ACADEMIC PUBLISHER
https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijdsml
15
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DATA SCIENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING (ISSN: 2692-5141)
Volume 05, Issue 01, 2025, pages 15-19
Published Date: - 28-02-2025
Doi: -
https://doi.org/10.55640/ijdsml-05-01-04
MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR PREDICTING EMPLOYEE
RETENTION AND PERFORMANCE
Nishitha Reddy Nalla
Software Application Engineer, WORKDAY INC, GA, USA
Abstract
This paper examines the usage of machine learning models in forecasting performance and retention among employees,
important organizational performance elements. Both substandard performance and high turnover are expensive, and in turn,
insights based on data are a requirement. The research applies a comprehensive literature review and examines existing
literature and finds predictors such as satisfaction, length of service, compensation, and engagement. It establishes a predictive
model-building process to efficiently forecast these outcomes. The research establishes such models allow firms to proactively
choose, allocate resources in a productive way, and lower costs on turnover. Data privacy, interpretability, and bias are however
among the implementation barriers. The paper concludes with a mention on machine learning’s potential in revolutionizing HR
analytics, with a systematic process in utilizing insights ethically. It supports future research in ethically aligned AI and real-
time predictions and makes a useful contribution in workforce strategy.
Keywords
Employee Retention, Employee Performance, Machine Learning in HR.
INTRODUCTION
Today’s business environment has seen companies turning increasingly toward cutting-edge technologies to streamline their
human resource (HR) policies. One such technology that has been changing the way organizations manage employees is machine
learning. Among the numerous ways that machine learning has been impacting companies is through the prediction of two vital
factors in workforce management: staff retention and performance. Using intricate algorithms, firms are able to identify
accurately the employees who will stay with the company and how they will perform effectively. This enables the HR
departments to take pre-emptive, fact-informed decisions such as the use of focused staff engagement initiatives or individualized
improvement programs (Kudirat Bukola Adeusi et al., 2024). Therefore, machine learning models present a groundbreaking
solution to prediction in the field of HR. Nevertheless, the application of the models needs careful attention of a variety of factors
such as the maintenance of confidentiality of the data, the simplicity of the models and how they avoid prejudice. Model
maintenance and updating also need regular occurrence in a bid to keep them updated and relevant. The future of machine
learning will be changing the ways of the world of HR and making the activities of the field more analytical and strategic.
UNDERSTANDING EMPLOYEE RETENTION AND PERFORMANCE
A.
Employee Retention
Employee Retention is a company’s ability to retain employees over a timeframe. According to Khan (2021), high retention is a
reflection on a steady and engaged workforce, while high turn-over is a reflection on a company’s financial and operational loss.
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM, 2024) reports hiring a replacement costs anything from 50% to 250%
in recruiting, onboarding, and training fees. Khan (2021) observed that replacing a level C employee with a compensation level
of $60,000 could cost anything from $30,000 to $150,000, and is a reflection on the financial need for retention.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHER
https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijdsml
16
B.
Employee Performance
Employee Performance, on the other hand, is a quantifiable measurement of the amount and quality of an employee’s work that
is usually evaluated by the performance appraisal, KPIs or productivity metrics. According to Vuong and Nguyen (2022),
performance forecasting helps in identification of talents within an organization, use of resources and identification of
underperformers. Traditional methods of HR such as annual engagement surveys or checklists often suffer from various biases
and do not focus on the prediction of future data. Machine learning avoids these pitfalls by analyzing large data and coming up
with patterns that will give more accurate predictions.
HOW MACHINE LEARNING MODELS OPERATE IN HR
Machine learning involves training algorithms to detect patterns within datasets and generate predictions based on those insights.
In HR applications, supervised learning dominates, utilizing labeled data—such as records of employee departures or
performance ratings—to guide model development. The process unfolds in three key stages as shown in figure 1 below:
Figure 1: Machine Learning Models Operate in HR
COMMON MACHINE LEARNING MODELS EMPLOYED
A variety of machine learning models are tailored to predict retention and performance, each offering distinct advantages:
A.
Logistic Regression
Widely used for retention prediction, this model calculates the probability of an employee leaving based on input features.
Wardhani and Lhaksmana (2022) reported a 79% accuracy rate in turnover forecasts, highlighting its efficacy for straightforward
relationships.
B.
Decision Trees and Random Forests
These models excel at capturing non-linear patterns. Random forests, which aggregate multiple decision trees, achieved an 84%
accuracy in performance prediction (Sun et al., 2024), making them ideal for complex datasets.
C.
Support Vector Machines (SVM)
Effective for classification tasks, SVMs distinguish between employees likely to stay or leave, with (Brereton and Lloyd, 2010)
documenting a 77% accuracy in retention predictions.
