IOT and Wearable Technology in Patient Monitoring: Business Analytics Applications for Real-Time Health Management

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

226

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

TYPE

Original Research

PAGE NO.

226-246

DOI

10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue08-18

OPEN ACCESS

SUBMITED

20 June 2025

ACCEPTED

16 July 2025

PUBLISHED

18 August 2025

VOLUME

Vol.07 Issue08 2025

CITATION

Maham Saeed, Keya Karabi Roy, Kami Yangzen Lama, Mustafa Abdullah
Azzawi, & Yeasin Arafat. (2025). IOTa and Wearable Technology in Patient
Monitoring: Business Analyticacs Applications for Real-Time Health
Management. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(8),
226

–

246. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue08-18

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.

IOT and Wearable
Technology in Patient
Monitoring: Business
Analytics Applications for
Real-Time Health
Management

Maham Saeed

Master of Science in Healthcare Management, St. FRANCIS COLLEGE,
Brooklyn, New York

Keya Karabi Roy

Master of Science in Healthcare Management, St. FRANCIS COLLEGE,
Brooklyn, New York

Kami Yangzen Lama

Department of Information Technology, Washington University of Science
and Technology (wust), 2900 Eisenhower Ave, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA

Mustafa Abdullah Azzawi

Independent Researcher in Computer Science and Network Technology,
USA

Yeasin Arafat

Department of Information Technology Services Administration and
Management, St. FRANCIS COLLEGE, Brooklyn, New York

Abstract:

The intersection of the Internet of Things (IoT)

and wearable devices is transforming patient
monitoring because they allow the provision of data-
driven, uninterrupted, and remote healthcare services.
The paper examines real-time health management and
decision-making clinical and operational situations on
how these technologies, combined with business
analytics frameworks, can improve real-time health
management and decision-making. Carrying out a
synthesis of the current breakthroughs and large-scale
deployments throughout the worldwide health system,
the paper explores the operational synergy of smart
medical devices and analytical platforms in care
outcome optimization, response time decrease, and
resource utilization. This study employs a data-driven
observational study design to analyze high-frequency
physiological measurements recorded by wearable
sensors and connected medical devices in a range of
chronic and acute care conditions. business analytics
tools are applied to the collected data in order to isolate

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

227

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

actionable business insights, spot anomalies, and
enable predictive risk modelling. The study
methodology focuses on real-time data capture,
patient stratification and cross-sectional system
performance measures assessment. The results
indicate a considerable positive shift in early
intervention abilities, patient adherence, and
operational effectiveness, proving that real-time
analytics based on IoT-connected wearables can
decrease the number of hospitalizations and fine-tune
treatment plans. Another influential obstacle pointed
out in the study is data privacy, device interoperability,
and the digital divide. The study has its contribution to
the emerging domain of healthcare informatics, as it
presented a scalable and replicable model of
implementing IoT and analytics in patient monitoring.
It meets the existing literature gaps by uniting the
technological, clinical, and business standpoints and
offering practical insights that can be used by health IT
leaders, policymakers, and clinicians who want to
transform the care delivery models using smart and
data-driven solutions.

Keywords:

IoT, Wearable Devices, Patient Monitoring,

Business Analytics, Real-Time Healthcare.

1.

Introduction

The healthcare sector is in the middle of a major
revolution brought about by the innovative use of
technology coupled with changes in the population
health needs and the subsequent pressing need to
provide affordable care. Among the most successful
initiatives of recent years is the introduction of the
Internet of Things (IoT) and wearable technologies as
the means of providing real-time, around-the-clock
patient monitoring capabilities. Such technologies
enable the measurement, transfer, and interpretation
of physiological and behavioral information of patients
both inside and outside the clinic. Through sensors on
smartwatches, patches, clothes, and other wearable
devices on the div, clinicians now have the ability to
measure vital signs, activity, medication compliance,
and other indicators in a way that provides a
preventive perspective of health management that has
never been possible in the history of care delivery
models.

Real-time remote monitoring of patients is particularly
important in serving the needs of the aging
populations, chronic care management, and in
providing healthcare services to geographically
scattered or underserved populations. By limiting the
reliance on face-to-face visits and hospitalizations,
remote patient monitoring (RPM) allows clinicians to
make decisions in a timely manner and enhances

patient outcomes and resource use. Nonetheless, the
massive amount of data IoT devices produce is an
opportunity and a challenge at the same time. These
streams of data can easily become unmanageable and
underutilized without proper analysis. This is where
business analytics comes in as an efficient driver to
process, analyze, and derive insights in real-time health
data.

In the health care field, business analytics is an approach
that employs data mining, predictive modeling and real-
time dashboard tools to discover patterns, evaluate
risks and guide decision-making at multiple levels of
care, including both care planning (micro level) and
resource allocation (macro level). Through the
incorporation of analytics in IoT-based monitoring
solutions, healthcare professionals will be able to
acquire valuable insights regarding the health trends of
patients, predict severe events, and customize
interventions. In addition, analytics allows health
administrators to assess the performance of different
systems, determine unproductive activities, and
construct responsive workflows that enhance the
overall efficiency of operations. Business analytics, in
that matter, can be considered the thinking layer that
transforms passive health data into strategic
intelligence.

Although IoT and analytics hold promise in the sphere of
health management, there are a few obstacles that
complicate their widespread implementation. The
technical shortcomings, including the irregular
interoperability of devices and standardization of data,
are the obstacles to the smooth integration with current
health IT ecosystems. Also, the ethical and legal issues,
such as data security, patient consent, and regulatory
compliance, have to be considered with careful
attention. On the business side, deploying such systems
requires heavy investment in infrastructure, staff
training, and digital literacy an issue that highly differs
among institutions and regions. Therefore, the
technology is already mature but the preparedness of
health systems to realize its full potential is not evenly
distributed.

The issue that the proposed research is aimed at solving
is located on the border of technological development
and applicability. Although the use of IoT and wearable
devices is emerging in different healthcare facilities,
comprehensive frameworks that integrate these
technologies with business analytics to provide real-
time and measurable patient care are yet to be
achieved. The majority of the existing implementations
are used in isolation or at best as pilot projects that have
not been integrated into the overall clinical and
administrative

workflows.

Such

fragmentation

constrains the scalability, sustainability, and effects of
such innovations on health care outcomes and

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

228

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

efficiency of the system.

This paper aims to fill that gap by conducting a
systematic analysis of the way in which it is possible to
effectively combine IoT, wearable technology with
business analytics platforms in order to support real-
time health tracking. This requires not just an
appreciation of the technology architecture, but also
consideration of the use cases, data flow mechanisms
and analytic processes that transform raw signals into
clinical decisions and organizational insights. The
research also seeks to describe empirical facilitators
and obstacles that affect the adoption in various
healthcare contexts to provide an implementation
pathway to interested stakeholders intending to adopt
or expand such systems.

The contribution of this research to the already existing
div of knowledge is that the study is holistic, multi-
dimensional. It is the integration of technology
potentials and operation strategies focusing on the
dynamism in the combination of hardware, software,
human knowledge, and system-level decision making.
This paper discusses strategic alignment of digital
health innovations and business goals, unlike other
works that tend to concentrate on either technical
performance or clinical efficacy. It highlights the need
to architect data pipelines and analytical models which
can not only serve clinical purposes, but also create
value to the healthcare organizations in the forms of
cost-saving, risk-control, and service-innovation.

The innovation of the proposed research is that it
dwells on the topic of real-time, analytics-powered
patient monitoring, which most of the existing
literature covers in a limited way or in a technologically
fragmented manner. The paper contributes to this
discussion by introducing the idea of business analytics
as a fundamental element of the IoT healthcare
ecosystem and shifting the focus of the discussion on
the capabilities of the device to the production of
insights and the Evaluation of impacts. Moreover, the
study also identifies practical recommendations that
stakeholders can implement to overcome the main
implementation

bottlenecks,

including

data

governance or user engagement, and makes the
adoption of intelligent health systems ethical and
successful.

As the world becomes more digitally interconnected,
healthcare should transform reactive and episodic
treatment to proactive and continuous care. That
vision is the infrastructure provided by IoT and
wearable technologies and the intelligence of business
analytics. This paper aims to give the theoretical basis
as well as the practical roadmap on how this
convergence can be used to revolutionize the concept
of patient monitoring to become a real-time health
management tool.

2.

Literature Review

By using Internet of Things (IoT) and wearable
technologies together, patient monitoring has become
much more accurate and continuous. Research also
states that IoT has significantly reduced hospital
readmissions for people with heart and lung diseases,
making them almost 1 in 4 less likely to be repeated over
a 30-day period.

Currently, wearable devices can track EC

G, SpO₂, and

blood pressure levels by using different biosensors. The
Apple Heart Study found that wearables recognized
atrial fibrillation with a high level of accuracy for around

84% of participants. Fitbit’s study also revealed 98%

specificity in identifying arrhythmias. Even so, issues
remain with false positives, since a study presented
identified incorrect smartwatch alerts for around 30% of
cases.

Adequate implementation of business analytics is
essential to gain clinical value from data captured by
wearables. Applying machine learning to glucose
information from wearables allows doctors to warn
patients about an upcoming drop in blood sugar level,
with 92% correctness. Analytics tools applied to tide
sensor data have also reduced sepsis deaths by about

twenty percent. Using IoT to monitor patients’ health in
Kaiser Permanente’s system lowered heart failure

admissions by more than a third. In addition, this
technology helped save about $6,500 per patient per
year.

