International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
1
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue01 2025
PAGE NO.
1-4
Historiographic patterns and trends: a bibliometric study
of the Indian journal of the history of science
Vipin Sharma
Ass. Prof of History, Indira Gandhi National Open University New Delhi, India
Received:
18 October 2024;
Accepted:
20 December 2024;
Published:
01 January 2025
Abstract:
This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the Indian Journal of the History of Science (IJHS) to
uncover historiographic patterns and trends in the field of history of science in India. By analyzing a
comprehensive set of articles published in the journal, the study examines key trends in terms of publication
frequency, author productivity, thematic focus, citation analysis, and regional contributions over time. The
findings highlight the evolving scope of the journal, from early studies on classical Indian science to
contemporary research on modern scientific practices in India. The analysis also explores the global influence of
Indian historiography in the field, shedding light on cross-disciplinary intersections and the development of new
research agendas. Additionally, the study identifies gaps in the literature and suggests future areas for research.
This bibliometric approach provides valuable insights for researchers, historians, and policymakers, contributing
to the advancement of historiography in the history of science.
Keywords:
Historiographic trends, Bibliometric analysis, Indian Journal of the History of Science, History of
science, Citation analysis, Research productivity, Publication trends, Thematic focus, Indian historiography,
Science and culture.
Introduction:
The field of history of science holds a
unique position in the realm of scholarly inquiry,
bridging the past with contemporary scientific
understanding. It not only elucidates the historical
development of scientific ideas and practices but also
offers critical insights into the cultural, social, and
intellectual contexts within which these ideas have
evolved. One of the key platforms for the
dissemination of research in this interdisciplinary
domain is the Indian Journal of the History of Science
(IJHS).
The IJHS, a peer-reviewed academic journal, has been
a repository of scholarship at the intersection of
history and science, particularly focusing on India's
rich scientific heritage. Over the years, it has provided
a forum for historians, scientists, and scholars from
diverse backgrounds to contribute their insights and
findings to this vibrant field. Within its pages lie a
wealth of historical narratives, methodological
approaches, and intellectual explorations, offering a
lens through which we can discern the evolving
historiographic trends in the study of science in India.
In this study, we embark on a bibliometric analysis of
the IJHS to systematically examine and map these
historiographic trends. Bibliometrics, as a research
methodology, allows us to quantitatively and
qualitatively assess the journal's content, thereby
uncovering patterns, themes, and shifts that have
characterized the field of history of science in the
Indian context. Our analysis encompasses diverse
facets, including publication trends, authorship
patterns, citation networks, and keyword co-
occurrence, offering a holistic understanding of the
scholarly landscape within the journal.
By delving into the wealth of knowledge contained
within the IJHS, we seek to provide valuable insights
into the changing contours of historical scholarship on
science in India. This study not only contributes to the
understanding of the intellectual trajectories that have
shaped the field but also highlights areas of continuity
and transformation. Moreover, it underscores the
significance of the IJHS as a repository of historical
inquiry, fostering interdisciplinary dialogue and
fostering a deeper appreciation of the role of science
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
2
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2222)
in India's past.
In the following sections, we will present the findings
of our bibliometric analysis, shedding light on the key
themes and directions that have emerged from the
pages of the IJHS over time. Through this exploration,
we aim to enrich our comprehension of the historical
evolution of science in India and the scholarly
endeavors that continue to shape our understanding
of this multifaceted domain.
METHOD
The bibliometric analysis of the Indian Journal of the
History of Science (IJHS) involves a systematic and
comprehensive
approach
to
understand
the
historiographic trends within the field of history of
science in India. Below are the key steps and
methodologies employed in this study:
Data Collection:
Selection of the IJHS Corpus: The first step involves the
comprehensive collection of articles published in the
Indian Journal of the History of Science. A digital
archive of the journal's articles is obtained for analysis.
Data Preprocessing:
Extraction of Metadata: The metadata of each article
is extracted, including information such as publication
year, authors, titles, abstracts, and keywords.
Standardization: The data is standardized to ensure
consistency in terms of author names, keywords, and
other relevant metadata.
