Authors

  • V. Ismailov
  • Sh. Avazov
  • Sh. Yodgorov
  • E. Yadigarov
  • A. Khusomidinov
  • B. Aktamov
  • A. Mansurov
  • N. Muhammadkulov
  • D. Jumaev

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.70510

Abstract

This article provides general information on the methods for calculating the seismic impact in assessing the stability of slopes and covers the main methods used in this area. Methods for calculating the seismic impact in assessing the stability of slopes are of great importance in modern construction and geotechnical engineering. These methods are used to determine the movement of the soil during an earthquake and its effect on structures, as well as to ensure the safety and strength of structures. The development and improvement of methods for calculating the seismic impact will increase the safety of construction projects and create the possibility of implementing them in complex natural conditions. This article discusses the methods for calculating the seismic impact used in assessing the stability of slopes and their practical significance. The results of the study are presented based on the H/V method, i.e. the Response spectrum.

 

 

background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 02,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 751

METHODS FOR CALCULATING SEISMIC EFFECTS IN SLOPE STABILITY

ASSESSMENT

Ismailov V.A., Avazov Sh.B., Yodgorov Sh.I., Yadigarov E.M.,

Khusomidinov A.S., Aktamov B.U., Mansurov A.F.,

Muhammadkulov N.M., Jumaev D.D.

Abstract:

This article provides general information on the methods for calculating the seismic

impact in assessing the stability of slopes and covers the main methods used in this area.

Methods for calculating the seismic impact in assessing the stability of slopes are of great

importance in modern construction and geotechnical engineering. These methods are used to

determine the movement of the soil during an earthquake and its effect on structures, as well as

to ensure the safety and strength of structures. The development and improvement of methods

for calculating the seismic impact will increase the safety of construction projects and create the

possibility of implementing them in complex natural conditions. This article discusses the

methods for calculating the seismic impact used in assessing the stability of slopes and their

practical significance. The results of the study are presented based on the H/V method, i.e. the

Response spectrum.

Introduction

Calculation of seismic impact and determination of slope stability, in turn, are of great

scientific and practical importance. Slope stability allows us to assess how the layers of the

earth's surface react to stress and shaking and how stable they are. This is necessary not only to

ensure the safety of construction sites, but also to maintain their strength in the long term. When

assessing slope stability, seismic impact calculation methods are used to determine the dynamic

properties of the soil, earthquake forces and their impact on structures.

The stability of the soil is understood as the ability of the soil to resist movement. This

property, in turn, depends on the physical and mechanical properties of the soil, such as density,

moisture, composition and other parameters. Seismic impact refers to the static and dynamic

forces acting on the soil and structures during an earthquake. Using methods for calculating the

seismic impact, the movement of the soil during an earthquake and its effect on structures are

determined.

At this point, the methods and technologies used to calculate slope stability and seismic

effects are very wide and diverse. They are important not only for industry professionals, but

also for improving the construction process and increasing safety.

Materials and methods

There are several methods for calculating seismic impact. The most commonly used

methods are:

Static analysis method:

This method is one of the simplest and most widely used

methods for calculating seismic action in assessing the stability of slopes. In this method, the

seismic action is considered as a static load and the stability of the soil is assessed under static

conditions. In order to provide a complete overview of the characteristics, applications,

advantages and limitations of the static analysis method, a detailed analysis of this method is

presented.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 02,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 752

In the static analysis method, seismic action is modeled as static loads. In this method, the

dynamic forces acting on the ground and structures during an earthquake are replaced by static

equivalent loads. Static loads are used to assess the stability of the ground and are based on the

properties of the ground, the earthquake parameters, and the geometric characteristics of the

structure.

Seismic impact is considered as a static load. The stability of the soil is assessed under

static conditions. Static loads are based on soil properties and earthquake parameters.

The static analysis method is carried out in several stages

:

Data collection: The study is

based on the physical and mechanical properties of the soil (e.g., density, bond strength, angular

internal friction) and earthquake parameters (magnitude, distance from epicenter, earthquake

strength).

Static Load Determination: Seismic effects are modeled as static loads. These loads are

based on the soil properties and earthquake parameters. Static loads are used to assess the

stability of the soil. In this step, the soil resistance and the effect of the loads are compared. After

the soil stability is assessed, the results are analyzed and conclusions are drawn about the safety

and strength of the structure.

This method is much simpler and faster to implement than dynamic analysis methods.

