Авторы

  • Joniuzoqova Mashhura Azizjon kizi
    First-year student at Karshi State University Foreign languages faculty

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijsr.107308

Ключевые слова:

Time poverty student life academic stress digital distractions mental health university culture burnout

Аннотация

This article explores the growing phenomenon of time poverty among university students, emphasizing how modern academic demands, extracurricular expectations, and digital distractions have created an overwhelming sense of time scarcity. The paper examines the root causes of time poverty, its psychological and academic consequences, and discusses possible interventions at both the institutional and individual levels. Based on qualitative analysis of literature and existing surveys, the study calls for a systemic reconsideration of time use in higher education to support student well-being and productivity.

 


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 1, April 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

290

Joniuzoqova Mashhura Azizjon kizi

First-year student at Karshi State University

Foreign languages faculty

mjoniuzoqova@gmail.com

TIME POVERTY AMONG STUDENTS: WHY 24 HOURS AREN’T

ENOUGH ANYMORE

Annotation:

This article explores the growing phenomenon of time poverty among university

students, emphasizing how modern academic demands, extracurricular expectations, and digital

distractions have created an overwhelming sense of time scarcity. The paper examines the root

causes of time poverty, its psychological and academic consequences, and discusses possible

interventions at both the institutional and individual levels. Based on qualitative analysis of

literature and existing surveys, the study calls for a systemic reconsideration of time use in

higher education to support student well-being and productivity.

Keywords:

Time poverty, student life, academic stress, digital distractions, mental health,

university culture, burnout

Introduction

. In a world where multitasking has become a norm, students find themselves in a

constant battle against the clock. In today’s educational landscape, students are expected to

manage a wide array of responsibilities, ranging from academic performance and internships to

financial independence and social engagement. This pressure has given rise to “time poverty,” a

condition where individuals feel they lack sufficient time to complete necessary tasks, often at

the expense of rest and emotional well-being. This paper investigates the underlying causes and

effects of time poverty among students and proposes institutional and personal strategies to

address it.

Method

. This article employs a qualitative content analysis approach. Data was gathered from

existing academic research, student surveys, and psychological studies related to time

management, burnout, and university lifestyle. Reports such as those from the National College

Health Association (NCHA) and peer-reviewed psychological journals were analyzed to identify

patterns and common themes around student experiences with time scarcity.

Results

. Academic Overload and Unrealistic Expectations. Most university programs today

encourage not only strong academic performance but also involvement in extracurricular

activities, internships, and research. Students reported feeling compelled to overcommit in order

to remain competitive in future job markets or graduate school admissions. This

overcommitment leads to time compression, where essential tasks such as rest, reflection, and

social interaction are sacrificed.A case study from a liberal arts university in the U.S. revealed

that 72% of students were enrolled in more than five courses per semester, while simultaneously

engaging in at least two non-academic commitments. These students reported reduced study

quality and difficulty concentrating.
Economic Pressures and Part-Time Work. Financial constraints play a critical role in time

scarcity. Many students rely on part-time jobs to pay tuition or living expenses, which adds an

average of 15–20 work hours per week. For some, this means prioritizing employment over


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 1, April 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

291

academic preparation or personal wellness. In low-income regions or among first-generation

students, the time burden is even more pronounced.The NCHA (2023) found that 43% of

working students experienced frequent scheduling conflicts between work and academic

obligations, leading to chronic lateness, missed classes, or incomplete assignments[6].
Digital Distraction and Attention Fragmentation. While digital platforms provide tools for

productivity, they also contribute heavily to time loss. Students often shift between academic

platforms (like Google Scholar or Canvas) and distracting apps (like Instagram, TikTok, and

YouTube). This attention-switching decreases task efficiency and leads to the perception that

time is vanishing.A psychological experiment conducted in 2022 revealed that students who

multitasked digitally while studying took 40% longer to complete tasks compared to those who

focused on one activity. Despite spending more time online, they retained less information[5].

