Authors

  • Xusnida Soliyeva
    University of Business and Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.115522

Abstract

This article analyzes the topic of discourse and simultaneously discusses the importance of historical discourse. In the historical work, anthroponyms and toponyms, as well as their nominative and communicative features, are examined. The article also highlights the functions of anthroponyms within the scope of their use in literary works.

 

 

background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1184

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF LITERARY WORKS

(BASED ON JAVLON JOVLIYEV’S WORK "DON’T BE AFRAID")

Soliyeva Xusnida Hasanboy qizi

Lecturer at University of Business and Science

Email: husnida201@gmail.com

Phone: +998978261197

Abstract:

This article analyzes the topic of discourse and simultaneously discusses the

importance of historical discourse. In the historical work, anthroponyms and toponyms, as well

as their nominative and communicative features, are examined. The article also highlights the

functions of anthroponyms within the scope of their use in literary works.

Keywords:

discourse, anthroponym, toponym, Don’t Be Afraid, Lola, Abdurauf Fitrat, Ulug'

Kursdosh.

INTRODUCTION

Discourse is an interdisciplinary research topic. Beyond theoretical linguistics, it is a

main object of study in fields related to computer linguistics and artificial intelligence,

psychology, philosophy and logic, sociology, anthropology and ethnology, literature, semiotics,

historiography, theology, law, pedagogy, translation theory and practice, politics, and other

disciplines connected with discourse. Each of these fields approaches discourse study in its

unique way.

N.A. Nikonov considered toponyms as proper nouns having three types of meanings: 1)

pre-toponymic meaning (the etymological meaning of the appellative), 2) the inherent meaning

of the toponym itself, and 3) post-toponymic meaning [2,62-63]. According to Nikonov, the

name "Yelena" embodies the concepts of "person" and "woman." Furthermore, this name also

points to meanings like "there she is" and "individual" [3,55].

A similar viewpoint is found in the work of Azerbaijani linguist Hasan Aliev, who

stated that proper nouns have both specific and general meanings. For example, the name Sevil

means person, woman, Azerbaijani woman; Ivan means person, male, Russian [4,7].

In this article, we analyze the historicity of discourse in literature. To deeply explore

discourse analysis in literary works, we focus on anthroponyms and proper nouns used in

Javlon Jovliyev's "Don’t Be Afraid." The work features various categories of proper nouns,

including anthroponyms (personal names), toponyms (place names), names of organizations,

and other proper nouns. Some of these are examined in detail. Each proper noun in the work

carries communicative and informative properties. Through these onomastic units, the general

idea of the historical work is conveyed clearly and understandably to the reader.

The author uses various anthroponyms to reveal this characteristic. The main character

of the story remains unnamed, which is itself a unique stylistic choice. Lola is the beloved


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1185

daughter of the main character. "I loved Lola from school and still love her. We were neighbors,

growing up side by side."

Discourse is the socially applied use of language to convey broad historical meanings.

The use of historical names also serves a specific function. For example, the figure of Abdurauf

Fitrat in the story clearly shows the goal of students going to Germany for education. Fitrat’s

gaze sharpens, and his steps quicken, as if his hands and feet hurried forward. Those behind

him follow, and the Timur Mausoleum stands proudly and firmly, casting a shadow over

Samarkand.

This use is conditioned by social circumstances — who uses it and in what context. The

author conveys his idea through historical figures. Munavvarqori Abdurashidxonov is described

in historical sources as an enlightened intellectual and a leader of the Jadid movement. He

understood early the need for educated youth in Turkestan and supported this cause.

"You wrote a letter to Munavvarqori Abdurashidxonov, emphasizing the importance of

Western Europe in the life of Turkestan: 'Sending students abroad is not just about producing a

few engineers or specialists; it won’t solve the poverty of our people. The focus must be on the

economic resources needed to improve the situation and their application. For this, we need

local youth who deeply understand economics, as essential as water and air.'"

A proper noun is “semantically reduced” and not related to the concept: “The

transformation of a common noun into a proper noun is primarily the loss of the concept and

the word becoming a nickname; conversely, the transformation of a proper noun into a common

noun is associated with the emergence of a new concept through new important features of the

word” [1,61].

The name of a German woman in the story also ensures informativeness: “According to

dormitory manager Laura Schmidt, the conflict arose due to a love quarrel.” Through the Timur

Mausoleum, students seem to receive blessings from Timur, as if Timur himself gave a prayer.

"We are not facing just a mausoleum filled with history and glory, but Timur himself, with his

proud and sharp gaze, seemed to be standing and watching."