The static analysis method requires less resources and computing power. This method is widely

used in various construction projects and is recommended in many standards and manuals.

In this method, the seismic effect is considered as a static load, so not all aspects of the

dynamic effect are fully reflected.

Static analysis is a simple and effective method for calculating the seismic impact in

assessing the stability of slopes. The importance of this method in the field of construction and

geotechnical engineering is demonstrated by providing a complete description of its advantages,

limitations, and practical applications. By improving the static analysis method and integrating it

with dynamic analysis methods, it is possible to more accurately assess the stability of the soil

and ensure the safety of structures.

Dynamic analysis method:

In this method, the seismic effect is considered as a dynamic

load and the stability of the soil is evaluated under dynamic conditions. This method allows for a

more accurate representation of the ground motion during an earthquake.

Dynamic analysis is an important technical method used to assess the stability of

landslides and the risk of soil and rock movement, displacement, or collapse. This method is

widely used in civil engineering, geotechnical engineering, and mining. Dynamic analysis

determines the dynamic properties of the soil, how the soil behaves and maintains or loses its

stability under the influence of earthquake forces, water action, and other external forces.

Dynamic Properties of Soil: The dynamic properties of soil, such as the modulus of

elasticity, viscosity coefficient, and density, play a key role in dynamic analysis. These

parameters determine how the soil behaves under the influence of an earthquake or other

dynamic forces. Dynamic analysis studies the effect of earthquake waves on the soil and how the

soil responds to these forces. Earthquake forces can disrupt the stability of the ground and cause

landslides. The saturation of the soil with water has a significant effect on its stability. Water can

reduce the viscosity of the soil and cause subsidence. Dynamic analysis also takes into account

water pressure and the permeability of the soil.

Construction work, mining, or other structures can cause additional loads on the ground.

These loads can disrupt the stability of the ground and cause landslides.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 02,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 753

When applying the dynamic analysis method, data collection is carried out: physical and

mechanical properties of the soil, earthquake history, water effects, and other important

information are collected. Based on the collected data, a mathematical model of the soil is

created. Through this model, the dynamic movements and stability of the soil are simulated.

The model assesses how the soil will behave and maintain or lose its stability under

different conditions. It determines the level of risk of the soil under the influence of earthquakes,

water impact, and other external forces.

Based on the results of the analysis, necessary measures are recommended to ensure soil

stability. These measures may include soil reinforcement, creation of drainage systems, or

changes to the building design.

The dynamic analysis method allows for a more accurate assessment of ground motion.

The effects of various external forces (earthquake, water, loads) can be taken into account

simultaneously. Based on the analysis results, risks can be identified in advance and measures

can be taken to reduce them.

Numerical modeling methods: Modern computer technologies allow the creation of

numerical models to assess the stability of soil to seismic action. These methods determine the

movement of soil and its impact on structures under various scenarios. The dynamic properties

of soil are important in calculating seismic action. The dynamic modulus of soil, viscosity

coefficient, and other parameters determine how soil behaves under seismic action. These

parameters are measured in laboratory conditions and used in calculations.

Response Spectrum Method:

This method is a diagram showing the response at each

frequency versus the maximum displacement, velocity, or acceleration. The maximum response

at each frequency is found using the spectrum to determine how the system will respond to

seismic action.

Response Spectrum - shows the natural frequencies of a system, how it vibrates (or other

mechanical responses) when subjected to seismic forces. Spectra are usually plotted against the

maximum displacement and maximum velocity or maximum acceleration of the system.

In seismic impact calculations, seismic forces are presented as time - varying forces, but

the Response Spectrum Method calculates seismic forces simultaneously at all frequencies. For

each natural frequency of the system, the maximum values of the displacement, velocity, or

acceleration are taken from the spectrum and calculated for the system.

Dynamic analysis of a system determines its natural frequencies and modes. Once the

frequency and mode of vibration of the system are determined, the response to seismic action

can be calculated using the spectrum. The spectra are plotted against the highest displacement,

velocity, or acceleration for each frequency.

To calculate the effects of seismic forces, the spectral forces that occur during a seismic

event (e.g., earthquakes) are determined. These forces indicate how the system is affected at each

frequency. Using the information in the spectrum, the maximum displacements or forces for each

natural frequency of the system are calculated. By summing the responses from each model, the

overall response of the system to seismic forces is calculated. The results obtained are used to

calculate the forces and deformations of the system.

