Решающая роль рабочей памяти в овладении вторым языком

Аннотация

Овладение вторым языком (SLA) — это сложный процесс, на который влияют различные когнитивные факторы, среди которых ключевую роль играет рабочая память (WM). Этот обзор синтезирует существующие исследования, чтобы прояснить значение WM в SLA. Мы углубляемся в теоретические основы, эмпирические исследования и методологии, используемые для изучения взаимосвязи между WM и SLA. Более того, мы обсуждаем последствия этих результатов для преподавания языка и педагогики, подчеркивая важность внедрения стратегий на основе WM для улучшения результатов изучения языка.

Тип источника: Журналы
Годы охвата с 2022
inLibrary
Google Scholar
ВАК
elibrary
doi
 
Выпуск:
  • Преподаватель, кафедра прикладных наук N1, факультет английского языка N1, Узбекский государственный университет мировых языков
114-119
30

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Поделиться
Иргашева M. . (2024). Решающая роль рабочей памяти в овладении вторым языком. Зарубежная лингвистика и лингводидактика, 2(3), 114–119. извлечено от https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/foreign-linguistics/article/view/67535
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Аннотация

Овладение вторым языком (SLA) — это сложный процесс, на который влияют различные когнитивные факторы, среди которых ключевую роль играет рабочая память (WM). Этот обзор синтезирует существующие исследования, чтобы прояснить значение WM в SLA. Мы углубляемся в теоретические основы, эмпирические исследования и методологии, используемые для изучения взаимосвязи между WM и SLA. Более того, мы обсуждаем последствия этих результатов для преподавания языка и педагогики, подчеркивая важность внедрения стратегий на основе WM для улучшения результатов изучения языка.


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika

Зарубежная

лингвистика

и

лингводидактика

Foreign

Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Journal home page:

https://inscience.uz/index.php/foreign-linguistics

The crucial role of working memory in second language
acquisition

Madina IRGASHEVA

1

Uzbekistan State World Languages University

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

Article history:

Received March 2024
Received in revised form

10 April 2024

Accepted 25 April 2024

Available online

25 July 2024

Second language acquisition (SLA) is a complex process

influenced by various cognitive factors, among which working
memory (WM) plays a pivotal role. This review synthesizes

existing research to elucidate the significance of WM in SLA. We

delve into the theoretical frameworks, empirical studies, and

methodologies employed to explore the relationship between

WM and SLA. Moreover, we discuss the implications of these
findings for language instruction and pedagogy, emphasizing

the importance of incorporating WM-based strategies to

enhance language learning outcomes.

2181-3701

2024 in Science LLC.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol2-iss3-pp114-119

This is an open-access article under the Attribution 4.0 International
(CC BY 4.0) license (

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru

)

Keywords:

second language acquisition,
working memory,

cognitive factors,

language instruction,
pedagogy.

Ikkinchi tilni o

rganishda ishlab chiqarish xotirasining

ahamiyati

ANNOTATSIYA

Kalit so‘zlar

:

ikkinchi tilni o

zlashtirish,

operativ xotira,

kognitiv omillar,

tilni o

rgatish,

pedagogika.

Ikkinchi tilni o‘zlashtirish (SLA) turli kognitiv omillar

ta’sirida murakkab jarayon bo‘lib, ular orasida ishchi xotira

(WM) muhim rol o‘ynaydi. Ushbu

maqola SLAda WMning

ahamiyatini aniqlash uchun mavjud tadqiqotlarni sintez qiladi.

WM va SLA o‘rtasidagi munosabatlarni o‘rganish uchun

qo‘llaniladigan nazariy asoslar, empirik tadqiqotlar va

metodologiyalarni o‘rganamiz. Bundan tashqari, ushbu
topilmalarning tilni o‘qitish va pedagogikaga ta’sirini

muhokama qilinib, til o‘rganish natijalarini yaxshilash uchun

WM-ga asoslangan strategiyalarni kiritish muhimligini

ta’kidlanadi.

1

Teacher, Applied Sciences N1 Department, English Language N1 Faculty, Uzbekistan State World Languages

University.


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika

Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика

Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Issue

2

3 (2024) / ISSN 2181-3701

115

Решающая роль рабочей памяти в овладении вторым
языком

АННОТАЦИЯ

Ключевые слова:

овладение вторым
языком,

рабочая память,
когнитивные факторы,
обучение языку,

педагогика.

Овладение вторым языком (SLA) –

это сложный процесс,

на который влияют различные когнитивные факторы,

среди которых ключевую роль играет рабочая память

(WM).

Этот

обзор

синтезирует

существующие

исследования, чтобы прояснить значение WM в SLA. Мы
углубляемся в теоретические основы, эмпирические
исследования и методологии, используемые для изучения

взаимосвязи между WM и SLA. Более того, мы обсуждаем

последствия этих результатов для преподавания языка и
педагогики, подчеркивая важность внедрения стратегий на

основе WM для улучшения результатов изучения языка.

INTRODUCTION

Second language acquisition (SLA) has been a topic of extensive research, with

scholars endeavoring to unravel the cognitive mechanisms underlying the acquisition
process. Among the myriad cognitive factors implicated in SLA, working memory (WM)
has emerged as a key determinant of language learning success. This article provides a
comprehensive overview of the role of WM in SLA, elucidating its theoretical foundations,
empirical evidence, and practical implications for language instruction.

