Authors

  • Hizbullah Hashimi
  • Shahab Subhanullah
  • Abdul Samad Roshan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.science-research.63707

Keywords:

Afghan EFL learners EFL pedagogy learning style preferences.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the learning style preferences and multiple intelligence profiles of Afghan EFL learners, focusing on identifying the most and least dominant learning styles and intelligence types. A quantitative, non-experimental correlational design was employed, involving 70 male EFL learners at the Paktika Institute of Higher Education. The Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ) and the Multiple Intelligences (MI) Inventory were administered to collect data on learning style preferences and intelligence profiles, respectively. The results revealed a strong preference for visual learning, followed by group learning, among Afghan EFL learners. Tactile learning was found to be the least preferred style. In terms of multiple intelligences, interpersonal intelligence emerged as the most dominant type, followed closely by intrapersonal and linguistic intelligence. While logical-mathematical, Spatial and musical intelligences were the least dominant. The findings of this study had implications for EFL pedagogy in Afghanistan, suggesting that educators should have incorporated visual aids and self-directed learning opportunities into their teaching practices to cater to the dominant learning styles of their students. Additionally, the study highlighted the importance of considering multiple intelligence profiles in language learning, as learners with diverse intelligence strengths may benefit from tailored instruction. The study's results contributed to the existing body of research on learning styles and multiple intelligences, providing new insights into the preferences and strengths of Afghan EFL learners. The study's limitations and potential avenues for future research were also discussed, including the need to investigate the learning preferences of female EFL learners and other demographic groups in Afghanistan. The pedagogical implications of this study advocate for a more adaptive, inclusive, and learner focused approach to teaching English as a Foreign Language.

background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

979

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN LEARNING STYLE PREFERENCES AND

MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES AMONG AFGHAN UNDERGRADUATE EFL

LEARNERS AT PAKTIKA INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Hizbullah Hashimi

English Department, Education Faculty, Paktika Higher Education institute

hizbullahhashimi33@gmail.com

Subhanullah Shahab

Department of Pashto, Faculty of Language and Literature, Shaikh Zayed University

subhanullah.shahab1364@gmail.com

Abdul Samad Roshan

Department of Pashto, Faculty of Language and Literature, Shaikh Zayed University

abuhanifaroshan@gmail.com

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14750541

Abstract. This study aimed to investigate the learning style preferences and multiple

intelligence profiles of Afghan EFL learners, focusing on identifying the most and least dominant

learning styles and intelligence types. A quantitative, non-experimental correlational design was

employed, involving 70 male EFL learners at the Paktika Institute of Higher Education. The

Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ) and the Multiple Intelligences (MI)

Inventory were administered to collect data on learning style preferences and intelligence profiles,

respectively. The results revealed a strong preference for visual learning, followed by group

learning, among Afghan EFL learners. Tactile learning was found to be the least preferred style.

In terms of multiple intelligences, interpersonal intelligence emerged as the most dominant type,

followed closely by intrapersonal and linguistic intelligence. While logical-mathematical, Spatial

and musical intelligences were the least dominant. The findings of this study had implications for

EFL pedagogy in Afghanistan, suggesting that educators should have incorporated visual aids

and self-directed learning opportunities into their teaching practices to cater to the dominant

learning styles of their students. Additionally, the study highlighted the importance of considering

multiple intelligence profiles in language learning, as learners with diverse intelligence strengths

may benefit from tailored instruction. The study's results contributed to the existing div of

research on learning styles and multiple intelligences, providing new insights into the preferences

and strengths of Afghan EFL learners. The study's limitations and potential avenues for future

research were also discussed, including the need to investigate the learning preferences of female


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

980

EFL learners and other demographic groups in Afghanistan. The pedagogical implications of this

study advocate for a more adaptive, inclusive, and learner focused approach to teaching English

as a Foreign Language.

Keywords: Afghan EFL learners, EFL pedagogy, learning style preferences.

