of economic crises,

pandemics, and recessions, which affects the strengthening of ties between some countries and

the extension of a helping hand.

In the United States, the number of low-income and poor people decreased between 1960

and 1965, and small businesses and entrepreneurs almost tripled due to free government

assistance - subsidies and soft loans. While China's daily income increased from 55 cents to $1,

the number of poor people increased from 26 million to 128 million. Scandinavian countries

such as Luxembourg, Austria, Germany, and Norway set a daily income of $60, which reduced

the number of poor people among households with four members from 960,000 to 450,000. In

the United States, daily income also increased from $5.7 to $61, and the number of poor people

decreased by 3.5-4 times.

LIST OF REFERENCES USED:

1. 1.. . Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-60 dated January 28,

2022 “On the Development Strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026”;

2. 3. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated June 7, 2018 on the

implementation of the program "Every Family is an Entrepreneur";

3. 4. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PQ-4231 dated March 7,

2019 “On additional measures to widely involve the population in entrepreneurship in the

regions and develop family entrepreneurship”;

4. Uzbekistan Republic President's"PF-6241 dated June 4, 2021"Population social support

system further to improve aimed at additional measures "about" Decree;

5. Uzbekistan Republic Ministers CourtIssue 617, October 4, 2021 "Social to the defense

needy the youth of support additional measures "about" Decision;

6. 7. Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Together we will build a free and prosperous, democratic state of

Uzbekistan. – T. “Uzbekistan”, 2016;

7. 8. Mukhitdinova MZ “Assessment of the standard of living of the population: analysis and

results” - International Scientific Electronic Journal of Finance and Accounting. No. 2,

April, 2019.;

8. Manning N. Russia v bede // Mir Rossii. 2001.-No. 1. S. 17;

9. Vavilina N.D. Bednost v Rossii is a social problem. Novosibirsk, 2000.;

10. Varvus S.A. Sovremennoy bednosti "Profil". - Vestnik Taganrog Institute of Management

and Economics. - 2010 - p. 45-56.;

11. Raitsin V.Ya. Modeli planirovaniya urovnya jizni. - M. "Economics", 1987, pp. 42-60;


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2086

12. Sorokina A.V. Funktsii bednosti: analyz zapadnykh kontseptsii i reali rossiyskoi

deystvitelnosti // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevsky: series social

science. 2002. #1. S. 219;

13. Q.S. Abdurakhmonov, S.R. Kholmo`minov “Labor Economics and Sociology”. - Textbook

- T.: Publishing House of the Literary Fund of the Writers' Union of Uzbekistan, 2004;

14. QXAbdurakhmonov, XXAbduramanov. Lifestyle and income of the population, - Tashkent

- 2011;

15. Bachurin A. Ekonomicheskaya i sotsialnaya politika gosudarstva po uluchsheniyu

conditional jizni: Economist. -2003.-№8.-p. 23-27, str. 23-26.;

16. Slesinger G.E. "Sotsialnaya ekonomika" - M.: "Delo i servis", 2001. 360 p.;

17. Sicheva V.S. Измерение уровня бедности: a historical question. - M., 1996. No. 3. S.

142.;

18. Surinov A.E. Doxody naselenia. Opyt kolichestvennyx izmereniy. M., 2000. S. 306-309;

19. Thompson DL, Priestley D. Sociology. M., 1998. S. 353.;

20. Deaton A.(2013) The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality,

Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 27;

21. Ricardo David(1817) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Piero Sraffa

(Ed.) Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Volume I, Cambridge University Press,

1951, p. 135. 33;

22.

Solow, Robert M.(February 1956). "A contribution to the theory of economic growth".

Quarterly Journal of Economics. 70 (1): 65–94. doi:10.2307/1884513. 34;

23. William Zeits "Where is the Jew? Indicators of the level of poverty, average consumption

and average class in Central Asia at the regional level".

wseitz@worldbank.org

;

24. Williams F. Social Policy: a critical introduction. L. 1994;

25. Haveman R. New Policy for the New Poverty // Challenge. 1988. September, October.;

World Economic Outlook, International Monetary Fund. April 2018. Chapter IV. P. 8.;

References

. . Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-60 dated January 28, 2022 “On the Development Strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026”;

Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated June 7, 2018 on the implementation of the program "Every Family is an Entrepreneur";

Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PQ-4231 dated March 7, 2019 “On additional measures to widely involve the population in entrepreneurship in the regions and develop family entrepreneurship”;

Uzbekistan Republic President's"PF-6241 dated June 4, 2021"Population social support system further to improve aimed at additional measures "about" Decree;

Uzbekistan Republic Ministers CourtIssue 617, October 4, 2021 "Social to the defense needy the youth of support additional measures "about" Decision;

Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Together we will build a free and prosperous, democratic state of Uzbekistan. – T. “Uzbekistan”, 2016;

Mukhitdinova MZ “Assessment of the standard of living of the population: analysis and results” - International Scientific Electronic Journal of Finance and Accounting. No. 2, April, 2019.;

Manning N. Russia v bede // Mir Rossii. 2001.-No. 1. S. 17;

Vavilina N.D. Bednost v Rossii is a social problem. Novosibirsk, 2000.;

Varvus S.A. Sovremennoy bednosti "Profil". - Vestnik Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics. - 2010 - p. 45-56.;

Raitsin V.Ya. Modeli planirovaniya urovnya jizni. - M. "Economics", 1987, pp. 42-60;

Sorokina A.V. Funktsii bednosti: analyz zapadnykh kontseptsii i reali rossiyskoi deystvitelnosti // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevsky: series social science. 2002. #1. S. 219;

Q.S. Abdurakhmonov, S.R. Kholmo`minov “Labor Economics and Sociology”. - Textbook - T.: Publishing House of the Literary Fund of the Writers' Union of Uzbekistan, 2004;

QXAbdurakhmonov, XXAbduramanov. Lifestyle and income of the population, - Tashkent - 2011;

Bachurin A. Ekonomicheskaya i sotsialnaya politika gosudarstva po uluchsheniyu conditional jizni: Economist. -2003.-№8.-p. 23-27, str. 23-26.;

Slesinger G.E. "Sotsialnaya ekonomika" - M.: "Delo i servis", 2001. 360 p.;

Sicheva V.S. Измерение уровня бедности: a historical question. - M., 1996. No. 3. S. 142.;

Surinov A.E. Doxody naselenia. Opyt kolichestvennyx izmereniy. M., 2000. S. 306-309;

Thompson DL, Priestley D. Sociology. M., 1998. S. 353.;

Deaton A.(2013) The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 27;

Ricardo David(1817) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Piero Sraffa (Ed.) Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Volume I, Cambridge University Press, 1951, p. 135. 33;

Solow, Robert M.(February 1956). "A contribution to the theory of economic growth". Quarterly Journal of Economics. 70 (1): 65–94. doi:10.2307/1884513. 34;

William Zeits "Where is the Jew? Indicators of the level of poverty, average consumption and average class in Central Asia at the regional level".wseitz@worldbank.org;

Williams F. Social Policy: a critical introduction. L. 1994;

Haveman R. New Policy for the New Poverty // Challenge. 1988. September, October.; World Economic Outlook, International Monetary Fund. April 2018. Chapter IV. P. 8.;