This method reduces the complexity of performing a full dynamic analysis of the system.

Instead of analyzing over time in the response spectrum method, it is possible to obtain fast and

efficient results by reading the spectrum. In this method, there is no need for time- based analysis,

so the calculations are simplified and accelerated. This method is especially widely used in

seismic analysis. It is very useful in assessing the seismic safety of buildings, bridges, reservoirs,


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 02,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 754

slope stability and other structures. Due to its wide application, this method allows you to work

according to many standards and regulations. The ability to calculate the system response for

each natural frequency and model, as well as the system's response, helps to better understand

the dynamics of the system.

Research results

The H/V method is used to determine the seismic properties of the ground, and the

seismic response spectrum is mainly based on this method. This method helps to assess the

resonance properties of the soil, that is, the frequency and amplitude relationships. At the same

time, this method determines the seismic wave energy absorption properties of the soil.

Seismometric studies are based on synchronous recording of natural noises. Their amplitude-

frequency characteristics are analyzed and compared. Seismometric studies were carried out

using a CMG-6TD seismometer (Guralp, UK). Seismic analysis was carried out using the HVSR

(H/V spectral ratio) method. The Geopsy program was used for analysis. Using the soil response

spectrum, the damping law was determined depending on which frequency and amplitude the

soil corresponds to.

The damping law of the ground is determined using the following formula:
A=A

0

e

- ξ t

Here, A – vibration amplitude, A

0

– maximum vibration amplitude,

ξ –

damping coefficient, T – oscillation period, t – time, e – natural logarithm base (e=2.718).

In the law of decay, the oscillation frequency is expressed by the oscillation period to

determine the duration of the oscillation. In this case, a decay graph is constructed from

oscillation intervals with large amplitudes to small amplitude values over time.

The oscillation of a soil particle is equal to the sum of the periods of each oscillation

according to the law of increasing time.

t

n

= t

n-1

+T

n

Here, t

n

- the sum of the oscillation periods, T

n

- is the oscillation period, and n - the

number of corresponding values of frequency and amplitude.

Seismometric studies were used to determine the response spectrum of the soil to study the effect

of railway transport on the seismic properties of the soil. First, seismometric studies conducted

on the soil were interpreted with values ​ ​ measured in the absence of the influence of railway

transport (Figure 1).


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 02,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 755

Figure 1. Amplitude and frequency coupling spectrum in seismometric data measured in a

quiet state

In the amplitude and frequency characteristics of the soil (Fig. 1), the value of frequency

indicates that the resonance effects or vibrations in the soil are at their maximum. In the second

case, the data obtained under the influence of railway transport showed a decrease in frequency

and an increase in amplitude (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Amplitude and frequency coupling spectrum in seismometric data

measured under the influence of railway transport

The vibration properties of the soil under the influence of railway transport are expressed

in its increased vulnerability to seismic action. It turns out that the ability of the soil to absorb

seismic wave energy is greater than in its quiet state. This means that the dislocation properties

of the soil increase during an earthquake. An increase in the dislocation properties of the soil

indicates the emergence of new discontinuities, an increase in forces in the seismic or dynamic

direction.

The damping property in the response spectrum of the soil: The damping law of the soil

is determined from the amplitude and frequency relationship of the soil particles. The damping

coefficient determined for two cases in the soil showed that the ability of the soil to absorb

seismic energy increased (Fig. 3)


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 02,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 756

Figure 3. Soil damping pattern in seismometric data measured in a quiescent state

Figure 4. Soil damping patterns in seismometric data measured under the influence of

railway transport

Analysis of the soil response spectrum showed that the absorption of seismic energy in a

quiescent state was ξ = 1%, and under the influence of railway transport

ξ = 1.5%. It can

be observed that the overloading of railway transport increases the seismic impact of the soil by

Δξ = 0.5% during an earthquake.

Railway transport imposes excessive loads on the landslide area. In modern geotechnical

and construction engineering, various software products are used to calculate seismic effects.

Among them are PLAXIS, GeoStudio, MIDAS and other programs. With the help of these

programs, it is possible to assess the stability of the soil to seismic effects and check the strength

of structures.