КОРРЕЛЯЦИЯ МЕЖДУ ПРЕДПОЧТЕНИЯМИ В СТИЛЕ ОБУЧЕНИЯ И

МНОЖЕСТВЕННЫМ ИНТЕЛЛЕКТОМ СРЕДИ АФГАНСКИХ СТУДЕНТОВ,

ИЗУЧАЮЩИХ EFL, В ИНСТИТУТЕ ВЫСШЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ ПАКТИКА

Аннотация. Целью данного исследования было изучение предпочтений в стиле

обучения и множественных профилей интеллекта афганских студентов, изучающих EFL,

с упором на выявление наиболее и наименее доминирующих стилей обучения и типов

интеллекта. Был использован количественный, неэкспериментальный корреляционный

дизайн с участием 70 мужчин, изучающих EFL в Институте высшего образования

Пактика. Опросник предпочтений в стиле восприятия обучения (PLSPQ) и инвентарь

множественного интеллекта (MI) были использованы для сбора данных о предпочтениях

в стиле обучения и профилях интеллекта соответственно. Результаты показали сильное

предпочтение визуального обучения, за которым следует групповое обучение, среди

афганских студентов EFL. Было обнаружено, что тактильное обучение является

наименее предпочтительным стилем. С точки зрения множественного интеллекта,

межличностный интеллект оказался наиболее доминирующим типом, за которым

следуют внутриличностный и лингвистический интеллект. В то время как логико-

математический, пространственный и музыкальный интеллекты были наименее

доминирующими. Результаты этого исследования имели последствия для педагогики EFL

в Афганистане, предполагая, что преподаватели должны были включить наглядные

пособия и возможности самостоятельного обучения в свою педагогическую практику,

чтобы удовлетворить доминирующие стили обучения своих учеников. Кроме того,

исследование подчеркнуло важность рассмотрения множественных профилей

интеллекта при изучении языка, поскольку учащиеся с различными сильными сторонами

интеллекта могут выиграть от индивидуального обучения. Результаты исследования

внесли вклад в существующий корпус исследований стилей обучения и множественного

интеллекта, предоставив новое понимание предпочтений и сильных сторон афганских

учащихся EFL. Также обсуждались ограничения исследования и потенциальные

направления для будущих исследований, включая необходимость изучения предпочтений в


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

981

обучении женщин, изучающих EFL, и других демографических групп в Афганистане.

Педагогические выводы этого исследования говорят в пользу более адаптивного,

инклюзивного и ориентированного на обучающегося подхода к преподаванию английского

языка как иностранного.

Ключевые слова: афганские обучающиеся EFL, педагогика EFL, предпочтения в

стиле обучения.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Afghan education system has made significant strides in rebuilding after decades of

conflict, with efforts focused on improving infrastructure, access, and the quality of education.

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) has become an integral part of the curriculum at various

levels, with the Ministry of Higher Education establishing English departments in most

universities. Recognizing the importance of English as a global lingua franca, these initiatives aim

to prepare Afghan students for academic and professional opportunities on an international scale.

However, despite these advancements, Afghan EFL learners, particularly undergraduates, face

challenges in achieving fluency, especially in speaking skills. Factors such as limited practice

opportunities, fear of mistakes, and cultural communication barriers often hinder their progress.

Two key theories, Learning Styles Theory and Multiple Intelligence (MI) Theory, offer

insights into addressing individual differences in learning, which could be instrumental in

overcoming these challenges. Learning Styles Theory emphasizes how individuals process and

retain information, advocating for adapting teaching methods to match students' preferred styles

(Armstrong, 2008). MI Theory, developed by Howard Gardner, proposes that individuals possess

multiple distinct intelligences such as linguistic, logical-mathematical, and musical and learning

is more effective when aligned with these domains (Gardner, 1983). While both theories focus on

personalization, Learning Styles Theory addresses how learning occurs, whereas MI Theory

emphasizes what should be taught based on intelligence domains. Together, they underscore the

importance of tailoring education to individual needs.

Research supports the integration of these theories into instructional practices. Armstrong

(2008) suggests that aligning teaching methods with learners’ preferred styles enhances learning

outcomes. However, Lazear (1999) argues that while it may not always be feasible to cater to all

styles in every lesson, educators can encourage students to leverage their dominant intelligences

to address weaker areas. Applying these theories in the Afghan context can help create more


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

982

inclusive and effective educational strategies, particularly in addressing speaking deficiencies

among EFL learners. By incorporating MI-based tasks and learning styles into language

instruction, teachers can foster an engaging environment that bridges linguistic and cultural gaps.

To further improve EFL education in Afghanistan, educators must focus on creating

supportive, student-centered classrooms that encourage risk-taking, collaboration, and authentic

communication. Targeted interventions such as integrating idioms into teaching materials and

providing cultural context for language use can help learners overcome specific challenges, such

as understanding and applying idiomatic expressions. By emphasizing interactive tasks and real-

world application, teachers can empower students to achieve fluency and global competence. With

a commitment to professional development and individualized pedagogy, the Afghan education

system can continue to enhance its English language programs, preparing students for success in

an interconnected world.

