56
YANGI OʻZBEKISTON TALABALARI
AXBOROTNOMASI
www.in-academy.uz
Volume 3 Issue 04 YO’TA
SUBVERSION AND SATIRE OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM IN
ENGLISH LITERATURE
Qurbonova Umida
Chirchik State Pedagogical University
4-th course student
+998881113135
Akhmedova Muyassar
Scientific Advisor:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15342040
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Qabul qilindi: 25- Aprel 2025 yil
Ma’qullandi: 28- Aprel 2025 yil
Nashr qilindi: 30- Aprel 2025 yil
This article examines the subversion and satire of
anthropocentrism in English literature from the Middle
Ages to the contemporary period. By analyzing works
from Chaucer, Shakespeare, Swift, Wordsworth, Shelley,
Hardy, Eliot, Woolf, McEwan, Atwood, and Winterson, the
study reveals a persistent literary tradition that
challenges the notion of human centrality. Through
satire, irony, and narrative reorientation toward nature
and non-human perspectives, these texts expose the
limitations of human pride and reimagine humanity’s
relationship with the broader world. The paper argues
that literary critiques of anthropocentrism offer essential
insights for contemporary ecological and philosophical
thought.
KEY WORDS
anthropocentrism,
satire,
subversion,
English
literature,
nature,
posthumanism,
eco-
criticism;
Anthropocentrism—the philosophical stance that places humans at the center of
existence—has been deeply woven into Western literature and thought. Yet English literature,
from its earliest records to the contemporary period, frequently challenges this assumption.
Through satire, allegory, and irony, writers have exposed the limitations of a human-centered
worldview, revealing humanity’s vulnerability, fallibility, and often absurd self-importance.
This essay explores the tradition of subverting and satirizing anthropocentrism in English
literature, tracing key moments from the Middle Ages to postmodernism.
Even in early English literature, anthropocentrism was questioned. Geoffrey Chaucer’s
The Parliament of Fowls
(1382) presents animals engaging in sophisticated political debates
about love and hierarchy. The use of animals as political allegory subtly implies that human
debates are no more elevated than those of beasts (Chaucer, 1382/2006). The birds, with
their comical disagreements, mirror the pettiness of human courts, suggesting a continuity
rather than a chasm between humanity and the natural world.
William Shakespeare, too, often explored the precariousness of human superiority. In
King Lear
(1606), Lear’s descent into madness is marked by a recognition of human fragility.
His famous lines—"unaccommodated man is no more but such a poor, bare, forked animal"
(Shakespeare, 1606/2008, 3.4.106–107)—directly strip away the illusions of human
grandeur. Shakespeare’s portrayal of man as a mere animal underlines the thin veneer of
civilization and questions human exceptionalism.
57
YANGI OʻZBEKISTON TALABALARI
AXBOROTNOMASI
www.in-academy.uz
Volume 3 Issue 04 YO’TA
Jonathan Swift’s
Gulliver’s Travels
(1726) represents one of the most powerful satirical
attacks on anthropocentrism. In the land of the Houyhnhnms, rational horses govern society
with virtue and logic, while humans, embodied by the Yahoos, are depicted as violent, greedy,
and base. Swift critiques not only human morality but also Enlightenment optimism about
reason and progress (Swift, 1726/2010). By making animals the rational beings and humans
the savage ones, Swift satirizes humanity’s self-image as the apex of creation.
The Romantic period witnessed a profound literary reorientation toward nature as a
force greater than humankind. In William Wordsworth’s poetry, nature is not merely a
backdrop for human action but a living entity with moral and spiritual authority. In "Lines
Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey," Wordsworth asserts that nature can guide
human thought and feeling better than society or organized religion (Wordsworth,
1798/2004).
Similarly, Percy Bysshe Shelley’s
Ozymandias
(1818) offers a devastating image of
anthropocentric arrogance. The shattered remains of a once-mighty king’s statue, lost in the
desert sands, epitomize the inevitable downfall of human pride before the enduring forces of
nature and time (Shelley, 1818/2013).
Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s
The Rime of the Ancient Mariner
(1798) also critiques human
arrogance towards the natural world. The Mariner's killing of the albatross—a symbolic act of
human domination—brings about catastrophic consequences, emphasizing that human
actions are inextricably bound to the larger ecological order (Coleridge, 1798/2017).
