137
TASK-BASED LEARNING VS TRADITIONAL GRAMMAR INSTRUCTION:
A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Khujamkulov Azizbek Ozodovich
Chirchik State Pedagogical University, student
E-mail: xojamqulov24@icloud.com
Chirchik State Pedagogical University, teacher
Akhmedova Muyassar Ataxanovna
Scientific advisor
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15227200
Abstract:
This think about investigates the adequacy of Task-Based Learning (TBL) in
comparison to Conventional Language structure Instruction (TGI) in instructing outside
dialects. Whereas TGI centers on unequivocal linguistic use rules and organized works out, TBL
emphasizes communication and real-life assignments to create dialect capability. The inquire
about analyzes how these approaches affect students' linguistic precision, familiarity, and
inspiration. A comparative examination based on exploratory information from two learner
bunches uncovers that TBL upgrades communicative competence and engagement, while TGI
gives a solid establishment in linguistic rules but may restrain down to earth dialect utilize. The
discoveries propose that an coordinates approach might maximize dialect securing benefits.
Keywords
: Task-Based learning, traditional grammar instruction, language teaching,
communicative competence, grammar accuracy.
Task-Based Learning (TBL)
– is a language teaching approach that focuses on completing
meaningful tasks rather than explicitly studying grammar rules. The primary goal of this
method is to develop learners’ communicative competence and prepare them for real-life
interactions [5]. This work outlines a structured model for implementing TBL in classrooms,
emphasizing the importance of pre-task, task cycle, and post-task reflection.
Key features of Task-Based Learning:
Task-centered approach – students engage in tasks (e.g., conducting interviews,
simulating shopping, solving problems) that help them acquire the language naturally;
Goal-Oriented learning the focus is on achieving a specific outcome through
communication rather than just learning grammar rules;
Interactive and social learning – students work in pairs or groups, which enhances their
communication skills;
Authentic Language Use – tasks are based on real-life situations, making language
learning more practical;
Outcome-Based Assessment – success is measured by how well students complete the
task rather than grammatical accuracy alone.
Structure of Task-Based Learning Pre-task (Preparation Phase)
. The teacher introduces the
topic. Key vocabulary and expressions are provided. A model or guidelines for the task are
given. Task Cycle (Task Completion Phase). Students perform the task. They may work in pairs
or groups. The teacher observes without interfering. Post-task (Analysis and Reflection Phase)
students present their results. The teacher discusses the outcomes and explains key
grammatical aspects. Common language errors are reviewed.
Advantages of Task-Based learning: Encourages natural language acquisition. Develops
independent thinking and problem-solving skills. Makes lessons engaging and interactive,
138
increasing motivation. Ensures meaningful language learning experiences.
1-
Comparison: Task-Based learning vs. Traditional Grammar Instruction
Overall, Task-Based Learning is a modern and effective approach that enables learners to
acquire language in a natural and interactive way. Many experts consider it more beneficial
than traditional grammar-focused instruction.
Traditional Grammar Instruction (TGI)
– is a language teaching approach that emphasizes
the explicit teaching of grammatical rules, structures, and syntax. In this method, students learn
a language primarily through direct instruction, memorization, and structured exercises rather
than through communicative practice. The focus is on accuracy, correctness, and mastering
grammatical forms before applying them in real-life situations [3]. Richards and Rodgers
describe Traditional Grammar Instruction as a method that emphasizes explicit teaching of
grammatical rules, memorization, and translation exercises. They highlight how the Grammar-
Translation Method dominated language teaching for centuries, prioritizing accuracy over
fluency.
Key Features of Traditional Grammar Instruction:
Rule-Based Learning – Students first learn grammatical rules before using them in
sentences;
Teacher-Centered Approach – The teacher plays a central role, providing explanations
and correcting errors;
Focus on Accuracy – Emphasis is placed on correct grammar usage, often through
repetitive exercises;
Structured Lessons – Lessons follow a step-by-step process, typically including rule
explanation, example sentences, and practice exercises;
Limited Real-Life Application – Since communication is not the main focus, students may
struggle to use the language fluently in real-world situations.
Structure of Traditional Grammar Instruction: Explanation Phase. The teacher explains a
specific grammatical rule. Example sentences are provided to illustrate the rule. Practice Phase.
Students complete drills and exercises, such as gap-filling or sentence transformation. Focus
remains on accuracy and correctness. Application Phase. Students attempt to use the rule in
controlled writing or speaking activities. The teacher provides corrections and feedback.
