DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AMONG TEACHERS OF CATHOLIC SCHOOLS IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF BAMENDA, NORTH WEST REGION OF CAMEROON
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between distributive justice and the psychological well-being of teachers in the Archdiocese of Bamenda North West Region of Cameroon. The main research question for the study was to find out the effect of distributive justice on the psychological well-being of teachers in the Archdiocese of Bamenda, North West Region of Cameroon. The study employed a cross sectional survey research design. The sample for the study comprised of 270 male and female teachers working in Catholic nursery, primary and secondary schools within the Mankon and Bambui Deaneries of the Archdiocese of Bamenda. Data was analysed using descrpive and inferential statistics. Quantitative data were analyzed using the linear regression technique. Findings revealed that 65% of teachers’ responses indicated dissatisfaction with distributive justice in the Catholic Education Agency of the Archdiocese of Bamenda and also that there was no relationship between distributive justice and the psychological well-being of teachers and thus no significant effect of distributive justice on the psychological well-being of teachers of the Archdiocese of Bamenda. Based on the findings, the study recommended that the government should effectively follow-up, monitor and audit the channels of paying subvention funds to beneficiary private sector teachers to ensure that the money reaches the intended beneficiaries uncompromised. The study further recommended that private sector education employers should uphold honesty, accountability and transparency in the management of subventions and payment of salaries to teachers and that they allow private sector education teachers to exercise their right to form trade union to defend their labour interests.
Similar Articles
-
UTTERANCE STRUCTURE OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN FROM THE AGE OF 3 TO 6 YEARS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN VIETNAM
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 05 (2023) / Nguyen Thi Giang, -
Stereotypical Questions In The Organization Of The Process Of Teaching Children By Japanese Mothers
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 05 (2021) / Nadira Tashmurzaevna Khalmurzaeva, -
CURRENT STATUS OF STUDYING THE PROBLEM OF COMMUNICATION IN CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 11 (2022) / Nilufar Z. Abidova, Nazhiba S. Shukuralieva, -
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN WITH COMPLEX DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 11 (2022) / Dilnoza Gapurova, -
PECULIARITIES OF SPEECH OF CHILDREN WITH DYSARTHRIA
-
THE MORAL EDUCATION OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH FROM A PEDAGOGICAL RETROSPECTIVE: REFLECTIONS ON MORAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTION
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 06 (2023) / Zoriana Perepeliuk, -
DEVELOPMENT OF SOUND PRONUNCIATION OF SPEECH IN CHILDREN WITH EXPRESSIVE ALIA
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 11 (2022) / Abidova N.Z., Kaxarova M.M., -
CHILDREN WITH COMPLEX DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES (CHILDREN WITH SENSORY AND MENTAL DISABILITIES)
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 11 (2022) / Dilnoza Gapurova, -
The Execution Of Entire Day School The Executives In Primary School, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
-
Effect Of Examination Malpractice Assesment Of Students In Tertiary Institutions
The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations: No. 06 (2021) / Umar Mohammed Ali ,
References
Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of Inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology, 67(5), 422– 436.
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230582675_4
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Turnley, W. H., & Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1080-1109.
Charness, G., & Levine, D. I. (2010). When Is Employee Retaliation Acceptable at Work? Evidence from Quasi‐Experiments. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 49(4), 499-523.
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018). The new era workplace relationships: Is social
exchange theory still relevant? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 456-481.
Chou, T. Y., Chou, T. C., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2013). The organizational citizenship behavior of IS personnel: Does organizational justice matter?. Information & Management, 50(2-3), 105-111.
Cohen-Charash, Y. & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-
analysis. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.
Cohn, S. E, White, S., O., & Sanders, J., (Oct., 2000) Distributive and Procedural Justice in
Seven Nations. Law and Human Behaviour, 24 (5), 553-579
Colquitt, J.A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. (2005). What is organizational justice: An
historical analysis. In Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J.A. (2004). Handbook of organizational justice 3-57. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
Cropanzano, R., Ambrose, M. L., Greenberg, J., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. Advances in organizational justice, 119(151), 351-360.
Fischer, R. (2012). Rewarding Employee Loyalty : an Organizational Justice Approach.
International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 8(3), 486–503.
Folger, J. P. (1984). Supportive work–family environments: implications for work–family conflict and well-being. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(5), 653-672.
Gim. C. W. & Mat. D. N. (2014) The impact of Distributive justice, procedural justice, and Affective commitment on turnover intention among public and private sector employees in Malaysia. International journal of social science and humanity, Vol, 4(6)
Goergen, C., Pauli, J., Cerutti, P., & Perin, M. (2018). The organizations. Justice, trust and retaliatory attitude: a study in a company the metal-mechanic sector. Cuadernos de Administración (Universidad del Valle), 34(62), 33-49.
Greenberg, J. (2001). The quest for justice on the job. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Granrose, C. S. (1992). Role stressors, social support, and well‐being among two‐career couples. Journal of Organizational behavior, 13(4), 339-356.
Olatunde, E. B., & Odusanya, O. (2015). Job satisfaction and psychologicl wellbeing among mental health Nurse. International Journal of nursing Didactics, Vol5(8), PP 107-112.
Saidu, S. O. (2021). Leadership Strategies Used to Reduce Turnover in Turnaround Settings (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Usmani, S., & Jamal, S. (2013). Impact of distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, temporal justice, spatial justice on job satisfaction of banking employees. Review of integrative business and economics research, 2(1), 351-383.
Valizade, D., Ogbonnaya, C., Tregaskis, O., & Forde, C. (2016). A mutual gains perspective on workplace partnership: Employee outcomes and the mediating role of the employment relations climate. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3), 351-368.
World Health Organisation. (2012). Measurement of and target-setting for well-being: an initiative by the WHO Regional Office for Europe: second meeting of the expert group, Paris, France, 25–26 June 2012.
World Health Organization. (2014). Joint meeting of experts on targets and indicators for health and well-being in Health 2020: Copenhagen, Denmark, 5-7 February 2013.
