Authors

  • Jonqobilov Jahongir Tirkashevich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.wsrj.100612

Keywords:

Keywords: Method of undetermined coefficients solving homogeneous and nonhomogeneous equations finite element method analytical solution boundary value methods.

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines the relationship between classical and modern methods for solving first and second-order differential equations and the differences in their solutions. Classical methods are based on analytical solutions, while modern methods utilize numerical techniques to solve complex equations. The connection between classical and modern methods is explained, and their role in mathematical modeling is analyzed. Modern methods, with the aid of computers, provide significant opportunities for modeling large and complex systems.


background image

World scientific research journal

https://scientific-jl.com/wsrj

Volume-40_Issue-1_June-2025

108

CONNECTION BETWEEN CLASSICAL AND MODERN METHODS

FOR SOLVING FIRST AND SECOND-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL

EQUATIONS AND THEIR SOLUTIONS

Jonqobilov Jahongir Tirkashevich

Assistant, Almalyk Branch of Tashkent State Technical University

Abstract:

This article examines the relationship between classical and modern

methods for solving first and second-order differential equations and the differences
in their solutions. Classical methods are based on analytical solutions, while modern
methods utilize numerical techniques to solve complex equations. The connection
between classical and modern methods is explained, and their role in mathematical
modeling is analyzed. Modern methods, with the aid of computers, provide
significant opportunities for modeling large and complex systems.

Keywords:

Method of undetermined coefficients, solving homogeneous and

nonhomogeneous equations, finite element method, analytical solution, boundary
value methods.

Introduction

Differential equations are used to model numerous physical, technological, and

engineering processes. They describe the changes in objects or systems. While first
and second-order differential equations have traditionally been solved using classical
methods through analytical solutions, with the development of modern technologies
and complex systems, modern numerical methods have become widely applied. This
article reviews classical and modern methods, analyzing their differences and
interconnections.

Methodological Analysis

1. First-Order Differential Equations

Classical Methods:

Classical methods are frequently used to describe various

physical, chemical, and technological processes. These methods are widely applied
for analytically solving first-order differential equations. Among them, the method of
separation of variables and the integrating factor method are the most commonly used.

ο‚·

Separation of Variables Method:

The separation of variables method is one

of the most fundamental and straightforward techniques for solving first-order
differential equations. This method relies on representing variables in a separable
form and is applied to equations of the following form:

π’…π’š

𝒅𝒙

= 𝒇(𝒙)π’ˆ(π’š)

1.


background image

World scientific research journal

https://scientific-jl.com/wsrj

Volume-40_Issue-1_June-2025

109

Here, f(x) depends only on x, and g(y) depends only on y. The essence of the

method is to separate the variables into two parts:

𝟏

π’ˆ(π’š)

π’…π’š = 𝒇(𝒙)𝒅𝒙

2.

Then, each part is integrated separately:

∫

𝟏

π’ˆ(π’š)

π’…π’š = ∫ 𝒇(𝒙)𝒅𝒙

3.

The solution is obtained by integrating the separated variables. This method is

applicable only to equations where variables can be separated but is highly effective
for many simple systems.

Practical Example:

Let’s solve the following simple equation:

π’…π’š

𝒅𝒙

= πŸπ’™π’š

Separate the variables

:

𝟏
π’š

π’…π’š = πŸπ’™π’…π’™

Integration

Result:

∫

𝟏
π’š

π’…π’š = ∫ πŸπ’™π’…π’™

𝒍𝒏 ∣ y ∣= 𝒙

𝟐

+ π‘ͺ

Express the solution in terms of y:

π’š = π‘ͺ𝒆

𝒙

𝟐

This is the general solution obtained using the separation of variables method.

Integrating Factor Method:

The integrating factor method is also used to solve

first-order differential equations but requires additional steps. The simple integrating
factor method is applied to linear equations of the form:

π’…π’š
𝒅𝒙

+ 𝑷(𝒙)π’š = 𝑸(𝒙)

where P(x) and Q(x) - are functions of x. To solve this equation using the

integrating factor method, the following steps are taken:

Multiply the equation by the integrating factor ΞΌ(x):

𝝁(𝒙) = 𝒆

∫ 𝑷(𝒙)𝒅𝒙

4.

Multiply each term of the equation by the integrating factor ΞΌ(x):

𝝁(𝒙)

π’…π’š

𝒅𝒙

+ 𝝁(𝒙)𝑷(𝒙)π’š = 𝝁(𝒙)𝑸(𝒙)

5.

The equation now takes the form:


background image

World scientific research journal

https://scientific-jl.com/wsrj

Volume-40_Issue-1_June-2025

110

𝒅

𝒅𝒙

[ΞΌ(x)y] = 𝝁(𝒙)𝑸(𝒙)

6.

Now integrate the entire equation:

𝝁(𝒙)π’š = ∫ 𝝁(𝒙)𝑸(𝒙)𝒅𝒙 + π‘ͺ

7.

