GRAMMAR VS. VOCABULARY: WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT IN LANGUAGE LEARNING?

Аннотация

This paper explores the long-standing debate over the relative importance of grammar and vocabulary in second language acquisition. While vocabulary provides the basic tools for communication, grammar offers the structural foundation necessary for clarity and accuracy. The study examines theoretical and practical perspectives through a review of literature and analysis of language teaching practices. The findings suggest that a balanced approach, where grammar and vocabulary are developed simultaneously, is the most effective for language learners across different proficiency levels.

Тип источника: Журналы
Годы охвата с 2023
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Выпуск:
272-274
0

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Поделиться
Latifova Nurshoda Dilmurod qizi. (2025). GRAMMAR VS. VOCABULARY: WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT IN LANGUAGE LEARNING?. Международный журнал научных исследователей, 12(1), 272–274. извлечено от https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/ijsr/article/view/130455
0
Цитаты
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Аннотация

This paper explores the long-standing debate over the relative importance of grammar and vocabulary in second language acquisition. While vocabulary provides the basic tools for communication, grammar offers the structural foundation necessary for clarity and accuracy. The study examines theoretical and practical perspectives through a review of literature and analysis of language teaching practices. The findings suggest that a balanced approach, where grammar and vocabulary are developed simultaneously, is the most effective for language learners across different proficiency levels.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 12, issue 1, June 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

272

GRAMMAR VS. VOCABULARY: WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT IN

LANGUAGE LEARNING?

Latifova Nurshoda Dilmurod qizi

Andijon davlat chet tillari instituti Ingliz tili va adabiyoti fakulteti 1-bosqich talabasi

Abstract:

This paper explores the long-standing debate over the relative importance of grammar

and vocabulary in second language acquisition. While vocabulary provides the basic tools for

communication, grammar offers the structural foundation necessary for clarity and accuracy.

The study examines theoretical and practical perspectives through a review of literature and

analysis of language teaching practices. The findings suggest that a balanced approach, where

grammar and vocabulary are developed simultaneously, is the most effective for language

learners across different proficiency levels.

Annotatsiya:

Ushbu maqola ikkinchi tilni o‘zlashtirishda grammatik va lug‘at boyligining

nisbiy ahamiyati haqidagi uzoq yillik munozarani o‘rganadi. Lug‘at aloqa uchun asosiy

vositalarni ta’minlasa, grammatika esa aniq va to‘g‘ri ifodalanish uchun zarur bo‘lgan tuzilma

poydevorini yaratadi. Tadqiqot nazariy va amaliy yondashuvlarni adabiyotlar sharhi va til

o‘rgatish amaliyotlarini tahlil qilish orqali ko‘rib chiqadi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki,

grammatika va lug‘at birgalikda rivojlantiriladigan muvozanatli yondashuv har xil darajadagi til

o‘rganuvchilar uchun eng samarali usul hisoblanadi.

Аннотация:

Данная статья рассматривает давнюю дискуссию о сравнительной важности

грамматики и словарного запаса в процессе изучения второго языка. Словарный запас

предоставляет базовые средства для общения, в то время как грамматика обеспечивает

структурную основу, необходимую для ясности и точности. Исследование охватывает

теоретические и практические взгляды через обзор литературы и анализ методов

преподавания языков. Результаты показывают, что наиболее эффективным подходом для

изучающих язык на разных уровнях владения является сбалансированное развитие как

грамматики, так и словарного запаса.

Introduction

In the field of language education, grammar and vocabulary are considered fundamental

components of linguistic competence. However, educators and learners often question which

one should be prioritized. Some believe that vocabulary is the key to effective communication,

while others argue that without grammar, language use becomes chaotic and unclear. This

paper aims to explore the functions of both grammar and vocabulary in language learning and

evaluate their roles in promoting communication skills, fluency, and accuracy.

