PEDAGOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF INTEGRATING MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

Abstract

This article discusses the psychological and pedagogical foundations of integration in mathematics education, focusing on ideas about ensuring the coherence of scientific knowledge, as well as the thoughts and views of past thinkers. It explores the efforts in the field of scientific knowledge integration and the ideas of pedagogical scholars in our republic regarding the organization of teaching based on integrative knowledge in the natural sciences. The article also addresses the lack of mutual integration between pedagogical and methodological scholars in explaining the essence of educational integration.

Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2014
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Branch of knowledge
CC BY f
13-19
199

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Kuchkarova, Nazarov, F. , X. (2025). PEDAGOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF INTEGRATING MATHEMATICS EDUCATION. International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development, 1(1), 13–19. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/imjrd/article/view/69005
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

This article discusses the psychological and pedagogical foundations of integration in mathematics education, focusing on ideas about ensuring the coherence of scientific knowledge, as well as the thoughts and views of past thinkers. It explores the efforts in the field of scientific knowledge integration and the ideas of pedagogical scholars in our republic regarding the organization of teaching based on integrative knowledge in the natural sciences. The article also addresses the lack of mutual integration between pedagogical and methodological scholars in explaining the essence of educational integration.


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

13

PEDAGOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF INTEGRATING

MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

F.X. Kuchkarova

Zarmed University Head of the Department of "Social Sciences"

X. Nazarov

Zarmed University Associate Professor of the Department of "Social Sciences"

Annotation:

This article discusses the psychological and pedagogical foundations of integration

in mathematics education, focusing on ideas about ensuring the coherence of scientific knowledge,

as well as the thoughts and views of past thinkers. It explores the efforts in the field of scientific

knowledge integration and the ideas of pedagogical scholars in our republic regarding the

organization of teaching based on integrative knowledge in the natural sciences. The article also

addresses the lack of mutual integration between pedagogical and methodological scholars in

explaining the essence of educational integration.

Keywords:

integration, perpendicular, coherence, mathematics, plane, logic.

Аннотация:

В статье рассматриваются психологические и педагогические основы

интеграции в математическом образовании, уделяя внимание идеям обеспечения

целостности научных знаний, а также мыслям и взглядам мыслителей прошлого.

Исследуются усилия в области интеграции научных знаний и идеи педагогических ученых

нашей республики относительно организации обучения на основе интегративных знаний в

области естественных наук. В статье также рассматривается отсутствие взаимной

интеграции между педагогическими и методическими учеными в объяснении сути

образовательной интеграции.

Ключевые слова:

интеграция, перпендикуляр, целостность, математика, плоскость, логика.

In Uzbekistan, the education system is undergoing fundamental reforms to elevate it to a new

level in line with modern times and transition to a new stage of interaction between the state and

society. To achieve this, every individual living in the present era must possess sufficient

knowledge for the future of the country, ensuring its comprehensive development and progress.

The preparation of independent-thinking, creative specialists who can consciously apply their

knowledge in life begins with school education.

According to academician N.N. Semenov, mandatory obedience in the teacher-student

relationship should be replaced by free and conscious discipline. Furthermore, the main task of a

teacher should be to develop students' ability to think independently and freely and to

systematically enhance this skill. It is well known that in any legal and democratic state,

students—and, more broadly, every member of society—should be educated to think freely, and

the education system should be structured accordingly.

In particular, one of the most essential conditions for mastering mathematics is developing

students' thinking abilities, as full comprehension of the subject is only possible through cognitive

growth. Global market integration and the rapid pace of scientific and technological progress

require strengthening interconnections between all levels of education. This, in turn, necessitates

an integrated approach to teaching and learning.


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

14

In today's socio-economic conditions, the education system must align with democratic and

market economy changes. It is crucial to ensure that the learning process is sufficiently supported

by material, technical, and informational resources, provided with highly qualified scientific and

pedagogical staff, and supplemented with high-quality textbooks, teaching methodologies, and

literature. Additionally, establishing strong integration between education, science, and industry is

essential.

This, of course, requires giving great attention to mathematics and its development. The laws,

theoretical concepts, and practical applications of mathematics continue to evolve in response to

real-world demands. The advancement of mathematics requires a comprehensive, integrative

understanding of its essence, methods of cognition, and tools.

