International Journal of Pedagogics
32
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue08 2025
PAGE NO.
32-35
10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue08-08
The Importance of The Communication Process in The
Development of Communication Culture in Students
Tajiyeva Nodira Yusupjanovna
Doctoral Student of Urgench State University, Uzbekistan
Received:
13 June 2025;
Accepted:
09 July 2025;
Published:
11 August 2025
Abstract:
This article discusses the directions for developing students' communication culture, its characteristics,
types, and historical evolution. The importance of communication processes in implementing communication
culture has been scientifically analyzed. The terms "communication" and "social communication" are also
explained, and their functions are described. The requirements for adhering to certain moral norms in the process
of communication are characterized from a pedagogical perspective. The elements and features of
communication are examined. The distinctive characteristics of the terms "communication" and "dialogue" are
elucidated.
Keywords:
Student, interaction, communication, speech, communication, social communication, pedagogical,
culture, pedagogical process, communication.
Introduction:
In scientific sources, the scientific
interpretation of the concepts of interaction,
communication, and social communication is widely
described. Our analysis shows that, firstly, the concepts
of "communication" and "social communication" rarely
have the same similar meanings. Secondly, in various
sources, opinions are expressed that "communication"
and "communication" have opposing views. While one
group of specialists equates them completely with each
other, researchers belonging to the second group use
the concept of communication as a single direction of
communication, and from the third side, the term
communication or interaction is used, interpreting
them as synonyms. In the course of our research, we
tried to clarify the concepts of "communication",
"communication",
"social
communication"
and
systematizing them, to clarify the concepts that are
part of the culture of communication.
Analysis of literature
Communication is the interaction between two
subjects, carried out based on the requirements of
communication culture. Therefore, communication
also embodies communication among its specific
components. In this sense, communication is a broader
concept than communication. M.A.Vasilik indicates the
concept of information as an invariant (constant) of
communication.
Psychologists
have
repeatedly
emphasized that communication also has an
informational character.[1]
A.V. Sokolov categorized communication into four
types: material communication, communication of a
genetic nature, psychological communication, and
social communication.[2] Therefore, the concepts of
communication and interaction can be understood and
interpreted in relation to the concept of information.
This is because information is also exchanged between
people.
During
this
process,
interpersonal
communication takes place. From this perspective,
communication is considered a concept with a broad
meaning. In this context, the terms "communication"
and "social communication" are also used. Because
these terms complement each other. Accordingly, all
relationships in material and spiritual existence are
considered an integral part of communication. Because
these relationships are connected with information,
communication, and relationships. Here it should be
recognized that the concept of communication is
broader than the concept of communication.
Accordingly, specialists have been able to substantiate
that the term "communication" is broader than the
term "communication," and social communication is a
relatively topical concept.
International Journal of Pedagogics
33
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)
METHODS AND TECHNIQUES OF OUR RESEARCH
In the process of scientific research, methods of
analysis, generalization, observation of scientific and
methodological literature, systematic analysis of
pedagogical and psychological phenomena, and
generalization of results were used.
RESEARCH RESULTS AND THEIR DISCUSSION
In our opinion, the concepts of "communication" and
"social communication" came from the Latin language
and are generally connected with the concept of
communication. In the explanatory dictionary of the
Uzbek language, the word "communication" is used in
three senses. Communication - 1. Underground
transport,
communication
routes,
and
urban
infrastructure networks and their structures. 2. In
cybernetics: the process of information exchange. 3.
Exchange of opinions, communication.
In the encyclopedia of pedagogy, communication is the
process of exchanging information in pedagogy;
exchange of ideas, communication. Communication,
approached from a social point of view, includes the
process of information exchange between individuals
within a group, organization, or educational institution,
within the entire community. This type of
communication is mainly carried out using natural
language. In individual communication, a person's
ability to identify and perceive (assimilate) information
is of great importance. For communication within a
group or organization, the distribution of relationships
among the members of this group or organization, the
characteristics of the adopted rules of communication
are important.
Diagrams representing the elements of communication
require three participants.
1. The subject providing information, i.e., the
communicator.
2. The object of communication provided by
information, i.e., messages.
3. The subject receiving the information.
As can be seen, communication represents the
interaction between subjects, and this relationship also
applies to individual objects. A.V. Sokolov divided
communication
into
four
types:
material
communication, genetic communication, psychological
communication, and social communication.[2]
Psychological communication is characteristic of the
fourth
type
of
communication,
since
any
communication has a social character. Also, the
technical and biological directions of communication
are not taken into account in scientific sources. Most
specialists
have
studied
the
concepts
of
"communication" and "social communication" by
equating them. This is especially evident in social and
socio-psychological research. In the study of
communication processes, foreign researchers widely
use the term "communication".
Today, the term "communication" is widely used in
educational and methodological sources, including
state educational standards, curricula, and textbooks.
