Characteristics and development of anthropocentric compounds as a main factor in linguistics

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of the terms “anthropocentrism” and “anthropocentric combinations of language” in linguistics of the 20th century, exploring their development as a pragmatic phenomenon. The authors analyze how in modern linguistics language began to be viewed not just as a means of communication, but also as a tool for the discovery of new principles and approaches. The article highlights how these scientific concepts contribute to expanding the functionality of language, giving it a more focused and practical meaning in the study of linguistic phenomena.

Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
HAC
elibrary
doi
 
857-859
24

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Khonsaidova , M. . (2024). Characteristics and development of anthropocentric compounds as a main factor in linguistics. Foreign Linguistics and Lingvodidactics, 2(1/S), 857–859. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/foreign-linguistics/article/view/67740
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of the terms “anthropocentrism” and “anthropocentric combinations of language” in linguistics of the 20th century, exploring their development as a pragmatic phenomenon. The authors analyze how in modern linguistics language began to be viewed not just as a means of communication, but also as a tool for the discovery of new principles and approaches. The article highlights how these scientific concepts contribute to expanding the functionality of language, giving it a more focused and practical meaning in the study of linguistic phenomena.


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika

Зарубежная

лингвистика

и

лингводидактика

Foreign

Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Journal home page:

https://inscience.uz/index.php/foreign-linguistics

Characteristics and development of anthropocentric
compounds as a main factor in linguistics

Maktuba KHONSAIDOVA

1


Chirchik Pedagogical University

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

Article history:

Received April 2024

Received in revised form

10 May 2024

Accepted 25 May 2024

Available online

25 June 2024

This article examines the evolution of the terms

“anthropocentrism” and “anthropocentric combinations of
language” in linguistics of the 20th century, exploring their

development as a pragmatic phenomenon. The authors analyze

how in modern linguistics language began to be viewed not just
as a means of communication, but also as a tool for the discovery

of new principles and approaches. The article highlights how
these scientific concepts contribute to expanding the
functionality of language, giving it a more focused and practical

meaning in the study of linguistic phenomena.

2181-3701

2024 in Science LLC.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol2-iss1

/S

-pp857-859

This is an open-access article under the Attribution 4.0 International

(CC BY 4.0) license (

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru

)

Keywords:

anthropocentrism,

pragmatics,

socio-pragmatic,

anthropocentric

environment,

semantic features


Tilshunoslikda

antroposentrik

birikmalarning

hususiyatlari va asosiy omil sifatida rivojlanishi

ANNOTATSIYA

Kalit so‘zlar

:

antroposentrizm,

pragmatika,

sotsio-pragmatika,

antroposentrik muhit,

semantik hususiyatlar.

Ushbu maqola tilshunoslikda XX asrda pragmatik hodisa

sifatida

rivojlana boshlagan “Antroposentrizm va tilning

antroposentrik birikmalarI” kabi ilmiy atamalar qay tarzda kirib

kelgani, xamda qanday hususiyatlarga ega ekanligi xaqida so‘z
yurutiladi. Zamonaviy tilshunoslikda so‘ngi kunlarda inson o‘zi

foydalanayotgan y

oki o‘zi yangi tamoyillarini kashf etayotgan bir

vaqtda tilning omili sifatida ham tadbiq etib kelinmoqda. Bu omil

esa tilning funksional imkoniyatlarini kengaytirishi hamda o‘ziga

xos yo‘nalishga ega bo‘lishi bilan alohida mohiyatga egaligi chuqur

tahlil qilingan.

1

Teacher, Chirchik Pedagogical University. E-mail: szakirovmaktuba@gmail.com


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika

Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика

Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Special Issue

1 (2024) / ISSN 2181-3701

858

Характеристика

и

развитие

антропоцентрических

соединений как основного фактора в лингвистике

АННОТАЦИЯ

Ключевые слова:

антропоцентризм,

прагматика,

социо

-

прагматика,

антропоцентрическая

среда,

смысловые особенности

.

В данной статье рассматривается эволюция терминов

"антропоцентризм" и "антропоцентрические сочетания
языка" в лингвистике XX века, исследуя их развитие как

прагматического явления. Авторы анализируют, как в
современной лингвистике язык начал рассматриваться не

просто как средство коммуникации, но и как инструмент
открытия новых принципов и подходов. Статья освещает,
как эти научные концепции способствуют расширению

функциональных возможностей языка, придавая ему более
целенаправленное и практическое значение в изучении
языковых явлений

.

