Authors

  • Raupov Abdurahmon Ortiq o’g’li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.wsrj.96416

Keywords:

Keywords: Comorbidity gastroesophageal reflux disease ischemic heart disease dual antiplatelet therapy anticoagulants aminosalicylates.

Abstract

Аnnotation.  This  review  summarizes  key  evidence  on  the  interrelations 
between  gastroesophageal  reflux  disease,  peptic  ulcer  disease,  liver  disorders, 
inflammatory  bowel  diseases,  and  ischemic  heart  disease.  It  highlights  both 
common  and  specific  risk  factors,  as  well  as  mechanisms  of  comorbidity, 
including those linked to standard treatments. Based on meta-analyses and large-
scale population studies, the review aims to support the improvement of current 
clinical guidelines for managing comorbid conditions. 


background image

https://biti.uz/konferensiya/konferensiya2025/index.html

21 апреля 2025 г.

110

GASTROINTESTINAL ACID-RELATED DISEASES AND ISCHEMIC

HEART DISEASE: PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL LINKS AND CLINICAL

IMPLICATIONS

Raupov Abdurahmon Ortiq o’g’li

Bukhara State Medical Institute.

Independent PhD researcher at the

Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases

rao.biti.22@gmail.com

orcid.org/0009-0005-6651-4500

Аnnotation.

This review summarizes key evidence on the interrelations

between gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, liver disorders,

inflammatory bowel diseases, and ischemic heart disease. It highlights both

common and specific risk factors, as well as mechanisms of comorbidity,

including those linked to standard treatments. Based on meta-analyses and large-

scale population studies, the review aims to support the improvement of current

clinical guidelines for managing comorbid conditions.

Keywords:

Comorbidity, gastroesophageal reflux disease, ischemic heart

disease, dual antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants, aminosalicylates.

Modern medicine is dynamic and constantly evolving. However, clinical

studies that form the basis of guidelines, algorithms, and protocols often consider

comorbidity as an exclusion criterion. In real-world clinical practice, comorbid

conditions are common and complicate both diagnosis and patient management,

particularly when one disease limits the use of essential treatments for another.

While the proposed use of multiple or cumulative risk models helps manage such

cases, it does not address many of the practical challenges faced by clinicians.[1]

Gastroesophageal

Reflux

Disease

and

Ischemic

Heart

Disease.

There is now little doubt about the association between gastroesophageal reflux

disease (GERD) and ischemic heart disease (IHD). These conditions share

common risk factors, including male sex, obesity, diabetes, hypertension,

smoking, and alcohol consumption. Myocardial ischemia has been described as a


background image

https://biti.uz/konferensiya/konferensiya2025/index.html

21 апреля 2025 г.

111

result of coronary artery spasm triggered by acidic reflux, reduced lower

esophageal sphincter pressure, and sympathetic activation. In patients with both

GERD and IHD, episodes of heartburn have been shown to coincide with

myocardial ischemia and cardiac arrhythmias. A rare phenomenon has also been

reported—mechanical compression of the left atrium by paraesophageal hernias,

which reduces cardiac blood supply and may lead to ischemia, angina, and

arrhythmias.[2]

A nationwide population-based cohort study demonstrated an association

between GERD and increased risk of IHD. The overall incidence of IHD was 82%

higher in the GERD cohort compared to those without GERD (11.8 vs. 6.5 per

1,000 person-years), with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.49 (95% CI: 1.34–

1.66). This association remained significant after adjusting for age, sex,

hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, alcohol-related diseases, stroke, COPD,

asthma, gallstones, anxiety, depression, chronic kidney disease, and cirrhosis.[3]

Conversely, cardiac pathology can influence GERD through various

mechanisms, including reduced regional esophageal blood flow and hypoxia due

to endothelial dysfunction, as well as upper GI dysmotility in IHD. Additionally,

standard IHD treatments—such as calcium channel blockers, nitrates, beta-

blockers, and antiplatelet agents—may negatively affect lower esophageal

sphincter tone.[4]

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy improves GERD symptoms and may

indirectly benefit IHD by reducing esophago-cardiac reflex activity. However,

prolonged PPI use has been associated with increased risks of atherosclerosis and

potential impairment of cardiac contractility.[5]

Conclusion:

Comorbid conditions, though often excluded from clinical

trials, are frequently encountered in real-world practice and complicate patient

management. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and ischemic heart disease

(IHD) share common risk factors and show a significant bidirectional relationship.

GERD may contribute to myocardial ischemia through reflex mechanisms and


background image

https://biti.uz/konferensiya/konferensiya2025/index.html

21 апреля 2025 г.

112

structural effects, while IHD and its treatments can exacerbate GERD symptoms.

Population-based studies confirm a significantly increased risk of IHD in GERD

patients. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may alleviate GERD symptoms and

indirectly benefit cardiac function, long-term use may pose cardiovascular risks,

highlighting the need for careful therapeutic strategies in comorbid patients.

REFERENCES

1.

Wunker C. The diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and its

complications: a review. Consultant. 2018; 58(1):10–16.

2.

Glassner K.L., Abraham B. P., Quigley E. M.M. The microbiome and infl

ammatory bowel disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jan;145(1):16–27. doi:

10.1016/j. jaci.2019.11.003.

3.

Goldstone R.N., Steinhagen R. M. Abdominal Emer gencies in

Inflammatory Bowel Disease. SurgClin North Am. 2019 Dec; 99(6):1141–1150. doi:

10.1016/j.suc.2019.08.007.

4.

Simonova Zh.G., Martusevich A. K., Tarlovskaia E. I. The course of

coronary heart disease concurrent with peptic ulcer disease: Clinical and pathogenetic

aspects. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. 2014;86(1):33–36. (In Russ.)

5.

Shiraev TP, Bullen A. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Events:

A Systematic Review. Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Apr;27(4):443–450. doi: 10.1016/j.

hlc.2017.10.020.

References

Wunker C. The diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and its

complications: a review. Consultant. 2018; 58(1):10–16.

Glassner K.L., Abraham B. P., Quigley E. M.M. The microbiome and infl

ammatory bowel disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jan;145(1):16–27. doi:

1016/j. jaci.2019.11.003.

Goldstone R.N., Steinhagen R. M. Abdominal Emer gencies in

Inflammatory Bowel Disease. SurgClin North Am. 2019 Dec; 99(6):1141–1150. doi:

1016/j.suc.2019.08.007.

Simonova Zh.G., Martusevich A. K., Tarlovskaia E. I. The course of

coronary heart disease concurrent with peptic ulcer disease: Clinical and pathogenetic

aspects. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. 2014;86(1):33–36. (In Russ.)

Shiraev TP, Bullen A. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Events:

A Systematic Review. Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Apr;27(4):443–450. doi: 10.1016/j.

hlc.2017.10.020.