Authors

  • Kamilla Rayimjanova
  • N.N. Shavazi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.science-research.60458

Keywords:

Research results. In those examined with PR an increase in the frequency of risk factors was observed in comparison with women with a preserved pregnancy: stress (31.2%) bad habits (3.6%) age under 18 after 30 years (6.33%) history of abortion (44.7%) gynecological diseases (56.5%) threatened miscarriage (99.5%) early preeclampsia (100%) PT up to 22 weeks (0.90%) PT up to 36 weeks (45.2%) cardiovascular diseases (5.4%) hypertensive disorders (11.3%).

Abstract

Objective: to consider the impact of preterm birth on obstetric complications, diagnostic methods and types of correction of various disorders, as well as the results of the study.

background image

2025

JANUARY

NEW RENAISSANCE

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE

VOLUME 2

|

ISSUE 1

305

PERINATAL RISK IN PRETERM BIRTH: NEW OBSERVER OPPORTUNITIES

Kamilla Farxodovna Rayimjanova

The 1st year Master's degree resident of the

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №3

Samarkand State Medical University

N.N. Shavazi

Scientific supervisor: DSc.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14647884

Objective:

to consider the impact of preterm birth on obstetric complications, diagnostic

methods and types of correction of various disorders, as well as the results of the study.

Materials and methods of research.

The study was performed in the Regional Perinatal

Center of the city of Samarkand in the department of pathology of pregnant women. A total of

700 pregnant women were examined to assess risk factors for the development of PR. We

retrospectively analyzed 350 birth histories for 2017-2019, prospectively analyzed the initial

clinical characteristics, as well as the features of the course of pregnancy. Pregnant women were

included in the study as they were referred. The inclusion criteria were: pregnant women with a

period of 30-34 weeks, the age of pregnant women 18-36 years, a history of medical abortion (1

or more abortions in history), women who had a history of PR, women who had a history of

premature rupture of amniotic fluid, and exclusion criteria: gestational age less than 30 weeks,

anomalies and tumors of the uterus and ovaries, isthmic-cervical insufficiency, multiple pregnancy,

complicated preeclampsia, decompensated placental insufficiency, congenital malformations of

the fetus, severe somatic pathology.

Under our supervision were 350 pregnant women. The main group consisted of 250

pregnant women with a gestational age of 28-35 weeks of pregnancy, who were divided into 3

groups according to the history. The control group consisted of 100 pregnant women with a

physiological course of pregnancy.

Research results.

In those examined with PR, an increase in the frequency of risk factors

was observed in comparison with women with a preserved pregnancy: stress (31.2%), bad habits

(3.6%), age under 18 after 30 years (6.33%), history of abortion (44.7%), gynecological diseases

(56.5%), threatened miscarriage (99.5%), early preeclampsia (100%), PT up to 22 weeks (0.90%),

PT up to 36 weeks (45.2%), cardiovascular diseases (5.4%), hypertensive disorders (11.3%).

Based on multiple studies and the information content of the biochemical composition of

blood and AF, we carried out a biochemical analysis of all indicators.


background image

2025

JANUARY

NEW RENAISSANCE

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE

VOLUME 2

|

ISSUE 1

306

Based on the obtained results, we would like to note that in the blood and in the AF, the

changed parameters were similar. I noticed a change in urea, which was observed in 70% of

women in the period of 28-35 weeks.

Of interest is the assessment of the urea content in the mother-fetus system. In the mother's

blood at the time of the birth of the child, the average urea content does not differ significantly

from that in cord blood and varies within relatively small limits - from 6.39 to 3.0 mmol / l. The

concentration of urea in the amniotic fluid (6.9±0.56 mmol/l) in all cases increases its level in the

cord blood and in the mother's blood.

The next task before us was the question of the method of delivery of a pregnant woman

with preterm labor that had already begun, taking into account complications or the mother's

consent to a caesarean section. When considering perinatal outcomes at 34-36 weeks of gestation,

vaginal births were 1.3 times less likely to have hypoxia at birth, and the incidence of respiratory

distress syndrome was significantly lower. Perinatal outcomes at 31-33 weeks of gestation SDR

was 2.4 times more likely to occur in children born by caesarean section.

Conclusion.

Thus, our study of perinatal outcomes of PR, depending on the tactics of

delivery, showed that premature babies at 34-36 weeks 6 days have a very low incidence of IVH

(0.58%) and it does not depend on the method of delivery. However, the frequency of SDR is

significantly higher (3.7 times) in children born by caesarean section. Thus, we can say that the

optimal method of delivery for premature babies at 34-36 weeks 6 days is vaginal delivery. At 28-

30 weeks, all newborns develop SDR and all children require respiratory support. We did not find

a significant difference between the required ventilation parameters and the method of delivery.