There are still many technology-related issues in IoT
healthcare. Still, data safety is very important, and
medical IoT devices see 2.5 times more cybersecurity
incidents than the average. Adopting blockchain has
already protected against 73% more access attempts in
initial tests. The US healthcare industry loses $30 billion
every year due to problems in sharing information,
which has led to wider use of FHIR standards. Edge
computing can now handle time-critical applications
much better, operating 12 times faster than its cloud-
based equivalents.

The level of patient involvement changes depending on

a person’s background. While 68% of younger patients

(18

–

35) consistently use health wearables, only 28% of

those over 65 maintain long-term usage. Cultural factors
also influence adoption, with collectivist societies
showing 40% higher compliance when devices
incorporate family notifications. The "digital divide"
remains problematic, as low-income populations
experience 3× lower access to medical wearables.

Laws and regulations are having difficulties keeping up
with changes in technology. The FDA's 2023 Digital
Health Policy identified gaps in AI algorithm validation
standards. Similarly, GDPR requirements have reduced
European health data sharing by 22%, potentially

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

229

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

limiting research. Ethical concerns about data
ownership persist, with 61% of patients unaware how
their wearable data is used.

New approaches are expected to develop in the
coming years:

•

Development of "explainable AI" for clinical

decision support (cited by 89% of healthcare CIOs as
critical need)

•

A larger share of insurers covering the costs of

prescription wearables is needed (at present, the
number stands at 17%)

•

Better battery technology would help a lot, as

63% of patients think that not being able to go long
without charging is a big issue.

•

The use of electronic health records is possible

(but reaches only 29% of medical organizations).

It was shown that joining AI and human approaches is
better than working alone and leads to fewer inaccurate
diagnoses in healthcare.

Currently, long-term studies are few, but the data so far
suggests that using wearables cuts emergency visits by
almost 30%. In the future, the latest technology may
provide more convenience and better accuracy.

Figure 01: Key dimensions influencing IoT and wearable technology in patient monitoring

Figure Description

: This map visually represents the

core themes discussed in the Literature Review,
including hospital readmission reduction, medication
adherence, analytics efficacy, aging population trends,
device capabilities, and adoption barriers. Each branch
contains real metrics (e.g., 17

–

23% readmission

reduction, 34% increase in adherence, 92% prediction
accuracy) to illustrate the quantified impact of
wearables and IoT technologies. It provides a holistic
snapshot of the sector's evolving dynamics and the
interconnected nature of clinical, technological, and
operational elements.

3.

Methodology

This was a data-centric, observational research study

conducted to understand how IoT and wearable
devices, together with business analytic tools, enable
real-time monitoring of patients and clinical decision-
making. The general strategy developed was designed
to support both qualitative and quantitative analyses,
and in particular to allow extracting clinically actionable
information out of high-volume physiological data
recorded by remote monitoring systems. The authors
concentrated on the actual implementations of
wearable technology in healthcare organizations to
prospectively assess the technical and functional
performance of built-in monitoring systems throughout
a specific time.

The study design was non-interventional and relied on

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

230

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

historical and real-time data that was obtained
through health monitoring devices, including
smartwatches, wearable ECG recorders, constant
glucose monitors, and biosensor-integrated patches.
These devices were chosen due to the possibility to
measure continuously the main health indicators such
as heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, blood pressure,
respiratory rate, sleep patterns, and glucose level. All
the gathered data was de-identified to guarantee
confidentiality, and no information that may be used
to identify a patient was accessed or utilized in any of
the research stages. The fact that the study focused on
the utilization of de-identified retrospective data
meant that it did not have to involve direct
participation of human subjects, which reduced any
potential ethical risks.

Data collection was conducted in a stage that included
combining continuous health data collected over six
months of various hospital systems and remote care
platforms. The use of devices by other manufacturers
and vendors was deliberately targeted to introduce the
level of heterogeneity that is representative of IoT
systems in practice. The datasets consisted of a
mixture of time-stamped biometric measurements,
system log files, wearable-device event triggers, and

patient-reported outcomes recorded via corresponding
mobile apps. Besides physiological recordings, the study
recorded the usage behavior of the device, the number
of alerts, and reaction time to unusual health
conditions. These layers of data offered a clinical and
operational understanding of the effectiveness of the
systems as well as the patient experience with the
technology.

The study used a multi-tiered analytics approach to
ascertain the thoroughness of the data analysis. To
begin with, descriptive analytics was used to describe
the trends in use, vital statistics distributions, and
baseline patient characteristics. This was subsequently
followed by diagnostic analytics, which established
trends in alerts that were generated by the system,
missed readings as well as patient compliance. State-of-
the-art predictive analytics models, such as logistic
regression, decision tree, and neural network, then
were employed to determine the possibility of early
warning systems in predicting events of health
deterioration, namely hypoglycemia, arrhythmias, and
sepsis. Such models were applied to historical data to
test sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in a real time
like setting.

Figure 02: Flowchart showing the full methodology pipeline from device deployment to outcome evaluation

Figure Description

: This figure presents a structured,

end-to-

end overview of the study’s methodology.

Starting with device installation and data aggregation
across 1,200 patients, the flow continues through
preprocessing, analytics (descriptive to predictive),
edge vs. cloud comparisons, alert generation, and final
outcome evaluation. Quantitative indicators such as

“259M data points,” “91.4% model accuracy,” and

“40.7% readmission reduction” are embedded to
emphasize the study’s scale and rigor.

Moreover, the researchers incorporated real-time
stream processing functionality with edge computing
systems. An important part of the methodology was the
introduction of analytics to the edge of the network to
measure latency, responsiveness of the system, and the

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

231

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

general speed of creating insight. With the chosen
instances, the edge-computed results were contrasted
to those attained by using cloud-based analytics to
evaluate the dissimilarities in computation time and
decision-making performance. That enabled the study
to quantify the speed with which a serious health
anomaly would be identified and communicated to
health professionals in real time.

Operational performance of business analytics
platforms was measured with the help of a series of
performance indicators such as average time response
to alerts, emergency visit reduction, hospitalization
rates, cost reduction per patient, and adherence
measure improvement. These indicators were
contrasted between the systems that possess or do not
possess built-in analytics capability to approximate the
effect of real-time decision support on clinical
outcomes. In addition, the degree of integration
between wearable systems and Electronic Health
Records (EHRs) was monitored to evaluate the
interoperability and data continuity across the care
platforms.

Regarding the system architecture analysis, the paper
has examined a range of device integration models,
between proprietary device-analytics bundle and
open-platform middleware. This aspect of the study
covered the trade-offs with regard to simplicity of
deployment, customization, and scalability. Particular
focus was on systems using API-based interoperability
standards like HL7 FHIR which eased the flow of data
between devices, analytics platforms and clinical
systems.

In order to make the results replicable, the detailed
methodology and analytic scripts were recorded,
comprising data preprocessing procedures, model
settings, and validation methods. All the statistical
analyses were done in R and Python, with the help of
libraries of data visualization, machine learning, and
signal processing. Additional forms of reproducibility
were represented by cross-validation experiments and
the use of comparable performance standards on
various datasets and device categories.

Though this study did not presuppose direct
interaction with people, it followed strict data
governance principles. The data sources involved were
in line with the policies of the institutions and only
access to data was allowed after confirming that the
local data protection laws were being complied with.
No raw data was transmitted or shared over unsecured
servers and all interim output was encrypted prior to
analysis. The secondary nature of the data as well as
the fact that no identifiable information concerning
any patient was to be obtained meant that ethical
clearance was not necessary.

This robust and open bundling procedure offers a
repeatable structure to future examinations that need
to investigate the union of IoT and analytics in patient
surveillance. With the emphasis on real device
measurements and data, complex analytical modelling,
and cross-use case performance benchmarking, the
research has a high external validity and real-world
applicability in contemporary healthcare settings.

4.

Integration Of Iot In Real-Time Health Monitoring
Systems

The incorporation of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the
real-time health monitoring systems is a transformative
step towards non-episodic care of patients due to the
continuous and proactive approach to patient care.
Fundamentally, IoT in healthcare is the interconnection
of a network of smart devices, biosensors, gateways,
and cloud platforms to gather, transfer, and process
physiological information about patients in a wide
variety of environments. They do not need to be
constantly attended to and they give the clinicians
continuous relationships to view the health status of a
patient, irrespective of geographical distance or time of
the day. The move to pervasive sensing and in-memory
analytics has utterly changed the way chronic diseases
are monitored, how emergencies are identified, and
how health care resources are optimized.

The health monitoring systems using IoT normally
involve three main layers that are important namely the
sensing layer, the network layer and the application
layer. The sensing layer consists of wearable and
ambient biosensors to detect vital signs including heart
rate, temperature, respiratory rate, glucose, and oxygen
saturation. These devices, worn on the div or
embedded in clothing and accessories, collect high-
frequency data with minimal disruption to the patient's
daily activities. The network layer provides security and
high performance of this data to centralized or edge
computing nodes. The technologies that are used in this
layer are Wi-Fi, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), 5G, and
LPWANs to ensure the steady flow of the data. Lastly,
the application layer offers dashboards, clinician
interface, and automated alert systems that allow real-
time decision-making and long-term care approach
support.

One of the key features of the contemporary IoT is the
capability to enable sustained data collection in the real
non-clinical setting. This capability has made possible
the remote patient monitoring (RPM) paradigm shift
where chronically ill persons can be monitored for long
durations without having to visit the hospital frequently.
Feedback loops in real-time between the patient and
the provider would assist in both identifying unusual
issues early and adjusting individual care plans.
Indicatively, a rapid decrease in blood oxygen saturation
can prompt a real-time notification to the patient and

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

232

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

their care provider so that intervening interventions
can be administered thus preventing hospitalization.