The concept of ensuring the integrative (holistic) nature of scientific mathematical knowledge is

reflected in the works of past thinkers. More than 300 years ago, Euclid’s famous work Elements

proved theorems using geometric methods, and even arithmetic problems were explained in the

language of geometry. In those times, many algebraic identities were also demonstrated through

geometric constructions. This suggests that arithmetic and algebra were integrated with geometry.

Moreover, the works of our ancestors, such as Al-Khwarizmi, Al-Farabi, Ibn Sina, A.R. Beruni,

and M. Ulugh Beg, in fields like mathematics, astronomy, geography, medicine, and other

sciences, discuss the relationship between quantity and quality, as well as the unity of natural,

social, and applied sciences.

Al-Khwarizmi’s famous work, Al-Kitab al-Mukhtasar fi Hisab al-Jabr wa al-Muqabala, which

holds an important place in the history of mathematics, consists of three sections:

1.

The first section presents an algebraic method for solving first- and second-degree

equations with a single unknown, ensuring that only non-negative roots are considered. He also

provides a geometric analysis of these solutions.

2.

The second section is dedicated to geometry, where algebraic applications to measurement

problems and calculations related to quantities are discussed.

3.

The third section explores the practical applications of algebra, particularly problems

related to inheritance distribution.

In the introduction of his work, Al-Khwarizmi also provides information about the contributions

of past scholars to the development of science. His book covers both simple and complex

arithmetic problems and emphasizes their necessity in legal and commercial matters such as

inheritance distribution, drafting wills, property division, land measurement, canal construction,

and area calculations.

Abu Nasr al-Farabi, in his work The Origins of Sciences and Their Classification, describes more

than 30 sciences known during the medieval period and highlights their significance. He

categorizes all sciences into five groups and includes the following subjects under the

mathematics category: arithmetic, geometry, optics, astronomy, music, the science of weights, and

mechanics. This suggests that even in his time, Farabi pursued an integrated approach to

knowledge in his writings.


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

15

Abu Ali Ibn Sina, in his Book of Knowledge, presents the foundations of planimetry and

stereometry as a unified subject. For example, in the section titled On the Basics of Intersecting

Lines in Stereometry, he discusses perpendicularity to a straight line and simultaneously addresses

perpendicularity to a plane. Additionally, Ibn Sina describes number notation and the comparison

of numerical equality and inequality. His works, such as The Canon of Medicine, Kitab al-Najat,

and Kitab al-Insof, integrate knowledge from fields such as geometry, astronomy, botany,

zoology, and logic.

In the field of scientific knowledge integration, scholars such as B.M. Kedrov, P.N. Fedoseev, and

N.P. Devenchuk have conducted research. However, they have not provided a clear answer to

what constitutes the objective basis of knowledge integration.

From a scientific perspective, the objective basis of knowledge integration lies in the unity of the

universe and the interrelationships of its constituent elements. E.O. Turdiqulov defines scientific

knowledge integration as follows:

“Integration is the process of uniting scattered, fragmented elements into a coherent, systematic

whole. It is the synthesis of knowledge about nature into a unified div, directing knowledge

from various disciplines toward a common goal. It expresses the unity of the universe” [2.198].

M.M. Mamadazimov, in his scientific article, discusses inter- and intra-disciplinary integration,

stating:

“Integration in education involves moving beyond a simple connection between subjects to an

advanced stage of mutual influence between different sciences, ensuring an effective

interdisciplinary approach” [3.30-b].

The term integration comes from the English word integration, meaning restoration, unification,

or the merging of separate elements into a whole (Encyclopedic Dictionary).

Regarding the integration of mathematical sciences in schools, research has mainly focused on:

Establishing internal and interdisciplinary connections,

Developing integrated course materials,

Strengthening the practical application of knowledge,

Achieving didactic coherence,

Ensuring consistency in mathematical education.

For example, the connection between algebra and geometry has been established primarily by

using algebraic (analytical) methods to solve geometric problems.

On the topic of interdisciplinary connections, the great didactician J.A. Comenius emphasized:

“All interconnected things must be studied in relation to one another” [4.242-b].

Later, several educators developed and expanded upon this idea. For example, I.G. Pestalozzi

drew attention to the diverse interconnections among scientific disciplines, stating:


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

16

“In one’s mind, all sciences that are inherently interconnected should be structured according to

their natural relationships, just as they are connected in reality” [5.202-b].

The Role of Integration in the Development of Sciences

The renowned mathematician Al-Khwarizmi made significant contributions to the history of

mathematics with his famous work "Al-Kitab al-Mukhtasar fi Hisab al-Jabr wa al-Muqabala".