Here, C is an arbitrary constant. Then, solve for y:

π’š =

𝟏

𝝁(𝒙)

(∫ 𝝁(𝒙)𝑸(𝒙)𝒅𝒙 + π‘ͺ

) 8.

The separation of variables and integrating factor methods are classical

approaches for solving first-order differential equations and are widely used in
modeling simple physical and mathematical processes. While the separation of
variables method directly integrates separated variables, the integrating factor method
is applied to more complex equations. Understanding these methods provides a
foundation for modern numerical methods and is useful for solving many engineering
problems.

2. Second-Order Differential Equations

Method of Undetermined Coefficients:

Second-order differential equations

are often used to solve physical problems, particularly in modeling vibrations, heat
conduction, and electromagnetic processes. One of the classical methods is the
method of undetermined coefficients, commonly used to solve second-order
equations. The equation is written in the following form:

𝒂

𝒅

𝟐

π’š

𝒅𝒙

𝟐

+ 𝒃

π’…π’š

𝒅𝒙

+ π’„π’š = 𝟎

9.

This equation is transformed into a characteristic equation:

𝒂𝒓

𝟐

+ 𝒃𝒓 + 𝒄 = 𝟎

10.

By solving the characteristic equation, the general solution is obtained. If the

discriminant is positive, it has two real roots, and the solution is written as:

π’š(𝒙) = π‘ͺ

𝟏

𝒆

𝒓

𝟏

𝒙

+ π‘ͺ

𝟐

𝒆

𝒓

𝟐

𝒙

11.

Here r

1

and r

2

are the roots of the characteristic equation,

π‘ͺ

𝟏

and

π‘ͺ

𝟐

– are

arbitrary constants.

Example: Consider the following equation:

𝒅

𝟐

π’š

𝒅𝒙

𝟐

βˆ’ πŸ“

π’…π’š
𝒅𝒙

+ πŸ”π’š = 𝟎

The characteristic equation is:

𝒓

𝟐

βˆ’ πŸ“π’“ + πŸ” = 𝟎

Thus, the general solution is:

π’š(𝒙) = π‘ͺ

𝟏

𝒆

πŸπ’™

+ π‘ͺ

𝟐

𝒆

πŸ‘π’™

Two Identical Real Roots: If the discriminant is zero, the characteristic equation

has two identical real roots. In this case, the general solution is written as:


background image

World scientific research journal

https://scientific-jl.com/wsrj

Volume-40_Issue-1_June-2025

111

π’š(𝒙) = (π‘ͺ

𝟏

+ π‘ͺ

𝟐

𝒙)𝒆

𝒓𝒙

12.

Two Complex Roots: If the discriminant is negative, the equation has two

complex roots of the form:

𝒓 = 𝜢 + π’Šπœ·

In this case, the general solution is expressed in terms of trigonometric functions:

π’š(𝒙) = 𝒆

𝒂𝒙

(π‘ͺ

𝟏

𝒄𝒐𝒔(πœ·π’™) + π‘ͺ

𝟐

π’”π’Šπ’(πœ·π’™))

13.

Solving Homogeneous and Nonhomogeneous Equations:

Homogeneous Equations:

These are equations where the right-hand side is

zero, with the general form:

𝒂

𝒅

𝟐

π’š

𝒅𝒙

𝟐

+ 𝒃

π’…π’š

𝒅𝒙

+ π’„π’š = 𝟎

14.

Homogeneous equations are solved using classical methods, such as the

method of undetermined coefficients described above.

Nonhomogeneous Equations:

These are equations with a non-zero right-hand

side, of the form:

𝒂

𝒅

𝟐

π’š

𝒅𝒙

𝟐

+ 𝒃

π’…π’š

𝒅𝒙

+ π’„π’š = 𝒇(𝒙)

15.

Here, f(x) is a given function on the right-hand side. The general solution for

nonhomogeneous equations consists of two parts:

ο‚·

The general solution to the homogeneous equation.

ο‚·

A particular solution (for the nonhomogeneous part).

ο‚·

To find the particular solution, various methods, such as the method of

variation of parameters or the method of undetermined coefficients, are used. For
example, if the right-hand side contains a sine or cosine function, the solution can be
found using a particular solution corresponding to that function.

ο‚·

Second-order differential equations are widely used in engineering, physics,

and other scientific processes. The method of undetermined coefficients is highly
effective for solving simple differential equations and is used to find general solutions
for various cases. Unlike homogeneous equations, nonhomogeneous equations
require particular solutions for the nonhomogeneous part. Understanding these
methods is of great importance in modern mathematical modeling and is applied to
solve many scientific and technical problems.

3. Modern Methods

Classical methods for solving second-order differential equations often provide

exact analytical solutions, but in the real world, many problems are too complex,
making it difficult or impossible to find analytical solutions. Therefore, modern
numerical methods are widely used to solve these equations. Below, two such


background image

World scientific research journal

https://scientific-jl.com/wsrj

Volume-40_Issue-1_June-2025

112

methodsβ€”finite element method and boundary value methodsβ€”are discussed in
detail.

a) Finite Element Method (FEM)

The Finite Element Method (FEM) is a modern mathematical approach used to

model complex geometries and loading conditions. It is widely applied in
engineering, physics, and other technical fields, particularly in structural analysis,
fluid mechanics, electromagnetic fields, and many other areas.