In the Victorian period, writers like Thomas Hardy advanced a vision of nature as
indifferent or even hostile to human concerns. In
Tess of the d’Urbervilles
(1891), nature does
not respond to human suffering or moral virtue; it simply exists, often compounding tragedy
through chance and circumstance (Hardy, 1891/2003). Hardy’s universe is one where human
beings are no more protected or privileged than any other creature, further undermining
anthropocentric assumptions.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s
In Memoriam
(1850) also grapples with a non-anthropocentric
vision. Although the poem mourns the death of a beloved friend, it recognizes that evolution
and natural selection imply a universe where "Nature, red in tooth and claw" cares nothing for
human sentiment (Tennyson, 1850/2004). Tennyson’s meditation on evolution hints at a
cosmos where human life is not central but incidental.
The early twentieth century brought a profound crisis in anthropocentric narratives. T.S.
Eliot’s
The Waste Land
(1922) portrays a fragmented, spiritually barren landscape in which
human mastery and coherence have collapsed (Eliot, 1922/2015). Eliot's allusions to ancient
myths and cultural decay depict humanity as drifting amidst ruins, unable to restore its lost
centrality.
Virginia Woolf’s
Flush
(1933), a fictional biography of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s dog,
further subverts anthropocentrism by centering the narrative on a non-human consciousness.
Through the dog’s perspective, Woolf critiques the presumption that human experiences are
the only ones that matter (Woolf, 1933/2003). This playful yet pointed narrative exemplifies
modernism's fascination with decentering the human subject.
Contemporary literature continues this tradition, often intensifying it in response to
ecological crises and technological developments. Ian McEwan’s
Solar
(2010) satirizes the
human inability to confront climate change, depicting a protagonist so absorbed in his petty
58
YANGI OʻZBEKISTON TALABALARI
AXBOROTNOMASI
www.in-academy.uz
Volume 3 Issue 04 YO’TA
desires that he fails to recognize the existential threat facing the planet (McEwan, 2010).
McEwan portrays humanity as simultaneously brilliant and self-destructive, deeply implicated
in its own marginalization.
Margaret Atwood’s
Oryx and Crake
(2003) imagines a post-apocalyptic world where
genetically engineered beings, the "Crakers," have replaced humanity. The novel critiques not
only human environmental destruction but also the arrogance of assuming humanity’s
permanence at the top of the evolutionary ladder (Atwood, 2003).
Likewise, in Jeanette Winterson’s
The Stone Gods
(2007), humanity repeats cycles of
environmental devastation across different planets and epochs, suggesting that human
exceptionalism is a delusion that endangers all life forms.
From Chaucer’s talking birds to Atwood’s posthuman species, English literature has
persistently questioned and satirized anthropocentric beliefs. By portraying humanity as
foolish, fragile, or secondary to nature and time, writers reveal the dangers of unchecked
human pride. Literary subversions of anthropocentrism encourage readers to adopt a
broader, more interconnected understanding of existence, one that recognizes humanity’s
place within, not above, the complex web of life.
As the ecological crises of the twenty-first century intensify, these literary critiques gain
renewed urgency, reminding us that literature not only reflects but can also reshape our
understanding of humanity’s role in the broader world.
Reference:
1.
Atwood, M. (2003). Oryx and Crake. McClelland & Stewart.
2.
Chaucer, G. (2006). The Parliament of Fowls. In L. D. Benson (Ed.), The Riverside Chaucer
(pp. 383–395). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1382)
3.
Coleridge, S. T. (2017). The rime of the ancient mariner. Penguin Classics. (Original work
published 1798)
4.
Eliot, T. S. (2015). The waste land. Liveright. (Original work published 1922)
5.
Hardy, T. (2003). Tess of the d’Urbervilles. Penguin Classics. (Original work published
1891)
6.
McEwan, I. (2010). Solar. Jonathan Cape.
7.
Shelley, P. B. (2013). Ozymandias. In S. Groom (Ed.), The poems of Shelley: Volume three
(pp. 150-151). Routledge. (Original work published 1818)
8.
Shakespeare, W. (2008). King Lear. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1606)
9.
Swift, J. (2010). Gulliver’s travels. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1726)
10.
Tennyson, A. (2004). In memoriam A.H.H. Penguin Classics. (Original work published
1850)
11.
Winterson, J. (2007). The stone gods. Hamish Hamilton.
12.
Wordsworth, W. (2004). Lines composed a few miles above Tintern Abbey. In S. Gill
(Ed.), William Wordsworth: The major works (pp. 131–135). Oxford University Press.
(Original work published 1798)
13.
Woolf, V. (2003). Flush. Penguin Modern Classics. (Original work published 1933)