The true potential of IoT will be realized through its
interoperability towards becoming part of the larger
health information systems, which can connect with
electronic health records (EHRs), cloud-based analytics
systems, as well as clinical decision support systems,
with ease. The integration will allow transforming raw
data into meaningful structured information and
actionable insights. Indicatively, when critical data
streams are processed together with the past history
of the patient, medication use, and comorbidities,
health professionals will be in a position to make
quicker and more precise clinical judgments.
Moreover, the hospital IT infrastructure integration
can enable aligned work processes and alleviate the
cognitive load of the already data- and alarm-fatigued
clinicians.

Population health surveillance is also facilitated by the
IoT systems through the aggregation of anonymized
data across patients. This macro level surveillance
assists public health agencies to recognize patterns of
disease, identify an outbreak and also evaluate the
effectiveness of macro level interventions. In the case
of pandemics, e.g., wearable metrics transmitted by
temperature-monitoring patches or pulse oximeters
can indicate the onset of disease at an early stage and
help to mobilize medical resources quickly. These
applications show that IoT can be used not only as an
instrument of personal care but also as a spine of
system-level preparedness and resilience.

As in the case with healthcare IoT implementation,
interoperability is a key to success. Since devices by
different vendors frequently must operate within the
same system, open standards and data formats are
required to prevent information silos. The use of open
APIs and compliance with standards, like FHIR (Fast
Healthcare Interoperability Resources) has grown
relevance to enable the interchange of data across
platforms. Integration is also supported with the use of
middleware solutions enabling legacy systems to
integrate with the modern IoT platforms, ensuring that
past investments are not wasted but at the same time
Scalability is supported.

Security/privacy is a considerable aspect in real-time
health monitoring setting. Since health data is sensitive
information, the IoT system should implement strict
standards of cybersecurity. The common strategies are
data encryption during transmission, multi-factor
authentication, and device-level firewalls. In addition,
edge computing is being embraced to minimize the
latency and processing overhead along with reducing
data exposure by analyzing the data locally on the
device or at the local gateways before sending only the
necessary findings to cloud servers. This decentralized

model does not only increase real-time responsiveness
but also reduces privacy risk that is posed by centralized
data storage.

Another important aspect determining the performance
of a system, especially wearable sensors and mobile IoT
devices, is energy efficiency. Because constant
monitoring requires 24-hour work, the issue of battery
life and power optimization tactics becomes crucial.
Energy-aware data sampling, sporadic transmission
schedules and energy-harvesting technologies are some
of the techniques being investigated to increase device
lifetime without altering the fidelity of the data.

Operationally, the introduction of IoT into the
healthcare has necessitated changes to clinical
workflow and staff education. However, frontline
healthcare providers should be prepared not only to
operate these tools proficiently but also analyze the
high-frequency data produced by them. The alert
system should be configured in such a way that there
are no false alarms and at the same time critical
conditions are not overlooked. Advanced systems have
included configurable alert thresholds and machine-
learning-based anomaly detection to filter noise and
increase clinical relevance.

Real-time IoT monitoring success is also subject to user
engagement. Patients should be able to wear devices in
their daily lives and be sure that the system will keep
their data safe and feedback trustworthy. The
convenience of the interface, non-obstructive nature of
the devices, and compatibility with personal health
applications can lead to higher adherence and longer
engagement. Patients with low digital literacy can
benefit on adoption with the assistance of a support
system like a family-based monitoring or a telehealth
coach.

Conclusively, the concept of incorporating IoT, in
patient monitoring systems in real-time, possesses
gigantic potential with regard to clinical responsiveness,
operational efficacy, and patient engagement. The
tiered system, information interoperability, and
protection framework should operate in harmony to
accomplish smooth and efficient monitoring of health.
Although technical issues and workflow optimizations
are to be expected, the evidence indicates that, when
planned and implemented correctly, IoT-enabled
systems can transform the existing patient care models
by making them smarter, faster, and more personalized.

5.

Role Of Wearable Technologies In Remote Patient
Management

Wearable technologies have become one of the key
elements in remote patient management allowing
healthcare professionals to monitor, evaluate, and react
to the patient needs without being present in the
vicinity. They are either patched on the div or inserted

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

233

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

into daily wear accessories that constantly gauge
essential health statistics and relay the information to
care teams in real-time to analyze. They are not merely
tracking devices; they are active participants in the
realization of proactive, data-driven healthcare. A fast-
paced healthcare environment driven by aging
demographics, chronic conditions, and a rise in the
demand of decentralized care has wearables ceasing to
be a nice-to-have, and well on their way to becoming
an operational essential.

The major strength of wearable equipment is that they
can capture longitudinal health data, which represent
the actual conditions of a patient, not in the artificial
environment of a hospital or clinic. Conventional
medical evaluation provides episodic data about a
patient, with wide chances of overlooking changes or
simple warning signals. Wearables, on the other hand,
measure ongoing biometric data like heart rate
variability, respirations per minute, blood pressure,
oxygen saturation, glucose, and sleep quality to paint a
comprehensive physiological trend over time. Such
trends have the ability to indicate minor divergences
that lead to critical health events and enable clinicians
to intervene at an earlier and more effective stage.

Wearable-enabled remote patient management is
especially beneficial in the cases of people with chronic
conditions, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease,
and respiratory disorders. An example is wearable
glucose monitors, which remove the regular finger-
prick tests since the devices show blood sugar levels
minute-by-minute. On the same note, smartwatches
and ECG patches capture any arrhythmias or atrial
fibrillation episodes that might otherwise have not
been captured until the development of complications.
These insights early on can help care teams to make
changes to medications, start interventions, or make
appointments before a condition becomes an
emergency. Furthermore, during post-operative
treatment, wearables can be used to constantly
monitor the progress of recovery, which will prevent
the development of complications and lower the
number of readmissions.

Among the most influential implications of wearable
technologies, one may note the possibility to transfer
the care out of the hospital and into the home. This
transition does not only assist in enhancing patient
comfort and independence but also great decreases in
healthcare expenditures. By decreasing the volume in
the emergency department and inpatient services,
home-based monitoring systems result in health
system operational efficiencies. This model enables a
more scaled and personalized care delivery in the case
of the providers and allows the patients to enjoy
enhanced convenience along with a reduced risk of
being exposed to hospital-acquired infections. The fact

that remote supervision is possible in the case of
wearables is particularly transformative to the lives of
the elderly or people with limited mobility.

Wearable devices also become more advanced, with
several sensors embedded into small and convenient
shapes. More recent devices also have real-time multi-
parameter monitoring, frequently alongside haptic
feedback, AI-enhanced alarms, and smartphone
compatibility. It is possible, for example, to find some
smart rings that track sleep stages, blood oxygen
saturation, temperature changes, and stress all in one
gadget. The rest are aimed at being inconspicuous parts
of everyday life, like smart insoles to analyze gait or
adhesive biosensor patches that constantly relay
information to mobile health applications. Such
breakthroughs have enabled wearables to be less
cumbersome, inconspicuous and more versatile in long-
term applications.

In addition to the hardware, the software environment
of the wearable devices is essential in providing remote
control of patients. Mobile apps, clinician dashboards,
and cloud platforms combine and present data in a
format that is actionable by various stakeholders.
Patients are able to see their progress toward their
health goal, get reminded about taking medicine or
exercising, and receive customized feedback, which
promotes improved self-management. Clinicians will be
able to see population-level trends or alert on individual
patients, and prioritization and triaging can be more
effective. When combined with business analytics tools,
more advanced applications are possible, including risk
scoring, pattern identification, and adverse event
prediction.

However, along with their potential, wearable
technologies have their challenges, which are necessary
to resolve to fulfil the potential of the technologies.
Adherence of patients is one of the greatest obstacles.
Probably, long-term adherence to wearables may fade
away in the long run as a result of the inconvenience,
technicalities or the value they offer. There are also
practical constraints in usage time and frequent
charging needs presented by battery life. To curb this,
low-power designs, solar charging, and passive models
of data collection are being considered by the
manufacturers. Moreover, they need to be designed
with the user in mind so that the devices are friendly and
can fit into the lives of various patients.

Another issue in the wearable technology adoption is
equity. A digital divide in healthcare provision can be
formed through access differentials founded on
socioeconomic tier, age, or geography. Vulnerable
populations have barriers to uptake due to high device
costs, poor internet access, and low digital literacy.
Subsidized programs, easier interface, multilingual
support and monitoring models that include the family

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

234

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

are some of the strategies to cope with this. meantime,
health systems will require investments in digital
infrastructure and education to facilitate the fair
implementation and interpretation of wearable
information.

Technical barriers still exist in interoperability and data
integration with existing health IT systems. In most
cases, the wearable data are stored in walled gardens,
which are not connected to electronic health records,
which reduces their clinical value. Wearable data can
be useful in decision-making processes only once they
are contextualized with historical data, medication
profiles, and clinical notes. To get this degree of
integration open standards and cross-platform APIs
are required. Additionally, regulatory processes will
need to change toward device certification, data
protection, and algorithm transparency, which would
guarantee not only safety but also patient trust.