Antroposentrizm yunoncha so‘zdan olingan bo‘lib, “antropos” –

“inson”, “sentrum”

esa “markaz” degan ma’noga egadir. Bu akademik yo‘nalish ilmiy tadqiqotlarda inson va
ko‘plab fanlarda hamda shahs bilan bog’liq faoliyat negizidagi obyekt sifatida qarab

keli

nmoqda. Til bu insoniyat uchun berilgan ilohiy ne’matdir va buning ortida uning asosiy

vazifasi etib muloqot belgilangan. Xar bir tilning o‘zini etnik yaralish, yaratilishi, mazmun

-

mohiyati va albatta tuzilmasi bo‘lganidek ma’lum bir davrlarda tarjima san’atidagi o‘zga
tillararo mutanosibligi jihatidan ahamiyatga ega bo‘ladi. Til rivojlanish davomiyligiga ko‘ra

chuqur tarihga ega bo‘lib, har bir mamlakatning tarihiy kelib chiqishi hamda zamonlar
osha rivojlanish bosqichlari bilan uzviy bog’liqdir. Inson ti

li esa ijodiy xususiyatga ega

bo‘lib, ilgari eshitilmagan va aytilamagan cheksiz miqdordagi yangi so‘zlarni ishlab
chiqarish hamda uni aniq tushunish qobiliyatini o‘z ichiga oladi. Bundan ko‘rinib turibdiki

insoniyat yangi so‘z yoki yaratish qobiliyatiga e

ga.Vaholanki, tilning davriy rivojlanishi

barcha millatlarda bazan o‘hshash, bazan esa anchagina farqlanadi, shu nuqtai nazardan

tarjimashunoslikda maqbul va ammo ilojsiz qiyinchiliklar paydo bo‘lishi mumkin. Agarda
tilni sinchiklab o‘rganish ishtiyoqi bo‘lsa eng to‘g’ri yo‘l avvalambor grammatikaga murojat

qilishdir. Grammatika ko‘p jihatdan tilning asosiy bo‘linmalari, turlari, xossalari va

tarkiblari haqida kengroq malumot berishi mumkin. Grammatika, phrazaning tuzilishini

va ularning mazmuni, ma'nosini tahlil qiladi. Masalan, phrazaning qanday tuzilganligi,
so'zlar o'rtasidagi munosabatlar, qo'llanilgan shakllar va qoidalar kabi masalalar

grammatikaning muammolari orasida bo'ladi. “Ibora”, demak, ma’noni ifodalovchi so‘z
yoki so‘zlar to‘plami bo‘lib; gap

, jumlalar, qo'shma gaplar yoki savollar shaklida bo'lishi

mumkin. Shu o‘rinda, "Idioma" bir katta guruh yoki guruhdagi insonlar tomonidan o'ziga

xos til yoki nutqdir. Bu, ma'naviy, ijtimoiy va geografik asoslar bo'yicha o'zgargan, o'ziga

xos tilda gapirish va izoh qilish uslubini ifodalaydi. Har bir idioma, uning izohlashda va
fikrlarni ifodalashda xos xususiyatlarga ega bo'lgan o'zgacha tilda ifoda qilinadi. Idomalar

tarihiga nazar tashlasak, ular qadimdan tillarda asosiy o‘rinlarda foydalanilgan bo‘lib,
insonlar o‘rtasida kommunikatsiyani kuchaytirishning eng mukammal vositasi sifatida

shakllangan. Bundan tashqari ular o‘ziga xos na’nolarga ega bo‘lib, milliylik, madaniylik

hamda zamoniaviylik jihatidan millatlararo aloqalarda rivojlanib kelgan. Shunisi qiziqki,

bazi manbalarga ko‘ra iboralarning ayrimlari mazmun jiahatidan o‘zgargan va qo‘shma


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika

Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика

Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Special Issue

1 (2024) / ISSN 2181-3701

859

ma’noga ega holda shakllangan. Til va inson o‘rtasida yaqin bo‘liqlik tushunchalarini nemis

filosofi Vilgelm Gumboldt o‘z g‘

oyalarida ilgari surgan. Uning fikricha, til insonni borliqqa

bo‘gan ma’naviy munosabati bo‘lib, insonning rivojlanishi, ichki dunyosi lingvistik

