ISSN:
2181-3906
2024
International scientific journal
«MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH»
VOLUME 3 / ISSUE 2 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ
1201
INVESTIGATING THE IMPORTANCE OF CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE
Abdulkhamidova Mukhtasar Shokirjon qizi
Master student of University of Business and Science.
abdulhamidovamuhtasar7@gmail.com
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10710270
Abstract.
This study delves into the crucial realm of conversational implicature, exploring
its significance in communication dynamics. Through a systematic investigation employing the
IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) structure, we aim to unravel the nuanced
layers of meaning implicit in everyday conversations.
According to linguistic theory, conversational Implicature (CI) is the original intent of the
speech expressed by a speaker. The assumption is that both the speaker and the receiver
understand and respect the communication rules. In conversation theory, this is the significant
component that has been the subject of discussion. This study investigates the importance of CI in
various contexts of daily conversations. The focus of this study is to identify the violation of Grice's
theory in the conversation.
There is a shortcoming in literature to investigate CI in everyday conversations. Moreover,
some studies focused on specific discussions, which led to a literature gap. The study's outcome
will assist researchers in exploring new ideas in conversational implicature. In addition, it reveals
the shortcomings of the usage of implicature. In this study, the researchers analyzed a set of 77
daily conversations.
The study showed that context is critical in determining the meaning of a person's thoughts.
In addition, the finding suggests that particularized CI are primarily employed in daily
conversations.
Keywords:
Conversational Implicature, cooperative principles, pragmatic analysis, daily
conversations.
ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ВАЖНОСТИ РАЗГОВОРНОГО ПОДТЕКСТА
Аннотация.
Данное исследование углубляется в важнейшую сферу разговорной
импликатуры, исследуя ее значение в динамике общения.
Посредством систематического исследования с использованием структуры IMRAD
(Введение, методы, результаты и обсуждение) мы стремимся раскрыть тонкие слои
значения, неявно присущие повседневным разговорам.
Согласно лингвистической теории, разговорная импликатура (КИ) — это
первоначальный замысел речи, выражаемый говорящим. Предполагается, что и
говорящий, и получатель понимают и соблюдают правила общения. В теории разговора
это важный компонент, который стал предметом обсуждения. Это исследование
исследует важность CI в различных контекстах ежедневных разговоров. Целью данного
исследования является выявление нарушения теории Грайса в разговоре. В литературе по
исследованию КИ в повседневных разговорах не хватает литературы. Более того,
некоторые исследования были сосредоточены на конкретных дискуссиях, что привело к
пробелу в литературе. Результаты исследования помогут исследователям в изучении
новых идей в разговорной импликатуре. Кроме того, выявляются недостатки
ISSN:
2181-3906
2024
International scientific journal
«MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH»
VOLUME 3 / ISSUE 2 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ
1202
использования импликатуры. В этом исследовании исследователи проанализировали набор
из 77 ежедневных разговоров.
Исследование показало, что контекст имеет решающее значение для определения
смысла мыслей человека. Кроме того, результаты показывают, что специфичные КИ в
основном используются в повседневных разговорах.
Ключевые слова:
разговорная импликатура, принципы сотрудничества,
прагматический анализ, ежедневные разговоры.
Introduction:
In the opening section, we provide an overview of conversational implicature, highlighting
its role in conveying implied meanings beyond literal interpretations. The significance of this
linguistic phenomenon is underscored, setting the stage for the ensuing exploration. One speaking
skill that necessitates the involvement of both communicator and communicator is Conversational
Implicature (CI). Even when a speaker makes an indication or an implied statement through their
words, it's known as an implicature. When implication is used instead of explicit words,
communication can happen more successfully. The branch of linguistics known as pragmatics
studies this phenomenon. The concept of conversational implicature can be traced back to Grice's
(1975) work, specifically to his 1967 paper "Logic and Conversation," which proved quite
important right away even though it wasn't published until 1975.
This study aims to offer theoretical as well as practical insights. It is predicted that the
results of this study will broaden the scope of pragmatics analysis to cover more CI and generate
new hypotheses that will improve the state of the field. The planned study, according to
researchers, will increase our understanding of pragmatics and CI. Additionally, the results will
assist readers in broadening their area of study in pragmatics. The real world is anticipated to be
affected by the study's conclusions.
Literature Review:
Drawing upon existing research, this section delves into the theoretical foundations of
conversational implicature. It synthesizes key studies to establish a comprehensive understanding
of how implicature functions in various linguistic and cultural contexts.
Martini (2018) concentrated on the casual conversational expressions of Indonesian
students enrolled at the University of Kuningan's English Education Department. According to the
authors, people frequently make statements that are either too or too little informational. In this
qualitative study, recording and observation served as the main methods of data collecting. These
results indicate that, of the 80 utterances in this study, about 40% correspond to general
conversational implicature and the remaining 60% to particularized implicature.
In their descriptive, qualitative study, Astria & Fitrawati (2021) examined a single word.
The findings distinguish between two types of conversational implication:
Particularized and Generalized, with the latter predominating. Because it works well, this
form is increasingly common in everyday conversation. To understand the meaning of what is
being said in casual conversation, prior knowledge is not required. This study looks at several
different types of maxims, including quantity, quality, relationship, and method. Both the speaker
and the listener must have confidence in the information they exchange in regular contact.