2. Literature Review: In Afghanistan, the education system has faced significant challenges

due to years of conflict. Despite improvements since 2001, including the introduction of English

as a compulsory subject, Afghan EFL learners still struggle with speaking skills, particularly due

to anxiety and limited classroom participation. This is compounded by difficulties in

understanding English idioms, as cultural knowledge and linguistic differences create barriers (De

Jesus et al., 2007). To address this, instructors need to incorporate idioms into lessons and create

supportive learning environments that encourage active participation and risk-taking (Lazear,

1999).

The Learning Styles Theory and the Multiple Intelligence Theory are two key frameworks

for explaining individual differences in learning. The Learning Styles Theory focuses on how

individuals acquire, process, and remembers academic information, suggesting instructional

methods should align with learners’ preferred styles. In contrast, The Multiple Intelligence Theory

emphasizes that individuals possess different intelligence domains, and all learners can succeed if

taught according to their dominant intelligence (Armstrong, 2008). While Learning Styles Theory

focuses on how instruction is delivered, Multiple Intelligence Theory highlights what content is

taught (Gardner, 1993).

Educational reforms focus on increasing access to English education, but challenges

remain. EFL learners need more opportunities for practical language use, particularly in speaking,

to improve their overall proficiency (Graf et al., 2009). By using student-centered approaches and


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

983

interactive activities, teachers can better support Afghan learners in overcoming these challenge,

fostering both language acquisition and cultural understanding (Armstrong, 2008).

2.1 Concept of Learning Styles and their Relevance to EFL Learning

2.1.1 The Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model: The Felder-Silverman Learning Style

Model categorizes learners based on four dimensions: active/reflective, sensing/intuitive,

visual/verbal, and sequential/global, acknowledging those individuals may exhibit a mix of these

preferences (Felder & Silverman, 1988). Active learners engage through discussions or hands-on

activities, while reflective learners prefer introspection. Sensing learners focus on concrete,

practical information, contrasting with intuitive learners who prefer abstract and theoretical

concepts. Visual learners process information through images, whereas verbal learners favor

written and spoken explanations. Sequential learners follow a step-by-step approach, while global

learners focus on the overall picture and context. Widely applied in education, including

engineering, the model helps educators tailor teaching strategies to accommodate diverse learning

styles, creating more inclusive and effective learning environments that enhance outcomes (Felder

& Henriques, 1995).

2.1.2 The VARK model: The VARK model, developed by Neil Fleming, categorizes

learners into four primary modalities: Visual (V), Aural (A), Read/Write (R), and Kinesthetic (K),

based on how they prefer to process information. Visual learners favor charts and diagrams, aural

learners excel in discussions and lectures, read/write learners prefer written materials, and

kinesthetic learners thrive on hands-on activities (Fleming, 2006). In English as a Foreign

Language (EFL) teaching, the VARK model helps instructors tailor their teaching methods by

using a variety of instructional strategies, such as visual aids, auditory explanations, written

materials, and kinesthetic activities, to meet diverse student needs. By recognizing and

accommodating these preferences, EFL teachers can foster a more engaging and inclusive learning

environment, improving student motivation and learning outcomes (Fleming, 2006).

2.2 Multiple Intelligences (MI) Theory: Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences (MI)

theory, proposed in 1983, challenges traditional views of intelligence by recognizing various types

of intelligences. Initially, Gardner identified seven intelligences: linguistic, logical-mathematical,

spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, and intrapersonal, later adding naturalistic and

existential intelligences (Gardner, 1983, 1993, 1999). Each intelligence involves distinct abilities,

such as linguistic intelligence's sensitivity to language, logical-mathematical intelligence’s

problem-solving, and spatial intelligence’s ability to visualize and manipulate objects. Bodily-


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

984

kinesthetic intelligence involves physical expression, while interpersonal intelligence relates to

understanding and interacting with others. Intrapersonal intelligence focuses on self-awareness,

and naturalistic intelligence is the ability to classify and understand nature, with existential

intelligence addressing philosophical questions (Gardner, 1983, 1993, 1999).

Gardner (1993) emphasized that these intelligences work together, influenced by

biological, personal, and cultural factors. His theory advocates for an inclusive educational

approach that considers the diverse capacities of individuals, encouraging personalized learning

experiences. For instance, activities such as reading and writing can enhance linguistic

intelligence, puzzles and science programs can foster logical-mathematical skills, and role-playing

or physical games can develop bodily-kinesthetic intelligence (Armstrong, 2008). By recognizing

and nurturing these different intelligences, educators can create more dynamic and effective

learning environments for all students.

