Authors

  • Qo’ziyev Sohib Saloyiddin o’g’li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.wsrj.96417

Keywords:

Keywords: Acute pyelonephritis ultrasound examination calyceal and renal pelvic system excretory urography.

Abstract

Аnnotation. This article provides an overview of one of the most relevant 
topics  in  modern  urology  –  the  early  diagnosis  of  purulent  forms  of 
pyelonephritis.  It  presents  the  current  state  of  the  issue  and  highlights  the  key 
debatable  aspects  of  the  problem.  The  article  reviews  nearly  all  non-invasive 
imaging  methods  for  diagnosing  various  forms  of  purulent  pyelonephritis, 
demonstrating their capabilities, advantages, and limitations. 


background image

https://biti.uz/konferensiya/konferensiya2025/index.html

21 апреля 2025 г.

107

EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF PURULENT FORMS OF ACUTE

PYELONEPHRITIS

Qo’ziyev Sohib Saloyiddin o’g’li

Bukhara Innovative Education and Medical University.

Bukhara .Uzbekistan

assistant of the Department of clinical and pre-clinical sciences

Qo’ziyevsohib@gmail.com

Аnnotation.

This article provides an overview of one of the most relevant

topics in modern urology – the early diagnosis of purulent forms of

pyelonephritis. It presents the current state of the issue and highlights the key

debatable aspects of the problem. The article reviews nearly all non-invasive

imaging methods for diagnosing various forms of purulent pyelonephritis,

demonstrating their capabilities, advantages, and limitations.

Keywords:

Acute pyelonephritis, ultrasound examination, calyceal and renal

pelvic system, excretory urography.

Acute pyelonephritis (AP) is a bacterial inflammation of the renal

parenchyma and collecting system. According to N.A. Lopatkin, pyelonephritis is

a non-specific infectious-inflammatory disease of the kidneys, involving the renal

pelvis, calyces, and parenchyma, primarily affecting the interstitial tissue. In the

final stage of the disease, the process spreads to the blood vessels and

glomeruli.Pyelonephritis, which is based on pre-existing organic or functional

urinary dynamics disorders, is referred to as secondary. Primary pyelonephritis is

characterized by initial infection of the urinary tract. AP can be either diffuse or

focal. Purulent forms of AP include abscess, carbuncle, and apostematous

nephritis. Pararenal retroperitoneal abscess is a complication of pyelonephritis.

Local forms of bacterial inflammation often transform into abscesses, initially

small, which then merge to form carbuncles or large abscesses. Acute localized

pyelonephritis is a localized form of kidney infection, and in foreign literature,

this form is also referred to as acute lobar nephronia, analogous to acute lobar

pneumonia.[1]


background image

https://biti.uz/konferensiya/konferensiya2025/index.html

21 апреля 2025 г.

108

Some authors consider limited pyelonephritis to be an intermediate stage

between simple pyelonephritis and abscess. It is possible that acute bacterial

localized pyelonephritis (analogous to a furuncle) represents an early stage in the

formation of an abscess, where inflammation has not yet reached the stage of

alteration and purulence. In any case, it is often difficult to distinguish a focus of

non-specific inflammation from an abscess. However, there is a critical need to

differentiate localized serous AP from purulent forms of AP, as this determines the

choice of treatment strategy. Simple focal inflammation can be successfully

treated with antibiotics, whereas purulent pyelonephritis often requires surgical

intervention.[2]

In at least one-third of patients, acute pyelonephritis (AP) immediately

develops as a purulent process, such as apostematous pyelonephritis, carbuncle,

and abscess. Additionally, 64% of serous AP cases progress to purulent form. The

disease is accompanied by pronounced intoxication and often leads to septic

shock, with mortality rates ranging from 60% to 92%. The frequency of

nephrectomy due to the purulent process in the kidney is 25-50%, and

postoperative mortality reaches 18.9-28.7%.[3]

The diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis (AP) is based on a comprehensive

approach, including medical history, clinical presentation, laboratory tests,

endoscopic, and imaging methods. A review of extensive literature shows that

treatment outcomes for AP are significantly influenced by the early diagnosis of

its various forms and the extent of kidney parenchymal involvement. This is

particularly important for assessing the transition from serous to purulent

inflammation, which requires a different treatment approach.[4]

Conclusion.

Acute pyelonephritis (AP) is a bacterial infection affecting the

renal parenchyma and collecting system, primarily involving the interstitial tissue.

It can be primary, with initial urinary tract infection, or secondary, resulting from

pre-existing urinary dysfunction. AP can manifest in both diffuse and focal forms,

with purulent cases including abscesses, carbuncles, and apostematous nephritis.


background image

https://biti.uz/konferensiya/konferensiya2025/index.html

21 апреля 2025 г.

109

The disease can progress rapidly, with 64% of serous cases turning purulent,

leading to severe complications such as septic shock and high mortality rates.

Early diagnosis, including clinical and imaging methods, is crucial for

determining the extent of kidney involvement and guiding treatment decisions.

Differentiating between serous and purulent inflammation is key, as purulent

forms often require surgical intervention, while focal inflammation can typically

be treated with antibiotics.

REFERENCES

1. Карпенко В.С., Переверзев А.С. Лечение гнойного пиелонефрита //

Клин. хир. – 1976. – №9. – С.31–38.

2. Лопаткин Н.А. Урология. – М.: Медицина, 1992.

3. Власов П.В., Курбатов Д.Г. Лучевая диагностика острого

пиелонефрита // Радиол. - практика. – 2004. – №3. – С.62–68.

4. Быковский В.А. Ультразвуковая семиотика острого пиелонефрита //

Ультразвук. диагност. – 1998. – №6. – С.69–74

References

Карпенко В.С., Переверзев А.С. Лечение гнойного пиелонефрита //

Клин. хир. – 1976. – №9. – С.31–38.

Лопаткин Н.А. Урология. – М.: Медицина, 1992.

Власов П.В., Курбатов Д.Г. Лучевая диагностика острого

пиелонефрита // Радиол. - практика. – 2004. – №3. – С.62–68.

Быковский В.А. Ультразвуковая семиотика острого пиелонефрита //

Ультразвук. диагност. – 1998. – №6. – С.69–74

Most read articles by the same author(s)