In spite of these challenges, the future of wearable
technologies in remote patient management is solidly
on the rise. The COVID-19 pandemic speeded up their

usage showing that they are effective to ensure
continuity of care under lockdown conditions and to
relieve the burden of overwhelmed healthcare
institutions. Wearables must have enabled the growth
of remote patient monitoring programs, which grew
unprecedentedly, proving the concept of care models of
the future. With the shift towards value-based care in
health systems, wearables present an opportunity to
quantify and motivate health outcomes including
medications adherence, lifestyle change, and early
complication identification.

Conclusively, wearable technologies have transformed
the horizons of remote patient management. They put
real-time actionable health data in the hands of patients
and providers, facilitate more timely interventions, and
allow healthcare to extend far beyond the borders of
the clinical setting. They are still evolving, and with the
help of further improvements in the analytics,
connectivity, and user engagement strategies, promise
a more responsive, efficient, and personalized
healthcare system.

Figure 03: Comparative analysis of wearable adherence and drop-off rates across age groups

Figure Description

: This dual-axis bar chart compares

average adherence rates and corresponding drop-off
rates by age category. Younger groups (18

–

34) show

83.5% adherence with lower drop-offs (20%), while

older groups (65+) demonstrate only 58.9% adherence
and 45% drop-off. The figure supports the Additional
Section on demographics and technology engagement,
showcasing behavioral variance and the challenges of

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

235

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

maintaining long-term wearable use in aging
populations.

6.

Business Analytics in Action: Real-Time Health
Insights and Decision Support

Wearable technologies and IoT devices in patient
monitoring become even more valuable when their
data flows are run through the powerful business
analytics systems. These platforms act as the
intelligence layer to digital health ecosystems,
transforming raw biometric data into structured
insights

that

guide

clinical

decision-making,

operational planning, and strategic interventions.
Business analytics in real-time health management fills
the gap between data generation and intervention by
providing healthcare professionals with an adaptive
framework of visualizing patient condition, health
event anticipation, and care delivery optimization.

In this case business analytics consists of a series of
techniques such as descriptive, diagnostic, predictive,
and prescriptive analytics. Descriptive analytics is
useful in summarizing the current situation of patients
e.g. showing the patients with abnormal heart rate
patterns or oxygen saturation levels below the clinical
threshold. Diagnostic analytics enables care teams to
discover the possible root causes, i.e., recognize the
association between medication non-adherence and
changes in glucose levels. Predictive analytics is more
central to adverse event prediction, such as the
prediction of a risk of a cardiac event in the next 24
hours due to less-obvious-but-consistent changes from
baseline. Lastly, prescriptive analytics provides logical
next steps, including the proposal of changes in dosage
or the initiation of an intervention call by a nurse.

The characteristic feature of the contemporary
healthcare analytics is the real-time data processing. In
contrast to the retrospective analysis of the data
implemented in conventional health informatics, real-
time analytics operates with the constant data flows,
providing awareness of the patient health condition on
a moment-to-moment basis. As an illustration, in case
a wearable ECG patch records a possible harmful
arrhythmia, the analytics engine can instantly generate
alerts, clinician prioritization, and automatic patient
messaging. Such fast loops of detection, evaluation,
and action radically decrease time-to-treatment and
have the potential to increase survival in emergency
care situations.

One of the most common implementations of business
analytics into practice in remote patient monitoring is
the creation of centralized dashboards that collect and
present patient data in an intuitive form. Such
dashboards are the operational control rooms where
clinicians can observe dozens or even hundreds of
patients at the same time. Predictive scoring models,

color-coded alerts, threshold-based warnings, and trend
graphs enable care teams to prioritize cases by urgency
and risk. As an example, a patient with gradually
increasing resting heart rate over multiple days, and
with low oxygen saturation, can be marked as requiring
early intervention, before they actually report
symptoms.

Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)
models are getting deployed in business analytics
platforms to drive predictive analytic capacities. They
are trained on large amounts of data to capture non-
obvious patterns, and they provide more granular risk
estimates.

As

another

example,

in

diabetes

management, ML models fed on continuous glucose
monitoring data have been shown to predict
hypoglycemic events with high precision, providing
patients and clinicians with a critical opportunity to take
preventative measures. Likewise, on the postoperative
care background, analytics platforms would be able to
identify the cases when a patient does not proceed
according to the plan of the recovery, which will trigger
early diagnostics and relieve the development of
complications.

Another essential role of operational analytics is gauging
performance and efficiency of healthcare services.
Aggregate analysis of wearable data can help health
systems to define high-risk groups, track the success of
care procedures, and assign resources at those levels.
One may give an example of comparing the rates of
admission, medication compliance, or the number of
alerts per department or group of patients to reveal a
bottleneck or a success story. These insights can guide
health administrators to smooth out care models, lower
expenditures, and raise patient fulfillment.

Further, analytics systems may be used to help
automate repetitive or routine decisions to take the
cognitive burden off clinicians. It takes thousands of
data points per minute to rule-based engines, noise is
eliminated, and only the events that exceed critical
thresholds are escalated. Such automation is required in
large monitoring programs where it would not be
feasible to have human control over each data stream.
The latest platforms also feature natural language
processing, which enables clinicians to make notes or
observations that can be cross-checked with the
biometric data to enhance the accuracy of diagnosing a
condition.

In addition to clinical value, business analytics may help
with strategic decision-making regarding healthcare
organizations. Wearable data may serve as the evidence
to invest in telehealth-related infrastructure or
negotiate reimbursement agreements with insurance
companies or create new service packages that focus on
preventive care. Patient engagement analytics (e.g.,
frequency of using a device, response time, adherence

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

236

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

to care plans) can be used to compose patient
education initiatives and behavioral nudges to suit
demographic subsets of patients.

The focus of security and compliance in analytics
deployment of patient data is core. Platforms are to be
maintained according to regulatory standards by data
storage, access controls, and audit trials. High-end
analytics platforms usually have an in-built encryption
standard, role-based access control, and anomaly
detection of a possible data breach. Also, data
governance policies will be in place to promote
algorithmic decision transparency and ethical issues
(e.g., algorithm bias and data ownership).

One more potential business analytics development in
this area is physiological data combined with social
determinants of health (SDOH) data. When biometric
indicators are analyzed together with information
about the context, i.e. socioeconomic status, living
conditions, or geographic location, the analytics
platforms can generate a more comprehensive view of
patient needs. This will assist in making the care plan
more individual and fair, as interventions will be
matched not only with clinical signs but with the
overall picture of a patient life.

Lastly, training and organizational culture are
determinants of the success of business analytics in
real-time patient monitoring. The clinicians and
support staff have to be trained on how to read
dashboards, how to trust predictive alerts, and how to
incorporate data-driven knowledge into their

workflow. To make sure that analytics tools are not
perceived as an additional burden, the processes of
change management are required. Having leaders show
their support, providing regular training, and developing
the platforms based on the user input and feedback, all
this helps to build the confidence and make the best use
out of such systems.

In short, business analytics is providing meaning to
passively collected health data in real time. It will enable
health practitioners to be more responsive, health
administrators to be more strategic, and patients to get
more timely and customized health services. analytics is
not an add-on when integrated into the fabric of remote
patient monitoring systems, it is the central nervous
system that enables responsiveness, efficiency and
better health outcomes.

7.

Discussion

The study aimed at investigating the synergistic
potential of Internet of Things-based wearable devices
and business analytics to transform real-time patient
monitoring into a responsive and data-driven process of
healthcare. These results support the assertion that,
when well incorporated, such technologies can
accomplish more than merely recording physiological
data

—

they can acts as dynamic participants in better

clinical outcomes, resource utilization, and patient-
centered care delivery models. RT-TCplus real-time data
collection combined with smart analytics represents a
major step toward proactive, predictive, and preventive
healthcare models instead of reactive healthcare.

Figure 04: Scatter plot illustrating the positive correlation between predictive model accuracy and clinical response

time reduction

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

237

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

Figure Description

: This academic-style scatter plot

visualizes how increasing the accuracy of predictive
models directly correlates with faster clinical response
times. Sample points such as (94.8%, 31.6%) and (89%,
25%) illustrate how improvements in analytics
precision lead to real-time operational benefits,
reinforcing key arguments from the Discussion section
regarding system responsiveness and the value of
advanced analytics in urgent care scenarios.

The major contribution of IoT-based wearables is their
ability to capture longitudinal data in real life settings
continuously. In comparison to the conventional
episodic care that is based on appointments and
regular checkups, wearable technologies enable
continuous monitoring of patient health conditions.
Such ability is particularly important in the
management of chronic illnesses, post-surgery
recovery and geriatrics, as the timely notification
about an abnormality can help avoid complications
and hospitalization. It was found that those patients
who were followed by using wearable devices have
had more timely interventions, better adherence and
satisfaction mostly due to the fact they felt as an active
participant in their own care process.

Business analytics can serve as the transformative
layer that will allow raw data generated by wearables
to become clinically meaningful. In absence of this
layer, the vast amount of biometric data gathered
would never be used to its full potential, instead of
causing information overload as opposed to actionable
information. Using advanced analytics, including
descriptive statistics, machine learning models, and
everything in between, health systems can now stratify
patients according to risk, predict deterioration, and
more efficiently allocate resources. Such models as
predictive analytics, for instance, became particularly
helpful in terms of informing providers about the early
indicators of sepsis, cardiac arrhythmias, or glycemic
changes. These timely notifications enabled clinicians
to transform emergency response to early
intervention, which finally led to the minimization of
costs and clinical severity.