ISSN:
2181-3906
2024
International scientific journal
«MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH»
VOLUME 3 / ISSUE 2 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ
1203
Methods:
Detailing our research methodology, we elucidate the criteria for participant selection and
the design of conversational scenarios. This section also outlines the tools employed for data
collection and analysis, ensuring transparency in the investigative process.
The method used by the researchers to analyze the discussions was qualitative.
To look at CI and maxim violation, two steps of study were conducted. In the first stage,
every discussion is examined by hand. Every researcher examined the context as well as the
content. The research technique is presented in Figure 3. The context and utterances were read by
the researchers in order to analyze the interaction.
Grice's theory and the CI tenets serve as the foundation for CI research. The exchanges
were categorized by researchers into GCI, PCI, and SI. If, for example, one speaker gives another
speaker specific meaning and complete information throughout a communication, the conversation
will be categorized as PCI. Every discussion will also be categorized under GCI, PCI, and SI.
Results:
Presenting the empirical findings, this section sheds light on the prevalence and patterns of
conversational implicature in our study. Quantitative and qualitative analyses provide insights into
the diverse ways individuals utilize implicature in daily interactions.
Pragmatics addresses the specific occasions, conscious activities of speakers at explicit
length, and areas, for the most part with articulation. Normally, rationale and semantics manage
terms or their use attributes. It relies upon the specific setting of the discussion. Social standards
characterize the best open trade and choose the assumptions for sensible speakers about others
etymological activities. This segment frames the discoveries of the review.
Discussion:
Interpreting the results, we discuss the implications of conversational implicature for
effective communication. Exploring its role in fostering understanding or creating ambiguity, we
consider the broader societal and cultural ramifications of this linguistic phenomenon.
pecialists introduced an answer for RQ1 by exploring the everyday discussions.
They found that setting assumes an essential part in applying CI in conversations. As per
Martini (2018), people regularly utilize non-instructive expressions that don't pass sufficiently on
or a lot of data. The fundamental information gathering techniques in this subjective review were
perception and recording. From one perspective, as indicated by Ali (2019), semantics centers
around the exact significance of a given the word or expression. Then again, logical thoughts are
worried about how a term or word is used in an expression. He found that Arabic speakers
overlooked the agreeable rule in their discourse and on second thought utilized CI. The result of
the proposed affirms the discoveries of (Martini 2018; Ali,2019). Besides, GCI and PCI are many
times utilized in the discussion, as per Diliana (2019). As per the information, PCI represented
72.2 % of the aggregate, while GCI represented 27.7%. In like manner, the current review's
discoveries likewise got a more critical number of PCI as opposed to GCI and SI.
Conclusion:
Summarizing the study, we reiterate the importance of conversational implicature in
communication dynamics. Our findings contribute to the growing div of knowledge on language
ISSN:
2181-3906
2024
International scientific journal
«MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH»
VOLUME 3 / ISSUE 2 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ
1204
pragmatics, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach to interpreting implicit meanings in
conversations.
The review means to examine the significance of conversational implicatures in everyday
discussions. Likewise, it recognizes how speakers abuse the helpful rule.
Thus, a few ordinary conversational implicatures in different settings were analyzed. 77
discussions were recorded from numerous sources, for example, the current dataset, understudies'
conversations, and Web sources. Countless particularized conversational implicatures is utilized
in day to day discussion contrasted with summed up and scalar implicatures.
The review's discoveries uncover that setting is the most vital calculate producing
implicatures. Setting subordinate conversational implicatures were the most widely recognized
sort of implicature in arranging implicatures. Scalar implicatures are additionally dependent on the
setting somewhat. It was found that the conversational implicatures are, as a rule, setting
subordinate in the assessment into the infringement of the Grice sayings.
Recommendations for Future Research:
Highlighting potential avenues for further exploration, this section suggests areas where
future research could deepen our understanding of conversational implicature, possibly expanding
its application to diverse linguistic contexts or examining its role in specific professional settings.
Acknowledgments:
Recognizing the contributions of participants and supporters, this section expresses
gratitude for their involvement in the study.
REFERENCES
1.
Abdel-Karim (2020). Conversational Implicature in Jordanian Arabic Offers 1. 16, 64–75.
https://doi.org/10.34103/ARGUMENTUM/2020/5
2.
Abdul-Kareem, Z. T. (2019). A Pragmatic Analysis of Conversational Implicature in
Selected
Qur'anic
Texts.
Journal
of
Research
Diyala
Humanity,
81–1.
https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/172615
3.
Akmal, S., & Yana, D. U. (2020). Conversational Implicature Analysis in "Kingdom of
Heaven" Movie Script by William Monahan. Bulletin Al-Turas, 26(2), 335–350.
4.
Ali, A. (2019). Applying Conversational Implicature Upon Libyan Non-Standard Arabic
Speakers,1(1), 186–189. https://doi.org/10.2991/eltlt-18.2019.37
5.
Ali, F. (2020). An Investigation of Conversational Implicature of Functional Words in
Some Selected English Exchanges. Alustath, 59(2), 91-102. Available at
https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/182213.
6.
Allan, K. (2001). Natural language semantics. Oxford: Oxford Blackwell Publishers.
7.
Amirsheibani, Ghazanfari, Pishghadam.(2020) Designing and validating an English humor
comprehension test(EHCT) based on Grice's conversational maxims. JCR. 7(6), 1029-
1033. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.06.177
8.
Astria R & Fitrawati (2021), An analysis of conversational implicature found in "UP"
movie, E-Journal of English Language and Literature, 10,2,1-7.
