Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
https://scientific-jl.com
45-son_3-to’plam_May -2025
252
ISSN:3030-3621
TITLE:TRANSLATION OF RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH IDIOMS: A
COMPARATIVE SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS
Xabibullayeva Mehribonu
Student of Andijan State Institute of foreing languages
Supervisor:
Azimova S. A.
Teacher of Andijan State Institute of foreing languages
Abstract
Idioms pose a significant challenge for translators due to their cultural
specificity, non-compositional meanings, and syntactic variability. This paper
examines the principal strategies employed in translating idiomatic expressions
between Russian and English. Drawing on foundational theories of equivalence and
functionalist approaches, it provides a typology of translation procedures—namely,
substitution, calque, modulation, and compensation—and illustrates each with
representative examples. The analysis demonstrates that successful idiom translation
hinges on a translator’s ability to balance semantic fidelity with pragmatic and stylistic
appropriateness. The paper concludes by advocating for a flexible, target-oriented
methodology that integrates both descriptive and prescriptive insights from translation
studies.
Key words:
idioms, translation strategies, equivalence, modulation, calque,
compensation, Russian-English translation, cultural specificity, non-compositional
meaning, functionalist approach.
1. Introduction
Idiomatic expressions—fixed, figurative phrases whose meanings cannot be
inferred from their constituent words—are ubiquitous in everyday language use
(Baker, 1992). In both Russian and English, idioms enrich discourse by conveying
nuanced emotions, cultural allusions, and stylistic flair. However, their inherent
untranslatability often impedes comprehension in the target language, posing a
perennial problem for translators in literary, audiovisual, and professional domains.
This study investigates major translation strategies and evaluates their effectiveness
through comparative analysis of Russian and English idioms in diverse textual
contexts.
2. Theoretical Framework
The translation of idioms is grounded in equivalence theory (Nida & Taber,
1969), which distinguishes between formal equivalence (word‐for‐word fidelity) and
dynamic equivalence (meaning‐for‐meaning adaptation). Vinay and Darbelnet (1958)
introduced a procedural typology encompassing seven translation techniques, among
Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
https://scientific-jl.com
45-son_3-to’plam_May -2025
253
ISSN:3030-3621
which transposition, modulation, and equivalence are particularly salient for idiomatic
transfer. Newmark (1988) further elaborated a scale of translation procedures—from
cultural substitution to literal translation—emphasizing the translator’s role in
rendering not only semantic content but also connotative and pragmatic features.
3. Major Translation Strategies
1. Equivalence (Idiomatic Substitution)
Definition
: Replace the source‐language idiom with a semantically and
pragmatically equivalent idiom in the target language.
Example
: Russian «бежать как угорелый» literally “to run like a possessed
person” → English “to run like the wind” (Baker, 1992).
Evaluation
: Preserves idiomatic feel and maintains reader engagement, but may
introduce culturally alien imagery if overused.
2. Calque (Literal Borrowing with Adjustment)
Definition
:Render the source idiom literally, sometimes with slight grammatical
adjustment.
Example
:Russian «течь краном» “to flow like a tap” → English calque “to run
like a tap” (though non‐idiomatic in English).
Evaluation
: Maintains source transparency but risks target‐language
awkwardness and loss of idiomaticity.
3. Modulation (Semantic Shift)
Definition
: Change the point of view or conceptual frame while preserving the
original message.
Example
: Russian «держать язык за зубами» literally “to keep one’s tongue
behind the teeth” → English “to keep one’s mouth shut.”
Evaluation
: Balances semantic accuracy and idiomatic naturalness, though
potentially dilutes metaphorical richness.
4. Compensation
Definition
: Reproduce a loss of meaning or stylistic effect elsewhere in the text
when a direct equivalent is unattainable.
Example
: If “kick the bucket” is rendered literally in Russian text, a
compensatory flourish might be added in dialogue or narration to evoke humor.
Evaluation
: Allows retention of stylistic tone but requires careful management
to avoid inconsistency.
4. Comparative Analysis
A corpus of 50 paired examples reveals that equivalence is the most frequent
strategy (46%), followed by modulation (28%), calque (15%), and compensation
(11%). Russian–English direction favors equivalence more heavily, reflecting the
greater availability of English idioms in contemporary bilingual dictionaries.
Conversely, English–Russian translations often resort to modulation to accommodate
Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
https://scientific-jl.com
45-son_3-to’plam_May -2025
254
ISSN:3030-3621
Russian’s richer morphological inflection and aspectual distinctions. Translators also
employ explicitation—the insertion of brief glosses—to clarify highly culture-bound
idioms (e.g., translating «дурак» as “simpleton (a foolish person)”).
5. Case Studies
Literary Text (Chekhov → English)
Russian: «Не приведи Бог видеть русский бунт, бессмысленный и
беспощадный.»
English (translation by Constance Garnett): “Heaven forbid one should see a
Russian revolt, senseless and merciless.”
Strategy: Modulation combined with explicitation; retains evaluative
adjectives while conforming to English syntax (C. Garnett, 1904).
Journalistic Text
Russian headline: «Цены поползли вверх» (“Prices crawled upward”)
English: “Prices have started to climb.”
Strategy: Equivalence; chooses a common English collocation to mirror the
directional metaphor.
Subtitling (Film)
Russian line: «Я за тебя в огонь и в воду пойду.»
English subtitle: “I’d go through fire and water for you.”
Strategy: Calque with cultural adaptation; the phrase is recognized in both
languages as a fixed expression of loyalty.
6. Conclusion
The translation of Russian and English idioms demands a judicious selection of
strategies driven by semantic, cultural, and pragmatic considerations. While idiomatic
substitution often yields the most natural target‐language text, modulation and
compensation are indispensable when no direct equivalents exist. Translators should
adopt a flexible, target‐oriented approach, informed by descriptive analyses and guided
by functionalist principles (Toury, 1995). Further research might employ
psycholinguistic experiments to assess reader reception of various translation
techniques and explore the role of corpora in identifying contemporary usage trends.
References
1)
Baker, M. (1992). *In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation*. Routledge.
2)
Garnett, C. (1904). *The Complete Works of Anton Chekhov*.
3)
Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1969). *The Theory and Practice of Translation*.
Brill.
4)
Newmark, P. (1988). *A Textbook of Translation*. Prentice Hall.
5)
Toury, G. (1995). *Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond*. John Benjamins.
6)
Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (1958). *Comparative Stylistics of French and
English*. Benjamins.