At the same time, the frequency of IVH was 2.5 times higher in children born through the natural

birth canal. When calculating the relative risk, it was found that in the case of vaginal delivery at

28-30 weeks, the risk of IVH is increased by 2.5 times than with a cesarean section, and the

frequency of IVH reaches almost 15%.

REFERENCES

1.

БолотскихВ. М., Болотских О. И. Клиническое обоснование активно-выжидательной

тактики ведения родов, осложненных преждевременным излитием околоплодных

вод. // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. — 2007. — Т. LVI, № 3. — С. 3-9.

2.

Васильев С. А. Плазменный фибронектин при патологии системы крови: автореф.

дис. ... канд. мед. наук. — М., 1987. — 21 с.


background image

2025

JANUARY

NEW RENAISSANCE

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE

VOLUME 2

|

ISSUE 1

307

3.

Громова A. M. Прогнозирование и профилактика преждевременного излития

околоплодных вод при доношенной беременности: дис. ... д-ра мед.наук. — М., 1992.

— 370 с.

4.

Долгов В. В., Свирин П. В. Лабораторная диагностика нарушений гемостаза. — М.:

Триада, 2005. — 227 с.

5.

Шавази Н., Халилова Д. Медико–социальная проблема детей с ограниченными

возможностями //Журнал гепато-гастроэнтерологических исследований. – 2021. – Т.

2. – №. 3.2. – С. 56-62.

6.

S. N. N. B. The Role Of Fetal Fibronectin In The Prediction Of Premature Births Shavazi

Nn (Republic of Uzbekistan) Email: Shavazi451@ scientifictext. ru.

7.

Shavazi N. N., Babamuradova Z. В. Ratio Of Pro-And Antiangiogenic Factors In

Pathogenesis Of Premature Delivery In Pregnant Women Against Background Of

Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Dysplasia.

8.

Nuraliyevna S. N., Dilshodovna J. M. MORPHOFUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE

PLACENTA IN PREMATURE LABOR //Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research

Journal. – 2022. – Т. 10. – №. 4. – С. 381-384.

9.

Ахтамова Н. А., Шавази Н. Н. PREDICTION OF OBSETRIC BLOOD LOSS IN

WOMEN WITH PRETERM BIRTH (LITERATURE REVIEW) //УЗБЕКСКИЙ

МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 5.

10.

Nuralievna S. N., Islamovna Z. N., Rakhimovna K. D. Prediction of Premature Outflow of

amniotic fluid in Preterm pregnancy //International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation.

– 2020. – Т. 24. – №. 5. – С. 5675-5685.

11.

Shavazi N. N. The nature of changes markers of dysfunction of the endothelium in blood

of women with premature bursting of amniotic waters //Journal of Advanced Medical and

Dental Sciences Research. – 2021. – Т. 9. – №. 6. – С. 6-9.

12.

Nuraliyevna S. N. et al. Total gisterektomiyaning subtotal gisterektomiyadan ustunvorligini

tahlillash //Journal of biomedicine and practice. – 2022. – Т. 7. – №. 3.

13.

Shavazi N. N. Informativity of the indicators of blood allowing to predict premature water

breaking at prematurely born pregnancy //American Journal of Medicine and Medical

Sciences.-America. – 2020. – С. 5-8.

14.

Nasyrovich S. S. et al. PREDICTORS OF BLEEDING IN PRETERM LABOR:

RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL //Journal of Modern Educational Achievements.

– 2023. – Т. 5. – №. 5. – С. 185-196.


background image

2025

JANUARY

NEW RENAISSANCE

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE

VOLUME 2

|

ISSUE 1

308

15.

Shavazi N., Akhtamova N., Katkova N. Perinatal risk of premature birth: New obstetric

opportunities //E3S Web of Conferences. – EDP Sciences, 2023. – Т. 413. – С. 03035.

16.

Sattarova N., Shavazi N. PERINATAL RISK OF PREMATURE BIRTH: NEW

OBSTETRIC OPPORTUNITIES //International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical

Research. – 2024. – Т. 4. – №. 02. – С. 41-51.

17.

Шавази Н. Н. и др. ПРЕЖДЕВРЕМЕННЫЕ РОДЫ: ОДИН СИМПТОМ МНОГО

ПРИЧИН

//ЖУРНАЛ

ГЕПАТО-ГАСТРОЭНТЕРОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ

ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ. – 2022. – №. SI-3.

18.

Jalilova D. M., Shavazi N. N. Prognosis of Fetoplasentar Insufficiency in Pregnant Women

with Preterm Obstetric Care and Optimize Preventive Measures //International Journal of

Integrative and Modern Medicine. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 5. – С. 323-327.