The term "communication" is used in educational and
scientific sources of the socio-humanitarian category.
Most specialists are looking for an answer to the
question: does the term "communication" encompass
the concepts expressed by the word "communication"?
The common feature of both terms is that they mean
the exchange of information between themselves and
their presentation. In this sense, both concepts are
characterized by the fact that they are aimed at
presenting information in connection with human
speech activity.
The distinctive features of the terms "communication"
and "communication" are determined by the breadth
and narrowness of their meaning. The concepts of
communication and communication are the objects of
research in various disciplines, therefore, priority is
given to various directions of these concepts. The
presence of various nebulae and contradictions creates
difficulties in analyzing these terms. Therefore, the
need to clarify each of these terms is increasing. This
need is especially growing in the social sciences and
humanities, as well as in social psychology.
To clarify each of these terms, first of all, it is necessary
to abandon the idea of equating the terms
"communication" and "social communication." When
considering the term interpersonal communication, it
is advisable to use the term "social communication."
Because in most sources, this term is used simply as a
word of communication. In this case, it is necessary to
reconcile not only the content of the terms
"communication" and "communication," but also the
content of the terms "communication" and "social
communication." Here, the following is implied: it is not
advisable to interpret the concept of "communication"
in both a broad and a narrow sense. Because this
creates uncertainties.
It is advisable to use the term "communication" on a
broad scale. It is understood in a narrow sense as the
term "social communication" and requires a certain
degree of clarification. Below we will try to analyze the
approaches of specialists to the scientific interpretation
of the concepts of communication and communication
from a psychological point of view.
The initial approach includes attempts to define the
basic categories of these terms. Along with points of
view on determining what kind of concept
International Journal of Pedagogics
34
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)
communication is, there are also points of view on the
interpretation of communication as a basic concept. In
the studies of L.V.Volodina and O.K.Karpukhin, the
term "communication" has three meanings: a) means
of communication of any material and spiritual world;
b) communication aimed at transmitting information
from person to person, which, in turn, is assessed as
interpersonal
communication;
c)
interpersonal
communication and mutual exchange of information in
society, which, in turn, is understood as social
communication.[3] Accordingly, communication, along
with communication, embodies all the means of the
material
and
spiritual
world.
Therefore,
communication
is
a
broader
concept
than
communication. Its connection to communication lies
in its ability to provide information. Interpersonal
communication is one of the various functions of
communication.
Interpersonal
communication
includes the culture of communication.
Communication is an exchange of information, a flow
of information, characterized by the fact that it is a
source of messages. This peculiarity allows us to
determine its result. While information sources are
natural and artificial, interpersonal communication as a
subject is one of the various forms of communication,
and it is evident that communication is a broader
concept than communication itself.
The second approach is aimed at distinguishing the
concepts of "communication" and "communication." In
the research of M.S. Kagan, the point of view of the
makur direction is reflected. According to him,
communication and communication are distinguished
by two types of relationships. Firstly, communication
has a practical, material, and spiritual, informational,
and practical-spiritual character. Communication is a
full-fledged information process. Secondly, they differ
in the interaction of systems. Within the framework of
communication, there are subject-object connections.
In this process, the subject provides certain
information, which can include knowledge, ideas,
information, factual data, and instructions. The object
acts as a passive recipient of information. The object
receives information, efficiently assimilates it, and
performs actions accordingly. Therefore, according to
M.S. Kagan, communication is a one-way phenomenon.
In this case, information is transmitted only in one
direction, therefore it does not matter who or what
receives it, and the recipient can be a person,
technology, or another being.[4]
The process of communication is monologue, and the
process of communication is dialogue. That is why
dialogue requires interlocutors to have good manners.
Accordingly, communication is subject-subject, and
communication is subject-object. From this point of
view, the development of communication culture skills
in future teachers is of particular pedagogical
importance for preparing them for dialogue relations
between teacher-student, student-student.
Analysis of the relationship between social
communication and communication is also of particular
importance for our research. Analysis of sources on
pedagogy and psychology shows that there are also
interrelationships and differences between the
concepts
of
"social
communication"
and
"communication." In the first approach in this
direction, both subunits are balanced. Proponents of
this approach include such psychologists as
L.S.Vygotsky, A.A.Leontyev, O.A.Gulevich.
Experts who have studied the problem of information
exchange have emphasized that social communication
consists of information exchange activities in society,
while interpersonal communication represents the
verbal level of information exchange in society. T.G.
Grusheviskaya assessed communication as an
interpersonal joint action, while indicating that social
communication is a joint action of both interpersonal
and mass nature.[5] In both cases, communication
culture plays a central role. It should be particularly
emphasized that all specialists who have conducted
research in this field sharply distinguish social
communication from interpersonal communication. At
the same time, scientists have pointed out that there
are contradictions in the relationship between the
concepts of communication and interpersonal
interaction. They define interpersonal interaction as
the primary concept, and communication as a
secondary concept. This is reflected in the views of
well-known psychologists such as B.F. Lomov, A.A.
