Authors

  • Rufat Qurbonov
    Tashkent State University of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijpse.124633

Abstract

This article presents safe methods for increasing the capitalization level of commercial banks. In addition, it analyzes the amount and dynamics of the capital of commercial banks in our republic, as well as the share of authorized capital in their own funds, and provides relevant conclusions.


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

163

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR INCREASING THE CAPITALIZATION

LEVEL OF COMMERCIAL BANKS

Rufat Bakhtiyorovich Qurbonov

, PhD

Professor of the Department of "Bank Accounting and Audit",

Tashkent State University of Economics

Annotation:

This article presents safe methods for increasing the capitalization level of

commercial banks. In addition, it analyzes the amount and dynamics of the capital of commercial

banks in our republic, as well as the share of authorized capital in their own funds, and provides

relevant conclusions.

Keywords:

commercial banks, capitalization level, resource base, capital, authorized capital.

Introduction

In the

Action Strategy for the Further Development of the Republic of Uzbekistan

, increasing the

capitalization level and deposit base of banks, as well as strengthening their financial stability

and reliability, has been identified as one of the top priorities [1]. In order to timely and

effectively implement these objectives, the Presidential Decree of the Republic of Uzbekistan No.

PF-5992 dated May 12, 2020, “On the Strategy for Reforming the Banking System of the

Republic of Uzbekistan for 2020–2025,” outlines a phased increase in the minimum authorized

capital of banks to 500 billion soums by 2025 [2].

At present, in order to raise the capitalization level of commercial banks in our republic, several

issues still need to be resolved. In particular, the low capitalization level of commercial banks,

the allocation of significant state budget funds in recent years, the weak activity of commercial

banks in the stock market both as issuers and investors, their inability to provide high-quality

services to clients, the weakness of the resource base, the low share of bank capital in GDP, and

similar problems remain pressing challenges.

Literature Review

In the existing economic literature, the concept of “capitalization level” and issues related to its

increase have been studied by foreign scholars and experts, and corresponding definitions have

been provided. For instance, in A.B. Borisov’s

Comprehensive Economic Dictionary

,

capitalization is defined as “the part of a bank’s capital that has grown due to the issuance and

sale of securities, and the allocation of a portion of income to form specific reserves” [3].

In the research of A.S. Klimov, the term “capitalization” is described as “the market value of a

credit institution’s capital, calculated by multiplying the number of shares by their market

price” [4].
Professor A. Omonov, in his doctoral dissertation in economics titled

“Issues of Effective

Management of Commercial Bank Resources”

, provided a detailed classification of the factors

influencing the capitalization level of commercial banks [5].

Similarly, I.B. Tursunov, in his research work, substantiated that the capitalization of a particular

bank largely depends on the absolute volume of its equity capital [6].


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

164

Research Methodology

In preparing this article, practical data related to increasing the capitalization level of commercial

banks were analyzed. All utilized information was studied by the author based on current legal

regulations and statistical indicators provided by the Central Bank. The research employed

methods such as grouping, comparison, systematic approach, and structural analysis.

Analysis and Results

In global theory and practice, there are two main approaches to interpreting the term

“capitalization” [4].

The first approach is closely linked to the stock market, within which market capitalization is

considered the value of a company’s securities based on their quotations on the stock exchange.

The second approach defines capitalization as the process of increasing capital through profits.

This perspective associates capitalization with the amount of a financial institution’s own equity,

as well as with the capital adequacy level in accordance with the internationally recognized Basel

and Basel I agreements.

Taking into account the consequences of the global financial crisis, the Basel Committee on

Banking Supervision approved the new

Basel III

standard in September 2010, which

significantly tightened the capital requirements for financial institutions.

In order to comply with the new regulations, banks increased the minimum capital adequacy

ratio of Tier 1 capital from 2% to 4.5% by 2019.

Each bank is required to establish a special capital buffer amounting to 2.5% of its assets.

According to the new requirements, the total minimum requirement for core (Tier 1) capital is set

at 7%. The capital adequacy ratio for Tier 1 capital has been increased from 4% to 6%.

It is worth noting that, under the new regulations, the capital of commercial banks must consist

of no less than 50% of common equity and retained earnings. In addition, the Basel Committee

recommends that the level of debt capital should not exceed 25 times the amount of capital.

Although the committee’s decisions are advisory in nature for regulatory authorities, most

developed countries have adopted these recommendations almost entirely in forming their

banking requirements frameworks.
The issue of determining bank capital adequacy has long been the subject of academic research

and remains a matter of debate between banks and regulatory authorities. While banks prefer to

use minimal capital in order to maximize profits and ensure asset growth, regulatory bodies

demand higher capital levels to reduce the risk of bankruptcy.