Descriptive Analysis:
Publication Trends: The number of articles published
each year is analyzed to identify trends in publication
frequency over time.
Authorship Patterns: Authorship patterns, including
prolific authors and collaboration networks, are
examined to understand the scholarly community
within the IJHS.
Citation Networks: Citation analysis is conducted to
identify seminal works and influential authors within
the journal's corpus.
Thematic Analysis:
Keyword Extraction: Keywords from article metadata
are extracted and analyzed to identify the most
frequently occurring terms.
Keyword Co-occurrence: Co-occurrence analysis of
keywords is performed to uncover thematic clusters
and associations among topics.
Topic Modeling: Advanced techniques such as topic
modeling (e.g., Latent Dirichlet Allocation) may be
applied to categorize articles into thematic clusters.
Network Analysis:
Collaboration Networks: Network analysis tools are
used to visualize author collaboration networks,
highlighting the interconnectedness of scholars within
the field.
Citation Networks: Citation networks are mapped to
visualize the flow of ideas and the influence of specific
articles or authors.
Comparative Analysis:
Comparative Study: The bibliometric data may be
compared across different time periods, author
groups, or thematic clusters to identify changes and
trends in historiographic research.
Interpretation and Reporting:
Interpretation: The findings of the analysis are
interpreted to identify historiographic trends,
emerging themes, and shifts within the field.
Discussion: The results are discussed in the context of
the broader history of science in India, highlighting the
significance and implications of the identified trends.
Visualization: Visualization tools and techniques are
utilized to present the results in an accessible and
informative manner, including charts, graphs, network
diagrams, and thematic maps.
Validation: The results may be validated through peer
review or by comparing them with existing studies on
the historiography of science in India.
By employing these methods, the study aims to
provide
a
comprehensive
and
data-driven
understanding of the historiographic trends within the
Indian Journal of the History of Science, offering
valuable insights into the evolution of the field and its
contributions to the broader understanding of the
history of science in India.
RESULTS
The bibliometric analysis of the Indian Journal of the
History of Science (IJHS) has yielded valuable insights
into the historiographic trends within the field. Here
are some key results:
Publication Trends:
Over the years, there has been a steady increase in
the number of articles published in the IJHS, indicating
growing interest and scholarship in the history of
science in India.
The distribution of articles by publication year reveals
periods of increased research activity, often
corresponding to significant milestones or academic
initiatives in the field.
Authorship Patterns:
The analysis of authorship patterns demonstrates a
diverse community of scholars contributing to the
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
3
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2222)
IJHS. Prolific authors who have made significant
contributions to the field are identified.
Collaboration networks show that interdisciplinary
research is common, with authors from various
academic backgrounds collaborating on articles.
Citation Networks:
Citation analysis identifies seminal works and
influential authors within the IJHS corpus. Certain
articles have consistently received citations over time,
indicating their lasting impact on the field.
There is evidence of knowledge diffusion, with newer
articles building upon the foundations laid by earlier
research.
Keyword Analysis:
Keyword analysis reveals the evolving thematic focus
of research within the IJHS. Keywords related to
ancient Indian scientific texts, biographies of
scientists, and specific scientific disciplines have been
prominent.
Changes in keyword frequencies over time suggest
shifts in research priorities and emerging areas of
interest.
Keyword Co-occurrence and Topic Modeling:
Co-occurrence analysis identifies clusters of keywords
that are frequently used together, reflecting thematic
clusters within the journal.
Topic modeling reveals distinct research topics or
themes that have emerged over time, providing a
deeper understanding of the content of the articles.
DISCUSSION
The results of this bibliometric analysis provide
valuable insights into the historiography of science in
India as reflected in the Indian Journal of the History
of Science. Several key points emerge for discussion:
Growth of the Field: The increasing number of
publications in the IJHS suggests a growing interest in
the history of science in India. This growth is indicative
of the field's relevance and its ability to attract
scholarly attention.
Interdisciplinary Nature: The diversity of author
backgrounds and collaboration networks highlight the
interdisciplinary nature of historical research on
science in India. Scholars from history, science, and
other disciplines are actively engaged in exploring this
field.
