Authors

  • Sobir Abduvaitov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.science-research.139690

Keywords:

Moral rehabilitation of prisoners Modern approaches Foreign experience Psychological rehabilitation Social adaptation

Abstract

This article analyzes modern foreign approaches to the moral rehabilitation of prisoners. The research results indicate that prisoner reintegration programs, psychological rehabilitation, vocational and educational training, as well as social adaptation activities, significantly reduce the likelihood of recidivism. Foreign experiences, particularly methods applied in Scandinavian and Western European countries, demonstrate the effectiveness of individualized approaches and interactive rehabilitation programs. The article also discusses the possibilities of applying these approaches in the context of Uzbekistan and ways to enhance the efficiency of the system.

References

Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). Prisons and recidivism. Crime and Justice, 40(1), 115–200.

Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13(2), 355–375.

McNeill, F. (2012). Four components of effective offender rehabilitation. Practice: Social Work in Action, 24(3), 179–192.

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. 5th edition. New York: Routledge.

Pratt, J., & Eriksson, A. (2013). Contrasts in punishment: An explanation of Anglophone excess and Nordic exceptionalism. British Journal of Criminology, 53(6), 997–1024.