Methods for calculating seismic impact in assessing the stability of landslides are

developing. With the help of modern technologies, artificial intelligence and big data analysis, it

is possible to more accurately assess seismic impact and determine the stability of the soil with

high accuracy. This creates new opportunities in the field of construction and geotechnical

engineering.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 02,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 757

Conclusions

Changes in the vibration properties of the soil under the influence of railway transport

can lead to an increase in seismic energy. This is expressed in a decrease in frequency (from 5.5

Gs to 2.1 Gs) and an increase in amplitude (from 3.4 to 4.2). According to the results observed

through the seismic response spectrum of the soil, its reaction to seismic energy depends on the

physical properties of the soil, and additional loads under the influence of railway transport play

an important role in calculating the energy of the soil. The magnitude, epicenter and depth of the

earthquake play an important role in calculating the seismic impact. Earthquake forces lead to

soil movement and the emergence of dynamic loads affecting structures. Therefore, when

calculating the seismic impact, it is necessary to correctly assess the characteristics of the

earthquake. With the help of these methods, the strength and stability of structures during an

earthquake are assessed, as well as the stability of the soil to seismic action is determined.

Acknowledgements.

This work was funded by grants from the Academy of Sciences of

the Republic of Uzbekistan under the “Development of scientific foundations for assessing

various levels of seismic risk and reducing earthquake losses in seismically active areas” project

and the “Research of the compaction properties of dispersed soils during strong earthquakes in

laboratory and field conditions and development of its classification” project, as well as the

Agency for Innovation Development (nos. ALM202311142839, AL5822012294,

AL5822012298) under the following projects: Creation of a simulation digital model of the city

of Tashkent allowing to assess the level of economic damage from strong earthquakes,

Development of technology for predicting the risk of strong earthquakes, Create an electronic

database on seismological soil characteristics to replace Table 1.1 in the regulatory document:

seismological part of KMK- construction of seismic areas, and Regionally coordinated

assessment of earthquake and flood risks. We sincerely thankful of all the funding Organizations.

References:

1. W. Fellenius, Erdstatische Berechnungen Mit Reibung Und Kohaesion. Berlin, Ernst, 1927.

2. Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1982). Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During

Earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

3. Das, B. M. (2010). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. Cengage Learning.

4. PLAXIS 2D/3D User Manual. (2021). Bentley Systems.

5. GeoStudio User Guide. (2020). Seequent Limited.

6. Ismailov, V., Khusomiddinov, S., Khusomiddinov, A., Yodgorov, Sh., Aktamov, B., and

Avazov, S.: Seismic Risk Assess ment of Jizzakh Region, AIP Conf. Proc. 2432, 030035, 1–

7, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0089664, 2022.

7. Ismailov, V. A., Yodgorov, Sh. I., and Allayev, Sh. B.: Seis mic microzoning of the

Tashkent territory based on cal culation methods, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 152, 107045,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107045, 2022.

8. Ismailov, A. I., Yodgorov, Sh. I., Khusomiddinov, A. S., Yadigarov, E. M., Allayev, S. B.,

and Aktamov, B. U.: New classification of soils by seismic properties for the building code

in Uzbekistan, Geomechanics and Geoengineering– An International Journal,

https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2023.2296975, in press, 2023.

9. Ismailov, A. I., Yodgorov, Sh. I., Khusomiddinov, A. S., Yadigarov, E. M., Allayev, S. B.,

and Aktamov, B. U.: New classification of soils by seismic properties for the building code

in Uzbekistan, Geomechanics and Geoengineering– An International Journal,

https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2023.2296975, in press, 2023.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 02,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 758

10. Aktamov, B. U., Ismailov, V. A., and Yodgorov, Sh. I.: Earthquake damage assessment of

buildings in rural areas (in the sample of Jizzakh region), Int. J. Geol., 10, 35–42, 2020.

11. J.L. Durville and G. Sève, Stabilité des Pentes. Glissements en Terrain Meuble, Techniques

de l’ingénieur, traité construction, chap. C 254, 1996, 16 p.

12. X.P. Zhou and H. Cheng, Analysis of Stability of Three-Dimensional Slopes Using the

Rigorous Limit Equilibrium Method, Engineering Geology 160, 2013, pp. 21-33.

13. L. Bjerrum, Fundamental Consideration on the Shear Strength of Soil. Geotechnique, Vol. 2,

No. 3, 1951, pp. 209-218.

14. N. Lu, A Power Law for Elastic Moduli of Unsaturated Soil. Springer-verlag, Berlin

Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 271-275.