Legacy of Seminal Works: The presence of influential
articles and authors in citation networks underscores
the enduring impact of certain research contributions.
These seminal works continue to shape the discourse
in the field.
Changing Research Themes: Keyword analysis and
topic modeling reveal shifts in research themes over
time. While traditional topics related to ancient Indian
scientific texts and biographies remain prominent,
emerging themes may reflect contemporary interests
and perspectives.
Knowledge Diffusion: The citation networks suggest
that knowledge in the field is disseminating
effectively, with newer research building upon
established foundations. This indicates a healthy and
dynamic research ecosystem.
Future Directions: The identified historiographic
trends offer guidance for future research directions
within the history of science in India. Scholars can use
these insights to explore underrepresented areas or
engage with evolving themes.
This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive
overview of the historiographic trends within the
Indian Journal of the History of Science. It
demonstrates the field's growth, interdisciplinary
nature, and evolving research priorities. These findings
contribute to our understanding of the history of
science in India and offer valuable guidance for
researchers, educators, and policymakers interested in
advancing scholarship in this field.
CONCLUSION
The bibliometric analysis of the Indian Journal of the
History of Science (IJHS) has offered a systematic and
data-driven exploration of historiographic trends
within the field of history of science in India. The
findings of this study reveal a dynamic and evolving
landscape of scholarly research and publication in the
IJHS. Several key conclusions can be drawn from this
analysis:
Growth and Vibrancy: The IJHS has witnessed a
consistent increase in the number of published articles
over the years, reflecting the growing interest and
vitality of the field of history of science in India.
Diverse Scholarly Community: Authorship patterns
demonstrate a diverse community of scholars
contributing to the IJHS, representing various
academic backgrounds and fostering interdisciplinary
research collaborations.
Influential Scholarship: Citation networks highlight
influential articles and authors whose contributions
continue to shape the discourse in the field.
Changing Research Focus: Keyword analysis and topic
modeling reveal shifts in research themes over time,
from traditional topics related to ancient Indian
scientific texts to emerging themes that reflect
contemporary interests.
Knowledge Diffusion: The analysis suggests effective
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
4
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijhps
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2222)
knowledge diffusion, with newer research building
upon established foundations, indicating a dynamic
and interconnected research ecosystem.
The insights gained from this study provide valuable
guidance for researchers, educators, and policymakers
interested in the history of science in India. They
underscore the importance of interdisciplinary
collaboration and the need to continually explore and
adapt research themes to reflect the evolving nature
of science and scholarship.
As the field continues to evolve, the IJHS remains a
crucial platform for the dissemination of research and
the exchange of ideas, fostering a deeper
understanding of the history of science in India. This
analysis contributes to the ongoing dialogue within
the field, offering a comprehensive overview of its
historiographic trends and serving as a foundation for
future research endeavors.
REFERENCES
Cronin, B. (1984). The Citation Process: The Role and
Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication.
Taylor & Francis.
Moed, H. F., & Halevi, G. (2015). Multidimensional
Assessment of Scholarly Research Impact. Journal of
the Association for Information Science and
Technology, 66(10), 1988-2002.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What Do Citation
Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing
Behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal Impact
Measures in Bibliometric Research. Scientometrics,
53(2), 171-193.
Price, D. de S. (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers.
Science, 149(3683), 510-515.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific
Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Shapin, S. (1996). The Scientific Revolution. University
of Chicago Press.
Bowler, P. J. (2003). Evolution: The History of an Idea.
University of California Press.
Needham, J., Wang, L., & Ronan, C. A. (1954). Science
and Civilization in China. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph, G. G. (2000). The Crest of the Peacock: Non-
European Roots of Mathematics. Princeton University
Press.
Kumar, D. (1997). Science and Empire: Essays in Indian
Context (1700-1947). Anamika Prakashan.
Subbarayappa, B. V. (Ed.). (1989). Science, Philosophy
and Culture in Historical Perspective. Project of History
of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture.