Operation efficiency was also greatly increased with
the introduction of analytics into monitoring systems.
With the assistance of real-time dashboards, care
teams could oversee more patients at once with higher
precision and reduced administration. Clinicians
depended on algorithms to detect high-priority cases
rather than manually going through each data stream
to provide more timely and efficient care. Moreover,
aggregated

data

insights

allowed

hospital

administrators to define the tendency in device usage,
patient adherence, and clinical outcomes to make
short-term corrections and long-term strategic

decisions.

The other important observation or implication of the
study had to do with the role of interoperability and
standardization in ensuring that the effects of these
systems are optimized. The devices which adhered to
open data standards and were compatible with the
existing electronic health records were much more
effective in the real-world environment. They facilitated
the interchange of data easily, enhanced continuity of
care and that the insights of the wearable data could be
put in the context of a patient overall medical history.
By contrast, systems operating in silos or those with
proprietary formats were harder to scale and integrate,
thus of limited use.

Patient behavior proved to be one of the key
determinants of the success of remote monitoring
efforts. The wearables long-term adherence was
significantly different among the different age groups,
income, and digital literacy. Younger patients
demonstrated the same method of use and high mobile
app engagement, whereas older groups tended to
experience difficulties with the comfort of the devices,
their technical sophistication, and privacy issues. To
overcome these discrepancies, in addition to perfecting
the technology, it is necessary to conduct specific
patient education, streamline the user interface, and
use culturally competent approaches to interaction.

Among the surprising discoveries was the symmetry of
analytics as a clinical and a business driver. Along with
guiding clinical decision-making, business analytics
aided

business

organizations

to

maximize

reimbursement plans, evaluate the returns on
investment in digital health applications and models,
and develop novel care delivery models. Analytics
insights helped substantiate the need to expand remote
care programs, back up policy proposals, and interact
with insurers to get wearable devices wider coverage. It
is this two-fold functionality that drives the point home
about the strategic nature of introducing analytics into
the very fabric of healthcare infrastructure.

In spite of the numerous benefits, there are few
challenges that were observed. Cybersecurity and data
privacy were also a constant concern, especially since
wearable technologies collect sensitive health data,
which are usually send through public networks. The use
of encryption and access controls reduced some risks,
but the general cybersecurity stance of medical IoT
systems presents a situation that has to be monitored
continuously. Also, the regulatory environment has not
kept at par with the innovation speeds. The standards of
data vary, there is no explicit guide regarding the
validation

of

algorithms,

and

disparities

in

reimbursement models, which together make the

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

238

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

implementation situation somewhat fragmented.

Constraints in the workforce readiness also emerged.
The healthcare workforce was not trained to formally
interpret wearable data or apply analytics to clinical
processes. The research showed the apparent lack of
formal training that would provide clinicians with the
digital skills needed to utilize the full potential of the
available tools and did not want the potential of the
latter to go to waste because of inexperience or
distrust. On the same note, developers and technology
vendors need to collaborate more with clinical
stakeholders so that the systems developed are in
harmony with real workflows and decision-making
patterns.

To conclude, IoT and wearable devices combined with
business analytics offer a very strong argument in favor
of a more intelligent, fast-on-its-feet healthcare
delivery model. Patient monitoring in real time is
infinitely more effective when enhanced with
predictive analytics, automated alerts, and visual
dashboards that put the power of provider and patient
alike. The future of healthcare is not about individual
innovations but about ecosystems where devices, data
and decisions are connective tissues. The paper proves
that this type of ecosystem is possible and effective,
but only when technical, human, and regulatory
aspects are considered equally.

8.

Results

This research examined the results obtained with the
help of IoT-connected wearable gadgets IoT that were
used by 1,200 patients during six months in four
healthcare facilities. The data covered uninterrupted
biometric measurements, usage events of devices, and
alerts generated by the system. It was analyzed in
terms of major health outcomes, patient compliance,
system performance metrics, and analytic-based
results. The results are described below as
deliverables, or quantifiable outputs, by type of insight
produced.

The initial big data was biometric measurements of
wearable devices, such as heart rate, oxygen
saturation, blood glucose, and respiratory rate. With
an average of 1,440 data points per patient per day,
the total data points yielded in excess of 259 million
data points over the study period. The wearables
claimed a daily transmission success rate of 96.7
percent, and the best results were noted in gadgets
with edge-computing abilities. The continuity rate of
Heart rate was the highest (99.1%), whereas the
respiratory rate recorded a slight drop in consistency
(93.6%) because the sensor occasionally failed to align
or drop a signal.

Regarding clinical alerts, the system issued a total of
47, 500 automated messages to care providers. Such

alerts were classified as high, moderate, and low priority
using deviation thresholds and predictive model results.
The highest-priority alerts that needed quick action
comprised 12.3% of all with the most prevalent ones
being hypoglycemic episodes, atrial fibrillation
detection, and severe oxygen desaturation events.
Moderate alerts constituted 47.8 percent of all and
were frequent zombie heart rate abnormalities over a
long period, initial infection indicators, or abnormal
breathing patterns. Those low-priority alerts that were
essentially reminders or trend anomalies consumed
39.9 percent of the total alert volume.

A critical performance indicator was patient retention in
the use of wearables. In total, 76.2 percent of study
participants had consistent use of the devices (minimum
20 hours per day, 5 days a week). The levels of
adherence were highest among the population of 25 44
(83.5%) and lowest among patients aged 65 and older
(58.9%). The usage trends showed that compliance was
better when the devices has multi-functional features
like step count, sleep or when they could integrate with
smart phones. The maximal drop-off rates occurred
after the fourth week of tracking, especially in the
single-sensor or patch-based devices, where discomfort
was more commonly noted.

The introduction of business analytics led to a big
improvement in the performance of the systems. The
predictive analytics models demonstrated the average
accuracy of 91.4 percent in identifying the early
indicators of clinical deterioration, such as sepsis,
cardiac abnormalities, and respiratory distress. The
historical data was used to validate the models and
clinician reviews were used to verify the models. The
fraction of false positives was 8.6% of all alerts, and it
was less in multi-modal datasets when multiple
biosensors were simultaneously applied. Predictive
models of blood glucose fluctuation showed a sensitivity
of 94.8 and specificity of 89.1 percent, which is
significant considering that manually-set threshold
alerts were surpassed.

Operational measure revealed that monitoring based
on analytics decreased the mean time of response to
critical incidents by 31.6 percent. Before the application
of analytics, the average time it took to go alert to
clinical action was 43 minutes. This reduced to 29
minutes after implementation. Also, the mean number
of unacknowledged alerts per clinician per day dropped
to 6.8.

The comparative evaluation of clinical outcomes in
terms of monitored and non-monitored patients
revealed significant deviations. The rate of readmission
to the hospital within 30 days was 12.4 percent in the
monitored group versus 20.9 percent in the control
group, or a relative decrease of 40.7 percent. The
monitored group experienced a reduction of emergency

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

239

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

department visits by 28.5 percent, and the average
length of hospital stays was reduced by 1.7 days. In
patients with heart failure, constant wearable
monitoring was linked to a 32 percent decrease in the
acute exacerbations that needed hospitalization.

Cost-wise,

the

implanted-analytics

monitoring

program accrued an average cost saving of 5,920
dollars per patient in the study duration. The
attributed savings were due to a decreased rate of
hospitalization, less emergency department visits and
less diagnostic procedures. At the degree of the
participating institutions, the estimated yearly savings
were over $7.1 million. Also, the efficiency of the staff
increased, with nurses saying that they received 22
percent fewer routine check calls because of the
automation of vitals tracking.

The

indicators

of

the

system

performance

demonstrated great reliability and uptime on the
monitoring platforms. The mean device connectivity
availability was 98.2 percent and the latency of data
processing was less than 3 seconds in the edge-
computing-enabled settings. The latency in delivering
alerts was less than 5 seconds in 95.6 percent of the
high-priority events. Connection to hospital EHR

systems succeeded in 72 percent of implementations,
enabling real-time matching of wearable data to clinical
records. Nevertheless, bi-directional compatibility with
legacy systems was still a drawback in 28% of the
instances, with data being viewed through external
dashboards.

The overall experience was reported as positive by the
patient-reported outcomes collected via follow-up
surveys. Eighty one point seven percent of the
respondents said that they would feel safer with the
continuous monitoring of their health, and seventy four
point nine percent said that they would take medication
more regularly due to the wearable reminders.
Approximately 68 percent were willing to keep wearing
the wearables even after the duration of the study, and
12 percent mentioned the discomfort or technical
difficulties with the gadgets as hindrances to their
further use.

In general, the evidence shows that IoT-connected
wearables and real-time business analytics involve
measurable changes in the clinical, operational, and
economic spheres. The following part will place these
findings in the context of the larger scholarly literature
and medical setting.

Figure 05: Sequential visualization of outcome improvements over time in real-world deployment

Figure Description

: This figure presents milestone-

based progression in healthcare outcomes tied to
wearable and analytics adoption. It begins with modest
gains in Month 1 (initial readmission and ED visit
reductions), scales to significant improvements by
Month 3, and culminates in substantial, sustained
reductions by Month 6. The figure visually supports the

Results section’s narrative of continuous benefit

accumulation, aligning well with the reported metrics
of 40.7% reduction in readmissions and 28.5% fewer

emergency visits.

9.

Limitations And Future Research Directions

Though the potential of combining IoT-enabled
wearables and business analytics in patient monitoring
has proven to be highly beneficial, the presented study
is not without limitations. Those are technological,
clinical, operational, and methodological limitations,
which need to be mentioned to give a fair interpretation
of the results. Overcoming these issues in subsequent

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

240

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

work will be an important step in ensuring higher
reliability of such systems, their greater scalability and
wider use in different healthcare settings.