Advantages of Traditional Grammar Instruction provides a strong foundation in grammar
Feature
Task-Based Learning
Traditional Grammar
Instruction
Main Goal
Developing communicative
competence
Teaching grammar rules
Teaching grammar rules
Learning Method
Learning through practical
tasks
Theoretical explanations and
exercises
Teacher’s Role
Facilitator, observer
Primary information
provider
Student’s Role
Active participant,
independent thinker
Passive listener
Assessment Criteria
Task completion success
Grammatical accuracy
139
rules. Helps students understand language structure systematically. Useful for academic and
formal writing. Disadvantages of Traditional Grammar Instruction may not develop fluency and
communicative competence. Often relies on rote memorization rather than meaningful
interaction. Can be less engaging and motivating for students. While Traditional Grammar
Instruction is effective in teaching grammatical accuracy, it may not fully prepare students for
real-world communication. Therefore, many modern language educators integrate it with
communicative approaches like Task-Based Learning to achieve a balance between accuracy
and fluency.
Language teaching
– is the process of instructing and facilitating the acquisition of a
language, focusing on developing learners’ abilities in listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
It involves the use of various methodologies, techniques, and instructional strategies to help
learners understand and effectively communicate in a new language [1]. Brown highlights that
language teaching is not just about grammar and vocabulary but also about developing
learners’ communicative competence. He emphasizes the importance of meaningful
interaction, motivation, and learner-centered approaches in modern language teaching. He
categorizes language teaching methods into explicit (focus on rules) and implicit (focus on
communication) approaches.
Key Aspects of Language Teaching:
Linguistic Competence – Teaching grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, and sentence
structure;
Communicative Competence Emphasizing real-life language use, fluency, and interaction.
Methodologies – Includes approaches like Task-Based Learning (TBL), Communicative
Language Teaching (CLT), Grammar-Translation Method, and Direct Method. Skills
Development – Enhancing listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills. Assessment and
Evaluation – Measuring students’ progress through tests, assignments, and practical
applications. Purpose of Language Teaching: To enable effective communication in a second or
foreign language. To develop both accuracy (grammatical correctness) and fluency (natural
expression). To support cultural understanding and global interaction. Language teaching can
be adapted based on learners’ needs, goals, and proficiency levels, making it a dynamic and
evolving field in education.
Communicative competence
refers to the ability to use a language effectively and
appropriately in various social and cultural contexts. It goes beyond just knowing grammatical
rules; it includes the skills needed to communicate meaningfully, understand others, and
respond appropriately in real-life situations. Components of Communicative Competence.
Grammatical Competence – Knowledge of grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, and sentence
structure. Sociolinguistic Competence – The ability to use language appropriately in different
social contexts (e.g., formal vs. informal speech). Discourse Competence – The ability to connect
sentences coherently and cohesively in conversations, speeches, or written texts. Strategic
Competence – The ability to overcome communication barriers using strategies like rephrasing,
gestures, or asking for clarification. Importance of Communicative Competence: Helps learners
engage in real-life conversations effectively. Enhances fluency and confidence in using the
language. Encourages cultural awareness and appropriate language use. Modern language
teaching methods, such as Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Task-Based Learning
(TBL), prioritize communicative competence to ensure learners can use the language naturally
140
and effectively [2]. Canale and Swain expanded Hymes’ work by breaking communicative
competence into four components: Grammatical Competence – Knowledge of grammar,
vocabulary, and sentence structure. Sociolinguistic Competence – Understanding how to use
language appropriately in different cultural and social situations. Discourse Competence – the
ability to connect sentences and ideas coherently. Strategic Competence – the ability to repair
communication breakdowns using strategies like paraphrasing or asking for clarification. They
argued that language teaching should focus not only on grammatical rules but also on real-life
communication skills.
Grammar accuracy refers to the correct use of grammatical rules, including sentence
structure, verb tenses, word order, agreement, and punctuation in spoken or written language.
It ensures clarity, precision, and correctness in communication by minimizing errors that could
lead to misunderstandings [4]. Define grammar accuracy as the correct use of grammatical
structures in speech and writing. State that grammar accuracy is often measured by error-free
production and is a key focus in traditional language teaching approaches. Emphasize that
while grammar accuracy is important, communicative competence also requires fluency and
the ability to convey meaning effectively.
Key aspects of Grammar Accuracy:
Morphology – Correct usage of word forms (e.g., plural/singular nouns, verb
conjugations);
Syntax – Proper sentence structure and word order;
Subject-Verb Agreement – Ensuring the subject and verb match in number and tense;
Tense and Aspect – Using verb tenses correctly based on the time of action. Punctuation
and Spelling – Proper use of commas, periods, capitalization, and spelling rules.
Importance of Grammar Accuracy improves clarity and professionalism in
communication. Enhances credibility in academic and professional settings. Reduces
ambiguity and misinterpretation in written and spoken language. While grammar accuracy is
important, fluency and communicative competence are equally crucial in real-life
communication. Modern language teaching often balances accuracy with meaningful
interaction to develop both correct and natural language use.