Psychological Toll and Burnout.The cumulative result of overwork and under-rest is emotional

exhaustion. Students reported symptoms of burnout such as chronic fatigue, sleep disruption,

irritability, and even detachment from academic goals. Many equated busyness with worth,

contributing to a toxic mindset where taking breaks felt like failure[7].
Social Disconnection and Isolation. Students suffering from time poverty also face social

withdrawal. As schedules tighten, time for friendships, family interaction, and even casual

conversations shrinks. This isolation reduces access to emotional support and can increase

anxiety or depressive symptoms. An ethnographic study in Canada noted that students living in

shared housing units were physically present with peers but rarely interacted beyond brief

greetings. They cited exhaustion and “no time for talking” as the main reasons.
Reduced Academic Engagement and Learning Quality. Perhaps most paradoxically, time

poverty undermines the very purpose of university: meaningful learning. Overloaded students

often engage in surface-level learning, memorizing material for short-term retention instead of

deep understanding.Educators observed that time-poor students were less likely to participate in

discussions, attend office hours, or take advantage of enrichment opportunities such as academic

seminars or tutoring — despite being academically capable[9].

Literature Review

. Numerous studies have explored student workload and time use. Misra and

McKean (2000) highlighted the link between academic overload and mental health decline[2].

More recent research by Rosa (2021) discusses the phenomenon of “time confetti,” where

fragmented attention leads to reduced task efficiency and increased stress[3]. Babcock and

Marks (2011) coined the term “time poverty” in educational contexts, linking it with academic

burnout and reduced cognitive performance[1]. These findings collectively support the claim that

time poverty is not merely a personal issue, but a structural problem in higher education systems.

Conclusion

.Time poverty among students is a widespread issue rooted in academic culture,

economic demands, and digital environments. It affects mental health, academic outcomes, and

overall student satisfaction. While individual time management strategies help, broader

institutional reforms — such as flexible scheduling, reduced multitasking expectations, and

mental health awareness — are essential to meaningfully combat this issue. Recognizing time as

a limited yet vital resource may pave the way for a more compassionate and balanced student

experience. In addressing it, we affirm that students are not just learning machines, but whole

individuals with emotional, intellectual, and social needs.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 11, issue 1, April 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

292

References

:

1. Babcock, P., & Marks, M. (2011). The falling time cost of college: Evidence from half a

century of time use data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 468–478.

2. Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College students’ academic stress and its relation to their

anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies,

16(1), 41.

3. Rosa, H. (2021). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. Columbia University

Press.

4. National College Health Association. (2023). National College Health Assessment:

Undergraduate Student Reference Group Executive Summary.

5. Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple

indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1),

187–198.

6. Schor, J. (1991). The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. Basic

Books.

7. Ellis, A., & Marx, J. (2020).Burnout and mental fatigue in university students: Predictors

and prevention. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 34(2), 112–127.

8. Casey, B. M. (2022).The multitasking myth: How digital distractions are rewriting the

academic brain. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 375–390.

9. Kember, D. (2004). Interpreting student workload and the factors that shape it. Studies in

Higher Education, 29(2), 165–184.

10. Huang, L., & Yang, D. (2019).Academic competition and student burnout: A cross-national

comparison. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 79–90.

Библиографические ссылки

Babcock, P., & Marks, M. (2011). The falling time cost of college: Evidence from half a century of time use data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 468–478.

Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College students’ academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16(1), 41.

Rosa, H. (2021). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. Columbia University Press.

National College Health Association. (2023). National College Health Assessment: Undergraduate Student Reference Group Executive Summary.

Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198.

Schor, J. (1991). The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. Basic Books.

Ellis, A., & Marx, J. (2020).Burnout and mental fatigue in university students: Predictors and prevention. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 34(2), 112–127.

Casey, B. M. (2022).The multitasking myth: How digital distractions are rewriting the academic brain. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 375–390.

Kember, D. (2004). Interpreting student workload and the factors that shape it. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 165–184.

Huang, L., & Yang, D. (2019).Academic competition and student burnout: A cross-national comparison. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 79–90.