19.

Шавзи Н. Н. Современные подходы в диагностике преждевременного разрыва

плодных оболочек у беременных женщин //Новый день в медицине. – 2020. – №. 1.

– С. 453-456.

20.

Nuralievna S. N., Akbarjonovna A. N., Farkhodovna R. N. Management of the Reatening

Preterm Birth //Texas Journal of Medical Science. – 2023. – Т. 17. – С. 25-38.

References

БолотскихВ. М., Болотских О. И. Клиническое обоснование активно-выжидательной тактики ведения родов, осложненных преждевременным излитием околоплодных вод. // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. — 2007. — Т. LVI, № 3. — С. 3-9.

Васильев С. А. Плазменный фибронектин при патологии системы крови: автореф. дис. ... канд. мед. наук. — М., 1987. — 21 с.

Громова A. M. Прогнозирование и профилактика преждевременного излития околоплодных вод при доношенной беременности: дис. ... д-ра мед.наук. — М., 1992. — 370 с.

Долгов В. В., Свирин П. В. Лабораторная диагностика нарушений гемостаза. — М.: Триада, 2005. — 227 с.

Шавази Н., Халилова Д. Медико–социальная проблема детей с ограниченными возможностями //Журнал гепато-гастроэнтерологических исследований. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 3.2. – С. 56-62.

S. N. N. B. The Role Of Fetal Fibronectin In The Prediction Of Premature Births Shavazi Nn (Republic of Uzbekistan) Email: Shavazi451@ scientifictext. ru.

Shavazi N. N., Babamuradova Z. В. Ratio Of Pro-And Antiangiogenic Factors In Pathogenesis Of Premature Delivery In Pregnant Women Against Background Of Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Dysplasia.

Nuraliyevna S. N., Dilshodovna J. M. MORPHOFUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE PLACENTA IN PREMATURE LABOR //Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal. – 2022. – Т. 10. – №. 4. – С. 381-384.

Ахтамова Н. А., Шавази Н. Н. PREDICTION OF OBSETRIC BLOOD LOSS IN WOMEN WITH PRETERM BIRTH (LITERATURE REVIEW) //УЗБЕКСКИЙ МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 5.

Nuralievna S. N., Islamovna Z. N., Rakhimovna K. D. Prediction of Premature Outflow of amniotic fluid in Preterm pregnancy //International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. – 2020. – Т. 24. – №. 5. – С. 5675-5685.

Shavazi N. N. The nature of changes markers of dysfunction of the endothelium in blood of women with premature bursting of amniotic waters //Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. – 2021. – Т. 9. – №. 6. – С. 6-9.

Nuraliyevna S. N. et al. Total gisterektomiyaning subtotal gisterektomiyadan ustunvorligini tahlillash //Journal of biomedicine and practice. – 2022. – Т. 7. – №. 3.

Shavazi N. N. Informativity of the indicators of blood allowing to predict premature water breaking at prematurely born pregnancy //American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences.-America. – 2020. – С. 5-8.

Nasyrovich S. S. et al. PREDICTORS OF BLEEDING IN PRETERM LABOR: RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL //Journal of Modern Educational Achievements. – 2023. – Т. 5. – №. 5. – С. 185-196.

Shavazi N., Akhtamova N., Katkova N. Perinatal risk of premature birth: New obstetric opportunities //E3S Web of Conferences. – EDP Sciences, 2023. – Т. 413. – С. 03035.

Sattarova N., Shavazi N. PERINATAL RISK OF PREMATURE BIRTH: NEW OBSTETRIC OPPORTUNITIES //International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research. – 2024. – Т. 4. – №. 02. – С. 41-51.

Шавази Н. Н. и др. ПРЕЖДЕВРЕМЕННЫЕ РОДЫ: ОДИН СИМПТОМ МНОГО ПРИЧИН //ЖУРНАЛ ГЕПАТО-ГАСТРОЭНТЕРОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ. – 2022. – №. SI-3.

Jalilova D. M., Shavazi N. N. Prognosis of Fetoplasentar Insufficiency in Pregnant Women with Preterm Obstetric Care and Optimize Preventive Measures //International Journal of Integrative and Modern Medicine. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 5. – С. 323-327.

Шавзи Н. Н. Современные подходы в диагностике преждевременного разрыва плодных оболочек у беременных женщин //Новый день в медицине. – 2020. – №. 1. – С. 453-456.

Nuralievna S. N., Akbarjonovna A. N., Farkhodovna R. N. Management of the Reatening Preterm Birth //Texas Journal of Medical Science. – 2023. – Т. 17. – С. 25-38.