2.3 Studies on Multiple Intelligences: Research highlights the significance of addressing

diverse learning styles and intelligence profiles in education. Lee (2015) found that learners with

tactile or kinesthetic styles exhibited higher expectations, suggesting the value of incorporating

varied learning styles to boost engagement and performance. Similarly, David (2005) reported that

students excelled in interpersonal, intrapersonal, and verbal-linguistic intelligences but struggled

with bodily-kinesthetic and naturalistic ones, emphasizing the need to cater to multiple

intelligences (MI) profiles. Wilson (2018) demonstrated that co-creating learning environments

based on MI principles transformed classroom dynamics, fostering inclusivity and interactivity.

Further studies explored the integration of MI into specific instructional methods.

Savojbolaghchilar et al. (2020) found that Thematic Vocabulary Instruction (TVI)

combined with MI-oriented tasks significantly enhanced vocabulary learning, although

intrapersonal learners underperformed in this approach. Shafiee et al. (2020) revealed that logical

and musical intelligences influenced various aspects of L2 writing, such as content organization

and grammar.

However, Rahayu et al. (2023) observed no significant performance differences when MI

principles were applied in EFL classrooms, possibly due to inconsistent implementation by

instructors. These findings underscore the potential benefits and challenges of leveraging MI in

language instruction. To this end the researcher formulated the following research questions:

1. What are the most and least dominant learning style preferences among Afghan

EFL Learners.


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

985

2. What types of intelligences are mostly exhibited by Afghan EFL learners?

3. Is there any significant relationship between Afghan EFL learners' multiple

Intelligences types and their learning styles?

3. Methodology

3.1 Participants

:

This study involved 70 Afghan male intermediate-level EFL learners aged

22 to 27 from the Paktika Institute of Higher Education. Participants were selected through

convenience sampling due to their accessibility and shared cultural and educational backgrounds,

ensuring a relatively uniform baseline of language proficiency. This approach, while limiting

generalizability, allowed for efficient recruitment and focused exploration of the relationship

between multiple intelligences and learning style preferences within this specific context. The

selection was influenced by the researchers’ access to the institution and the potential for

meaningful insights from this homogenous group.

3.2 Instrumentation: The Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ),

developed by Reid (1996), was used to assess the learning style preferences of participants in this

study. Designed for foreign language learners, the PLSPQ includes 30 items that evaluate six

learning styles: visual, auditory, tactile, kinesthetic, group, and individual learning. Participants

rated each item on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Scores were totaled for each category, with the highest score indicating the dominant learning

style. This structured and quantifiable approach enabled detailed analysis of learner preferences

and their potential correlation with multiple intelligences.

3.2 1 Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ): The Perceptual

Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ), developed by Reid (1996), was used to assess

the learning style preferences of participants in this study. Designed for foreign language learners,

the PLSPQ includes 30 items that evaluate six learning styles: visual, auditory, tactile, kinesthetic,

group, and individual learning. Participants rated each item on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from

1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Scores were totaled for each category, with the highest

score indicating the dominant learning style. This structured and quantifiable approach enabled

detailed analysis of learner preferences and their potential correlation with multiple intelligences.


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

986

3.2 2 Multiple Intelligences (MI) Inventory: The study utilized McKenzie's (1999) 90-item

Multiple Intelligence Questionnaire to identify participants' dominant intelligences, based on

Gardner's theory of Multiple Intelligences. The questionnaire assesses nine intelligences—

linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal,

naturalistic, and existential—through ten items per category. Its reliability and validity have been

confirmed in prior studies, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 (Razmjoo,

2008; Razmjoo et al., 2009). This tool provided a comprehensive evaluation of participants'

cognitive strengths, enabling the researchers to analyze intelligence profiles in relation to learning

style preferences for the study's objectives.

3.3 Data Collection Procedure: This study used a quantitative, non-experimental

correlational design to explore the relationship between multiple intelligences and learning style

preferences among 70 male Afghan EFL learners at the Paktika Institute of Higher Education.

Ethical approvals were obtained, and participants with intermediate English proficiency provided

informed consent. Data collection involved two tools: the 30-item PLSPQ, which assessed visual,

auditory, tactile, kinesthetic, group, and individual learning styles, and the 90-item MI Inventory,

which identified nine dominant intelligences. Scores were calculated for each learning style and

intelligence type, and statistical software was used for correlational analyses. The findings were

analyzed to determine the associations between intelligence profiles and learning styles, providing

insights for EFL pedagogy tailored to Afghan learners while acknowledging study limitations.