This book consists of three sections:

1.

The first section presents algebraic methods for solving first- and second-degree equations

with non-negative roots and includes their geometric analysis.

2.

The second section is dedicated to geometry, where measurement of quantities and the

application of algebra to measurement-related problems are discussed.

3.

The third section explores the practical applications of algebra, particularly problems

related to inheritance distribution.

Additionally, in the introduction of his book, Al-Khwarizmi provides information about the

contributions of past scholars to the development of science. His work encompasses both simple

and complex arithmetic problems, emphasizing their importance in inheritance division, drafting

wills, property distribution in legal and commercial affairs, land measurement, canal construction,

and surface measurement.

Abu Nasr al-Farabi, in his work "The Origins and Classification of Sciences", describes and

highlights the significance of more than 30 sciences known during the Middle Ages. He

categorizes all sciences into five groups and includes arithmetic, geometry, optics, astronomy,

music, the science of weights, and mechanics within the mathematics group. This indicates that

Farabi integrated knowledge in his works even in that era.

Abu Ali Ibn Sina (Avicenna), in his "Book of Knowledge", unifies the fundamentals of

planimetry and stereometry. For instance, in the section "On the Principles Related to Intersecting

Lines in Stereometry", he discusses perpendiculars to a straight line and also those to a plane.

Moreover, Ibn Sina explores numerical notation, comparisons of equality and inequality, and

logical operations on numbers. His famous works, such as "The Canon of Medicine" (Kitab al-

Qanun fi al-Tibb), "The Book of Salvation" (Kitab al-Najat), and "The Book of Fairness" (Kitab

al-Insaf), integrate knowledge of geometry, astronomy, botany, zoology, and logic.

Several scholars, including B.M. Kedrov, P.N. Fedoseyev, and N.P. Devenchuk, have worked on

the integration of scientific knowledge but have not found a definitive answer regarding its

objective foundation. From a scientific perspective, the objective basis of knowledge integration

lies in the unity of the universe and the interrelation of its elements.

E.O. Turdiqulov defines the integration of scientific knowledge as follows:

"Integration is the process of bringing together scattered, fragmented, and separate elements into a

whole, a systematic and unified state. It represents a comprehensive understanding of nature and

directs knowledge from various fields toward a single goal. It expresses the integrity of the

universe."


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

17

M.M. Mamadazimov, in his research, discusses interdisciplinary and intradisciplinary integration,

stating:

"Integration means transitioning from the mere interconnection of different subjects in education

to a deeper mutual influence between them."

The term "integration" originates from the English word "integration", meaning restoration of

parts, unification, or fusion into a whole (according to an encyclopedic dictionary).

In school mathematics, research on subject integration mainly focuses on establishing internal and

interdisciplinary connections, developing integrated courses, enhancing applied approaches,

ensuring didactic consistency, and maintaining continuity in mathematical education. For example,

the link between algebra and geometry is primarily established by applying algebraic (analytical)

methods to solve geometric problems.

In the discussion of interdisciplinary connections, the great didactician J.A. Comenius stated:

"Everything interconnected should be studied in the same interconnected manner."

Later, various pedagogues further developed and generalized this idea. For example, I.G.

Pestalozzi emphasized the diversity of connections between educational subjects:

"In one's mind, all sciences should be connected exactly as they are interconnected in nature."

The distinguished educator K.D. Ushinsky, in his selected works (Vol. III, M., Prosvisheniye,

1969, pp. 59-60), thoroughly substantiates the didactic importance of interdisciplinary

connections from both psychological and pedagogical perspectives.

The integration of algebra and geometry in education should follow this system:

Explaining algebraic material during the learning process

Providing an analytical proof of geometric material

Ensuring a systematic and sequential connection between algebra and geometry

Various psychologists have also studied interdisciplinary connections. For example, I.P. Pavlov

emphasized that the foundation of scientific cognition is research and observation. He argued that

human brain activity relies on systematically integrated information. Psychologist I.A. Mironenko

proposed the idea of shaping a bio-social character in individuals, considering it one of the main

challenges in modern school education. According to Mironenko, today's school curriculum lacks

integration between worldly sciences, language, and the spiritual teachings of great individuals,

which should not remain isolated.

L. S. Vygotsky highlighted the role of global sciences in shaping human psychology and the

necessity of their full integration, stating:

"One of the greatest difficulties an adolescent must overcome at the end of their transitional

period is transferring the meaning and significance of a developed concept to new concrete

situations, which they initially think about in an abstract manner."