Bodalev, B.D. Parigin, and G.M. Andreev.
In his research, G.M. Andreev distinguished three
aspects of communication:[6]
1. Communicative. In this process, the exchange of
information between the interacting parties takes
place.
2. Interactive. In this case, activities aimed at organizing
joint actions are carried out among the persons
entering into communication.
3. Perceptive. The process of interlocutors perceiving
and knowing each other is carried out, and in this
direction, skills of mutual understanding are formed.
B.D.Parigin, on the other hand, tried to determine the
structure of communication both internally and
externally.
The
socio-psychological
model
of
communication presented by them is aimed at
differentiating communication on a single basis.[7]
Accordingly, the aspect of communication based on
International Journal of Pedagogics
35
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)
internal content, as a communicative process,
expresses the emotional aspect of the individual and
the exchange of information in relation. Its external
aspect is aimed at implementing the behavioral
direction of communication based on interaction. This
includes the joint actions of the subjects of the
communication process and their relationships with
each other. It is precisely these actions and attitudes
that manifest themselves as an indicator of the culture
of communication. At the same time, interaction, like
communication, is also studied in terms of form and
content.
Accordingly,
communication,
unlike
interaction, expresses the content-related aspect of
communication.
V.F.Lomov
identifies
three
functions
of
communication:
informational-communicative,
regulatory-communicative,
and
affective-
communicative.[8] V.N.Panferov managed to classify
the functions of the individual in the process of
communication. In this process, six functions of the
communication process are highlighted as specific
manifestations of the basis: the mental, socio-
psychological, and social identity of the individual as a
subject of joint activity. These are: communicative,
informational,
cognitive,
emotional,
conative
(development of aspirations), creative functions. He
emphasizes the need to study the internal logic of the
problem and shows that this is done by the human. [9]
Despite the different approaches of the authors, in
determining
the
structure
and
function
of
communication, their views on the comprehensiveness
of communication in relation to social communication
form the basis of all approaches. The fact that social
communication is one of the specific aspects of
communication is theoretically substantiated in most
studies.
Social and interpersonal communication has its own
scope and content. In this system, the culture of
communication, as an important component,
embodies the essence and content of communication,
as well as its moral and cultural aspects. When
considering which aspects of interpersonal and social
communication correspond to each other, it should be
noted that the research of L.V. Volodina and O.K.
Karpukhina substantiates that interpersonal and social
communication has different manifestations.[3] The
first is that information is directed and transmitted
from one person to another. In the second case, the
exchange of information in society is considered. As can
be seen, the classifications justified by specialists have
a different social character.
CONCLUSION
Social communication is simultaneously interpersonal
communication. All specialists evaluate social
communication as a direct interpersonal joint action, as
a result of which the subjects of the communication
process experience joint experiences, influence each
other, and understand each other. This communication
process, connected to the subjects' positions, national,
social, age, levels, social status, and background,
determines their communication culture. Because both
communication and social communication represent
interpersonal joint action. In this process, the culture of
communication plays an important role.
REFERENCES
M.A. Vasilika. Osnovi teorii kommunikatsii: Uchebnik
/Pod red. prof. 0-75 M.A. Vasilika.
—
M.: Gardariki,
2003.
—
615 s.: il.
A.V.
Sokolov
Obshaya
teoriya
sotsialnoy
kommunikatsii: Ucheb. posobiye. SPb., 2002.
Volodina L.V., Karpuxina O.K. Delovoye obsheniye i
osnovi teorii
kommunikatsii (spets. 350400) / SPbGUT.
–
SPb., 2002.
Kagana M.S. «Mir obsheniya: Problema mejsubyektnix
otnosheniy» (1988)
Grushevitskaya T.G., Popkov V.D., Sadoxin A.P. Osnovi
mejkulturnoy kommunikatsii: Uchebnik dlya vuzov/Pod
red. A.P. Sadoxina. - M.: YUNITI-DANA, 2003. - 352 s.
ISBN 5-238-00359-5
Andreyeva G.M. Atributivniye protsessi v usloviyax
sovmestnoy deyatelnosti // Obsheniye i optimizatsiya
sovmestnoy deyatelnosti.
–
M., 1987.
Parigin, B.D. Osnovi sotsialno psixologicheskoy teorii /
B.D. Parigin.
—
M., 1971.
Problema obsheniya v psixologii / Otv. red. V.F. Lomov.
—
M.: Nauka, 1981.
—
280 s.
Panferov V.N. Psixologiya chelovecheskix otnosheniy.
Izbrannoye. SPb, 2009