-

falasafiy yondashuvdir deb hisoblaydi. Til millatning ruhi, kelib chiqishi, va ma’naviy kuchi

deb tasvirlaydi. Antrposentrik frazeologik birliklar shahsning hususiyatlari, xulq-atvori va

madaniyatiga bog’liq bo‘lgan g’oyalarni ilgari suradi. Aynan o‘zbek va ingliz tilidagi

antroposentrik frazeologik birliklar turli hildagi farqli jihatlar, yani; tarihiy, ijtimoiy, va

madaniy jihatdan bunday konseptlar til sistemasida alohida xususiyatlarga ega.
Antproposentrizm XX asrda tilshunoslikka yangi paradigma sifatida kirib kelgan. Bu atama

asosan insonga xos bo‘lgan akademik hodisa bo‘lib, buday birikmalarning asosida shahs

mujassamlanadi. Insonga hos bunday birikmalar lingvokultura tamoyillariga ham

aloqadordir. Demak, bunday

birikmalar insoniyatning kelib chiqishiga ham bog’liq bo‘lib,

tarjimada hozirgi kunda keng ommaviy tarzda qo‘llanilmoqda. Eng muhimi shuki,

dunyoning barcha nuqtalarida bu jarayon sezilarli darajada foydalanib kelinmoqda.

Masalan:

A busydiv

iborasi ingiz tilida insonga hos bo‘lgan birikma bo‘lib, uning

negizida shahs yotadi. Shahsning harakteri yoki holatini bir so‘z bilan tasviralash uchun
ishlatilgan. Bu iboraning tarjimasi har bir narsaga yoki voqelikka o‘ta qiziquvchan va

o‘ziga tegishli bo‘lmagan tafsilotlarga ham qiziquv

chi shahslarga nisbatan ishlatiladi. Bu

birikmani antroposentrik jihatdan tahlil qilsak, tasvirning asosida va narkazida shahs

bo‘lib, “div” –

tana manosidagi atama bilan inson markazlashgan birikmadir.

A big mouth

yana bir boshqa frazeologik birikma bo‘lib, uning asl mohiyati yani

tarjimasi -

aytilishi mumkin bo‘lmagan sirlarni ommaga aytish degan ma’noda ishlatiladi.

Eng qiziqarli jihati shuki, bu idiomaning tub mohiyatida inson mujassamlanadi. Yanikim,

birikma

insonning tanasi yani og‘iz so‘zi ishlatilib, antroposentrik birikmaga yaqqol misol

bo‘ladi.

Bundan ko‘rinib turibdiki, antroposentrik birikmalar tilshunoslikda sayqallangan

pragmatik jarayon bo‘lib, shahs markaziy omil sifatida foydalaniladi.

FOYDALANILGAN ADABIYOTLAR RO‘YXATI

:

1.

Suyunova Z. Ingliz va O‘zbek tillardagi antroposentrik maqolalarda gender talqini.

Dekabr 2022. Vol-24. P7-9.

2.

Shodiyeva N.N. Ingliz va O‘zbek tillarida antroposentrik frazeologik birliklarning

leksik-semantik xususiyatlari. 2023.

3.

Abdugafur M. Anthropocentric study of phraseological units with an adjective

component. 2020. Pp24-32

4.

Prolyhina O. Positive evaluation of a person in the context of anthropocentric

phraseology of the English language.

5.

Ayto, J. Oxford Dictionary of English Idioms. Oxford University Press. 2009.

6.

Cowie, A. Phraseology; Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford, p272.

References

Suyunova Z. Ingliz va O‘zbek tillardagi antroposentrik maqolalarda gender talqini. Dekabr 2022. Vol-24. P7-9.

Shodiyeva N.N. Ingliz va O‘zbek tillarida antroposentrik frazeologik birliklarning leksik-semantik xususiyatlari. 2023.

Abdugafur M. Anthropocentric study of phraseological units with an adjective component. 2020. Pp24-32

Prolyhina O. Positive evaluation of a person in the context of anthropocentric phraseology of the English language.

Ayto, J. Oxford Dictionary of English Idioms. Oxford University Press. 2009.

Cowie, A. Phraseology; Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford,p272.