This study employs a systemic functional linguistics (SFL) approach to investigate the generic structure of French editorials. Editorials, as a genre of written discourse, serve a crucial function in conveying opinions, shaping public discourse, and influencing readers' perspectives. Through the lens of SFL, which emphasizes the interplay between language structure, social context, and communicative purpose, this research examines the linguistic features and organizational patterns that characterize French editorials. Drawing on a corpus of French editorials, the study identifies recurring textual structures, rhetorical strategies, and linguistic choices employed by writers to engage with readers, advance arguments, and assert authority. By uncovering the systemic patterns underlying editorial discourse, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the genre conventions and communicative strategies that underpin French editorial writing.
Ansary, H., and E. Babaii. 2004. “The Generic Integrity of Newspaper Editorials: A Systemic Functional Perspective.” Asian EFL Journal 6 (3). Accessed August 18, 2006. http://www. asian-efl-journal.com/Sept_04_ha&.pdf
Bolivar, A. 1994. “The Structure of Newspaper Editorials.” In Advances in Written Text Analysis, edited by M. Coulthard, 276–294. London: Routledge.
Caffarel, A., and E. Rechniewski. 2008. “When is a Handover Not a Handover? A Case Study of Ideologically Opposed French News Stories.” In Communicating Conflict: Multilingual Case Studies of the News Media, edited by E. Thompson and P. White. London: Continuum.
Caffarel, A., and E. Rechniewski. 2009. “A Systemic Functional Approach to Analysis and Interpreting Ideology: An Illustration from French Editorials.” In Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 22: 27–43.
Danes, F. 1974. “Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text.” In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, edited by F. Danes, 106–128. The Hague: Mouton.
Firbas, J. 1987. “On the Delimitation of Theme in Functional Sentence Perspective.” In Functionalism in Linguistics, edited by R. Dirven and V. Friend. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fries, P. H. 1981. “On the Status of Theme in English: Arguments from Discourse.” Forum Linguisticum 6 (1), 1–38.
Hagège, C. 1978. “Du thème au thème en passant par le sujet.” Pour une théorie cyclique’, La Linguistique 14 (2): 3–38.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd Ed. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., and R. Hasan. 1985. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Iedema, R., S. Feez, and P. White. 1994. Stage Two: Media Literacy. A Report for the Write it Right Literacy in Industry Research Project. NSW: Department of School Education.
Le, E. 2010. Editorials and the Power of Media: Interweaving of Socio-Cultural Identities. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Maingueneau, D. 1998. Analyser les textes de communication. Paris: Dunod.
Martin, J. R. 1985. Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging Social Reality. Victoria: Deakin University.