This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using 360 videos as a teaching tool to enhance environmental education in primary schools. Environmental education plays a crucial role in fostering environmental awareness and responsible behavior among young learners. However, traditional teaching methods often struggle to provide immersive and engaging experiences that effectively convey complex environmental concepts. This study employs a quasi-experimental design, with a pre-test and post-test control group, to assess the impact of 360 videos on students' knowledge acquisition, engagement, and attitudes towards environmental issues. A sample of primary school students is divided into two groups: an experimental group that receives environmental education using 360 videos and a control group that follows a conventional teaching approach. Data on knowledge acquisition, engagement levels, and attitudes towards environmental issues are collected through pre-test and post-test assessments and self-report questionnaires. The results of this study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of 360 videos as a teaching tool for environmental education in primary schools, informing educators and policymakers about innovative approaches to enhance environmental learning experiences.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Bell, S., & Pahl, K. (2018). Technology, nature, and childhood: Creating supportive contexts for young children's digital play in the outdoors. Environmental Education Research, 24(6), 841-857.
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 37-58). Springer.
Evans, G. W., & McCoy, J. M. (1998). When buildings don't work: The role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 85-94.
Heimlich, J. E., & Norland, E. (2002). To test or not to test: A primer on classroom assessment. Journal of Extension, 40(5), 1-5.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Interaction Book Company.
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting reflection on field experiences through video-based portfolios: A design-based approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 513-547.
Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin Books.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.