SYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTHY THINKING OF SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

Abstract

This article studies the problems of harmonious formation of students' independent and healthy thinking, healthy thinking, independence in decision-making, responsibility, the formation of their own ideas and thoughts. The psychological features of the formation of healthy thinking among students are highlighted.

Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2014
inLibrary
Google Scholar
Branch of knowledge
CC BY f
76-79
33

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Khasanova, I. . (2025). SYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTHY THINKING OF SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS. International Multidisciplinary Journal for Research & Development, 1(1), 76–79. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/imjrd/article/view/69636
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

This article studies the problems of harmonious formation of students' independent and healthy thinking, healthy thinking, independence in decision-making, responsibility, the formation of their own ideas and thoughts. The psychological features of the formation of healthy thinking among students are highlighted.


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

76

SYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTHY THINKING

OF SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

Iroda Khasanova

Trainee teacher of the Department of general psychology of Jizzakh State Pedagogical Universit

Abstract:

This article studies the problems of harmonious formation of students' independent and

healthy thinking, healthy thinking, independence in decision-making, responsibility, the formation

of their own ideas and thoughts. The psychological features of the formation of healthy thinking

among students are highlighted.

Key words:

Thinking, healthy thinking, idea and thought, economic and intellectual potential,

development of science and culture, perception, perception, imagination.

Several studies have been carried out by scientists of our country on thinking and its

manifestations (creative, logical, artistic-aesthetic, moral, environmental, independence,

historical). Perhaps this situation is due to the point of view theory that common sense applies to

all forms of thinking. As you know, the effectiveness of the reforms carried out in all spheres of

our society is inextricably linked, first of all, with the restoration of folk spirituality, a deep study

of our rich historical heritage, the preservation of our traditions, the development of Culture, Art,

Science and education, the training of qualified specialist personnel armed with technical

achievements of modern science.

So we are not mistaken to say that with the rise of a person's spirituality, his thinking and thinking

also develop. After all, thinking is a high form of human mental activity, the most important

connections and relationships between things and phenomena are reflected in our minds. Through

contemplation, we have the opportunity to know the essence of things and phenomena in the

material world, and therefore direct perception, perception, imagination and thinking play an

important role in knowing the world. Thinking is a high form of human mental activity. Thinking

is a weapon of knowledge of the surrounding world and is a prerequisite for the emergence of

rational practical activity of a person.

Reality is more vivid and Fuller in thinking than in perception and imagination. Contemplation is

a generalizing reflection of reality. The most important connections and relationships between

things or phenomena are opened with the help of contemplation.

Consequently, thinking is such a mental activity of a person that this activity allows you

to reflect (know) reality most clearly (correctly), fully, deeply and generalizing, allowing a person

to engage in a more rational practical activity. As schoolchildren begin to acquire knowledge,

they also learn to justify, prove, reject, verify various rules. In particular, they learn to use

examples, facts, general rules, and axioms as arguments. High school students, especially students

of the upper classes, are able to reveal contradictions in complex discussions of other people, as

well as their own too, irrationality, unsubstantiated aspects Schoolchildren always use arguments

that prove and refute in training on the basics of socio-historical science and Darwinism.

The participation of schoolchildren in amateur circles, active participation in the

discussion of the issues seen, plays a big role in the growth and development of critical, proven

and independent thinking. During the period of teaching children, in combination with theoretical

thinking, practical thinking is also developed in them. First of all, this is achieved in such a way

that the teaching of most subjects in the school (for example, Physics, Chemistry, Botany,


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

77

Zoology) is carried out in connection with the application of the knowledge received by students

in industry, agriculture.

Schoolchildren believe that the growth and development of thinking will not be even

and the same. The individual characteristics of students are determined to a large extent by the

growth of other psychic processes - memory, imagination, speech, attention, will; these individual

characteristics are in many respects due to the interests of students, their activity in educational

and practical work, as well as the self-education of students.will depend. Educational work in

secondary schools is carried out with the active, conscious participation of students. Therefore,

the school of hiz helps to a large extent the growth of a wide range of meaningful, mustacjil and

logically correct thinking in children. K.P.Megrelidze argues that any mental phenomenon in a

person cannot be properly explained without taking into account the social factor. This thing

depends primarily on human thinking.

Thinking cannot be studied without other manifestations of social life. The methods of

human thinking are not in the nervous system, nor in the brain, but in the social conditions that in

one period give way to such perception, thinking, working, and in another period to work nerve

activity differently. Human thoughts and views are caused not by individual order, but by social

relations, about which Megrelidze writes: "human thought moves not according to natural and

biological laws, but on the path of socio-historical laws. The way a person thinks is primarily a

social phenomenon. The opinion of a separate individual is a private manifestation of socially

matured thoughts. Each individual person thinks with the help of social concepts and visions.

Thoughts and ideas are not the product of free individual creativity, but the product of society and

social monasteries, such as the individual himself. Therefore, the solution to the puzzle about

human thinking, stages of thinking, forms and methods of human thinking should be sought not

from logical research, not from traditional psychology, but first of all from the social origin of

these ideas. One or another individ becomes a "random" expressiveness of matured social ideas in

society". A special place in Uzbek families is occupied by spiritual heritage created by ancestral

thought and intelligence. Material and spiritual monuments created by the thought and genius of

our ancestors, from samples of folk oral creativity, thousands of manuscripts preserved in the

treasures of our libraries today, valuable works on history, literature, art, politics, ethics,

philosophy, medicine, mathematics, astronomy, architecture, agriculture and other fields

embodied in our great spiritual wealth.

