TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD AI-ENHANCED LISTENING ACTIVITIES: A PILOT STUDY IN UZBEKISTAN

Abstract

This pilot study investigates the perceptions and attitudes of secondary EFL teachers in Uzbekistan toward the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced listening activities in classroom instruction. With the increasing prevalence of AI technologies in language education, understanding teacher acceptance and readiness is crucial for successful implementation. The study was conducted with 25 EFL teachers from both urban and rural schools, using surveys, interviews, and lesson observations to gather data. Participants explored AI tools such as Elsa Speak, ChatGPT (with speech integration), and Listenwise over a four-week trial period. The findings reveal that while teachers generally acknowledge the pedagogical value of AI—especially in fostering learner autonomy, increasing motivation, and supporting differentiated instruction—they also express concerns regarding insufficient training, technological access, and the cultural relevance of AI-generated content. Some participants were apprehensive about the potential devaluation of teacher roles in favor of automation. Overall, the study highlights the importance of professional development, infrastructure investment, and the contextual adaptation of AI tools. It concludes that AI-enhanced listening activities should complement rather than replace traditional methods and that a teacher-centered, blended learning approach is the most viable path for integration in Uzbekistan's EFL classrooms.

Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2024
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Branch of knowledge
f
56-58

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Baxramova , M. (2025). TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD AI-ENHANCED LISTENING ACTIVITIES: A PILOT STUDY IN UZBEKISTAN. Научный информационный бюллетень, 9(2), 56–58. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/ifx/article/view/131015
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

This pilot study investigates the perceptions and attitudes of secondary EFL teachers in Uzbekistan toward the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced listening activities in classroom instruction. With the increasing prevalence of AI technologies in language education, understanding teacher acceptance and readiness is crucial for successful implementation. The study was conducted with 25 EFL teachers from both urban and rural schools, using surveys, interviews, and lesson observations to gather data. Participants explored AI tools such as Elsa Speak, ChatGPT (with speech integration), and Listenwise over a four-week trial period. The findings reveal that while teachers generally acknowledge the pedagogical value of AI—especially in fostering learner autonomy, increasing motivation, and supporting differentiated instruction—they also express concerns regarding insufficient training, technological access, and the cultural relevance of AI-generated content. Some participants were apprehensive about the potential devaluation of teacher roles in favor of automation. Overall, the study highlights the importance of professional development, infrastructure investment, and the contextual adaptation of AI tools. It concludes that AI-enhanced listening activities should complement rather than replace traditional methods and that a teacher-centered, blended learning approach is the most viable path for integration in Uzbekistan's EFL classrooms.


background image

ILM FAN YANGILIKLARI KONFERENSIYASI

IYUL

ANDIJON,2025

56

TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD AI-ENHANCED LISTENING ACTIVITIES: A

PILOT STUDY IN UZBEKISTAN

Baxramova Malika Muzaffarovna

Urgench State Pedagogical Institute

Abstract:

This pilot study investigates the perceptions and attitudes of secondary EFL teachers

in Uzbekistan toward the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced listening activities in

classroom instruction. With the increasing prevalence of AI technologies in language education,

understanding teacher acceptance and readiness is crucial for successful implementation. The

study was conducted with 25 EFL teachers from both urban and rural schools, using surveys,

interviews, and lesson observations to gather data. Participants explored AI tools such as Elsa

Speak, ChatGPT (with speech integration), and Listenwise over a four-week trial period. The

findings reveal that while teachers generally acknowledge the pedagogical value of AI—

especially in fostering learner autonomy, increasing motivation, and supporting differentiated

instruction—they also express concerns regarding insufficient training, technological access,

and the cultural relevance of AI-generated content. Some participants were apprehensive about

the potential devaluation of teacher roles in favor of automation. Overall, the study highlights

the importance of professional development, infrastructure investment, and the contextual

adaptation of AI tools. It concludes that AI-enhanced listening activities should complement

rather than replace traditional methods and that a teacher-centered, blended learning approach

is the most viable path for integration in Uzbekistan's EFL classrooms.

Keywords :

AI in education, teacher attitudes, listening comprehension, EFL instruction,

ChatGPT in classrooms, Uzbekistan, language learning technology, digital pedagogy, speech

recognition tools, blended learning.

The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into language education has opened up

new avenues for enhancing the teaching and learning of English as a Foreign Language (EFL).

Among these, AI-enhanced listening activities have gained traction due to their ability to offer

personalized, interactive, and real-time feedback. However, the effectiveness of these

technologies in classroom settings largely depends on the attitudes and readiness of teachers to

adopt them. This pilot study explores the perceptions, concerns, and experiences of secondary

EFL teachers in Uzbekistan regarding the use of AI in listening instruction.

The research was conducted with a sample of 25 EFL teachers working in urban and rural

secondary schools across Uzbekistan. Data was collected through a combination of structured

interviews, observation of AI-enhanced lessons, and teacher questionnaires. The AI tools

explored in this study included language learning platforms equipped with speech recognition

(e.g., Elsa Speak), adaptive listening comprehension apps (e.g., Listenwise), and interactive AI

chatbots (e.g., ChatGPT with text-to-speech functionalities). Teachers were introduced to these

tools during professional development sessions and were then asked to incorporate at least one

AI-enhanced activity into their classroom routine over a four-week period.