At the same time, it is argued that bankruptcy often results from poor management, and that

well-managed banks may perform effectively even with lower levels of capital adequacy.

In international practice, the amount of authorized capital is not strictly limited by law. However,

in order to ensure the stability of the banking system, regulatory authorities set a minimum

threshold for the authorized capital of commercial banks.

There is no unified approach to determining the minimum level of bank capital. Historical, legal,

and economic factors play a role in this variation, and the practice of licensing banking activities

differs from country to country.


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

165

Countries that impose minimum capital requirements for banks mostly include those in the Asian

region (see Table 1).

Table 1

Countries with the Highest Requirements for Bank Equity Capital

(

as of January 1, 2010, in million euros

)

Country

National Banks

Foreign Banks

Branches of Foreign Banks

Singapore

722,8

722,8

96,4

Malaysia

392.6

58,9

-

Indonesia

211,8

211,8

211,8

Taiwan

204,9

204.9

3.1

Bahrain

175,4

66,0

-

Kuwait

173,5

173,5

34,7

Nigeria

111,7

111,7

111,7

Thailand

99,6

79,2

Israel

99,2

99,2

China

96,8

29,0

The European Union countries have taken the lead in standardizing the minimum level of bank

capital, where a unified norm for private capital has been adopted, requiring it to be no less than

5million #euros.

The spread of the European standard has led to the fact that most countries around the world now

set the minimum capital requirement within the range of 1 to 5 million euros.

In recent years, special attention has been paid to increasing the capitalization of banks in

Uzbekistan. In this regard, a number of Presidential Decrees and Resolutions have been adopted

by the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

Table 2

Minimum Authorized Capital Requirements for Commercial Banks Operating in the Republic of

Uzbekistan

Years

For Joint-Stock

Commercial Banks

For Banks Established

with Foreign Capital

Participation

For Private Banks

January 1,

1998

1.5 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

5.0 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

0.3 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

January 1,

2.0 million USD

5.0 million USD

0.3 million USD


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

166

1999

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

January 1,

2000

2.5 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

5.0 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

0.3 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

January 1,

2002

2.5 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

5.0 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

1.25 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

January 1,

2005

5 million USD equivalent

in Uzbek soums

5.0 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

2.5 million USD

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

January 1,

2008

5.0 million EUR

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

5.0 million EUR

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

5.0 million EUR

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

January 1,

2011

10.0 million EUR

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

10.0 million EUR

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

5.0 million EUR

equivalent in Uzbek

soums

October 1,

2017

100 billion UZS

September 1,

2023

200 billion UZS

April 1, 2024

350 billion UZS

January 1,

2025

350 billion UZS

As is known, starting from

September 1, 2023

, the minimum amount of the

authorized capital

of banks

is required to be

200 billion UZS

 [12]. This provision was established by a draft law

adopted in

October 2022

and enacted in

April 2023

. In accordance with the amendments

introduced to

Article 13

of the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Banks and Banking

Activities”, the Central Bank has officially announced that the minimum authorized capital of

banks must amount to

200 billion UZS from September 1, 2023

, and

500 billion UZS from

January 1, 2025

, to be implemented gradually.

However, at present,

not all commercial banks

have been able to fully meet the newly

established minimum capital requirements. This can be seen in the following table.

Conclusion and Recommendations

In conclusion,

commercial banks must seek and identify effective opportunities to increase

their authorized capital

. Otherwise, failure to comply fully with Presidential Decree No. PQ-

5992 dated May 12, 2020, may hinder the implementation of strategic reforms. This, in turn,

could

jeopardize the continuity of commercial banks’ operations

.


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

167

It is evident that

commercial banks in Uzbekistan need to significantly increase the amount

of their authorized capital within a short period of time

. In addition, there are

issues related

to the placement of shares issued by these banks

.

The

average annual dividend rates

offered by the banks are almost equivalent to the

interest

rates on deposits

, and they tend to be

volatile

, as the amount of dividends may decline due to

operational or financial challenges faced by the banks.

Moreover,

share premiums (emission income)

within the capital structure of commercial banks

are

negligible

. As a result, the

shares of domestic banks are traded at nearly their nominal

value

on the securities market, with

no effective mechanisms or factors influencing their real

market price

.

The analysis carried out has led to the following conclusions:

A

regulatory and legal framework

has been developed and adopted in Uzbekistan that

provides significant opportunities for increasing the

capitalization level of banks

.

