ISSN:
2181-3906
2023
International scientific journal
«MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH»
VOLUME 2 / ISSUE 11 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ
946
MEN AND WOMEN SPEECH PECULARITIES AND EXCEPTIONS
Burxonov Baxodirjon Botirali o’g’li
teacher of Andizhan state university
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10231560
Abstract.
This article examines and discusses gender differences in language using the
author's recorded conversations. The dissertation will begin with a detailed explanation of the
research context in this area. He then proceeds to analyze the data, looking at the comparisons
that can be made between the study here and previous studies in the field. It will also include a
discussion of relevant issues arising from the analysis of this research.
Key words:
gender role, speech, conversation, intervention, comparison process.
ОСОБЕННОСТИ И ИСКЛЮЧЕНИЯ РЕЧИ МУЖЧИН И ЖЕНЩИН
Аннотация.
В данной статье рассматриваются и обсуждаются гендерные
различия в языке с использованием записей разговоров автора. Диссертация начнется с
подробного объяснения контекста исследований в этой области. Затем он приступает к
анализу данных, рассматривая сравнения, которые можно провести между данным
исследованием и предыдущими исследованиями в этой области. Он также будет
включать обсуждение актуальных вопросов, возникающих в результате анализа данного
исследования.
Ключевые слова:
гендерная роль, речь, беседа, вмешательство, процесс сравнения.
Introduction
For the study of gender and speech, conversations are recorded so that they can be
translated and analyzed to provide data for discussing these issues. A key difference in the
language of women and men is that men have shown to dominate conversation through the use of
pauses and overlaps, and that the number of these irregularities of conversation increases
significantly when men speak. There is clearly a difference in the amount of interventions men
and women use, with men being more likely to intervene and less likely to do so. Considering the
size of the study and the way in which one participant differs significantly from the other, it cannot
be said that this is due to gender differences, and it was interfered with the fact that the participants
differed only from each other, not men, reluctance to participate. The female part interrupts men,
and men pick up women more often than men.
Research methodology
The traditional view of differences between men and women is the use of offensive words
and ugly language. This is explained by the prevalence of expressions such as "feminine" behavior
or "a gentleman's curse", which indicates the belief that cursing is a purely masculine habit. Many
claims have been made about the speaking styles of women and men in this field. Jesperson argues
that women are inherently flawed in their vulgar and vulgar expressions and prefer to express
themselves secretly and indirectly. (in some areas) Flexner states that "more American dialects are
made and used by men".
Discussion
Lakoff also argued that while men call each other names more loudly, women use more
polite language such as "shit" and "oh god". Lakoff highlighted the use of the "question mark" as
ISSN:
2181-3906
2023
International scientific journal
«MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH»
VOLUME 2 / ISSUE 11 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ
947
an illustration of this. It states that women use more marked questions than men. Fewer answers
to these questions will give you more confidence. Recent studies have shown that tag issues are
more often associated with female language (Siegler and Siegler), which illustrates people's
attitudes towards women and their insecurity.
However, the study for this test found very different results, with men using the labels more
often than women. Interestingly, none of the problems classified, which were considered more
common due to excessive use of pauses, were addressed. Perhaps this is important because the
more aggressive speech style used can also make it more confident in its speech. However, it
cannot be said to be gender related as he uses mostly group-tagged questions.
Another form of language that has been identified as questionable speech is the use of
closures, such as gender, type, etc. Lakoff described them as an element of female language that
makes their language less direct. In this study, it was found that the women who participated
actually used fences more often than men.
Results
This study seeks to explore differences between women's and men's language. And
although the overall picture from a small study group cannot be summarized, it indicates that
speech patterns vary greatly in some areas. Determining whether it is similar or just a difference
in speech style requires further research. But in this group: the two men were the most interrupted
and the two women the most interrupted; a woman used the most active hearing aids and a man
the least; a man spoke more and a woman spoke less; both women used different obstacles, which
meant dubious speech; and the two men used more vulgar terms.
Conclusion
These basic facts show that there are and can be many factors influencing this investigation,
such as nationality, length of relationship, length of tenure with the company, and at least the fact
that the investigator is male. It seems that some research results from twenty to twenty years ago
are still valid today. These results are remarkable considering how each actor grew up in a very
different society twenty or thirty years ago. The concepts of gender equality and women's rights
are not new, and the responses of the participants in this study demonstrate awareness and
commitment to equality.
REFERENCE
1.
Brown, P. (1980) “How and Why Are Women More Polite: Some Evidence from a Mayan
Community.” In Coates (ed.) (1998)
2.
Cheshire, J. (1982)
Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study.
Cambridge University Press.
3.
Coates, J. (1986)
Women, Men and Language.
Longman.
4.
Coates, J (ed.) (1998)
Language and Gender: A Reader.
Blackwell
5.
Coates, J. & D. Cameron (eds.) (1989)
Women in Their Speech Communities.
Longman
6.
Flexner, S. (1960)
Preface to the Dictionary of American Slang
Thomas Y.Cromwell: New
York.
7.
Goddard A. & L.M. Patterson (2000)
Language and Gender
The Eihosha LTD.
8.
Holmes, J. (1992)
An Introduction to Sociolinguistice.
Longman.