It is on the basis of these that it is important to educate the younger generation. In this case,

special attention should be paid to further improving the activities of cooperation between the

family and the educational institution. After all, spiritual culture in the family is also associated

with the actions of family members, the potential to assess reality, moral knowledge and

experiences, the ability to use them, the differentiation of good-bad, positive-negative situations

and hakozo factors. But happiness is not determined only by wealth, property. A decent,

knowledgeable and intelligent, hardworking child is the greatest asset not only of the parents, but

of the whole society.

Therefore, to educate our young people a harmonious generation with a physically healthy,

spiritually mature and independent mind, to strengthen the family, which is a stronghold of

spirituality, where the eternity of life ensures the continuity of generations today. The only idea

that, regardless of the hurficrism that exists in our society today, jeeps young people, protects the

inviolability of our people and our state, encourages el-Yut to higher goals – to educate in the

spirit of loyalty to the national ideology-constitutes the essence of today. S.Atakhanova touched

on the issue of the formation of Healthy Thinking in student-youth and came to the following

conclusion: --first, to educate them spiritually-aesthetically, - secondly, to form their active point

of view on problems in the life of society, - thirdly, it becomes the basis for their interpretation in


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

78

the perspective as a social group that protects the health of the whole society. Therefore, healthy

thinking is desirable if it is considered as a means of ensuring the personal perfection of students

and young people.

When it comes to the set of pedagogical-psychological measures and processes in the

development of Healthy Thinking in students, it is necessary to first assume that healthy thinking

is both a psychological, philosophical and pedagogical category. Because, healthy thinking

embodies them all in its meaning. If we focus only on the pedagogical-psychological aspects of

healthy thinking, it becomes clear that several specific stages and processes take place in the

formation of healthy thinking. They are: a) the process of analyzing previous knowledge and

skills, social status and experiences in itself.

The main feature of this process is that the essence of the existing concept is divided into certain

units that make it up, that is, the components of the concept are separated. At the same time, the

set of competencies of this concept, firstly, a set of knowledge, and secondly, separately, is sorted

and determined;
b) the process of synthesizing existing knowledge and skills. In the previous process, it is clarified

the nature of the generalization of the concept, which is specially divided into units, arising from

today's demand;
d) the process of comparative comparison, on the basis of a comparative study of all available

knowledge and skills, the specific aspects in them that are similar and different are understood

and accepted. This process contributes to a clearer understanding of the relevance within the

constituent parts of the concept, the content of mutually complementary factors;
e) the process of classification, all knowledge and skills related to healthy thinking, its

components and content are grouped by combining existing characteristics. Grouping creates the

possibility of a holistic picture of the essence of the concept in general. Grouping helps to

understand the logic within the content of the concept. In classification, grouping is carried out on

the basis of the characteristics of the components.
f) in the process of generalization, knowledge and skills related to healthy thinking are grouped on

the basis of the most common parties and characteristics present in them; j) in the process of

clarification, the private aspects of the concept of healthy thinking are distinguished from its

common aspects. That is, clarity is introduced into the internal private aspects of each concept

within healthy thinking, which is then summarized; h) the process of abstraction directs one

aspect of healthy thinking to intensify and exaggerate awareness without taking into account

others. That is, healthy thinking actually acquires modernity with several dozen different facets of

itself. It is in this process that one aspect of healthy thinking can be more relevant today than the

other aspects.

list of used literature

1.M.G.Davletshin et al. Psychological foundations of Education. Tutorial - T.: Teacher. 1995y.

B.20.

2. P.I.Ivanov, M.E.Zufarova textbook "general psychology". Tashkent-2008. 186-187-b

3. DJ.Dyui "Psychologicheskaya I pedagogichkaya mishleniya". - M.: Sovershenstvo. 1998y.

B.41.


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 02 (2025)

79

4. Kamolova, S., & Amankhanova, lit. (2022). The importance of pedagogical technologies in the

formation of thinking processes of students. Journal pedagogic I psychologii v sovremennom

obrazovanii, 2 (6).
5. Kamolova, Sh. O., & Munarova, R. O. (2010). Urovni sovershenstvo lichnosti. Issledovatel

nauchny magazine.- Kazakhstan, 5 (49), 100-105.

References

M.G.Davletshin et al. Psychological foundations of Education. Tutorial - T.: Teacher. 1995y. B.20.

P.I.Ivanov, M.E.Zufarova textbook "general psychology". Tashkent-2008. 186-187-b

DJ.Dyui "Psychologicheskaya I pedagogichkaya mishleniya". - M.: Sovershenstvo. 1998y. B.41.

Kamolova, S., & Amankhanova, lit. (2022). The importance of pedagogical technologies in the formation of thinking processes of students. Journal pedagogic I psychologii v sovremennom obrazovanii, 2 (6).

Kamolova, Sh. O., & Munarova, R. O. (2010). Urovni sovershenstvo lichnosti. Issledovatel nauchny magazine.- Kazakhstan, 5 (49), 100-105.