Data Collection
: Organizations compile
extensive employee datasets,
encompassing demographics (e.g., age,
tenure), job-related details (e.g., role,
salary), and behavioral indicators (e.g.,
engagement scores, absenteeism
rates).
Model Training
: Algorithms analyze
these inputs to identify correlations
with target outcomes. For example, the
system can determine that employees
with low satisfaction scores and
frequent absences are likelier to leave
within six months.
Prediction
: The trained model then
forecasts outcomes for current
employees, such as identifying a
customer service agent with declining
engagement as a turnover risk or
predicting a software developer’s
future performance based on past KPIs.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHER
https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijdsml
17
D.
Neural Networks
These models, inspired by human brain architecture, are adept at modeling intricate patterns. Borhani and Wong (2023) reported
a 91% accuracy in performance forecasting, though neural networks demand substantial data and computational resources.
Table 1: model performance
Model Type
Retention Accuracy (%)
Performance Accuracy (%)
Logistic Regression
79
75
Random Forests
83
84
SVM
77
78
Neural Networks
85
91
These accuracies illustrate how model selection depends on the prediction task and data complexity, with organizations often
testing multiple approaches to optimize results.
DATA FUELING PREDICTIONS
The predictive power of machine learning hinges on the diversity and quality of input data. Key categories include:
A.
Demographic Data
Variables such as age, gender, education, and tenure provide foundational insights. For instance, younger employees with shorter
tenures may exhibit higher turnover tendencies.
i)
Job-Related Data
Role, department, salary, and promotion history offer context-specific predictors. A sales manager recently denied a raise might
be flagged as a flight risk.
ii)
Behavioral Data
Metrics like satisfaction scores, absenteeism, and training participation reveal engagement levels. Abdul-Yekeen et al. (2024)
noted that firms leveraging such data improved retention by over 20%.
iii)
Performance Data
Historical reviews and productivity metrics (e.g., sales targets met) enable performance forecasting. A consistent decline in a
technician’s output could signal future underperformance.
BENEFITS OF MACHINE LEARNING IN HR
Machine learning provides several advantages to human resource management in terms of decision-making, resource utilization,
cost savings, and improvement of information. The first and the most significant benefit is that it can be used for making
anticipatory decisions. Through such analysis, one is able to identify possible challenges that may occur in the organization and
address them before they become unmanageable. It assists the HR teams to develop specific plans, for instance, in offering
mentorship or engagement programs that can enhance the retention rates and performance of the employees. For instance,
Kozlowski and Ilgen (2006) described a tech firm that managed to cut down turnover by 6% through enhanced mentorship based
on the retention models.
Resource optimization is another advantage since machine learning helps organizations to prioritize training and development
resources. Thus, by knowing the likelihood of an employee to give a suboptimal performance, an organization can target its
ACADEMIC PUBLISHER
https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijdsml
18
training in the right areas, thus increasing its efficiency and decreasing its costs. For instance, a manufacturing company enhanced
its productivity by 17% by focusing training on the low-performing employees that were forecasted (Devlin Peck, 2025).
Apart from resource utilization, cost is also impacted by machine learning in that it greatly reduces the number of employees
who change jobs. According to Devlin Peck (2025), turnover costs can be up to $50,000 per employee, which means that there
is a great potential for cost savings if turnover is prevented through the use of predictive analytics. Additionally, machine learning
is different from other types of assessments that involve the use of general impression since it uses real data for the analysis. This
clarity that is derived from data enhances the workforce planning to help the HR teams to make the right decisions that are
strategic in nature and are aligned to the business objectives.
CHALLENGES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Despite its numerous benefits, implementing machine learning in human resource management presents significant challenges
and ethical considerations, including data privacy, interpretability, bias risks, and model maintenance. Data privacy is a critical
concern, as predictive models require vast amounts of employee data to generate accurate insights. Organizations must comply
with regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which mandates transparent data usage and imposes
severe penalties for non-compliance, reaching up to €20 million (Europea Council of the European Union, 2025). To maintain
employee trust and avoid legal repercussions, companies must ensure robust data governance, secure storage solutions, and clear
communication about data usage policies.
Interpretability poses a further issue with complex models such as the use of neural networks. They might be hard to comprehend
and therefore difficult for the human resource specialist to take away and use in making informed decisions. This limited
transparency might discourage the use of predictive analytics because the decision maker might not be willing to use models that
they do not fully understand. Organizations might use explainable AI techniques that maximize the transparency of the models
and minimize the prediction errors in an effort to tackle this problem.
There also lies a risk of bias because machine models based on the past will reinforce existing disparities. We know that the AI
hiring program that Amazon discontinued in 2018 preferred male applicants based on discriminatory patterns of the past (Rafi,
2024). Organizations need to avoid such a situation and include a diversified set of training data and introduce checks of fairness.