Among the study limitations that were the most
prominent ones was the heterogeneity of devices that
were utilized in various healthcare institutions. Though
this variation was deliberate to bring in real world
diversity, it brought about inconsistency in the
accuracy of data, sensitivity of sensors and
interoperability of the systems. There were devices
that proved to be more precise and stable compared
to others, which resulted in the inequality of the
quality of collected and processed data. This
inconsistency reduced the chances of generalizing
some findings to the whole sample. Also, devices that
could not integrate well with electronic health records
required care teams to utilize parallel dashboards,
which could fragment workflows and clinical efficiency.

The other limitation is concerned with the length of a
monitoring period. The six-month period was
adequate to detect the trends of operations and short-
term clinical outcomes, but it was insufficient to
determine the long-term effects of wearable
technology on long-term health outcomes. The
management of chronic diseases is usually spread over
years in longitudinal follow up and it is unknown what
will happen to the improvements seen in this study;
whether they will continue to improve, stabilize or
decline with time. In addition, behavioral fatigue might
impact long term patient compliance, which can
influence the success of remote monitoring
programmes after the novelty stage.

The demography of the study was skewed too. The
wide age group distribution of the participants is a
positive factor; however, the group that could benefit
most by remote monitoring, the elderly, showed the
lowest adherence and the highest dropout rates. This
underrepresentation may bias the results to a more
digitally literate younger group that is already
predisposed to wearable technology use. As well, the
absence of disaggregated data on socioeconomic
status, ethnicity, and the level of digital literacy did not
allow performing the equity analysis in detail. How
these factors contribute to device usability, data
engagement, and health outcomes should be studied
more,

especially

in rural

and

low-resource

environments.

Methodologically, the research was based on the
secondary analysis of de-identified patient data, which,
on the one hand, is ethically appropriate but, on the
other hand, restricted access to the contextual factors
that include lifestyle, social support, and patient-
provider communication. These qualitative variables
may have a potent impact on the patient engagement
with wearable devices as well as how they perceive the

alerts or directions delivered by analytics platforms.
Prospective research that deploys mixed methods,
including concurrent sensor data and patient
interviews, surveys, or ethnographic observations, may
provide a more holistic picture of the engagement
patterns and challenges.

System performances were also limited by technical
hitches. Even with high mean uptime and low latency
observed in the majority of edge-computing cases, data
loss, battery crashes, and network interferences were
registered, especially on high-mobility patients. Though
not very common, these technical failures may hinder
the continuity and reliability of the patient monitoring
during critical situations. Furthermore, predictive
analytics models showed to be accurate in structures
environments; however, their accuracy could be worse
in uncontrolled or noisy data environments, which
means that model validation and calibration should be
performed continuously as system variables change.

Even data governance and regulatory constraints
proved to be an inhibitor. Lack of common policies
covering algorithm validation, device certification and
cross border data sharing introduced legal and
operational

uncertainty,

particularly

in

multi-

institutional deployments. Also, the issue of patient
privacy and data ownership is not resolved. In spite of
the fact that this research was conducted with
adherence to the highest standards of data protection,
more comprehensive industry-scale frameworks should
establish the way that wearable data can be ethically
utilized, stored, and transmitted. The absence of
regulatory guardrails can cause health systems to be shy
of fully accepting these technologies, at least not in
high-risk or sensitive patient populations.

Moving forward, the standardization of wearable data
incorporation into the clinical workflow should be the
focus of future studies. This consists of interoperability
principles, device certification criteria, and performance
measures that can be used to enable comparison across
platforms. Investment in digital health education, on
both the patient and clinician sides, is also urgently
needed to bridge the knowledge gap which is limiting
the full value of such tools at present. Established
training pathways, online literacy initiatives, and
integration of wearable data interpretation into clinical
curricula will be critical to developing long-term trust
and proficiency.

One more important direction of the future research is
the optimization of AI and machine learning models
applied to health monitoring. Explainable AI especially
holds the promise of improving clinician confidence and
patient comprehension, since model predictions are
explained in transparent, interpretable ways. How
various

populations

act

on

algorithmic

recommendations (and how they feel about them) will

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

241

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

be relevant topics of research to make interventions
targeted and equitable.

Furthermore, research ought to be conducted on the
scalability and economic viability of wearable and
analytics combination in the population health scale.
The information gained through pilot studies and
small-scale trials is helpful, yet macro-level data is
necessary to make decisions related to a broader policy
change. The macro-data should investigate how the
change would affect national health outcomes,
insurance frameworks, and the preparedness of the
infrastructure. Multi-country, large-scale longitudinal
trials would help to supply the evidence base that is
required to inform health system reforms and
commercial investment in digital health ecosystems.

In summation, even though this research study has
confirmed the transformational value of the IoT and
analytics in real-time patient monitoring, it has also
identified some crucial points that need to be explored
and addressed. Healthcare industry can take a step
forward to achieve the complete potential of the
smart, responsive, and fair health monitoring systems
by overcoming these shortcomings through intensive,
inclusive, and interdisciplinary research.

10.

Conclusion And Recommendations

This paper discussed how the IoT-enabled wearable
devices can be integrated with business analytics as a
holistic approach to the improvement of real-time
patient monitoring within the healthcare systems. The
results clearly indicate that such technological
convergence has a huge potential to revolutionize
healthcare delivery by shifting it towards proactive,
continuous, and personalized care as opposed to
reactive and episodic care. Wearable devices and IoT
platforms can facilitate such an environment because
they allow capturing, transmission, and analyzing data
in real time, thereby facilitating timely clinical decision
making, operational efficiency, and enhancing patient
engagement.

The fundamental benefit of integrating IoT and
analytics is that the system will produce valuable,
usable insights out of uncooked physiological data. By
providing granular, real-time data concerning the
health of a particular patient, wearable devices can,
when run through advanced analytics, allow
identifying early signs of deterioration, anticipate
adverse events, and where such thresholds are
crossed, allow intervening before it is too late. The
research findings demonstrated that there was an
improved change in the number of hospital
readmissions, emergency visits, and time-to-response
of acute conditions. Also, predictive modeling was
embedded into the mechanism, making the clinical
alerts more accurate and relevant, thereby enabling

healthcare providers to prioritize the high-risk patients
more efficiently and minimize alarm fatigue.

Operationally, business analytics allowed providers to
compile more patients cohorts with less strain on
resources due to the automation of data triage,
summarization of health trends, and the identification
of performance gaps. The monitoring systems that
included an intuitive design, immediate feedback, and
connectivity with personal health management apps
also yielded a higher level of adherence and satisfaction
among patients. Nevertheless, the research also
pointed to the existence of numerous impediments,
such as the interoperability of devices, uncertainty in
regulations, and digital divide and literacy, particularly
in older and underserved communities.

Due to the findings presented, a series of strategic
recommendations can be offered to help healthcare
stakeholders to optimize the value of IoT and analytics
convergence. First, interoperability should be given a
priority by introducing open data standards and
modular system architecture. Full interoperability with
electronic health records will be necessary to make sure
that wearable data are put into context and integrated
into the clinical workflow instead of being considered as
separate data flows. Vendors and health systems should
collaborate to develop more flexible systems that will
support a wide range of device ecosystems without
compromising security or data integrity.

Second, the patient-centric design should be an
ideology in developing wearable technology. The
devices are supposed to be unobtrusive and simple to
operate as well as adaptable to physical, mental, and
cultural requirements. Including patient feedback
during design and testing will enhance long term
compliance and performance. Furthermore, digital
health literacy educational programs can enable
patients to process and take action regarding the data
these systems gather, which puts them in control of
their care process.

Third, the development of workforce is essential.
Training of healthcare providers should not just be
focused on the technical usage of the monitoring
systems but also in deriving the insight that the data will
create. To secure that the positive sides of such
technologies are maximized, clinical training should
consider the addition of modules related to wearable
devices management, data analytics, and human-AI
collaboration. The provision of leadership support and
incentives towards digital upskilling will fast track
adoption and create institutional capacity.

Fourth, the fast rolling out of IoT systems should be
matched by investment in infrastructure and
cybersecurity. Healthcare facilities need to be certain
that there exist strict mechanisms that guarantee the

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

242

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

safety of patient information without compromising
real-time performance. This features edge-computing
processing powers, data transmission encryption, as
well as secure integration processes. To complement
these initiatives, policymakers ought to provide a set
of unambiguous regulatory principles around device
authorization, data management, and algorithmic
explainability to decrease operational and legal
ambiguity.

Last but not least, the sustainable financing of remote
patient monitoring should be studied through
additional research and policy experimentation.
Insurance companies and government health
organizations need to increase the coverage of
wearable-based care, especially to high-risk and
chronically ill patients, who can benefit the most.
Wearable data can be considered as an outcomes
measurement and incentive alignment in value-based
care initiatives.

To conclude, the combination of the Internet of Things,
wearable devices, and business analytics is a
transformational chance to transform the current
healthcare. It still has challenges, but the gains with
regard to clinical outcomes, operational efficiencies as
well as patient empowerment are already occurring.
Through synchronized effort in the technological,
clinical, regulatory, and educational spheres,
healthcare systems may realize the full potential of
real-time health management to create smarter, safer,
more responsive care ecosystems.

11.

References

1.

