GUARANTEES OF FREEDOM OF SCIENTIFIC CREATIVITY IN THE NORMS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
Keywords:
Abstract
The article examines the consolidation and development in the law "On Science and Scientific activity" of the internationally recognized human right to freedom of scientific research. The article analyzes the normative content of freedom of science and its reflection in legislation of Uzbekistan. Much attention is paid to the issue of the correlation of freedom of science with a number of civil, social and economic human rights, the beneficiaries of which are also scientists and scientific and technical workers. It is concluded that it is necessary to establish a balance between freedom of scientific research and human rights due to the increasing risky nature of modern scientific and technological progress.
Similar Articles
-
MODERN VALEOLOGICAL TEACHINGS AND THEIR SOCIOANTHROPOLOGICAL ESSENCE
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology: No. 04 (2023) / Gadoeva Lobar Ergashevna, -
ETHICS IN THE WORKS OF ABDURAHMAN JAMI
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology: No. 04 (2023) / Lola M. Karimova, -
The Basic Laws Of The Countries Prohibit The State From Engaging In Religious Xenophobia And Bigotry
-
The Psychology Of The Search Investigative Action
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology: No. 03 (2021) / Khomidov Vokhidjon Adkhamovich,
References
Venice Statement on the Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress and its Applications. URL: http://shr.aaas.org/article15/Reference_Materials/VeniceStatement_July2009.pd
General comment No. 25 (2020) on science and economic, social and cultural rights (article 15 (1) (b), (2), (3) and (4) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights)
О статусе научно-исследовательских работников: рекомендация ЮНЕСКО 1974 года. URL: http://www.busnesspravo.ru/Docum/DocumShow_DocumID_33160.html
Claude R. Scientists' Rights and the Human Rights to the Benefits of Science//Chapman A., Russell S. Core Obligations: a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002. P. 247-278.
Аслонова. Л. 2022. История возникновения конституционного права на свободу научного творчества. Общество и инновации. 3, 11/S (дек. 2022), 235–245. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss11/S-pp235-245.
Аслонова. Л. 2023. Сравнительно-правовой анализ закрепления права на науку в конституциях стран мира. Общество и инновации. 4, 1/S (янв. 2023), 186–195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol4-iss1-pp186-195.
Schabas W.A. Study of the Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific and Technological Progress and Its Applications//Human Rights in Education, Science and Culture -Legal Developments and Challenges. Ed. by Y. Donders. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2007. P. 273-308.
Chapman A.R. Towards an Understanding of the Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress and its Applications//Journal of Human Rights. 2009. Vol. 8. P. 1-36
Аслонова , Л. 2023. Порядок защиты свободы научного исследования на конституционном уровне. Общество и инновации. 4, 6/S (авг. 2023), 387–393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol4-iss6/S-pp387-393.
Report of the Special Rapporteur in the Field of Cultural Rights (Farida Shaheed) «The Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress and Its Applications»//A/HRC/20/26, 14 May 2012.
Aslonova Laylo, . (2023). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACTS ON PERMISSIBLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FREEDOM OF SCIENCE. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 5(08), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume05Issue08-05
Bekov, I., & Saidboyeva, M. . (2022). Reforms for enhancing the role of political parties. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 4(01), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume04Issue01-03
Ustawa z dnia 26 stycznia 2018 r. o zmiane ustawy o Institucie Pamięci Narodowi – Komisji Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu // Dz. U. z 2018 r. Poz. 369.
Directive 2010/64/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 septembre 2010 relative à la protection des animaux utilisées à des fins scientifiques // JO L 276 du 20.10.2010. P. 33.
Commission canadienne de sûreté nucléaire. Compte rendu des déliberations, y compris les motifs de décision à égard de demandeur: Centre canadien de rayonnement synchrotron. Objet: Demande de modification de permis d’exploitation d’un accélérateur de particules de catégorie IB. Date de l’audience: 30 mars 2015.