The finite element method involves dividing the domain into smaller, simpler

shapes (elements) and solving the equation for each element. The solutions for these
elements are combined to obtain the solution for the entire domain. This approach
includes the following steps:

ο‚·

Discretization:

The geometry is divided into small elements (e.g., triangles or

quadrilaterals).

ο‚·

Element Equations:

Equations are formulated for each element, considering

their boundary conditions.

ο‚·

Solution:

The equations for each element are solved, and the results are

combined to obtain the solution for the entire domain.

The finite element method is highly effective for second-order differential

equations, especially in complex systems where exact solutions are difficult to obtain.

Practical Applications:

ο‚·

Structural Analysis:

FEM is used to analyze the mechanical state of

structures, such as stress and deformation.

ο‚·

Fluid Mechanics:

FEM is widely applied in modeling fluid flow (based on

Navier-Stokes equations).

ο‚·

Electronics and Electromagnetism:

Electric fields and electromagnetic wave

propagation are analyzed using FEM. [11, pp. 39-41]

b) Boundary Value Methods (BVP)

Boundary Value Methods (BVP) are numerical methods based on boundary

conditions for solving differential equations and are commonly used in engineering
and science. In this method, the solution to the equation must be found over an entire
interval, where boundary conditions are specified. These conditions often represent
physical or technical processes. Boundary value methods are significant numerical
techniques for differential equations, as many engineering problems (e.g., heat
conduction, fluid flow, elasticity) are boundary value problems.

Examples:

ο‚·

Heat Conduction:

For instance, if a rod is held at a given temperature at one

end and heat flow is calculated at the other, FEM and BVP methods are used to solve
the heat conduction differential equation.

ο‚·

Electromagnetic Fields:

Modeling the propagation of electromagnetic waves

relies on numerical solutions based on boundary conditions.


background image

World scientific research journal

https://scientific-jl.com/wsrj

Volume-40_Issue-1_June-2025

113

Boundary value methods involve the following steps:

ο‚·

Discretization:

Similar to the finite element method, the domain or system is

divided into smaller parts.

ο‚·

Solving Differential Equations:

The equations for each part are solved using

numerical methods.

ο‚·

Applying Boundary Conditions:

Solutions for all parts are combined to

obtain the solution for the entire system.

Practical Applications:

ο‚·

Fluid Motion:

Modeling the flow of liquids and gases.

ο‚·

Heat Problems:

Addressing energy conservation and heat conduction issues.

ο‚·

Mechanical Structures:

Calculating stress and deformation in machine parts

under load.

Conclusion

Methods for solving first and second-order differential equations are of great

importance in modern technology and science. Classical methods, such as separation
of variables and integrating factor methods, are effective for analytically solving
simple differential equations, but with the advancement of modern technologies,
numerical methods have been increasingly applied to solve more complex processes.
Modern methods, such as the finite element method and boundary value methods, are
widely used in modeling complex geometric shapes, physical processes, and precise
technological systems. They enable accurate modeling and analysis of real-world
problems in fields such as heat conduction, fluid mechanics, and mechanical
structures. Thus, classical and modern methods complement each other, providing
extensive opportunities for working with differential equations. Applying these
methods to solve complex technological and scientific problems enhances efficiency
and ensures the proper functioning of systems. In the future, deeper application of
these methods will enable the creation of innovative approaches for working with
complex systems.

References:

1. Boyce, W. E., & DiPrima, R. C. (2012).

Elementary Differential Equations and

Boundary Value Problems

(10th ed.). Wiley.

2. Butcher, J. C. (2008).

Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations

(2nd

ed.). Wiley.

3. Chapra, S. C., & Canale, R. P. (2015).

Numerical Methods for Engineers

(7th ed.).

McGraw-Hill Education.

4. Lagaris, I. E., Likas, A., & Fotiadis, D. I. (1998). Artificial neural networks for

solving ordinary and partial differential equations.

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks

,

9(5), 987-1000.

5. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural

networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving
nonlinear partial differential equations.

Journal of Computational Physics

, 378, 686-707.

6. Runge, C., & Kutta, W. (1895). On the numerical solution of differential equations.

Mathematische Annalen

, 46, 167-178.

References

Boyce, W. E., & DiPrima, R. C. (2012). Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems (10th ed.). Wiley.

Butcher, J. C. (2008). Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Chapra, S. C., & Canale, R. P. (2015). Numerical Methods for Engineers (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Lagaris, I. E., Likas, A., & Fotiadis, D. I. (1998). Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 9(5), 987-1000.

Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686-707.

Runge, C., & Kutta, W. (1895). On the numerical solution of differential equations. Mathematische Annalen, 46, 167-178.