The

ratio of total bank capital to the country’s GDP

is slightly above

6%

, and in recent

years, this figure has shown a

declining trend

.

The

market capitalization

of domestic banks is

almost five times lower

than their total

capital.

References

1. O’zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PF-4947-sonli “O’zbekiston Respublikasini yanada

rivojlantirish bo’yicha harakatlar strategiyasi to’g’risida”gi Farmoni, 2017 yil 7 fevral

2. O’zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 5992-sonli “2020 — 2025 yillarga mo’ljallangan

O’zbekiston Respublikasining bank tizimini isloh qilish strategiyasi to’g’risida”gi PF-

Farmoni, 2020 yil 12 may

3. Большой экономический словарь. А.Б.Борисов. Издание второе М. «Книжный мир»

2006 г. С-300.

4. Климов А.С.. Капитализация коммерческих банков: мировая практика и ее

использование российскими банковскими структурами: диссертация. кандидата

экономических наук: Москва, 2008.- 180

5. Omonov A.A. Tijorat banklarining resurslarini samarali boshqarish masalalari. Iqtisod

fanlari doktori ilmiy darajasini olish uchun bajarilgan dissertatsiya avtoreferati. –T.: 2008,

BMA, 36 b.

6. Tursunov I. B. Tijorat banki kapitallashuviga korporativ boshqaruv ta’sirini oshirish.

Iqtisodiyot fanlari bo’yicha falsafa doktori (PhD) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. Toshkent 2021.

56 b.

7.

www.cbu.uz

- O’zbekiston Respublikasi Markaziy bankning ma’lumotlariga asosan muallif

tomonidan tayyorlandi.

8. Kurbanov R. B., Khudoyberganova Z. Z. Matters of the increasement of private banks’

capitalization level //Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika. – 2018. – №. 6. – S. 103-105.

9. Курбанов, Р. (2022). БАНКЛАР КАПИТАЛЛАШУВ ДАРАЖАСИНИ

ОШИРИШНИНГ ДОЛЗАРБ МАСАЛАЛАРИ. Экономика и образование, 23(4), 96-101.


background image

Volume 4, issue 6, 2025

168

10. Kurbanov, R. B., & Asirarov, R. Z. (2022). The role of the bank's initial public offering in

increasing the capitalization of commercial banks. Asian Journal of Research in Banking

and Finance, 12(4), 30-36.

11. Kurbonov PhD, R. (2021). Analysis of efficiency indicators of private banks activity.

International Finance and Accounting, 2021(1), 11.

References

O’zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PF-4947-sonli “O’zbekiston Respublikasini yanada rivojlantirish bo’yicha harakatlar strategiyasi to’g’risida”gi Farmoni, 2017 yil 7 fevral

O’zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 5992-sonli “2020 — 2025 yillarga mo’ljallangan O’zbekiston Respublikasining bank tizimini isloh qilish strategiyasi to’g’risida”gi PF- Farmoni, 2020 yil 12 may

Большой экономический словарь. А.Б.Борисов. Издание второе М. «Книжный мир» 2006 г. С-300.

Климов А.С.. Капитализация коммерческих банков: мировая практика и ее использование российскими банковскими структурами: диссертация. кандидата экономических наук: Москва, 2008.- 180

Omonov A.A. Tijorat banklarining resurslarini samarali boshqarish masalalari. Iqtisod fanlari doktori ilmiy darajasini olish uchun bajarilgan dissertatsiya avtoreferati. –T.: 2008, BMA, 36 b.

Tursunov I. B. Tijorat banki kapitallashuviga korporativ boshqaruv ta’sirini oshirish. Iqtisodiyot fanlari bo’yicha falsafa doktori (PhD) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. Toshkent 2021. 56 b.

www.cbu.uz - O’zbekiston Respublikasi Markaziy bankning ma’lumotlariga asosan muallif tomonidan tayyorlandi.

Kurbanov R. B., Khudoyberganova Z. Z. Matters of the increasement of private banks’ capitalization level //Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika. – 2018. – №. 6. – S. 103-105.

Курбанов, Р. (2022). БАНКЛАР КАПИТАЛЛАШУВ ДАРАЖАСИНИ ОШИРИШНИНГ ДОЛЗАРБ МАСАЛАЛАРИ. Экономика и образование, 23(4), 96-101.

Kurbanov, R. B., & Asirarov, R. Z. (2022). The role of the bank's initial public offering in increasing the capitalization of commercial banks. Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance, 12(4), 30-36.

Kurbonov PhD, R. (2021). Analysis of efficiency indicators of private banks activity. International Finance and Accounting, 2021(1), 11.