In the story, a child’s birth is believed to be cursed, and the grandfather continuously

questions where and from whom this curse originated. The grandfather avoids telling the truth

about who the traitor really is. However, villagers already know this truth.

According to V.N. Telya, naming acts proceed in direct cooperation with pragmatic

factors. The second (significant) factor reflects the nominators’ attitude in their expression:

emotional, evaluative, oriented towards the social context of speech or the existing language

forms, and its functional and stylistic distinctions. Naming reflects not only objective reality but

also pragmatic, subjective attitudes, creating expressive properties of linguistic units based on

the special subjective-modal component of meaning [5].


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1186

“Shodi Choloq, Umri Qozok, Tursunqul grandfathers said: Your father was cruel and corrupt. I

pray! Once upon a time, my grandfather sent everyone to study. All of this happened thanks to

Ulug' Kursdosh from Tashkent.”

In the story, Ulug' Kursdosh is mentioned as a clear symbol of bribery and corruption.

“Great leaders such as Fitrat, Fayzulla Khojayev, and Cholpon became renowned in the Turkic

world.” The narrator argued with him about Babur and the Taj Mahal, saying that he spent

much time in London. “The English made Hindus into humans,” he said. I laughed at his

situation. We also have plenty of such people, but few openly say it abroad.

“Pharaoh Khan, you didn’t bribe the past this much...” Through this historical figure, an

anthroponym is used as a metaphor. He missed Lenin: “After all, he reduced the price of bread

by a few kopecks! Where is such a cap!”

The awakening of the nation is depicted with everyone joining forces for the

enlightenment of the youth. Among those who risked their lives and helped their peers were

Sayyid Alikhoja, Ibrohim Arifkhan, Kamol Dadakhoja, Unsh, Risqi Rahimiy, Abduvohid

Jalongir, Tolagan Momin, Ochilkhoja, Ahmad Shukriy, Tokir Shokiriy, and Salimxon

Tillaxonov, whose presence promises joyful years ahead for the nation. They did not think only

of themselves or yawn like old men in the teahouse; instead, they walked street to street,

begging if needed, to send students abroad for education.

The "Komak" charity soon opened regional branches, and donations were collected for

the education of our children in Germany from all sides. We, the theater troupe led by Mannon

Uyghur and our great poet Cholpon, prepared a performance for "Komak." Today, Turkestan’s

children are studying in Germany, sitting alongside Russians, Germans, and Poles, often with

even greater intellect. Yet you still sow discord. Can you forget the time when Petrovskiy could

not find a single student to send to Europe?

Professor Dyurte, Mrs. Nozima, Shirinbek Potya Abduvahob qizi, Mrs. Marta Meyerson, and

Ahmad Shukriy participated as historical and textual figures. Navoi is also mentioned in the

story, along with his works Farhod and Shirin and Layli and Majnun.

In conclusion, the use of historical anthroponyms in historical works is very important.

Historical works use historical figures and place names that have unique functions. Besides

their nominative function, they also perform a communicative function. Through historical

works, we can obtain relevant information about historical facts, truths, and the life and

activities of historical figures.

References:

1. Reformatsky A.A. Introduction to Linguistics / ed. by V.A. Vinogradov. Moscow: Aspect

Press, 1996. 536 pages.

2. Nikonov V.A. Introduction to Toponymy. Moscow, 1965. – P.184

3. Nikonov N.A. Tasks and Methods of Anthroponymy // Personal Names in the Past, Present

and Future. Moscow, 1970. P.55.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1187

4. Telya V.N. Connotative Aspect of Semantics of Nominative Units. Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

143 pages.

5. Eliyev N. General Anthroponymy Problems. Baku, 1985. 170 pages.

6. Javlon Jovliyev, Don’t Be Afraid. Tashkent, 2020.

References

Reformatsky A.A. Introduction to Linguistics / ed. by V.A. Vinogradov. Moscow: Aspect Press, 1996. 536 pages.

Nikonov V.A. Introduction to Toponymy. Moscow, 1965. – P.184

Nikonov N.A. Tasks and Methods of Anthroponymy // Personal Names in the Past, Present and Future. Moscow, 1970. P.55.

Telya V.N. Connotative Aspect of Semantics of Nominative Units. Moscow: Nauka, 1986. 143 pages.

Eliyev N. General Anthroponymy Problems. Baku, 1985. 170 pages.

Javlon Jovliyev, Don’t Be Afraid. Tashkent, 2020.