3.4 Data Analysis: To analyze the obtained data, different statistical procedures were used.

First of all, the SPSS data files was checked for missing data by taking frequency counts

of the responses on all items from both data collection instruments. Secondly, the Cronbach alpha

coefficients were computed to estimate the internal consistency reliability of each instrument.

Then, descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, variance, skewness, and

kurtosis, was run for all three variables of this study. Then, in order to answer the research

questions, Pearson moment correlation analysis and multiple regressions analysis was conducted.

4. Findings

4.1 Results of the First Research Question: The first research question aimed to identify

the most and least dominant learning style preferences among Afghan EFL learners. Using the

Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ), completed by 70 male EFL learners

at the Paktika Institute of Higher Education, descriptive statistics were calculated to assess each of


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

987

the six learning style preferences. The results, presented in Table 1.1, ranked the learning styles

based on mean scores to determine the dominant and least dominant preferences.

Table 1:

Descriptive Statistics for Learning Style Preferences

Learning Style

Mean Score

Standard Deviation

Visual Learning

4.20

0.95

Group Learning

4.00

0.90

Individual Learning

3.90

1.15

Auditory Learning

3.85

1.10

Kinesthetic Learning

3.70

1.05

Tactile Learning

3.50

1.25

Figure 1:

Column Chart for Learning Style Preferences

Table 1 and Figure 1 show the ranking of six learning style preferences among Afghan

EFL learners. The results from the Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ)

revealed a strong preference for visual learning (mean score of 4.20), with learners favoring visual

stimuli like diagrams and videos. Group Learning ranked second (mean 4.00), indicating a

preference for collaborative, interactive environments. Individual learning (3.90) and auditory

learning (3.85) were also moderately preferred, suggesting a mix of self-directed study and audio-

based learning. Tactile learning had the lowest mean (3.50), indicating a lesser preference for

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

Visual

Auditory

Tactile

Kinesthetic

Group

Learning

Individual

Learning

Название диаграммы


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

988

hands-on activities. These findings highlight the dominant learning styles of Afghan EFL learners,

which can inform more effective teaching strategies.

4.2 Results of the Second Research Question

The second research question aimed to investigate the multiple intelligences (MI) profile

of intermediate Afghan EFL learners, identifying the most and least dominant types. A 90-item

MI questionnaire by McKenzie (1999) assessed nine MI categories: Linguistic, Logical-

Mathematical, Spatial, Bodily-Kinesthetic, Musical, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, Naturalist, and

Existential.

Table 2

: MI Profile of the Participants

Variables

N

Min

Max

Mean

SD

MIQ

70

1.00

4.80

3.87

0.87

Linguistic Intelligence

70

1.00

4.80

4.11

0.88

Logical-Mathematical

Intelligence

70

1.67

5.00

2.72

0.61

Spatial Intelligence

70

1.67

4.87

2.55

0.71

Bodily-Kinesthetic

Intelligence

70

1.00

4.80

3.81

0.81

Musical Intelligence

70

1.67

4.87

2.21

0.71

Interpersonal Intelligence

70

1.00

4.80

4.41

0.87

Intrapersonal Intelligence

70

1.67

5.00

4.28

0.61

Naturalist Intelligence

70

1.29

4.90

3.33

0.56

Existential Intelligence

70

1.29

4.90

3.33

0.56

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

Название диаграммы

Ряд1

Ряд2


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

989

Figure 2:

Column Charts of the Dominant MI Types

Table 2 and Figure 2 show that interpersonal intelligence (M=4.41) was the most dominant,

followed by intrapersonal (M=4.28), linguistic (M=4.11), and bodily-kinesthetic (M=3.81)

intelligences. Naturalist and existential intelligences were moderately common (M=3.33), while

logical-mathematical (M=2.72), spatial (M=2.55), and musical (M=2.21) intelligences were the

least prevalent. The higher standard deviations for interpersonal, intrapersonal, and linguistic

intelligences indicate greater variation among students in these areas. These findings highlight a

diverse range of strengths, emphasizing the value of recognizing multiple forms of intelligence.

Results of the Third Research Question

This research question explores the relationship between Afghan EFL learners' multiple

intelligences and their learning style preferences, aiming to understand how intelligence profiles

may influence their preferred ways of engaging with information. The study used the Perceptual

Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ) and Multiple Intelligences (MI) Inventory,

completed by 70 male EFL learners at the Paktika Institute of Higher Education. Pearson

correlation analysis was performed to examine the associations between the nine types of

intelligence and the six learning style preferences, with statistical significance set at p < .05.