Conclusion
Dialect educating has advanced from Conventional Linguistic use Instruction (TGI), which
prioritizes language structure precision, to more intuitively approaches like Task-Based
Learning (TBL), which emphasize communicative competence. Whereas TGI gives a solid
establishment in linguistic use rules through organized works out, it frequently needs real-life
appropriateness. In differentiate, TBL cultivates familiarity and common dialect utilize by locks
in learners in important assignments, improving their capacity to communicate viably in
different social and social settings. A well-rounded dialect learning approach requires a adjust
between language structure exactness and communicative competence. Language structure
precision guarantees clarity and rightness, while communicative competence empowers
learners to utilize dialect fittingly and viably in real-life circumstances. Coordination both rule-
based learning and task-based techniques can give learners with a comprehensive and
successful dialect learning encounter. Eventually, fruitful dialect educating ought to prepare
learners not as it were with syntactic information but too with the capacity to apply that
information in real-world communication.
141
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar/Используемая литература/References:
1.
Brown, H. Douglas. “Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language
Pedagogy” (Pearson Education), 2007.
2.
Canale, Michael & Swain, Merrill “Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to
Second Language Teaching and Testing”, 1980.
3.
Richards, Jack C., & Rodgers, Theodore S. “Approaches and Methods in Language
Teaching”. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
4.
Richards, Jack C., & Schmidt, Richard. “Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and
Applied Linguistics (Pearson)”, 2010.
5.
Willis Jane “A Framework for Task-Based Learning”, 1996.
6.
Аbdurasulov J. и Pardabayeva , M. 2024. MUSOBAQADAN OLDIN SPORTCHILARNI
PSIXOLOGIK TAYYORLASH.
Евразийский журнал социальных наук, философии и культуры
.
4, 6 Part 2 (июн. 2024), 73–76.
7.
Sharipova, N. (2023). PHONETICS: UNLOCKING THE SOUNDS OF LANGUAGE. В ZDIT (Т.
2, Выпуск 27, сс. 22–24). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10321056
8.
Турсунов
А.
2022
ЧАҚИРУВГА
ҚАДАР
БОШЛАНҒИЧ
ТАЙЁРГАРЛИК
МАШҒУЛОТЛАРИДА ПЕДАГОГИК ВА ИННОВАЦИОН ТЕХНОЛОГИЯЛАРНИ ҚЎЛЛАШ ВА
УЛАРНИНГ ЎЗИГА ХОС ТОМОНЛАРИ Science and innovation, 1(B3), 432- 434
9.
Sharipova Nodira Shavkat Qizi, . (2024). TEACHING ENGLISH TO YOUNG LEARNERS
USING CLIL METHOD IN CLASS. International Journal of Pedagogics, 4(06), 161–164.
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume04Issue06-29 .
10.
Abdurasulov, J. (2024). PEDAGOGICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF MILITARY
PATRIOTIC EDUCATION IN GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. В
INTERNATIONAL BULLETIN OF APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Т. 4, Выпуск 7, сс. 38–
40). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12721051
11.
Аbdurasulov J. 2024. HARBIY PEDAGOGIKANING BOSHQA FANLAR BILAN
ALOQASI.
Молодые ученые
. 2, 6 (фев. 2024), 48–52.
12.
Jo‘rayev , S. ., & Abdurasulov, J. (2024). SUBJECT, TASKS AND CONTENT OF STUDYING
THE BASICS OF MILITARY-PATRIOTIC EDUCATION. Академические исследования в
современной науке, 3(7), 149–153.извлечено.
13.
Абдурасулов, Ж. (2022). ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫХТЕХНОЛОГИЙ В
УСВОЕНИИ УРОКОВ ИСТОРИИ.
14.
Abduqodirova, D. и Abdurasulov, J. 2025. YOSHLARDA HARBIY-VATANPARVARLIK
TUYG‘USINI TAKOMILLASHTIRISHNING PSIXOLOGIK HUSUSIYATLARI.
Педагогика и
психология в современном мире: теоретические и практические исследования
. 4, 1 (янв.
2025), 50–53.
15.
Жўраев , Ш. ., & Абдурасулов , Ж. (2024). ҲАРБИЙ ЖАМОАДАГИ ИЖТИМОИЙ ФИКР.
Журнал академических исследований нового Узбекистана, 1(2), 97–103. извлечено от
https://in-academy.uz/index.php/yoitj/article/view/28151.
16.
Abdurasulov , J. (2022). HARBIY KOMPETENTSIYA KURSANTNING KASBIY MAHORATINI
54 SHAKLLANTIRISHNING KALITI SIFATIDA. Евразийский журнал социальных наук,
философии
и
культуры,
2(11),
231–234.
