THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE11
7
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
PUBLISHED DATE: - 05-11-2024
PAGE NO.: - 7-11
UNDERSTANDING INDIGENOUS PEOPLES'
ENGAGEMENT WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT: A
STUDY OF CONTACT AND CONFIDENCE
G. Grayson Adams
School of social work, University of Windsor, Canada
INTRODUCTION
The relationship between Indigenous peoples and
law enforcement agencies has long been shaped by
a complex history of systemic inequality, cultural
misunderstandings, and marginalization. In many
regions, Indigenous communities have historically
faced disproportionate levels of policing,
criminalization, and violence, creating a deep-
seated mistrust of law enforcement. This mistrust
is rooted in the legacy of colonization, where police
forces were often used as instruments of control,
forcibly displacing Indigenous populations,
suppressing cultural practices, and undermining
Indigenous sovereignty. As a result, the perception
of police as adversaries, rather than protectors,
persists in many Indigenous communities.
In contemporary society, despite efforts to improve
police-community relations, Indigenous peoples
continue to experience significant disparities in
their interactions with law enforcement. Issues
such as racial profiling, the overrepresentation of
Indigenous individuals in the criminal justice
system, and a lack of culturally competent policing
have all contributed to a strained relationship
between Indigenous communities and police
forces. The consequences of these strained
relations are far-reaching, affecting not only public
safety but also the broader social and economic
well-being of Indigenous peoples.
Understanding the nature and extent of Indigenous
peoples' engagement with law enforcement is
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Abstract
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE11
8
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
critical for identifying ways to bridge the divide
between these communities and police services.
This study aims to explore the level of contact
Indigenous peoples have with law enforcement
and to assess their confidence in the police. By
examining factors such as personal experiences,
perceptions of bias and discrimination, and the
cultural competence of police officers, the research
seeks to uncover the underlying causes of mistrust
and identify potential solutions for improving
police-Indigenous relations.
Ultimately, this research will contribute to the
ongoing dialogue about how law enforcement
agencies can better serve Indigenous communities,
promoting fairness, accountability, and mutual
respect. Addressing the concerns of Indigenous
peoples and fostering more positive, productive
interactions with law enforcement is essential for
building safer, more inclusive societies.
METHODOLOGY
This study employs a mixed-methods approach to
explore Indigenous peoples' engagement with law
enforcement, specifically focusing on their contact
with police and the levels of confidence and trust
they have in law enforcement agencies. A
combination of qualitative and quantitative
methods
allows
for
a
comprehensive
understanding of the factors influencing
Indigenous peoples' interactions with police,
including their personal experiences, perceptions
of bias or discrimination, and attitudes toward
police services.
Study Population and Sampling: The target
population for this study consists of Indigenous
peoples residing in urban and rural areas, with a
focus on communities that have experienced
varying levels of engagement with law
enforcement. To ensure diverse representation, a
purposive sampling method was used, selecting
participants from different age groups, genders,
and socioeconomic backgrounds. The study
includes individuals from multiple Indigenous
groups to reflect the diversity of experiences
within these communities. Additionally, the study
seeks to capture both those who have had direct
contact with law enforcement and those who may
not have, to compare and contrast their
perceptions of police services.
Data Collection: The data collection process
involved two primary methods: structured surveys
and semi-structured interviews.
Surveys: A standardized questionnaire was
developed to assess participants' contact with law
enforcement, levels of trust, and perceptions of
police conduct. The survey included both closed-
ended questions (e.g., Likert scale items assessing
confidence in police, frequency of police
encounters, and perceived fairness of law
enforcement practices) and open-ended questions
to capture additional insights into their
experiences. The surveys were distributed both in-
person and online, depending on the accessibility
and preferences of the participants.
Interviews: In-depth, semi-structured interviews
were conducted with a subset of participants to
further explore personal experiences with law
enforcement. The interviews provided an
opportunity for respondents to share their
narratives in a more detailed and open-ended
manner, allowing for a deeper understanding of the
nuances behind their interactions with police.
Topics covered in the interviews included personal
stories of encounters with law enforcement,
perceived racial or cultural bias, and suggestions
for improving police-Indigenous relations.
Data Analysis: Data analysis was carried out in two
phases: quantitative and qualitative.
Quantitative Analysis: Survey data were analyzed
using descriptive statistics, including frequencies,
percentages, and mean scores. This provided an
overall picture of the level of contact Indigenous
peoples have with law enforcement and the general
confidence they have in police services.
Comparative analysis was conducted to assess how
confidence levels varied by factors such as age,
gender,
geographical
location,
and
past
experiences with law enforcement.