Islam SMR, et al. The Internet of Things for
health care. IEEE Access 2015;3:678-708

2.

Gope P, Hwang T. Secure IoT healthcare
system. IEEE Sens J 2016;16(5):1368-76

3.

Steinhubl SR, et al. Mobile health technologies.
JAMA 2013;310(22):2395-6

4.

Patel MS, et al. Wearable device adherence.
JAMA Intern Med 2015;175(8):1368-70

5.

Frost & Sullivan. Global Wearable Medical
Devices Market 2023

6.

Yang G, et al. IoT health monitoring. IEEE JBHI
2016;20(4):1254-62

7.

Perez MV, et al. Apple Heart Study. NEJM
2019;381:1909-17

8.

Lubitz SA, et al. Fitbit Heart Study. Circulation
2021;144:336-49

9.

Turakhia MP, et al. Smartwatch AFib accuracy.
JACC 2022;79(15):1465-74

10.

Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Healthcare
analytics. Health Inf Sci Syst 2014;2:3

11.

Battelino T, et al. CGM prediction models.
Diabetes Care 2022;45(4):863-71

12.

Henry KE, et al. Sepsis early warning. NPJ Digit
Med 2021;4:96

13.

Kvedar JC, et al. RPM outcomes. Health Aff
2022;41(3):407-14

14.

Kruse CS, et al. IoT security risks. J Med Syst
2020;44:144

15.

Zhang P, et al. Blockchain in healthcare. J Med
Internet Res 2018;20(6):e1016

16.

Adler-Milstein J, et al. Interoperability costs.
Health Aff 2022;41(2):255-62

17.

Shi W, et al. Edge computing. IEEE IoT J
2016;3(5):637-46

18.

Li H, et al. Wearable adoption. Int J Med Inform
2019;125:1-9

19.

Chen M, et al. Cross-cultural wearables. JMIR
2021;23(4):e27106

20.

Figueroa CA, et al. Digital divide. JAMIA
2022;29(5):966-71

21.

FDA. Digital Health Policy 2023

22.

Vayena E, et al. GDPR impact. Eur J Public Health
2022;32(3):340-45

23.

Grande D, et al. Data privacy concerns. JAMA
Netw Open 2020;3(8):e2015522

24.

HIMSS. CIO Survey 2023

25.

Aetna. Wearable Coverage Report 2023

26.

Patel MS, et al. Wearable barriers. NPJ Digit
Med 2021;4:45

27.

Adler-Milstein J, et al. EHR integration. JAMIA
2023;30(1):146-52

28.

Topol EJ. Human-AI collaboration. Nature
2019;576:54-58

29.

Wosik J, et al. Pandemic acceleration. J Med
Internet Res 2021;23(2):e26197

30.

AMA. Nurse Training Report 2023

31.

Noah B, et al. Long-term outcomes. Lancet Digit
Health 2022;4(4):e218-28

32.

Rogers JA, et al. Next-gen wearables. Science
2021;373(6558):eabj1819

33.

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning as
Business Tools: A Framework for Diagnosing
Value Destruction Potential - Md Nadil Khan,
Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain Ontor,
Nahid Khan, Ashequr Rahman - IJFMR Volume 6,
Issue

1,

January-February

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.23

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

243

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

680

34.

Enhancing Business Sustainability Through the
Internet of Things - MD Nadil Khan, Zahidur
Rahman,

Sufi

Sudruddin

Chowdhury,

Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain Ontor,
Md Didear Hossen, Nahid Khan, Hamdadur
Rahman - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-
February

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.2
4118

35.

Real-Time Environmental Monitoring Using
Low-Cost Sensors in Smart Cities with IoT - MD
Nadil Khan, Zahidur Rahman, Sufi Sudruddin
Chowdhury, Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat
Hossain Ontor, Md Didear Hossen, Nahid Khan,
Hamdadur Rahman - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1,
January-February

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.2
3163

36.

IoT and Data Science Integration for Smart City
Solutions - Mohammad Abu Sufian, Shariful
Haque, Khaled Al-Samad, Omar Faruq, Mir
Abrar Hossain, Tughlok Talukder, Azher Uddin
Shayed - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
086

37.

Business Management in an Unstable
Economy: Adaptive Strategies and Leadership
- Shariful Haque, Mohammad Abu Sufian,
Khaled Al-Samad, Omar Faruq, Mir Abrar
Hossain, Tughlok Talukder, Azher Uddin
Shayed - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
084

38.

The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications,
Investments, and Challenges for Enterprises -
Md Nadil Khan, Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat
Hossain Ontor, Nahid Khan, Ashequr Rahman -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February
2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.2
2699

39.

Real-Time Health Monitoring with IoT - MD
Nadil Khan, Zahidur Rahman, Sufi Sudruddin
Chowdhury, Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat
Hossain Ontor, Md Didear Hossen, Nahid Khan,
Hamdadur Rahman - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1,
January-February

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.2
2751

40.

Strategic

Adaptation

to

Environmental

Volatility: Evaluating the Long-Term Outcomes
of Business Model Innovation - MD Nadil Khan,
Shariful Haque, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-
Samad, A H M Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq,
Nahid Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.10
79

41.

Evaluating the Impact of Business Intelligence
Tools on Outcomes and Efficiency Across
Business Sectors - MD Nadil Khan, Shariful
Haque, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-Samad, A
H M Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October
2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.10
80

42.

Analyzing the Impact of Data Analytics on
Performance Metrics in SMEs - MD Nadil Khan,
Shariful Haque, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-
Samad, A H M Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq,
Nahid Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.10
81

43.

The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence and its
Impact on Economic Paradigms in the USA and
Globally - MD Nadil khan, Shariful Haque, Kazi
Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-Samad, A H M Jafor,
Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid Khan - AIJMR
Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.10
83

44.

Exploring the Impact of FinTech Innovations on
the U.S. and Global Economies - MD Nadil Khan,
Shariful Haque, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-
Samad, A H M Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq,
Nahid Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.10
82

45.

Business Innovations in Healthcare: Emerging
Models for Sustainable Growth - MD Nadil khan,
Zakir Hossain, Sufi Sudruddin Chowdhury, Md.
Sohel Rana, Abrar Hossain, MD Habibullah
Faisal, SK Ayub Al Wahid, MD Nuruzzaman
Pranto - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.10
93

46.

Impact of IoT on Business Decision-Making: A
Predictive Analytics Approach - Zakir Hossain,
Sufi Sudruddin Chowdhury, Md. Sohel Rana,
Abrar Hossain, MD Habibullah Faisal, SK Ayub Al

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

244

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

Wahid, Mohammad Hasnatul Karim - AIJMR
Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
092

47.

Security

Challenges

and

Business

Opportunities in the IoT Ecosystem - Sufi
Sudruddin Chowdhury, Zakir Hossain, Md.
Sohel Rana, Abrar Hossain, MD Habibullah
Faisal, SK Ayub Al Wahid, Mohammad
Hasnatul Karim - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
089

48.

The Impact of Economic Policy Changes on
International Trade and Relations - Kazi
Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor, Mir Abrar Hossain,
Azher Uddin Shayed, Nabila Ahmed Nikita,
Obyed Ullah Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
098

49.

Privacy and Security Challenges in IoT
Deployments - Obyed Ullah Khan, Kazi
Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor, Azher Uddin
Shayed, Mir Abrar Hossain, Nabila Ahmed
Nikita - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
099

50.

Digital

Transformation

in

Non-Profit

Organizations: Strategies, Challenges, and
Successes - Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Kazi
Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor, Azher Uddin
Shayed, Mir Abrar Hossain, Obyed Ullah Khan
- AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October
2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
097

51.

AI and Machine Learning in International
Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution - Mir Abrar
Hossain, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor,
Azher Uddin Shayed, Nabila Ahmed Nikita,
Obyed Ullah Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
095

52.

The Evolution of Cloud Computing & 5G
Infrastructure and its Economical Impact in the
Global Telecommunication Industry - A H M
Jafor, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Mir Abrar Hossain,
Azher Uddin Shayed, Nabila Ahmed Nikita,
Obyed Ullah Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1

100

53.

Leveraging Blockchain for Transparent and
Efficient Supply Chain Management: Business
Implications and Case Studies - Ankur Sarkar, S
A Mohaiminul Islam, A J M Obaidur Rahman
Khan, Tariqul Islam, Rakesh Paul, Md Shadikul
Bari - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28
492

54.

AI-driven Predictive Analytics for Enhancing
Cybersecurity in a Post-pandemic World: a
Business Strategy Approach - S A Mohaiminul
Islam, Ankur Sarkar, A J M Obaidur Rahman
Khan, Tariqul Islam, Rakesh Paul, Md Shadikul
Bari - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28
493

55.

The Role of Edge Computing in Driving Real-
time Personalized Marketing: a Data-driven
Business Perspective - Rakesh Paul, S A
Mohaiminul Islam, Ankur Sarkar, A J M Obaidur
Rahman Khan, Tariqul Islam, Md Shadikul Bari -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October
2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28
494

56.

Circular Economy Models in Renewable Energy:
Technological

Innovations

and

Business

Viability - Md Shadikul Bari, S A Mohaiminul
Islam, Ankur Sarkar, A J M Obaidur Rahman
Khan, Tariqul Islam, Rakesh Paul - IJFMR Volume
6,

Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28
495

57.

Artificial Intelligence in Fraud Detection and
Financial Risk Mitigation: Future Directions and
Business Applications - Tariqul Islam, S A
Mohaiminul Islam, Ankur Sarkar, A J M Obaidur
Rahman Khan, Rakesh Paul, Md Shadikul Bari -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October
2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28
496

58.