Literature Review

The debate between the significance of grammar and vocabulary in language learning has been

extensively discussed in the field of applied linguistics. Numerous researchers have contributed

to the understanding of how both components interact in the language acquisition

process.Wilkins (1972) made a famous statement: “Without grammar very little can be


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 12, issue 1, June 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

273

conveyed, without vocabulary nothing can be conveyed.” This suggests that while grammar

structures language, vocabulary is the core of actual communication. His work emphasizes that

words carry the main meaning in interaction, and grammar helps organize them

effectively.Thornbury (2002), in his book “How to Teach Vocabulary,” argues that lexical

competence is at the heart of communicative competence. He claims that a large vocabulary is

more helpful to a learner than perfect grammar, especially in the early stages of learning. His

viewpoint supports the idea that learners can still make themselves understood with minimal

grammar if they know enough words.
On the other hand, Swan (2005) stresses the importance of grammar in ensuring precision and

avoiding misunderstandings. In his book “Practical English Usage,” he explains that correct

grammar helps convey not just what is said, but how and why it is said — showing

relationships between ideas, time sequences, and levels of certainty or possibility. Grammar

also helps learners create more complex and academic forms of expression, which are vital in

writing and formal contexts.Nation (2001) distinguishes between productive and receptive

vocabulary, pointing out that vocabulary must be taught systematically and revisited regularly

to support fluency. He also states that vocabulary alone is not enough to develop competence; it

must be combined with structural patterns for learners to communicate naturally and

correctly.Larsen-Freeman (2003) introduces the idea of "grammaring," emphasizing grammar

as a dynamic process rather than a fixed set of rules. She encourages language teachers to move

beyond traditional grammar drills and to help learners internalize grammar through usage and

context. This perspective highlights grammar as a skill to be practiced, much like vocabulary.
Another study by Schmitt (2008) suggests that learners tend to prioritize vocabulary at the

beginning stages because it provides quick results in understanding and speaking. However, as

learners advance, grammar becomes more important for fluency, accuracy, and sophistication in

language use.
In support of this, Ellis (2006) notes that communicative competence requires a balance

between form (grammar) and meaning (vocabulary). He explains that focusing only on

vocabulary may lead to communication breakdowns in complex or ambiguous

situations.Moreover, studies in SLA (Second Language Acquisition) show that learners who are

exposed to both grammar and vocabulary simultaneously perform better than those who focus

on one component alone (Lightbown & Spada, 2013). These findings support the idea of

integrated learning models, where grammar and vocabulary are taught together in context.
In summary, the literature clearly shows that grammar and vocabulary are interdependent.

Vocabulary enables the expression of meaning, while grammar structures that meaning.

Researchers agree that neither should be ignored, and that the most effective learning occurs

when both are developed in a complementary manner.

Methodology

This paper follows a qualitative research design based on document analysis. Various scholarly

articles, language teaching textbooks, and research papers were reviewed to gather theoretical

insights and teaching practices related to grammar and vocabulary. Additionally, observations

from ESL (English as a Second Language) classrooms were considered to evaluate how these

components are integrated in real teaching environments. The study does not include a primary

data collection process but relies on secondary sources and existing literature.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS

ISSN: 3030-332X Impact factor: 8,293

Volume 12, issue 1, June 2025

https://wordlyknowledge.uz/index.php/IJSR

worldly knowledge

Index:

google scholar, research gate, research bib, zenodo, open aire.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=wosjournals.com&btnG

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Worldly-Knowledge

https://journalseeker.researchbib.com/view/issn/3030-332X

274

Conclusion

Both grammar and vocabulary are essential in learning a language, and their importance varies

depending on the learner’s level, goals, and context. Vocabulary is crucial for basic

communication and comprehension, especially in the early stages. Grammar becomes

increasingly important as learners strive for fluency, accuracy, and formal expression.

Ultimately, the most effective language instruction balances the development of both elements,

allowing learners to build not only meaningful but also correct communication.

References:

1. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Heinle

ELT

2. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University

Press.

3. Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed Second Language Vocabulary Learning. Language Teaching

Research, 12(3), 329–363.

4. Thornbury, S. (1999). How to Teach Grammar. Pearson Education Limited.
5. Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in Language Teaching. Edward Arnold.
6. Ellis, R. (2006). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
7. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages Are Learned (4th ed.). Oxford

University Press.

8. Swan, M. (2005). Practical English Usage (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
9. Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Longman.

Библиографические ссылки

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Heinle ELT

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed Second Language Vocabulary Learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363.

Thornbury, S. (1999). How to Teach Grammar. Pearson Education Limited.

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in Language Teaching. Edward Arnold.

Ellis, R. (2006). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages Are Learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Swan, M. (2005). Practical English Usage (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Longman.