Qualitative Analysis: Interview transcripts were
analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key
themes and patterns in the participants' responses.
Thematic coding allowed for the identification of
recurring issues related to police contact, trust, and
perceptions of bias or discrimination. This
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE11
9
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
qualitative approach provided rich, contextual
insights into the reasons behind the survey results
and highlighted the personal and collective
experiences that shape Indigenous peoples' views
on law enforcement.
Ethical Considerations: Ethical approval was
obtained from the relevant institutional review
board prior to the commencement of the study.
Informed consent was obtained from all
participants, ensuring that they were aware of their
right to participate voluntarily, withdraw at any
time, and remain anonymous. To ensure
confidentiality, all personal information was kept
secure, and identifying details were excluded from
the final analysis. Special care was taken to create a
culturally safe and respectful environment for
participants, especially when discussing sensitive
topics related to their experiences with law
enforcement.
Limitations: While the study aims to gather a broad
range of perspectives, limitations include potential
biases in the sample selection, as not all Indigenous
individuals may have been reached. Additionally,
the study’s reliance on self
-reported data may be
influenced by social desirability bias, particularly
in relation to sensitive topics such as trust in law
enforcement. Efforts were made to minimize these
biases through anonymous surveys and by
ensuring participants felt comfortable and safe in
sharing their experiences during interviews.
This methodology combines both structured and
open-ended data collection techniques, providing a
comprehensive understanding of the intersection
between Indigenous peoples and law enforcement.
The mixed-methods approach allows for an in-
depth exploration of not only the frequency and
nature of police contact but also the underlying
factors that shape Indigenous peoples' confidence
in law enforcement and their experiences with
policing practices.
RESULTS
The study involved 250 Indigenous participants
from urban and rural areas, providing valuable
insights into their engagement with law
enforcement, their levels of confidence in police,
and the factors influencing these dynamics. The
results showed clear patterns regarding police
contact, trust, and perceptions of bias or
discrimination:
Contact with Law Enforcement:
Frequency of Contact: Approximately 45% of
respondents reported having regular or occasional
contact with law enforcement, often due to routine
checks, legal matters, or involvement in
community-related incidents. The remaining 55%
reported limited or no direct contact with police,
particularly among those living in more isolated
rural areas.
Reasons for Contact: Those who had frequent
interactions with law enforcement cited issues
such as public order violations, traffic-related
matters, or disputes with neighbors. A small but
significant percentage of respondents (12%) also
described encounters linked to their Indigenous
identity, leading to feelings of being targeted or
stereotyped.
Confidence in Law Enforcement:
Trust Levels: Confidence in law enforcement varied
significantly among participants. Only 35% of
respondents expressed confidence in police to
handle issues fairly and without bias. Among this
group, those who had positive experiences with
officers, particularly those who received culturally
sensitive interactions, reported higher levels of
trust.
Distrust and Perceived Bias: Around 50% of
participants reported a general lack of confidence
in law enforcement, attributing this distrust to
historical experiences of discrimination and
criminalization, as well as ongoing perceptions of
racial profiling. Many respondents noted the
perception that Indigenous peoples were treated
unfairly by police, with some recounting instances
where they felt mistreated or misunderstood due
to their cultural background.
Perceptions of Police Conduct:
Cultural Insensitivity: Approximately 60% of
respondents felt that police officers lacked cultural
awareness or sensitivity when engaging with
Indigenous individuals or communities. A
significant number of participants (40%)
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE11
10
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
expressed the view that police officers were not
trained to understand the unique challenges faced
by Indigenous peoples, particularly in relation to
language barriers, cultural practices, and historical
trauma.
Suggestions for Improvement: Many respondents
suggested the need for greater police training on
Indigenous cultures, as well as more community-
based policing initiatives that involve Indigenous
leaders in decision-making processes. About 70%
of participants supported the idea of incorporating
more Indigenous voices into police policies and
practices,
particularly
when
addressing
community safety and law enforcement strategies.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study reveal significant gaps in
the relationship between Indigenous peoples and
law enforcement, particularly concerning the level
of trust and perceptions of fairness. The low levels
of confidence in police and widespread perceptions
of bias are consistent with broader trends
observed in other regions with high Indigenous
populations. The study highlights that Indigenous
peoples often view law enforcement not as
protectors of public safety but as institutions that
perpetuate historical injustices and ongoing
systemic discrimination.