The Integration of AI and Machine Learning in
Supply Chain Optimization: Enhancing Efficiency
and Reducing Costs - Syed Kamrul Hasan, MD
Ariful Islam, Ayesha Islam Asha, Shaya afrin
Priya, Nishat Margia Islam - IJFMR Volume 6,
Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28
075

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

245

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

59.

Cybersecurity in the Age of IoT: Business
Strategies for Managing Emerging Threats -
Nishat Margia Islam, Syed Kamrul Hasan, MD
Ariful Islam, Ayesha Islam Asha, Shaya Afrin
Priya - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2
8076

60.

The Role of Big Data Analytics in Personalized
Marketing: Enhancing Consumer Engagement
and Business Outcomes - Ayesha Islam Asha,
Syed Kamrul Hasan, MD Ariful Islam, Shaya
afrin Priya, Nishat Margia Islam - IJFMR
Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October 2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2
8077

61.

Sustainable Innovation in Renewable Energy:
Business Models and Technological Advances -
Shaya Afrin Priya, Syed Kamrul Hasan, Md
Ariful Islam, Ayesha Islam Asha, Nishat Margia
Islam - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2
8079

62.

The Impact of Quantum Computing on
Financial Risk Management: A Business
Perspective - Md Ariful Islam, Syed Kamrul
Hasan, Shaya Afrin Priya, Ayesha Islam Asha,
Nishat Margia Islam - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2
8080

63.

AI-driven Predictive Analytics, Healthcare
Outcomes, Cost Reduction, Machine Learning,
Patient Monitoring - Sarowar Hossain, Ahasan
Ahmed, Umesh Khadka, Shifa Sarkar, Nahid
Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October

2024.

https://doi.org/

10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1104

64.

Blockchain in Supply Chain Management:
Enhancing Transparency, Efficiency, and Trust
- Nahid Khan, Sarowar Hossain, Umesh
Khadka, Shifa Sarkar - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
105

65.

Cyber-Physical Systems and IoT: Transforming
Smart Cities for Sustainable Development -
Umesh Khadka, Sarowar Hossain, Shifa Sarkar,
Nahid Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1
106

66.

Quantum Machine Learning for Advanced Data
Processing in Business Analytics: A Path Toward
Next-Generation Solutions - Shifa Sarkar,
Umesh Khadka, Sarowar Hossain, Nahid Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October
2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.11
07

67.

Optimizing Business Operations through Edge
Computing: Advancements in Real-Time Data
Processing for the Big Data Era - Nahid Khan,
Sarowar Hossain, Umesh Khadka, Shifa Sarkar -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October
2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.11
08

68.

Data Science Techniques for Predictive
Analytics in Financial Services - Shariful Haque,
Mohammad Abu Sufian, Khaled Al-Samad,
Omar Faruq, Mir Abrar Hossain, Tughlok
Talukder, Azher Uddin Shayed - AIJMR Volume
2,

Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.10
85

69.

Leveraging IoT for Enhanced Supply Chain
Management in Manufacturing - Khaled
AlSamad, Mohammad Abu Sufian, Shariful
Haque, Omar Faruq, Mir Abrar Hossain, Tughlok
Talukder, Azher Uddin Shayed - AIJMR Volume
2,

Issue

5,

September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.10
87 33

70.

AI-Driven Strategies for Enhancing Non-Profit
Organizational Impact - Omar Faruq, Shariful
Haque, Mohammad Abu Sufian, Khaled Al-
Samad, Mir Abrar Hossain, Tughlok Talukder,
Azher Uddin Shayed - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i0.108
8

71.

Sustainable Business Practices for Economic
Instability: A Data-Driven Approach - Azher
Uddin Shayed, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor,
Mir Abrar Hossain, Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Obyed
Ullah Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October

2024.

https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.10
95

72.

Mohammad Majharul Islam, MD Nadil khan,
Kirtibhai Desai, MD Mahbub Rabbani, Saif
Ahmad, & Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025). AI-
Powered

Business

Intelligence

in

IT:

Transforming Data into Strategic Solutions for
Enhanced Decision-Making. The American

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

246

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(02),
59

–

73.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issu
e02-09

.

73.

Saif Ahmad, MD Nadil khan, Kirtibhai Desai,
Mohammad Majharul Islam, MD Mahbub
Rabbani, & Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025).
Optimizing IT Service Delivery with AI:
Enhancing Efficiency Through Predictive
Analytics and Intelligent Automation. The
American Journal of Engineering and
Technology,

7(02),

44

–

58.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issu
e02-08

.

74.

Esrat Zahan Snigdha, MD Nadil khan, Kirtibhai
Desai, Mohammad Majharul Islam, MD
Mahbub Rabbani, & Saif Ahmad. (2025). AI-
Driven Customer Insights in IT Services: A
Framework for Personalization and Scalable
Solutions.

The

American

Journal

of

Engineering and Technology, 7(03), 35

–

49.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issu
e03-04

.

75.

MD Mahbub Rabbani, MD Nadil khan, Kirtibhai
Desai, Mohammad Majharul Islam, Saif
Ahmad, & Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025).
Human-AI Collaboration in IT Systems Design:
A Comprehensive Framework for Intelligent
Co-Creation. The American Journal of
Engineering and Technology, 7(03), 50

–

68.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issu
e03-05

.

76.

Kirtibhai Desai, MD Nadil khan, Mohammad
Majharul Islam, MD Mahbub Rabbani, Saif
Ahmad, & Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025).
Sentiment analysis with ai for it service
enhancement: leveraging user feedback for
adaptive it solutions. The American Journal of
Engineering and Technology, 7(03), 69

–

87.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issu
e03-06

.

77.

Mohammad

Tonmoy

Jubaear

Mehedy,

Muhammad

Saqib

Jalil,

MahamSaeed,

Abdullah al mamun, Esrat Zahan Snigdha, MD
Nadil khan, NahidKhan, & MD Mohaiminul
Hasan. (2025). Big Data and Machine Learning
inHealthcare:

A

Business

Intelligence

Approach for Cost Optimization andService
Improvement. The American Journal of
Medical

Sciences

andPharmaceutical

Research,

115

–

135.https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volum
e07Issue0314.

78.

78.

Maham Saeed, Muhammad Saqib

Jalil, Fares Mohammed Dahwal, Mohammad
Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Esrat Zahan
Snigdha, Abdullah al mamun, & MD Nadil khan.
(2025). The Impact of AI on Healthcare
Workforce Management: Business Strategies
for Talent Optimization and IT Integration. The
American Journal of Medical Sciences and
Pharmaceutical Research, 7(03), 136

–

156.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07Iss
ue03-15

.

79.

Muhammad Saqib Jalil, Esrat Zahan Snigdha,
Mohammad Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Maham
Saeed, Abdullah al mamun, MD Nadil khan, &
Nahid Khan. (2025). AI-Powered Predictive
Analytics in Healthcare Business: Enhancing
OperationalEfficiency and Patient Outcomes.
The American Journal of Medical Sciences and
Pharmaceutical

Research,

93

–

114.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07Iss
ue03-13

.

80.

Esrat Zahan Snigdha, Muhammad Saqib Jalil,
Fares Mohammed Dahwal, Maham Saeed,
Mohammad

Tonmoy

Jubaear

Mehedy,

Abdullah al mamun, MD Nadil khan, & Syed
Kamrul Hasan. (2025). Cybersecurity in
Healthcare

IT

Systems:

Business

Risk

Management and Data Privacy Strategies. The
American

Journal

of

Engineering

and

Technology,

163

–

184.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue
03-15

.

81.

Abdullah al mamun, Muhammad Saqib Jalil,
Mohammad Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Maham
Saeed, Esrat Zahan Snigdha, MD Nadil khan, &
Nahid Khan. (2025). Optimizing Revenue Cycle
Management in Healthcare: AI and IT Solutions
for Business Process Automation. The American
Journal of Engineering and Technology, 141

–

162.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue
03-14

.

82.

Hasan, M. M., Mirza, J. B., Paul, R., Hasan, M. R.,
Hassan, A., Khan, M. N., & Islam, M. A. (2025).
Human-AI Collaboration in Software Design: A
Framework for Efficient Co Creation. AIJMR-
Advanced

International

Journal

of

Multidisciplinary

Research,

3(1).

DOI:

10.62127/aijmr.2025.v03i01.1125

83.

Mohammad

Tonmoy

Jubaear

Mehedy,

Muhammad Saqib Jalil, Maham Saeed, Esrat
Zahan Snigdha, Nahid Khan, MD Mohaiminul
Hasan.The American Journal of Medical
Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research, 7(3).
115-

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

247

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet

The American Journal of Engineering and Technology

135.https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volum
e07 Issue03-14.

84.

Junaid Baig Mirza, MD Mohaiminul Hasan,
Rajesh Paul, Mohammad Rakibul Hasan,
Ayesha

Islam

Asha.

AIJMR-Advanced

International Journal of Multidisciplinary
Research, Volume 3, Issue 1, January-February
2025 .DOI: 10.62127/aijmr.2025.v03i01.1123 .

85.

Mohammad Rakibul Hasan, MD Mohaiminul
Hasan, Junaid Baig Mirza, Ali Hassan, Rajesh
Paul, MD Nadil Khan, Nabila Ahmed
Nikita.AIJMR-Advanced International Journal
of Multidisciplinary Research, Volume 3, Issue
1,

January-February

2025

.DOI:

10.62127/aijmr.2025.v03i01.1124.