Volume 03 Issue 09-2023
1
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-4
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
713
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
This research paper conducts a comparative analysis of the perspectives on sovereignty and state-citizen relations
presented in the works of Cicero and Bodin, two prominent thinkers from different historical eras. Cicero, a Roman
statesman and philosopher, and Bodin, a French political theorist, both explored the nature of sovereignty and its
implications for the relationship between the state and its citizens. The study examines their respective views on the
origin and legitimacy of political authority, the role of the state in safeguarding citizens' rights, and the duties and
responsibilities of citizens towards the state. By delving into the writings of these influential figures, this research aims
to shed light on the evolution of political thought and its impact on our understanding of sovereignty and state-citizen
relations.
KEYWORDS
Sovereignty, state-citizen relations, political authority, Cicero, Bodin, political thought, legitimacy, rights,
responsibilities, political theory, comparative analysis.
INTRODUCTION
The concept of sovereignty and the relationship
between the state and its citizens have been
fundamental themes in political thought throughout
history. Scholars and philosophers from different eras
have explored these concepts, shaping our
understanding of governance and political authority.
Among the notable figures in this discourse are Cicero,
the Roman statesman and philosopher, and Bodin, the
French political theorist. Both authors offer unique
Research Article
SOVEREIGNTY AND STATE-CITIZEN RELATIONS: A COMPARATIVE
ANALYSIS OF CICERO AND BODIN'S WORKS
Submission Date:
Aug 22, 2023,
Accepted Date:
Aug 27, 2023,
Published Date:
Sep 01, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijhps/Volume03Issue09-01
Fikret Sahin
Phd,
Kırıkkale University
, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Department of Philosophy,
Kırıkkale
/Turkey
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijhps
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 03 Issue 09-2023
2
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-4
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
713
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
perspectives on sovereignty and state-citizen relations,
reflecting the contexts of their respective times.
Cicero, a prominent figure in ancient Rome, lived
during a period of political upheaval and transition
from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire. In his
works, he deliberated on the principles of justice, the
rule of law, and the responsibilities of citizens in
maintaining a just and stable state. On the other hand,
Bodin, a prominent thinker during the Renaissance and
Reformation period, witnessed the rise of absolute
monarchy in Europe. In his seminal work, "The Six
Books of the Commonwealth," Bodin examined the
concept of sovereignty and its concentration in the
hands of the ruler, emphasizing the importance of a
strong central authority.
This research paper aims to conduct a comparative
analysis of the works of Cicero and Bodin, exploring
their views on sovereignty and state-citizen relations.
By examining their writings, we seek to identify
similarities, divergences, and the evolution of political
thought regarding these crucial themes. Through this
comparative analysis, we hope to gain a deeper
understanding of the historical development of
political ideas and their relevance to contemporary
debates on governance and citizenship.
METHOD
To conduct this comparative analysis, the research will
follow a systematic and rigorous methodological
approach. The methodology comprises the following
key components:
Literature Review:
A comprehensive literature review will be conducted
to gather relevant primary and secondary sources on
the works of Cicero and Bodin. This will involve
studying their original texts, as well as scholarly
interpretations and commentaries on their ideas.
Textual Analysis:
The primary method of data collection will be textual
analysis. The selected works of Cicero, such as "De Re
Publica" and "De Legibus," and Bodin's "The Six Books
of the Commonwealth" will be carefully studied to
extract their perspectives on sovereignty and state-
citizen relations. Key themes, concepts, and
arguments will be identified and analyzed.
Comparative Framework:
A comparative framework will be developed to
systematically compare and contrast the views of
Cicero and Bodin on sovereignty and state-citizen
relations. This framework will serve as a guide to
organize the findings and draw meaningful
comparisons between the two thinkers.
Historical Context:
The research will pay close attention to the historical
context in which Cicero and Bodin lived and wrote.
Understanding the political, social, and cultural milieu
of their times is crucial for interpreting their ideas
accurately.
Theory Application:
Relevant political and philosophical theories will be
applied to interpret and contextualize the ideas of
Cicero and Bodin. This will provide a theoretical lens to
analyze the significance and implications of their views.
Validity and Reliability:
The research will ensure the validity and reliability of
the findings by employing rigorous methodologies and
adhering to academic standards. Counterarguments
Volume 03 Issue 09-2023
3
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-4
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
713
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
and alternative interpretations will be considered to
present a comprehensive analysis.
By adopting this methodological approach, the
research aims to provide a nuanced and insightful
comparative analysis of Cicero and Bodin's works on
sovereignty and state-citizen relations. The findings
will contribute to our understanding of the historical
development of political thought and shed light on the
relevance of their ideas to contemporary political
discussions.
RESULT
The comparative analysis of Cicero and Bodin's works
on sovereignty and state-citizen relations reveals
intriguing similarities and distinctions in their
perspectives. Both thinkers explore the nature of
political authority and its implications for the
relationship between the state and its citizens. While
Cicero's writings emphasize the importance of justice,
the rule of law, and active citizen participation, Bodin's
ideas revolve around the concept of absolute
sovereignty and the concentration of power in the
hands of the ruler. The research highlights how the
historical contexts of ancient Rome and the
Renaissance period significantly influenced their
respective views on governance and citizenship.
