Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
https://scientific-jl.com
45-son_3-to’plam_May -2025
6
ISSN:3030-3621
LINGUACUlTURAL COMMUNICATION
Ahmedova M.
Scientific supervisor, Andijan state
institute of foreign languages
Abdusalomova Oysanam
Student, Department of Theory and
Practice of the Russian Language,
Andijan state institute of foreign languages
Е-mail:
oysanamrakhmonova52@gmail.com
Abstract:
Language, culture, interdependence of ethnic groups, linguistic view
of the world and anthropocentric paradigm, the role and characteristics of national-
cultural linguistic units in discursive communication are interdisciplinary problems and
are studied as ethnological, sociological, psychological and cultural processes. The
study of the linguistic and cultural aspects of communication is important for
highlighting the unique potential of the language as an expression of national
consciousness and national contemplation, the national mentality of the Uzbek people,
the national way of life, the level of national and cultural values. This article discusses
these issues, in particular, the analysis of the meaning of linguistic units in the process
of communication, the correct interpretation of their semantic and pragmatic meaning.
Keywords
– linguistic view of the world, empirical knowledge, communicant,
cultural meaning, national-cultural values, national stereotype, ethnic imagination,
image, metaphor, analogy, connotation, symbolic concept.
The communicator perceives the linguistic landscape of the world around him
on the basis of general notions, expressions, empirical knowledge of the socio-cultural
group to which he belongs, and as a communicator begins speech activity on the basis
of basic notions interrelated with the cultural meaning of information. In this context,
linguoculturological principles aim to study language as a product of cultural
consciousness, an important component of it and a condition of existence, as a factor
in theexpression of concepts formed in cultural consciousness
. As far as man grows up in a native language environment that preserves the
system of national and cultural values, he enters the world of national culture as a
person. The accumulative function of language, which is an invaluable gift of the
Creator in terms of its relation to values, becomes even clearer. In human conciousness,
the linguistic view of the world is formed through such peculiarities as national
stereotypes, ethnic perceptions, figurative metaphors, analogies, connotative words,
symbolic concepts
Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
https://scientific-jl.com
45-son_3-to’plam_May -2025
7
ISSN:3030-3621
Initially, Humboldt's views on the need to focus on the culture of the nation in
the study of the relationship between language and thought led to the emergence a new
direction. Based on the hypotheses put forward by scientists such as A.A. Potebnya, E.
Sepir, Wharf, according to Maslova, in the formation of this industry the opinions of
linguists such as A.A.Potebnya, L.Weisgerber, H.Glints, H.Holts, U.D.Witney,
D.U.Powell, F.Boas, E.Sepir, B.L.Worf, G. Brutyan, A. Vezhbitskaya, D. Haymes
were the basis, whereas the theoretical bases of lingvoculturology were formed in the
researches of V.N.Telia, V.A.Maslova, V.Vorobyov, V.M.Shaklein, V.I.Karasik,
Yu.M.Lotman, S.V.Ivanova.
The relationship of language and culture in Uzbek linguistics [9; 10; 18; 19; 17;
21; 2; 5; 12; 16.] is also widely studied. The book "Language and Culture" co-authored
by M. Mirtojiev and N. Mahmudov can be called the first step in this direction. It
highlights the fact that more than a hundred years of colonialism were the cousins of
the development of the Uzbek language, the restoration of the national language as a
result of the sharp struggles of the advanced intelligentsia only on the eve of
independence, the process of turning the sources of enrichment of our dictionary into
national origins in the context of the emergence of national culture in the language for
the first time
“Language serves as a means of collecting and storing cultural information. In
some language units, this information may have been hidden for modern language
carriers due to changes over the centuries, but can only be obtained indirectly. But it
exists at the subconscious level and “works”
As the children get older, we adults start to get anxious: we collect what we have
and start preparing for the wedding. It is no secret that when it comes to marrying a
boy or getting a girl, it is understood, first of all, the wedding expenses, to collect the
wedding clothes of the bride and groom. If we refrain from spending on food and other
necessities in the household, we will try to make up for the lack of food that will be
served in front of the crowds.
"Dear, when will we decide the wedding day?" Said the wife.
"I have to talk to the bridesmaids before the wedding," I told my wife.
"What will you talk to them about, we'll do as people do."
"Well, to be a little more concise, where, for example, is it written that so much
should be given?"
"Oh, you're still stingy, and if you reduce what you're giving, won't the
bridesmaids say that we are mean. Let's drop it. Noone considers that this matches
your working status. On top of that, we ate at the wedding of the people, and we should
do the same!
... Finally, we reach the day we have been waiting for: one day we will scatter
what we have gathered. Then we take it easy
Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
https://scientific-jl.com
45-son_3-to’plam_May -2025
8
ISSN:3030-3621
... That's it, we did our duty ... (from the Internet)
In order to be able to analyze the meaning of language units in the process of
communication, to understand and correctly interpret their semantic-pragmatic
meaning, this subconscious knowledge is required from the language carrier. The
reality in this text is a familiar view for Uzbek speakers - the lines related to a modern
lifestyle. But doesn’t the antinomy “misqollab-botmonlab” (very hard to achieve – very
easy to waste) in the text provoke an objection in the language carrier, creating a
communicativebarrier? Although these words were used by our ancestors as
expressions of a unit of measurement and are no longer in use today, through the logical
chain of the text we understand the meaning of "kam-ko'p" (more or less) via the
subconscious senses. That is, the material wealth accumulated over the years is
"wasted" in a short time. This is a linguistic expression of an indisputable habit of the
modern Uzbek mentality.
References:
1.
Арутюнова Н.Д. Язык и мир человека, 2-е изд. испр. – М.: Языки русской
культуры, 1999. – I-XV. – 896 c.
2.
Бахронова
Д.К.
Антропозооморфизмларнинг
семантик
ва
лингвокультурологик хусусиятлари (ўзбек ва испан тиллари материалида).
Филол. фан бўйича фалс. д-ри... дисс... автореф. – Т., 2017. – 49 б.
3.
Воробьев В.В. Лингвокультурология. М.,Изд-во РУДН, 2008. – 340 с.
4.
Иванова С.В. Лингвокультурологический аспект исследования языковых
единиц. Дисс. ... д-ра филол. наук. – Уфа, 2003. – 364 с.
5.
Кадирова Б.Р. Белги билдирувчи лексемаларнинг лингвокультурологик
хусусиятлари Филол. фан бўйича фалс. д-ри... дисс... автореф. – Т., 2019. – 55
б.
6.
Карасик В.И. Лингвокультурные концепты: подходы к изучению //
Социолингвистика вчера и сегодня. / Сб. научных трудов. – М., 2004. – С. 136-
146.
7.
Лутфуллаева Д.Э., Худойберганова Д.С. Антропоцентрик тилшунослик
йўналишлари модули бўйича ўқув–услубий мажмуа. – Т., 2016
8.
Маслова В.А. Лингвокультурология. – Москва: Академия, 2001. – 183 с.
9.
Маҳмудов Н. Тилнинг мукаммал тадқиқи йўлларини излаб... // Ўзбек тили ва
адабиёти. – Тошкент, 2012. – № 5. – Б. 3-16.
10.
Маҳмудов Н. Ўхшатишлар – образли тафаккур маҳсули // Ўзбек тили ва
адабиёти. – Тошкент, 2011. – №3. – Б. 19-24.