N.A. Menchinskaya, in her book "Psychology of Teaching Arithmetic", asserts that students’

intellectual development is characterized not only by the volume of acquired knowledge but also


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

18

by their ability to apply cognitive methods and operations in problem-solving. She believes that a

key indicator of intellectual growth is a person’s ability to transfer their cognitive skills from one

area to another.

The educational reformer and American pedagogue John Dewey introduced a new principle for

structuring curricula and textbooks:

"From the child to the world and from the world to the child."

Dewey is considered one of the founders of integrated education. In his article "Integration of

Subjects in the Modern School", T.G. Braje states:

"The origin of integration is a pedagogical phenomenon... The current process of integration is

based on a long history of establishing interdisciplinary connections."

The author classifies the stages of educational integration into the following directions:

The emergence of integrated sciences, reflecting the relationships between humans and

nature, humans and society, history and geography, and other disciplines.

The integration of "classical" subjects, such as history and literature, Russian language and

Russian literature, and world literature with Russian literature and art. This leads to the

introduction of interdisciplinary lessons covering topics relevant to multiple courses.

Intra-disciplinary integration, where different branches within a subject are unified into a

single course, restructuring existing disciplines.

Many scholars believe that integrating subjects and improving curricula remains a crucial tool for

advancing educational systems.

An analysis of pedagogical and psychological literature reveals that there is no single, universally

accepted definition of integrative education. However, all educators and psychologists

acknowledge the effectiveness of integrative learning and its alignment with modern educational

requirements. To clarify the essence of educational integration, consensus and mutual

understanding among pedagogues and methodological scholars are necessary. This indicates that

the issue of integration remains unresolved to some extent.

References:

1.

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Education", August 23, 2020.

2.

Turdiqulov, E.O. Current Issues in the Content of Natural Sciences and Their Integrated

Teaching. Tashkent: UzPFITI, 2007, p. 19.

3.

Mamadazimov, M. Methodological Foundations of Integrated Teaching of Physics and

Astronomy. Tashkent, 2007, p. 30.

4.

Kamenskiy, Ya.A. Didactics. Leningrad: Gosizdat, 1957, p. 242.

5.

Pestalozzi, G. Collected Works. Vol. 4. Leningrad, 1949, p. 202.

6.

Mironenko, I.A. "Problems of Integrating Psychological Knowledge in Modern

Pedagogical Research." Pedagogy, 2004, No. 5, pp. 12-21.

7.

Vygotsky, L.S. Selected Psychological Studies. Moscow: APN RSFSR Publishing House,

1956, p. 519.


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

19

8.

Menchinskaya, N.A. The Psychology of Teaching Arithmetic. Moscow, 1956, p. 432.

9.

Dewey, John. Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Moscow, 1995.

10.

Braje, T.G. "Integration of Subjects in the Modern School." Literature in School, 1996, No.

5, pp. 15-19.

11.

Nazarov, X.E., Ostonov, Q., Tilavov, R. History of Mathematics. Samarkand: "O‘quv

Qo‘llanma", 2023, p. 291.

References

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Education", August 23, 2020.

Turdiqulov, E.O. Current Issues in the Content of Natural Sciences and Their Integrated Teaching. Tashkent: UzPFITI, 2007, p. 19.

Mamadazimov, M. Methodological Foundations of Integrated Teaching of Physics and Astronomy. Tashkent, 2007, p. 30.

Kamenskiy, Ya.A. Didactics. Leningrad: Gosizdat, 1957, p. 242.

Pestalozzi, G. Collected Works. Vol. 4. Leningrad, 1949, p. 202.

Mironenko, I.A. "Problems of Integrating Psychological Knowledge in Modern Pedagogical Research." Pedagogy, 2004, No. 5, pp. 12-21.

Vygotsky, L.S. Selected Psychological Studies. Moscow: APN RSFSR Publishing House, 1956, p. 519.

Menchinskaya, N.A. The Psychology of Teaching Arithmetic. Moscow, 1956, p. 432.

Dewey, John. Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Moscow, 1995.

Braje, T.G. "Integration of Subjects in the Modern School." Literature in School, 1996, No. 5, pp. 15-19.

Nazarov, X.E., Ostonov, Q., Tilavov, R. History of Mathematics. Samarkand: "O‘quv Qo‘llanma", 2023, p. 291.