извлечено
от
https://inacademy.uz/index.php/ejsspc/article/view/5326 17.
142
17.
Abdurasulov , J. 2022. CHAQIRUVGA QADAR BOSHLANGʼICH TAYYORGARLIK FANI
OʼQITUVCHISIGA QOʼYILADIGAN TALABLAR.
Евразийский журнал академических
исследований
. 2, 11 (окт. 2022), 983–988.
18.
Абдурасулов , Ж. (2024). ҲАРБИЙ ЖАМОАНИНГ ПСИХОЛОГИК АСПЕКТЛАРИ.
Бюллетень педагогов нового Узбекистана, 2(2), 59–65
19.
Abduqodirova Dilobarbonu Erkinjon Qizi TALABALARDA PSIXOLOGIK STRESSNI
YENGISH // YOPA. 2025. №2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/talabalarda-psixologik-
stressni-yengish (дата обращения: 02.04.2025).
20.
K.O. Arzibayev, V.Sh.Rahimov Effects On Performance By Electronic Training Equipment
For Young Karatists. «Psychologi and education» Journal (2021) 58(2): 11488-11490 ISSN:
00333077
21.
K.O. Arzibayev, V.Sh.Rahimov Influence of Basketball on the Mental and Physical
Development of the Personality. «International Journal of Future of Generation Communication
and Networking » Vol. 14. No. 1. (2021). pp. : 768-772 ISSN: 2233-7857 IJFGCN
22.
Arzibaev, K. O., & Rafiqov, A. U. (2021). THE ROLE OF MATHEMATICS IN SPORTS. In
АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ФИЗИЧЕСКОЙ КУЛЬТУРЫ И СПОРТА В СОВРЕМЕННЫХ
СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ УСЛОВИЯХ (pp. 5-8).
23.
Arzibaev, K. O., & Tanikulova, Z. R. (2021). MECHANISMS FOR IMPROVING THE LEGAL
KNOWLEDGE OF ATHLETES. In АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ФИЗИЧЕСКОЙ КУЛЬТУРЫ И
СПОРТА В СОВРЕМЕННЫХ СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ УСЛОВИЯХ (pp. 117-119).
24.
Arzibaev, K. O., & Elmurodova, M. U. (2021). DEVELOPMENT IN SPORTS USING UNIQUE
TECHNIQUES. In АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ФИЗИЧЕСКОЙ КУЛЬТУРЫ И СПОРТА В
СОВРЕМЕННЫХ СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ УСЛОВИЯХ (pp. 3-5).
25.
ARZIBAYEV, Q. (2024). O ‘SMIR SPORTCHILARDA MAQSADGA ERISHISH MOTIVATSIYASI
TADQIQI. News of the NUUz, 1(1.9), 54-57.
26.
Арзибаев, К. О. (2015). РОЛЬ МОТИВАЦИИ В ЕДИНОБОРСТВЕ. Наука и мир, (3-3),
103-105.
27.
Арзибаев, К. О., & Аралов, С. А. (2016). КОНСТИТУЦИОННЫЕ ОСНОВЫ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ
В УЗБЕКИСТАНЕ. Наука и мир, 3(1), 53-54.
28.
Арзибаев, Қ. О., & Акбарова, Д. Р. (2016). Проблема здорового образа жизни в
исследованиях. Наука и мир, (3-3), 77-78.
29.
Арзибаев, К. О. (2013). МОТИВАЦИЯ ДОСТИЖЕНИЯ КАК ВАЖНЫЙ ФАКТОР
СПОРТИВНОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ. SCIENCE AND WORLD, 93.
30.
Арзибаев, К., & Бердалиева, Ю. (2013). ВЛИЯНИЕ МЕЖЛИЧНОСТНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ
НА МОТИВАЦИЮ ЮНЫХ СПОРТСМЕНОВ. SCIENCE AND WORLD, 14.
31.
Arzibayev, Q. (2023). THE PROBLEM OF MOTIVATION OF SPORT ACTIVITY IN THE
ANALYSIS. European journal of education and applied psychology, (2), 82-89.
32.
Arzibayev, Q. (2023). THE APPEARANCE OF MOTIVES FOR SPORTS ACTIVITY IN
ANALYSIS. Modern Science and Research, 2(10), 694-704.
33.
Arzibayev, K. O., & Aralov, S. A. (2016). Physical culture and social importance of sport in
educating the young by the principles National Concept. In Scientific achievements of the third
millennium (pp. 23-24).
34.
Arzibayev, Q. (2023). О ‘smir sportchilarda sport bilan shug ‘ullanish motivlarini
о‘rganish. Sport ilm-fanining dolzarb muammolari, 1(3), 18-25.
