World scientific research journal
https://scientific-jl.com/wsrj
Volume-40_Issue-2_June-2025
384
LINGUACULTURAL FEATURES OF GODONYMS IN TASHKENT
Teacher of UzSWLU:
D.A.Turdaliyeva
Abstract:
This article explores the linguocultural characteristics of urban
toponyms in Tashkent, Uzbekistan's capital. The naming of streets, districts, squares,
and metro stations is analyzed through the lenses of semantics, etymology, and
culture. The study reveals how these place names reflect the city's historical memory,
national identity, ideological influences, and socio-cultural transformations. By
examining selected examples, the paper underscores the importance of toponyms as
more than just geographical markers but as carriers of linguistic and cultural
significance.
Keywords:
toponyms, Tashkent, linguoculture, semantics, national identity,
urban names
Introduction
Godoonyms are crucial elements in understanding the cultural and historical
landscape of any society. In urban settings, they are more than functional references;
they encapsulate the past, cultural values, and national ideologies. Tashkent, as a city
with deep historical roots and dynamic modern growth, offers a unique view into how
place names serve as linguistic signposts of change. This paper aims to investigate
urban toponyms of Tashkent from a linguocultural perspective, focusing on their
semantic richness and socio-cultural context.
Numerous scholars have studied toponyms as part of linguocultural research.
Kamilova (2015) emphasized that Uzbek toponyms reflect traditional beliefs,
historical figures, and cultural norms. Ibrahimova (2019) analyzed the naming
conventions in urban spaces, particularly in Tashkent, highlighting post-
independence shifts. Internationally, Azaryahu (1996) argued that street names act as
tools of political expression, while Helleland (2012) pointed to their role in identity
formation. These works form the basis for analyzing how Tashkent's toponyms reflect
its hybrid cultural and historical identity.
Methodology
This research utilizes qualitative methods including semantic and etymological
analysis, historical comparison, and cultural interpretation. Data was collected from
official Tashkent maps, government documents, archival materials, and observational
fieldwork. The study focused on naming patterns and transformations within
Tashkent’s districts and major roads, comparing historical and contemporary naming
trends.
The study found that Tashkent’s urban toponyms can be categorized into four
main groups: historical toponyms, symbolic-cultural toponyms, Soviet-era remnants,
and post-independence ideological names.
World scientific research journal
https://scientific-jl.com/wsrj
Volume-40_Issue-2_June-2025
385
Historical names include figures like Al-Beruniy and Amir Temur, which
reinforce national heritage. Cultural toponyms such as 'Navruz' and 'Friendship
Square' express social values and collective identity. Remnants from the Soviet
period—like 'Kommunar' or 'Sergeli-5'—illustrate past ideological influences, though
many have been renamed. Post-1991 toponyms like 'Mustaqillik' (Independence) and
'New Uzbekistan Avenue' symbolize national revival and state-building aspirations.
The analysis confirms that Tashkent’s toponyms act as markers of both
continuity and transformation. The shift from Soviet-era names to those reflecting
national pride and independence illustrates an effort to reconstruct historical memory
and assert cultural autonomy. Furthermore, these names serve didactic purposes,
introducing historical figures and ideals to the public consciousness. The dual role of
place names-practical and symbolic demonstrates their value in urban semiotics and
linguocultural identity.
Tashkent’s urban toponyms encapsulate complex narratives of the city's past and
present. They reflect political transitions, cultural continuity, and ideological shifts.
Understanding their linguocultural dimensions allows for a deeper appreciation of
how language and place intertwine to shape urban identity. Further research may
explore the psychological and social impacts of toponymic change on residents’ sense
of belonging and heritage.
References:
1.
Azaryahu, M. (1996). The power of commemorative street names.
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(3), 311–330.
2.
Helleland, B. (2012). Place names and identities. Oslo Studies in Language,
4(2), 95–116.
3.
Ibrahimova, M. (2019). Urban Toponyms and Cultural Representation. Journal
of Language and Culture, 3, 44–52.
4.
Kamilova, Z.K. (2015). Linguocultural Analysis of Uzbek Toponyms.
Tashkent: National Encyclopedia Press.
5.
Karimov, I.A. (2008). High Spirituality Is an Invincible Force. Tashkent:
Ma’naviyat.
6.
Uzbekistan Government Decree. (2020). On the Restoration of Historical Place
Names in Tashkent. Official Gazette of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
7.
Tashkent City Official Portal. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.tashkent.uz