The findings revealed a generally positive but cautious attitude toward AI in listening pedagogy.

Many teachers expressed enthusiasm about the potential of AI to diversify listening materials,

improve student motivation, and support individualized instruction. They particularly valued

features such as real-time feedback, repeated listening with adaptive difficulty, and

pronunciation assistance. Several teachers noted that students who typically struggled with


background image

ILM FAN YANGILIKLARI KONFERENSIYASI

IYUL

ANDIJON,2025

57

traditional listening tasks were more engaged and confident when interacting with AI-powered

tools.

However, concerns were also prominent. A majority of teachers cited a lack of training as a

significant barrier to effective implementation. Many participants were unfamiliar with the

technical operation of AI tools or unsure about how to align them with curricular goals. Others

questioned the cultural and linguistic appropriateness of the content, noting that many

platforms are designed for global audiences and do not always consider Uzbek learners'

contexts or accents. Technical limitations such as weak internet connectivity, outdated

hardware, and lack of access to personal devices were also mentioned as practical obstacles,

particularly in rural schools.

Another important concern was the potential reduction in the teacher's role. While some

educators saw AI as a valuable assistant, others worried that overreliance on automated systems

might diminish the importance of teacher-led instruction, classroom interaction, and human

feedback. Teachers emphasized the irreplaceable value of their intuition, empathy, and

pedagogical adaptability—elements they felt AI could not replicate. For instance, when

students make listening errors, teachers often diagnose not just the error but also the reason

behind it (e.g., confusion due to anxiety, misunderstanding of task instructions), something AI

tools are currently incapable of doing.

Interestingly, the pilot also revealed that teachers' attitudes were closely linked to their prior

exposure to digital technologies. Those who had previously used multimedia tools or online

learning platforms were more confident and open to AI adoption. In contrast, teachers with

limited digital experience showed more resistance and preferred traditional listening materials

such as CDs, printed transcripts, and teacher narration. This digital divide highlights the need

for differentiated training programs that consider teachers’ varying levels of technological

fluency.

In terms of perceived impact on learners, most teachers agreed that AI-enhanced activities

could complement existing methods rather than replace them. They recommended using AI

tools for homework, revision, and supplementary practice rather than as a primary classroom

method. Teachers also suggested that AI be used to target specific micro-skills, such as

recognizing connected speech, stress patterns, and key word identification, which are often

neglected in textbooks.

This pilot study concludes that while EFL teachers in Uzbekistan recognize the potential

benefits of AI-enhanced listening instruction, successful integration depends on systematic

support through training, infrastructure, and culturally responsive content. AI tools must be

presented not as replacements for teachers but as flexible resources that enhance instructional

quality and learner autonomy. Future research should explore student perceptions, long-term

outcomes, and the development of Uzbek-specific AI listening modules to ensure inclusivity

and relevance.

By understanding and addressing teachers’ concerns, policymakers and educational institutions

can develop more sustainable strategies for implementing AI in the language classroom. A

collaborative model involving teachers, technologists, and curriculum developers is essential to

maximize the pedagogical potential of AI while preserving the human-centered nature of

education.


background image

ILM FAN YANGILIKLARI KONFERENSIYASI

IYUL

ANDIJON,2025

58

References:

1.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2021).

AI and big data in language education: Realities and

expectations. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 1–12.

— Provides a broad overview of AI's potential and challenges in language classrooms.

2.

Li, V., & Warschauer, M. (2020).

Emerging technologies and language learning: AI

applications in listening comprehension. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 1–15.

— Discusses AI's role specifically in improving listening instruction.

3.

Suvorov, R. (2019).

Automated feedback in language assessment: Current state and

future directions. Language Testing, 36(4), 523–538.

— Reviews automated tools, such as speech recognition, used in EFL teaching.

4.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020).

Mobile and AI-assisted language learning: Future

directions. ReCALL, 32(3), 245–264.

— Highlights AI's pedagogical impact and limitations in diverse educational contexts.

5.

Hockly, N. (2018).

Focus on artificial intelligence. ELT Journal, 72(4), 400–403.

— Offers practical insights into AI tools and their classroom integration.

6.

Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016).

20 years of autonomy and technology: How far

have we come and where to next?. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154.

— Explores teacher and learner autonomy in tech-enhanced classrooms.

7.

UNESCO (2022).

Artificial Intelligence and Education: Guidance for Policy-Makers.

Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

References

Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). AI and big data in language education: Realities and expectations. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 1–12.

— Provides a broad overview of AI's potential and challenges in language classrooms.

Li, V., & Warschauer, M. (2020). Emerging technologies and language learning: AI applications in listening comprehension. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 1–15.

— Discusses AI's role specifically in improving listening instruction.

Suvorov, R. (2019). Automated feedback in language assessment: Current state and future directions. Language Testing, 36(4), 523–538.

— Reviews automated tools, such as speech recognition, used in EFL teaching.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile and AI-assisted language learning: Future directions. ReCALL, 32(3), 245–264.

— Highlights AI's pedagogical impact and limitations in diverse educational contexts.

Hockly, N. (2018). Focus on artificial intelligence. ELT Journal, 72(4), 400–403.

— Offers practical insights into AI tools and their classroom integration.

Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next?. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154.

— Explores teacher and learner autonomy in tech-enhanced classrooms.

UNESCO (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Education: Guidance for Policy-Makers. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.