Finally, maintenance of the models ensures that the predictions are correct and updated. The models need constant updating so
that they stay relevant in a changing business environment. The models will gradually get outdated and cease to be correct if they
don't get updated. Roy et al. (2016) also issue a warning that models will be 15% less accurate if not updated annually.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Machine learning in human resource management promises an exciting future with real-time analytics, technology integration,
and ethical AI. Real-time analytics will revolutionize workforce management with the strength of instant predictions and speedy
decision-making. The disengagement cues and workforce patterns will be detected by the future's highly developed machine
models and met immediately with interventions. This will maximize employees' experience with the earliest resolution of issues
of burnout and dissatisfaction. Organizations will be able to maintain high engagement and productivity rates with the application
of real-time data and will be able to fine-tune workforce management with ease based on changing needs.
One of the promising development areas lies in technology integration. The further intertwining of HR platforms with the addition
of machine learning and wellness and employee engagement tools will yield a better picture of the employees' overall well-being.
This integrated strategy will enable the HR teams to introduce focused strategies that cater to physical, mental, and emotional
wellness and further boost the employees' satisfaction and productivity rates. Through the merging of predictive analytics with
wellness platforms, organizations will be able to design individual interventions that appeal to the employees' unique needs and
enhance the general working environment and organizational performance.
CONCLUSION
Predictive models based on machine learning for retention and performance are a paradigm in HR analytics, giving organizations
the power to leverage their human capital. By utilizing diverse data and complex algorithms, organizations can drive down
turnover, boost productivity, and gain cost benefits. Overcoming privacy, interpretability, and bias remains key, however, in
unleashing such potential to the fullest. In the ongoing advance in technology, machine learning is going to increasingly position
itself as an asset in managing the complexity of the contemporary workforce.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHER
https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijdsml
19
REFERENCES
1.
Abdul-Yekeen, A. M., Kolawole, M. A., Iyanda, B., & Abdul-Yekeen, H. A. (2024). Leveraging Predictive Analytics to
Optimize Sme Marketing Strategies in the Us. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386
(Online), 3(3), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.vol3.n3.p73-102
2.
Borhani, K., & Wong, R. T. K. (2023). An artificial neural network for exploring the relationship between learning
activities and students’ performance. Decision Analytics Journal, 9, 100332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100332
3.
Brereton, R. G., & Lloyd, G. R. (2010). Support Vector Machines for classification and regression. The Analyst, 135(2),
230–267. https://doi.org/10.1039/b918972f
4.
Devlin
Peck.
(2025).
Employee
Training
Statistics,
Trends,
and
Data
in
2025.
Devlin
Peck.
https://www.devlinpeck.com/content/employee-training-statistics
5.
Europea Council of the European Union. (2025). The general data protection regulation. Consilium.
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/data-protection-
regulation/#:~:text=Severe%20sanctions%20are%20provided%20for,of%20their%20global%20annual%20turnover.
6.
Khan, U. (2021). Effect of Employee Retention on Organizational Performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management,
and Innovation, 2(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.52633/jemi.v2i1.47
7.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological
Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
8.
Kudirat Bukola Adeusi, Prisca Amajuoyi, & Lucky Bamidele Benjami. (2024). Utilizing machine learning to predict
employee turnover in high-stress sectors. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(5),
1702–1732. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i5.1143
9.
Rafi, M. (2024, October 14). When AI plays favourites: How algorithmic bias shapes the hiring process. The Conversation.
https://theconversation.com/when-ai-plays-favourites-how-algorithmic-bias-shapes-the-hiring-process-
239471#:~:text=Amazon’s%20AI%20tool%2C%20for%20example,population%20it’s%20meant%20to%20serve.
10.
Roy, R., Stark, R., Tracht, K., Takata, S., & Mori, M. (2016). Continuous maintenance and the future – Foundations and
technological challenges. CIRP Annals, 65(2), 667–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.006
11.
SHRM. (2024, October 14). The Cost of a Bad Hire. SHRM Human Resource Vendor Directory.
https://vendordirectory.shrm.org/company/930082/news/3518467/the-cost-of-a-bad-
hire#:~:text=The%20Society%20for%20Human%20Resource,productivity%20during%20the%20transition%20period.
12.
Sun, Z., Wang, G., Li, P., Wang, H., Zhang, M., & Liang, X. (2024). An improved random forest based on the classification
accuracy and correlation measurement of decision trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121549.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121549
13.
Vuong, T. D. N., & Nguyen, L. T. (2022). The Key Strategies for Measuring Employee Performance in Companies: A
Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114017
14.
Wardhani, F. H., & Lhaksmana, K. M. (2022). Predicting Employee Attrition Using Logistic Regression With Feature
Selection. Sinkron, 7(4), 2214–2222. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v7i4.11783
15.
THE ROLE OF DATA ENGINEERS AND ANALYSTS IN HEALTH INSURANCE AND COORDINATION. (2025).
International Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 5(01), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijdsml-05-01-03