15. R. Kourkoulis, F. Gelagoti, I. Anastasopoulos ans G. Gazetas, Slope Stabilizing Piles and

Pile-Groups: Parametric Study and Design Insights, Journal of Geotechnical and

Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 137(7), July 2011, pp.663-677

16. W. Alkasawneh, A.I.H. Malkawi, J. Nusairat and N. Albataineh, A Comparative Study of

Various Commercially Available Programs in Slope Stability Analysis, Computers and

Geotechnics 35, 2008, pp. 428-435.

17. R. M. Faure, L’évolution des Méthodes de Calcul de Stabilité des Pentes Partie 1: Méthodes

à la Rupture, Revue Française de Géotechnique, No. 92, 2001, p. 3-16.

18. A.W. Bishop, The Use of the Slip Circle in the Stability Analysis of Slopes, Geotechnique, 5

(1), 1955, pp.7-17.

References

W. Fellenius, Erdstatische Berechnungen Mit Reibung Und Kohaesion. Berlin, Ernst, 1927.

Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1982). Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

Das, B. M. (2010). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. Cengage Learning.

PLAXIS 2D/3D User Manual. (2021). Bentley Systems.

GeoStudio User Guide. (2020). Seequent Limited.

Ismailov, V., Khusomiddinov, S., Khusomiddinov, A., Yodgorov, Sh., Aktamov, B., and Avazov, S.: Seismic Risk Assess ment of Jizzakh Region, AIP Conf. Proc. 2432, 030035, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0089664, 2022.

Ismailov, V. A., Yodgorov, Sh. I., and Allayev, Sh. B.: Seis mic microzoning of the Tashkent territory based on cal culation methods, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 152, 107045, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107045, 2022.

Ismailov, A. I., Yodgorov, Sh. I., Khusomiddinov, A. S., Yadigarov, E. M., Allayev, S. B., and Aktamov, B. U.: New classification of soils by seismic properties for the building code in Uzbekistan, Geomechanics and Geoengineering– An International Journal, https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2023.2296975, in press, 2023.

Ismailov, A. I., Yodgorov, Sh. I., Khusomiddinov, A. S., Yadigarov, E. M., Allayev, S. B., and Aktamov, B. U.: New classification of soils by seismic properties for the building code in Uzbekistan, Geomechanics and Geoengineering– An International Journal, https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2023.2296975, in press, 2023.

Aktamov, B. U., Ismailov, V. A., and Yodgorov, Sh. I.: Earthquake damage assessment of buildings in rural areas (in the sample of Jizzakh region), Int. J. Geol., 10, 35–42, 2020.

J.L. Durville and G. Sève, Stabilité des Pentes. Glissements en Terrain Meuble, Techniques de l’ingénieur, traité construction, chap. C 254, 1996, 16 p.

X.P. Zhou and H. Cheng, Analysis of Stability of Three-Dimensional Slopes Using the Rigorous Limit Equilibrium Method, Engineering Geology 160, 2013, pp. 21-33.

L. Bjerrum, Fundamental Consideration on the Shear Strength of Soil. Geotechnique, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1951, pp. 209-218.

N. Lu, A Power Law for Elastic Moduli of Unsaturated Soil. Springer-verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 271-275.

R. Kourkoulis, F. Gelagoti, I. Anastasopoulos ans G. Gazetas, Slope Stabilizing Piles and Pile-Groups: Parametric Study and Design Insights, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 137(7), July 2011, pp.663-677

W. Alkasawneh, A.I.H. Malkawi, J. Nusairat and N. Albataineh, A Comparative Study of Various Commercially Available Programs in Slope Stability Analysis, Computers and Geotechnics 35, 2008, pp. 428-435.

R. M. Faure, L’évolution des Méthodes de Calcul de Stabilité des Pentes Partie 1: Méthodes à la Rupture, Revue Française de Géotechnique, No. 92, 2001, p. 3-16.

A.W. Bishop, The Use of the Slip Circle in the Stability Analysis of Slopes, Geotechnique,

Most read articles by the same author(s)

A. Xusomiddinov, B. Aktamov , SH. Yodgorov , E. Yadigarov , Sh. Avazov , J. Bozorov , R. Teshaeva , D. Jumaev , A. Mansurov , B. Xayriddinov , ASSESSMENT OF SEISMIC GROUND CONDITIONS OF THE CITY OF OLMALIQ , International Journal of Artificial Intelligence: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): International journal of artificial intelligence