411
STELL ISQ APPARATUS IN DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY
STUDY THE IMPORTANCE OF
Tojiev F.I., Ismoilkhojaeva K.G., Isanova D.R.
Tashkent State Dental Institute
The development and implementation of new therapeutic measures in the field
of dentistry as a level of work on "Reform of the medical field and the application
of modern technologies and methods of treatment" is a pressing issue today.
Nowadays, prosthetics of secondary adenomas present in the upper and lower jaws
are one of the current problems facing dentists. One of the modern ways to overcome
this problem
a.
e. dental floss defects is dental implantology.
The purpose of the research:
Optimization of implant stability determination using OSSTEL ISQ apparatus
Objectives of the research:
1.
Introduction of OSSTELL ISQ to the clinic.
2.
Compatibility with OSSTELL ISQ apparatus results and X-ray results.
Object and material of scientific work:
Thirty patients were recruited for the study, of whom 18 were male and 12
were female, with partial secondary adentia.
1.
Clinical
2.
Radiology
3.
Laboratory
4.
Statistics
Results : In the study, all patients were divided into two groups 1 group control
group 2 group OSSTELL ISQ apparatus implant group.
412
Implant surgery was performed in all patients. The first group used phenotic
torque and X-ray examination, the second group used torque, X-ray and OSSTELL
ISQ apparatus. As a result, orthopedic treatment was continued.
The ISQ scale
ISQ has a non-linear correlation to micro mobility.
Micro mobility decreases >50 % from 60 to 70 ISQ (ref. 7,8)
Sennerby L Prof,
implantologle 2013;21(l):21-33 Kokovlc V. JungR. Feloutds A, Todorovlc V.
Jurlslc M. Hammerte C. Clinical oral implants Research, 00.2013,1-6 Michael M.
Bomsteln, Dr. med. dent; Christopher N. Hart. DMD; Sandro A. Halbntter, Dr. med.
dent.-. Dean Morton. BDS, MS; Daniel Baser. Prof. Dr. med. dent. Clin implant
Dent Relat Res 2009 Serge Baltayan, Joan Pl-Anfruns, Tara Aghaloo, Peter Moy J
Oral Maxlllofac Surg 74:1145-1152,2016 РЗг-Olov ostman DOS. PhD, MD. Private
practitioner. Falun- and Blomatenal group, Sahlgrenska. Academy. Gothenburg,
clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, volume 7, Supplement 1.2005
Daniel Rodrigo. Luis Aracil. Conchita Martin, Mariano Sanz din. oral imp! Res.
21.2010; 255-261 Pagllanl L. Sennerby L, Petersson A,verrocchl D. Wipe S &
Andersson P. Journal of Oral Rehabllltatlcn 2012 Paolo Trtsl PhD. Teocrlto Carlesl
DDS, Marco Colaglovannl DOS. Giorgio Perfettl MD. DOS. Journal of Osteology
and Blomatenals, wlume 1. Number 3.2010 Stefan Paul Hicklin. Esther schneebeli,
VMannectiappuis. Simone Francesco Marco Janner, Daniel Buser. urs Bragger din.
oral impl. Res oo. 2015; 1-9 60 | low implant stability Between 60-70 implant
stability is normal 70 f implant stability is high The above is a summary of scientific
data and not an official recommendation by Osstell.
To monitor osseointegration measure at placement and before final
restoration.
Conclusion:
The first group of data was obtained and compared, the results
obtained in the second group were seen.
Bibliography:
3.
Олимов A., & Хайдаров A. (2020). Comparative evaluation of the
efficiency of conducting individual and professional hygiene in prosthetics for
dental
implants.
in
Library
,
20
(3),
862–868.
извлечено
от
https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/archive/article/view/14289
Technical
explanation
60
65
70
LOW STABILITY
MEDIUM STABILITY
HIGH STABILITY
1
'I
1
ISQ
Indication
ISQ <60
Implant at risk-
monitor
ISQ
Surgical protocol
Restorative protocol
Full splint (immediate
loading)
2-stage
Traditional loading
Partial case
Single case
l-or2-stage
Early loading
1-stage
Immediate loading
ISQ 60-65
ISQ 65-70
ISQ
>70