DISCUSSION
Cicero's works, "De Re Publica" and "De Legibus,"
reflect his belief in a mixed government with checks
and balances, where different branches of power
collaborate to safeguard the rights and welfare of
citizens. He places great importance on the rule of law,
advocating for the supremacy of justice and fairness.
Cicero views citizens as active participants in the
state's affairs, responsible for upholding moral values
and contributing to the common good. His vision of
state-citizen relations encourages civic engagement
and virtue as fundamental components of a just and
prosperous society.
On the other hand, Bodin's "The Six Books of the
Commonwealth" introduces the idea of absolute
sovereignty, where supreme authority is vested in a
single ruler. He contends that the strength and stability
of the state depend on the unchallenged power of the
sovereign. Bodin's concept of sovereignty emphasizes
the indivisibility of the state's authority, which implies
that the ruler is not bound by any external authority or
laws. In this context, state-citizen relations are
characterized by a hierarchical structure, with the ruler
exercising absolute control over the citizens.
Comparing these two perspectives, it becomes evident
that Cicero's ideas emphasize citizen participation and
shared governance, whereas Bodin's views focus on
concentrated authority and centralized power. The
research reveals how their respective historical
contexts shaped their interpretations of sovereignty
and state-citizen relations. Cicero lived during a time of
political turmoil and the decline of the Roman
Republic, which influenced his concerns about justice,
law, and citizen participation. In contrast, Bodin's
writings emerged during the Renaissance, a period
marked by the rise of absolute monarchies, which
influenced his emphasis on strong and centralized
governance.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the comparative analysis of Cicero and
Bodin's works on sovereignty and state-citizen
relations illuminates significant differences in their
perspectives. Cicero's focus on justice, the rule of law,
and citizen participation reflects the context of ancient
Rome's political turmoil and his commitment to
preserving the ideals of the Roman Republic. On the
Volume 03 Issue 09-2023
4
International Journal Of History And Political Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2222)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
09
P
AGES
:
1-4
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
713
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
other hand, Bodin's concept of absolute sovereignty
reflects the Renaissance era's shift towards strong
centralized governance and the emergence of
absolute monarchies.
The research underscores the importance of historical
context in shaping political thought and emphasizes
that different historical periods produce diverse
interpretations of sovereignty and state-citizen
relations. Both Cicero and Bodin have made valuable
contributions to our understanding of governance and
citizenship, with their works continuing to influence
political discourse and theory.
This
analysis
provides
valuable
insights
for
contemporary debates on sovereignty and state-
citizen
relations.
By
examining
the
diverse
perspectives of Cicero and Bodin, policymakers and
scholars can gain a deeper appreciation for the
complexities and implications of different models of
governance.
Understanding
these
historical
perspectives can inform current efforts to foster just,
participatory, and effective state-citizen relations in
modern societies. Ultimately, this research contributes
to a more nuanced understanding of the evolution of
political thought and its impact on our understanding
of sovereignty and state-citizen relations.
REFERENCES
1.
AGAOGULLARI, Mehmet Ali (2006), Ulus-Devlet ya
da Halkın Egemenliği (Nation
-State or Sovereignty
of People), İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
2.
AGAOGULLARI, Mehmet Ali, Levent Köker (2000),
Kral-
Devlet ya da Ölümlü Tanrı (King
-Stateor Mortal
God), İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
3.
AKAL, Cemal Bali (1998), İktidarın Üç Yüzü (Three
Faces of the Power), Dost Kitabevi, Ankara.
4.
AKKAS, Hasan Hüseyin (2004), Muhafazakâr
Düşünce ve Edmund Burke (Conservative Thought
and Edmund Burke), Kadim Yayınları, Ankara.
5.
ALLEN, J. M. (1925-
1926), “Jean Bodin”, Edit.:F. J. C.
Hearnshaw, Social and Political Ideas of Some
Great Thinkers of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth
Centuries, George G. Harrap & Company Ltd.,
London-Calcutta-Sydney, p. 42-61.
6.
ASHWORTH, Lucian M. (2003), “The Limits of
Enlighment: Inter-state Relations in Eighteenth-
Century Political Thought”, Edit.: Paschalis M.
Kitromilides, From Republican Polity to National
Community, Voltaire Foundation Press, Oxford, p.
110-140.
7.
AUDIER, Serge (2006), Cumhuriyet Kuramları
(Theories of the Republic), Translation: İsmail
Yerguz, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
8.
BEAUD,
Oliver
(2003),
“Egemenlik”(“Sovereignty”), Translation: İsmail
Yerguz, Siyaset Felsefesi Sözlüğü (Dictionary of
Political Philosophy), Edit.: Phillippe Raynaud and
Stéphane Rials, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, p. 271
-
280.
9.
BODIN, Jean (1955), Six Books Of The
Commonwealth, Trans.: M. J. Tooley, Printed in
Great Britain in the City of Oxford at the Alden
Press,
Oxford,
http://www.costitution.org/liberlib.com,
20.04.2011.
10.
BRANCOURT, Jean-
Pierre (2005), “Estat’lardan
Dev
lete Bir Sözcüğün Evrimi”(“Evolution of a Word
from Estat’s to the State”), Translation: Beki
Haleva ve PınarGüzelyürek, Devlet Kuramı, Edit. :
Cemal Bâli Akal, Dost Yayınevi, Ankara, p. 177
-190.
