READING AS AN INTERACTIVE PROCESS: IMPROVING STUDENTS' READING COMPREHENSION

Annotasiya

Reading comprehension is a dynamic and interactive process essential for academic success and critical thinking. Despite its importance, many students face significant challenges in developing effective comprehension skills. This article explores evidence-based practices to enhance students' reading comprehension by synthesizing key findings from seminal research. Strategies such as explicit instruction, scaffolding, fostering motivation, and integrating interactive elements are discussed. Emphasis is placed on the role of teacher guidance, differentiated instruction, and the use of authentic texts to create engaging learning environments. My perspective highlights the need for a multi-faceted approach tailored to diverse classroom contexts. The article concludes with recommendations for bridging research and practice, particularly for addressing disparities in educational resources and adapting to hybrid learning environments.

Manba turi: Konferentsiyalar
Yildan beri qamrab olingan yillar 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Chiqarish:
124-126
32

Кўчирилди

Кўчирилганлиги хақида маълумот йук.
Ulashish
Maxsitaliyev , U. . (2024). READING AS AN INTERACTIVE PROCESS: IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION. Молодые ученые, 2(34), 124–126. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/yosc/article/view/50752
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Annotasiya

Reading comprehension is a dynamic and interactive process essential for academic success and critical thinking. Despite its importance, many students face significant challenges in developing effective comprehension skills. This article explores evidence-based practices to enhance students' reading comprehension by synthesizing key findings from seminal research. Strategies such as explicit instruction, scaffolding, fostering motivation, and integrating interactive elements are discussed. Emphasis is placed on the role of teacher guidance, differentiated instruction, and the use of authentic texts to create engaging learning environments. My perspective highlights the need for a multi-faceted approach tailored to diverse classroom contexts. The article concludes with recommendations for bridging research and practice, particularly for addressing disparities in educational resources and adapting to hybrid learning environments.


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

124

READING AS AN INTERACTIVE PROCESS: IMPROVING STUDENTS' READING

COMPREHENSION

Maxsitaliyev Ulugʻbek Xursanali oʻgʻli

Faculty of English Language and Literature

Department of Foreign Language and Literature

Fergana State university

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14286471

Abstract:

Reading comprehension is a dynamic and interactive process essential for

academic success and critical thinking. Despite its importance, many students face significant
challenges in developing effective comprehension skills. This article explores evidence-based
practices to enhance students' reading comprehension by synthesizing key findings from
seminal research. Strategies such as explicit instruction, scaffolding, fostering motivation, and
integrating interactive elements are discussed. Emphasis is placed on the role of teacher
guidance, differentiated instruction, and the use of authentic texts to create engaging learning
environments. My perspective highlights the need for a multi-faceted approach tailored to
diverse classroom contexts. The article concludes with recommendations for bridging research
and practice, particularly for addressing disparities in educational resources and adapting to
hybrid learning environments.

Keywords:

Reading comprehension, interactive process, reading instruction, adolescent

literacy, evidence-based practices.

Introduction

Reading comprehension is a complex, interactive process that involves decoding,

understanding, and critically analyzing written texts. Effective reading comprehension
instruction is essential to equip students with the skills to process and interpret information.
However, many students struggle with reading comprehension due to limited vocabulary, poor
background knowledge, or insufficient instructional strategies. This article synthesizes key
findings from influential studies to explore effective practices for improving students' reading
comprehension.

Methods

This article draws upon research-based frameworks and interventions from five seminal

works:

1. Duke & Pearson (2002): Effective practices for developing reading comprehension.
2. Guthrie, Wigfield, & Perencevich (2004): Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI).
3. Kamil et al. (2008): Recommendations for adolescent literacy interventions.
4. National Reading Panel (2000): Evidence-based reading instruction.
5. Pressley (2000): Comprehension instruction strategies.
These works were analyzed to identify key instructional strategies and their application

in real-world classrooms. The discussion is augmented with my perspective on how to
implement these strategies effectively in diverse educational contexts.

Results
Key Findings
1. Interactive Nature of Reading


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

125

Reading comprehension involves multiple components, including decoding, vocabulary

development, and text structure knowledge (Duke & Pearson, 2002).

1

Effective instruction

focuses on integrating these components rather than isolating them.

2. Motivation and Engagement

Guthrie et al. (2004) emphasize that students' motivation significantly impacts their

reading comprehension.

2

The Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI) framework

combines content knowledge, strategy instruction, and motivation-enhancing practices to
engage students actively.

3. Explicit Strategy Instruction

According to the National Reading Panel (2000) and Kamil et al. (2008), teaching

strategies such as summarization, question generation, and visualization can improve
comprehension. Explicit modeling of these strategies helps students internalize and apply them
independently.

4. Adolescent Literacy Interventions

Kamil et al. (2008) highlight the need for targeted interventions for adolescent readers.

These include differentiated instruction, peer collaboration, and the use of multimedia
resources to make reading more accessible and engaging.

5. Teacher Guidance and Scaffolding

Pressley (2000) underscores the role of scaffolding in comprehension instruction.

Teachers must gradually release responsibility to students, enabling them to become
autonomous readers.

3

Addressing reading comprehension challenges requires a multi-faceted

approach. Teachers must create interactive and supportive learning environments where
students feel encouraged to explore texts critically. Integrating technology, such as e-books and
online discussions, can further enhance engagement. Furthermore, aligning reading materials
with students' interests and cultural backgrounds fosters deeper connections to the text.

Discussion

Improving students' reading comprehension demands a shift from traditional, passive

reading practices to active, interactive strategies. As demonstrated by the studies analyzed,
fostering engagement, teaching explicit strategies, and providing scaffolded support are critical.
Additionally, students should be given opportunities to apply their comprehension skills in
authentic contexts, such as debates, presentations, and collaborative projects.

While these strategies are effective, their implementation must consider classroom

diversity and resource availability. For example, low-income schools may face challenges in
providing access to diverse reading materials or technology. Addressing these disparities
requires systemic efforts, such as increased funding and teacher training.

Conclusion

1

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup

& S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). International

Reading Association.

2

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented

reading instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

3

Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B.

Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

126

Reading comprehension is a cornerstone of academic success and lifelong learning. By

adopting interactive, evidence-based practices, educators can help students overcome
comprehension challenges and become confident, critical readers. Future research should
explore how these strategies can be adapted for online and hybrid learning environments to
meet the evolving needs of 21st-century learners.

References:

1.

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading

comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading
instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). International Reading Association.
2.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Motivating reading comprehension:

Concept-oriented reading instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.

Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving

adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE
#2008-4027). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of
Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
4.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National

Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific
research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No.
00-4769). U.S. Government Printing Office.
5.

Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.

L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3,
pp. 545-561). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bibliografik manbalar

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). International Reading Association.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). U.S. Government Printing Office.

Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.