Table 3

: Correlation Matrix between Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles

Visual

Auditory

Tactile

Kinesthetic

Group

Individual

Linguistic

0.25

0.30

0.15

0.10

0.20

0.35

Logical-Mathematical

0.18

0.22

0.12

0.08

0.15

0.28

Spatial

0.38

0.20

0.10

0.15

0.25

0.22

Musical

0.10

0.40

0.20

0.18

0.30

0.15

Bodily-Kinesthetic

0.05

0.12

0.25

0.35

0.20

0.10

Interpersonal

0.20

0.28

0.15

0.12

0.45

0.18

Intrapersonal

0.30

0.15

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.40

Naturalistic

0.12

0.10

0.22

0.20

0.15

0.18

Existential

0.15

0.20

0.10

0.05

0.18

.25

Note:

p < .05, p < .01

The analysis revealed significant correlations between multiple intelligences and learning

style preferences among Afghan EFL learners. Key findings include:


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

990

Linguistic Intelligence: Moderate positive correlations with individual learning (r = .35),

visual (r = .25), and auditory learning (r = .30), indicating a preference for independent study and

learning through visual aids and listening.

Logical-Mathematical Intelligence: Moderate positive correlations with individual learning

(r = .28) and auditory learning (r = .22), suggesting a preference for independent study and audio-

based materials.

Spatial Intelligence: Strong correlation with visual learning (r = .38), and moderate positive

correlations with group (r = .25) and individual learning (r = .22), highlighting a preference for

visual materials and mixed learning environments.

Musical Intelligence: Strong correlation with auditory learning (r = .40), and moderate

correlation with group learning (r = .30), showing an affinity for sound-based learning.

Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence: Strong correlation with kinesthetic learning (r = .35) and

tactile learning (r = .25), underscoring a preference for hands-on, movement-based learning.

Interpersonal Intelligence: Strong correlation with group learning (r = .45), with moderate

correlations with auditory (r = .28) and visual learning (r = .20), indicating a preference for

collaborative environments and social interaction.

Intrapersonal Intelligence: Strong correlation with individual learning (r = .40), with a

moderate correlation with visual learning (r = .30), suggesting a preference for self-directed and

introspective learning.

Naturalistic and Existential Intelligences: Weaker correlations overall, with naturalistic

intelligence correlating with tactile learning (r = .22) and existential intelligence with individual

learning (r = .25).

5. DISCUSSION

5.1 Discussion of the First Research Question:

Q1. What are the most and the least dominant learning style preferences among Afghan

EFL learners?

The study of learning style preferences among Afghan EFL learners revealed a strong

preference for visual learning (mean = 4.20), followed by group

learning (4.00) and individual

learning (3.90). Tactile learning (3.50) was the least favored, indicating a lower preference for

hands-on activities. These findings suggest that Afghan EFL learners primarily engage with visual

aids like diagrams and videos, while also valuing collaborative group study. Visual learning aligns

with cognitive theories that emphasize retention through images, and group learning promotes


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

991

social interaction and peer feedback, which enhance language acquisition. Additionally, individual

learning preferences reflect the value of self-regulation and independent study, especially in

contexts with limited educational resources.

The study also highlighted moderate preferences for auditory learning (3.85), suggesting a

recognition of the value of verbal interactions in language learning. In contrast, tactile learning

was less preferred, reflecting possible cultural differences in educational practices. These results

are significant for developing effective pedagogical strategies in Afghanistan's evolving education

system, where visual aids and collaborative learning could be emphasized. Educators can

incorporate technology and self-directed learning opportunities to cater to these preferences, thus

enhancing student engagement and outcomes. Future research could explore learning preferences

across different demographic groups to further refine teaching practices.

5.2 Discussion of the second Research Question

Q2

. What types of intelligences are mostly exhibited by Afghan EFL learners?

The investigation into the multiple intelligence (MI) profiles of intermediate Afghan EFL

learners revealed a diverse distribution of intelligence types, with interpersonal intelligence (mean

= 4.41) being the most dominant, followed by intrapersonal intelligence (4.28) and linguistic

intelligence (4.11). Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence (3.81) also showed a significant presence, while

naturalist and existential

intelligences scored moderately (3.33). The least prevalent intelligences

were logical

-

mathematical (2.72), spatial (2.55), and musical

intelligence (2.21), indicating

challenges in tasks requiring abstract reasoning, spatial awareness, or musical skills. The wide

variation in interpersonal, intrapersonal, and linguistic intelligences suggests the importance of

personalized, differentiated instruction to address diverse learner profiles.

The prominence of interpersonal intelligence suggests that Afghan EFL learners benefit

from collaborative activities such as group discussions and peer learning, which enhance

engagement and achievement. The strong presence of intrapersonal intelligence points to the

effectiveness of self-reflection activities like journaling and goal-setting. Meanwhile, linguistic

intelligence highlights the value of verbal expression through debates and peer feedback. However,

the lower scores in logical-mathematical, spatial, and musical intelligences suggest a need for

targeted support in these areas. The moderate representation of existential and naturalist

intelligences offers opportunities to integrate critical thinking, philosophical discussions, and

nature-based themes into the curriculum, further diversifying learning experiences.


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

992

These findings emphasize the need for inclusive and adaptable teaching strategies that

consider the broad spectrum of student strengths and preferences in Afghan EFL classrooms.

5.3 Discussion of the Third Research Question

Q3. Is there any significant relationship between Afghan EFL learners' multiple

intelligences types and their learning styles?

The analysis of the relationship between Afghan EFL learners' multiple intelligences (MI)

and learning style preferences revealed significant correlations that illustrate how various

cognitive strengths influence preferred learning modalities. Linguistic intelligence was positively

correlated with individual, visual, and auditory learning styles, while logical-mathematical

intelligence showed a strong connection with individual and auditory learning. Spatial intelligence

was strongly linked to visual learning, and musical intelligence had a notable relationship with

auditory learning. Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence showed preferences for kinesthetic and tactile

learning. Additionally, interpersonal intelligence was correlated with group learning, and

intrapersonal intelligence with individual learning. These findings suggest that understanding the

interplay between MI and learning styles can help educators design more personalized and

effective teaching strategies.

The implications of these correlations are significant for enhancing language instruction in

Afghanistan. For instance, learners with strong linguistic intelligence may benefit from

independent study environments, such as research projects or reflective writing. The strong

correlation between spatial intelligence and visual learning highlights the importance of

incorporating visual aids, like diagrams and multimedia presentations, to aid comprehension.

Similarly, the relationship between interpersonal intelligence and group learning underscores the

need for collaborative learning environments, which can enhance student engagement and

achievement. Conversely, the weaker correlations of naturalistic and existential intelligences with

learning styles suggest a need to explore these areas further, potentially incorporating themes

related to the natural world or philosophical discussions in the curriculum. Overall, these findings

emphasize the importance of aligning instructional strategies with students' cognitive strengths to

foster deeper engagement and improve learning outcomes in EFL contexts.

6. CONCLUSION

This study aimed to explore the relationship between learning preferences and multiple

intelligences among Afghan EFL learners, providing insights into how cognitive and perceptual


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

993

factors influence English language learning. The investigation revealed key findings that

contribute to the broader field of language education, specifically for diverse learner populations.

The study examined dominant and least dominant learning styles, identified prevalent

multiple intelligences, and analyzed their interplay, with the ultimate goal of informing effective,

individualized teaching strategies in English language education.

The participants showed a strong preference for visual and group learning styles, indicating

that visual aids, such as diagrams, videos, and charts, should be integrated into the curriculum.

Additionally, the emphasis on group learning suggests that collaborative activities like

team projects and peer feedback sessions can enhance engagement and comprehension among

learners. These preferences highlight the need for teachers to incorporate a variety of instructional

strategies that cater to these learning styles, fostering an environment where students are more

likely to succeed.

The study also revealed a prominent presence of interpersonal

,

intrapersonal, and linguistic

intelligences among the participants, suggesting that learners possess a diverse range of cognitive

strengths. This finding underscores the importance of avoiding a one-size-fits-all teaching

approach. Instead, instructional methods should be adapted to nurture these intelligences through

strategies that foster social interaction, self-reflection, and verbal communication, thus enabling

learners to leverage their strengths in the language acquisition process.

Furthermore, the correlations between multiple intelligences and learning preferences

provided empirical evidence that learners’ cognitive predispositions are linked to their preferred

modes of engaging with learning materials. For instance, spatial

intelligence correlated with a

preference for visual

learning, suggesting that learners with stronger spatial reasoning may benefit

more from visual representations in the curriculum. These insights emphasize the need for

personalized teaching strategies that align with individual learner profiles, enhancing the

effectiveness of instruction.

Overall, this study highlights the heterogeneous nature of Afghan EFL learners, advocating

for instructional approaches that recognize and accommodate their diverse learning styles and

cognitive profiles. By doing so, educators can foster a more inclusive and motivating learning

environment, leading to better outcomes in language acquisition. The study contributes to the

growing div of research on language education, calling for pedagogical approaches that are

responsive

,

flexible, and adaptive to the varied needs of learners.