The results indicate that cultural insensitivity is a
major factor contributing to strained police-
Indigenous relations. Many Indigenous individuals
feel that their cultural identity is not respected or
understood by law enforcement officers, which
exacerbates feelings of distrust. This aligns with
research showing that cultural competence in
policing can significantly improve relationships
with marginalized communities. The lack of proper
cultural training among police officers is a critical
issue that needs to be addressed if police are to
build better relationships with Indigenous peoples.
The study also revealed that while some
Indigenous individuals have positive interactions
with law enforcement, these instances are the
exception rather than the rule. This suggests that
improving police-community relations requires a
systemic change that goes beyond individual
officer behavior. The introduction of community-
based policing models, where police work more
closely with Indigenous communities and leaders,
could be a productive avenue for improving
relations. This approach could foster trust and
ensure that police practices are more aligned with
the needs and perspectives of Indigenous peoples.
Furthermore, the study's findings suggest that the
experiences of Indigenous peoples with law
enforcement are deeply influenced by broader
historical and societal contexts, including the
legacies of colonization, forced assimilation, and
marginalization. These historical factors continue
to shape how Indigenous peoples view law
enforcement institutions, making it essential to
address not just current practices but also the
underlying historical dynamics that contribute to
distrust.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the study underscores the deep-
seated mistrust between Indigenous peoples and
law enforcement, driven by historical injustices,
perceptions of bias, and ongoing cultural
insensitivity within police forces. While there are
instances of positive interactions, the overall
relationship remains strained, with many
Indigenous
individuals
feeling
that
law
enforcement does not adequately serve or protect
their communities. To improve these relationships,
it is crucial for law enforcement agencies to
implement culturally sensitive training, engage in
community-based policing, and prioritize the
involvement of Indigenous voices in shaping
policing policies and practices.
Addressing
the
concerns
of
Indigenous
communities requires a multi-faceted approach
that not only seeks to improve the conduct of
individual officers but also works to reform
institutional practices and policies that perpetuate
inequality. Long-term change will depend on
building trust through open dialogue, meaningful
engagement,
and
systemic
reforms
that
acknowledge and address the historical and
cultural complexities at play.
Ultimately, fostering a relationship based on
mutual respect, understanding, and collaboration
between Indigenous peoples and law enforcement
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE11
11
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
is key to ensuring safer and more inclusive
communities for all.
REFERENCES
1.
Alberton, Amy M., and Kevin M. Gorey. 2018.
Contact is a stronger predictor of attitudes
toward police than race: A state-of-the-art
review. Policing: An International Journal of
Police Strategies and Management 41(1): 2
–
23.
2.
Benoit, Cecilia, Michaela Smith, Mikael Jansson,
Samantha Magnus, Nadia Ouellet, Chris
Atchison, Lauren Casey, Rachel Phillips, Bill
Reimer, Dan Reist, and Frances M. Shaver.
2016. Lack of confidence in police creates a
“blue ceiling” for sex workers’ safety. Canadian
Public Policy 42(4): 456
–
68.
3.
Bowleg, Lisa. 2012. The problem with the
phrase
women
and
minorities:
Intersectionality
–
An important theoretical
framework for public health. American Journal
of Public Health 102(7): 1267
–
73.
4.
Bradford, Ben, Jonathan Jackson, and Elizabeth
A. Stanko. 2009. Contact and confidence:
Revisiting the impact of public encounters with
the police. Policing and Society 19(1): 20
–
46.
5.
Brown, Ben, and Wm, Reed Benedict. 2002.
Perceptions of the police: Past findings,
methodological issues, conceptual issues and
policy implications. Policing: An International
Journal of Police Strategies and Management
25(3): 543
–
80.
6.
Brown, Lorne, and Caroline Brown. 1973. An
Unauthorized History of the RCMP. Toronto,
ON: James Lorimer.
7.
Cao, Liqun. 2011. Visible minorities and
confidence in the police. Canadian Journal of
Criminology and Criminal Justice 53(1): 1
–
26.
8.
Cao, Liqun. 2014. Aboriginal people and
confidence in the police. Canadian Journal of
Criminology and Criminal Justice 56(5): 499
–
526.
9.
Cheng, Hongming. 2015. Factors influencing
public satisfaction with the local police: A study
in
Saskatoon,
Canada.
Policing:
An
International Journal of Police Strategies and
Management 38(4): 690
–
704.
10.
Cheurprakobkit, Sutham. 2000. Police-citizen
contact and police performance: Attitudinal
differences between Hispanics and non-
Hispanics. Journal of Criminal Justice 28(4):
325
–
36.
11.
Comack, Elizabeth. 2012. Racialized Policing:
Aboriginal People’s Encounters with the Police.
Blackpoint, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing
