WAYS OF DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN STUDENTS

Аннотация

This article, Ways of Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students, explores effective educational strategies for nurturing critical thinking in learners. It emphasizes methods such as inquiry-based learning, metacognitive reflection, Socratic questioning, problem-based learning, and the integration of technology and argumentative writing. The article highlights the importance of a supportive classroom culture where diverse perspectives are respected and critical dialogue is encouraged. Drawing on research from educational theorists and empirical studies, it provides a comprehensive overview of how educators can foster analytical and independent thinking among students. This piece serves as a valuable resource for teachers, education professionals, and policymakers aiming to prepare students for complex real-world challenges through the development of critical thinking skills.

Тип источника: Конференции
Годы охвата с 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Выпуск:
78-81
19

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Поделиться
Allambergenova , G. . (2025). WAYS OF DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN STUDENTS. Теоретические аспекты становления педагогических наук, 4(9), 78–81. извлечено от https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/tafps/article/view/85357
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Аннотация

This article, Ways of Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students, explores effective educational strategies for nurturing critical thinking in learners. It emphasizes methods such as inquiry-based learning, metacognitive reflection, Socratic questioning, problem-based learning, and the integration of technology and argumentative writing. The article highlights the importance of a supportive classroom culture where diverse perspectives are respected and critical dialogue is encouraged. Drawing on research from educational theorists and empirical studies, it provides a comprehensive overview of how educators can foster analytical and independent thinking among students. This piece serves as a valuable resource for teachers, education professionals, and policymakers aiming to prepare students for complex real-world challenges through the development of critical thinking skills.


background image

THEORETICAL ASPECTS IN THE FORMATION OF

PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

78

WAYS OF DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN STUDENTS

Allambergenova Gulsanem Kenesbaevna

PhD , English and Global Perspectives Teacher

Presidential school in Nukus

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15347256

Annotation:

This article, Ways of Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students,

explores effective educational strategies for nurturing critical thinking in
learners. It emphasizes methods such as inquiry-based learning, metacognitive
reflection, Socratic questioning, problem-based learning, and the integration of
technology and argumentative writing. The article highlights the importance of a
supportive classroom culture where diverse perspectives are respected and
critical dialogue is encouraged. Drawing on research from educational theorists
and empirical studies, it provides a comprehensive overview of how educators
can foster analytical and independent thinking among students. This piece
serves as a valuable resource for teachers, education professionals, and
policymakers aiming to prepare students for complex real-world challenges
through the development of critical thinking skills.

Key Words:

Critical thinking, inquiry-based learning, metacognition, socratic

questioning, problem-based learning (PBL), reflective learning, argumentative
writing, higher-order thinking, educational strategies, student-centered
learning, classroom culture,analytical skills, decision-making, independent
thinking, Collaborative learning, digital tools in education, active engagement,
lifelong learning

Introduction

In an era marked by rapid technological change, global interconnectedness,

and information overload, critical thinking has emerged as an essential skill for
students. It encompasses the ability to analyze information, evaluate arguments,
solve problems, and make reasoned decisions. The development of critical
thinking is not only vital for academic success but also for lifelong learning and
informed citizenship. However, cultivating this skill requires deliberate
instructional strategies and supportive learning environments. This article
explores effective ways of developing critical thinking skills in students, drawing
from educational research and classroom practices.

Encouraging Inquiry-Based Learning

One of the most effective methods for developing critical thinking is

through inquiry-based learning. This approach shifts the traditional role of the


background image

THEORETICAL ASPECTS IN THE FORMATION OF

PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

79

teacher from a dispenser of knowledge to a facilitator of student exploration. In
inquiry-based learning, students pose questions, investigate solutions, and
develop conclusions based on evidence.

According to Pedaste et al. (2015), inquiry-based learning fosters higher-

order thinking by engaging students in activities such as formulating
hypotheses, testing ideas, and drawing reasoned conclusions. Teachers can
implement this strategy by designing open-ended projects, using case studies, or
facilitating scientific experiments where students are encouraged to reflect on
their thinking process.

Teaching Metacognitive Strategies

Metacognition, or thinking about one's thinking, plays a crucial role in

developing critical thinking. Teaching students to reflect on how they learn and
make decisions can significantly improve their analytical abilities.
Flavell (1979) introduced the concept of metacognition, highlighting its impact
on learning efficiency. In the classroom, this can be cultivated through practices
like learning journals, self-assessment checklists, and peer review sessions.

Promoting Socratic Questioning

Socratic questioning involves probing discussions that challenge

assumptions and explore underlying concepts. This method promotes deep
thinking

and

encourages

students

to

justify

their

reasoning.

Paul and Elder (2006) argue that using Socratic questioning helps students
develop clarity, precision, and logical consistency. Teachers can employ this
strategy in classroom discussions by asking open-ended questions such as
“What evidence supports your conclusion?” or “Can you think of an alternative
explanation?”

Integrating Problem-Based Learning (PBL)

Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is a student-centered pedagogy in which

students learn through solving complex, real-world problems. PBL fosters
critical thinking by requiring learners to research, collaborate, and propose
evidence-based solutions. A meta-analysis by Strobel and van Barneveld (2009)
found that PBL is particularly effective in enhancing critical thinking and long-
term knowledge retention.

Using Technology Thoughtfully

Digital tools, when used effectively, can support the development of critical

thinking. Online discussion forums, collaborative platforms like Google Docs,
and simulation software can provide opportunities for analysis, debate, and
problem-solving.


background image

THEORETICAL ASPECTS IN THE FORMATION OF

PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

80

However, technology should not be used passively. As Davies (2011) notes,
critical thinking is best supported by tasks that require active engagement—
such as creating blogs, producing videos, or analyzing datasets—rather than
passive consumption of content.

Encouraging Reading and Argumentative Writing

Critical thinking thrives on exposure to multiple perspectives and

structured argumentation. Assignments that involve analyzing texts, evaluating
sources, and writing argumentative essays promote analytical thinking and
logical reasoning.

Graff and Birkenstein (2014) advocate for using structured templates in

writing to help students enter academic conversations.

Creating a Supportive Classroom Culture

A classroom environment that values curiosity, risk-taking, and open

dialogue is essential for critical thinking. Students must feel safe to express their
ideas,

make

mistakes,

and

challenge

others

respectfully.

Brookfield (2012) emphasizes that democratic classrooms, where students have
a voice and diverse perspectives are respected, foster critical engagement.

Conclusion

Developing critical thinking skills in students is not an incidental outcome

but a deliberate educational goal. Strategies such as inquiry-based learning,
metacognitive reflection, Socratic questioning, problem-based learning, and
argumentative writing can transform the learning experience. When paired with
a supportive and inclusive classroom culture, these approaches help students
become independent thinkers capable of navigating the complexities of modern
life. Educators, therefore, have both the responsibility and the opportunity to
cultivate critical thinkers who can engage thoughtfully with the world

References:

1.

Brookfield, S. D. (2012). *Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and

techniques to help students question their assumptions*. Jossey-Bass.
2.

Davies, M. (2011). Introduction to special issue: Critical thinking in higher

education. *Higher Education Research & Development*, 30(3), 255–260.
3.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area

of cognitive–developmental inquiry. *American Psychologist*, 34(10), 906–911.
4.

Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2014). *They say/I say: The moves that matter

in academic writing*. W.W. Norton & Company.
5.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). *The miniature guide to Socratic questioning*.

Foundation for Critical Thinking.


background image

THEORETICAL ASPECTS IN THE FORMATION OF

PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

81

6.

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E.

T., ... & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and
the inquiry cycle. *Educational Research Review*, 14, 47–61.
7.

Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A

meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms.
*Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning*, 3(1), 44–58.

Библиографические ссылки

Brookfield, S. D. (2012). *Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions*. Jossey-Bass.

Davies, M. (2011). Introduction to special issue: Critical thinking in higher education. *Higher Education Research & Development*, 30(3), 255–260.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. *American Psychologist*, 34(10), 906–911.

Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2014). *They say/I say: The moves that matter in academic writing*. W.W. Norton & Company.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). *The miniature guide to Socratic questioning*. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., ... & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. *Educational Research Review*, 14, 47–61.

Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. *Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning*, 3(1), 44–58.