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

994

REFERENCES

1.

Armstrong, T. (2008). Multiple intelligences in classroom.(3 rd edition).Alexandria,

Virginia, USA.

2.

David, A. (2005). Multiple intelligences and learning styles: A study of their relationship.

International Journal of Learning, 12(10), 137-146.

3.

Felder, R. M., & Henriques, E. R. (1995). Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second

language education. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 21-31.

4.

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering

education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.

5.

Fleming, N. D. (2006). VARK: A guide to learning styles. [Website]. Retrieved from

https://vark-learn.com/

6.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

7.

Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). Basic

Books.

8.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New

York: Basic Books.

9.

Lazear,D.(1999).Eight Ways of Teaching The Artistry of Teaching with Multiple

Intelligences.K-College. Skylight Training and publishing Inc.,2626 S. clearbook Dr.,

Arlington Heights, IL 6005-5310.

10.

Lee, B. (2015). EFL Learners' Perspectives on ELT Materials Evaluation Relative to

Learning Styles. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 46(2), pp.

147-163.

11.

McKenzie, W. (1999). Multiple Intelligences Inventory. Retrieved February 2, 2006.

12.

Rahayu, A. P., & Dong, Y. (2023). The relationship of extracurricular activities with

students' character education and influencing factors: a systematic literature review. AL-

ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 459-474.

13.

Razmjoo, S. A. (2008). On the relationship between multiple intelligences and language

proficiency. The Reading Matrix, 8(2).

14.

Razmjoo, S. A., Riazi, A. M., & Pishkar, K. (2009). Investigating the relationship between

language learning styles and language proficiency among Iranian EFL learners. System,

37(3), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.005


background image

ISSN:

2181-3906

2025

International scientific journal

«MODERN

SCIENCE

АND RESEARCH»

VOLUME 4 / ISSUE 1 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ

995

15.

Savojbolaghchilar, S., Seifoori, Z., & Ghafoori, N. (2020). The effect of multiple

intelligence-oriented thematic clustering on advanced EFL learners’ vocabulary learning.

Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language

Skills), 39(2), 169-201.

16.

Shafiee, S., Mobini, M., Namaziandost, E., & Ghodoosi, S. (2020). Contribution of multiple

intelligences to L2 writing of EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature

and Translation, 3(6), 59-69.

17.

Wilson, S. D. (2018). Implementing Co-Creation and Multiple Intelligence Practices to

Transform the Classroom Experience. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 11(4),

pp. 127-132.

References

Armstrong, T. (2008). Multiple intelligences in classroom.(3 rd edition).Alexandria, Virginia, USA.

David, A. (2005). Multiple intelligences and learning styles: A study of their relationship. International Journal of Learning, 12(10), 137-146.

Felder, R. M., & Henriques, E. R. (1995). Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 21-31.

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.

Fleming, N. D. (2006). VARK: A guide to learning styles. [Website]. Retrieved from https://vark-learn.com/

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.

Lazear,D.(1999).Eight Ways of Teaching The Artistry of Teaching with Multiple Intelligences.K-College. Skylight Training and publishing Inc.,2626 S. clearbook Dr., Arlington Heights, IL 6005-5310.

Lee, B. (2015). EFL Learners' Perspectives on ELT Materials Evaluation Relative to Learning Styles. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 46(2), pp. 147-163.

McKenzie, W. (1999). Multiple Intelligences Inventory. Retrieved February 2, 2006.

Rahayu, A. P., & Dong, Y. (2023). The relationship of extracurricular activities with students' character education and influencing factors: a systematic literature review. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 459-474.

Razmjoo, S. A. (2008). On the relationship between multiple intelligences and language proficiency. The Reading Matrix, 8(2).

Razmjoo, S. A., Riazi, A. M., & Pishkar, K. (2009). Investigating the relationship between language learning styles and language proficiency among Iranian EFL learners. System, 37(3), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.005

Savojbolaghchilar, S., Seifoori, Z., & Ghafoori, N. (2020). The effect of multiple intelligence-oriented thematic clustering on advanced EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 39(2), 169-201.

Shafiee, S., Mobini, M., Namaziandost, E., & Ghodoosi, S. (2020). Contribution of multiple intelligences to L2 writing of EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(6), 59-69.

Wilson, S. D. (2018). Implementing Co-Creation and Multiple Intelligence Practices to Transform the Classroom Experience. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 11(4), pp. 127-132.