METHODOLOGY

This review adopts a systematic approach to synthesizing existing literature on the

role of working memory (WM) in second language acquisition (SLA). The methodology
encompasses the following steps: literature search (a comprehensive search of electronic
databases such as PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Google Scholar was conducted to
identify relevant studies published in peer

-

reviewed journals. Search terms included

combinations of keywords such as "working memory," "second language acquisition,"
"language learning," "cognitive factors," and "pedagogy"), inclusion criteria (studies were
included based on their relevance to the topic and their empirical investigation of the
relationship between WM and SLA. Both quantitative and qualitative research articles, as
well as theoretical frameworks and meta

-

analyses, were considered for inclusion), data

extraction (data from selected studies were extracted and organized according to key
themes, including theoretical frameworks, empirical findings, methodological
approaches, and practical implications. Relevant information such as sample
characteristics, research designs, WM measures, language proficiency assessments, and
intervention strategies was collated for analysis), synthesis of findings (the extracted
data were synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of WM in SLA.
Themes and patterns emerging from the literature were identified, and key findings were
summarized to elucidate the theoretical foundations, empirical evidence, and practical
implications of WM in language learning), critical analysis (the synthesized findings were
critically analyzed to evaluate the strength of evidence supporting the relationship
between WM and SLA. Limitations of existing research, potential confounding variables,
and alternative explanations were considered to provide a balanced interpretation of the


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika

Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика

Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Issue

2

3 (2024) / ISSN 2181-3701

116

literature), implications for practice (based on the synthesized evidence, practical
implications for language instruction and pedagogy were delineated. Strategies for
integrating WM

-

based interventions into language teaching approaches were proposed,

with emphasis on optimizing learning environments and enhancing learners' cognitive
processing capacities).

RESULTS

The synthesis of literature on the role of working memory (WM) in second language

acquisition (SLA) reveals several key findings and patterns:

1.

Theoretical frameworks, primarily based on Baddeley's model of working

memory, posit that WM plays a central role in language processing by facilitating the
temporary storage and manipulation of linguistic information. The central executive,
phonological loop, and visuospatial sketchpad components of WM are implicated in
various aspects of SLA, including phonological processing, vocabulary acquisition,
grammatical comprehension, and discourse organization.

2.

Empirical Evidence: Empirical studies employing diverse methodologies

consistently demonstrate a positive correlation between WM capacity and language
learning proficiency. Longitudinal studies reveal that individuals with higher WM
capacity tend to exhibit accelerated rates of language acquisition and greater proficiency
levels over time. Neuroimaging studies provide neurobiological evidence supporting the
involvement of WM networks in language processing tasks, further substantiating the
theoretical linkage between WM and SLA.

3.

Methodological approaches used to investigate the relationship between WM and

SLA include experimental tasks, behavioral measures, neuroimaging techniques, and
longitudinal assessments. Tasks assessing phonological memory, attentional control, and
executive functions are commonly employed to capture the cognitive processes
underlying language learning. Longitudinal studies tracking learners' progress over time
offer insights into the developmental trajectory of WM and its impact on SLA outcomes.

4.

The recognition of WM's significance in SLA has important implications for

language instruction and pedagogy. Educators can integrate WM

-

based strategies into

language teaching approaches to optimize learning environments and enhance learners'
cognitive processing capacities. Activities promoting rehearsal, chunking, and attentional
control can strengthen learners' WM skills and facilitate the acquisition of linguistic
structures. Adaptive instructional approaches tailored to individual learners' WM
profiles can address cognitive constraints and promote more efficient language learning.

Overall, the synthesis of findings underscores the critical role of WM in shaping

language learning trajectories and highlights the potential of WM-based interventions to
optimize SLA outcomes. By integrating theoretical insights with empirical evidence and
practical implications, this review provides a comprehensive understanding of the interplay
between WM and SLA, with implications for both research and pedagogical practice.

DISCUSSION

A working memory perspective shifts the scientific schema within which language

and language behavior have been studied to focus on the dynamics of language
processing, in addition to its structural aspects [2, 1107].

If working memory can indeed be validated as an independent variable that can

account for language comprehension and language acquisition, the obvious question is
how working memory fits into a theory of second language acquisition. As suggested by


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika

Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика

Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Issue

2

3 (2024) / ISSN 2181-3701

117

the eloquent statement made by Carpenter, Miyake and Just above, one area in which to
look for such a compatible theory of SLA is in the area of processing. Indeed, there
appears to be a growing consensus in the field of SLA [5] that working memory is highly
compatible with information processing models of L2 learning such as those proposed by
Pienemann and Johnston [12], VanPatten, McLaughlin [9], Rossman [10], and McLoed,
and Hulstijn W. and Hulstijn J [6]. Some of these theories have more recently been
incorporated into the recent work by Skehan (1998) on a cognitive approach to language
learning.

Cadierno and VanPatten [15] portray the role of processing from input to output in

the following schematic model.

I II III

input

--------

> intake

----------

> developing system

----------

> output

Figure 1. Model of second language acquisition [15]

The theoretical framework linking WM to SLA draws upon Baddeley's model of

working memory, which comprises the central executive, phonological loop, and
visuospatial sketchpad. According to this model, the central executive serves as the
supervisory system that coordinates cognitive processes, including language processing.
The phonological loop, responsible for the temporary storage of auditory information, is
crucial for retaining phonological forms during language learning. Similarly, the
visuospatial sketchpad facilitates the manipulation and retention of visual and spatial
information, which are pertinent to certain aspects of language comprehension and
production.

Baddeley's model of working memory, proposed by British psychologist Alan

Baddeley in 1974, is a widely accepted theoretical framework that provides a
conceptualization of the cognitive system responsible for temporary storage and
manipulation of information during complex cognitive tasks, such as language
processing. The model consists of several components, each with specific functions:

Central Executive: The central executive is considered the control center of working

memory, responsible for coordinating cognitive processes and allocating attentional
resources. It regulates the flow of information between different components of working
memory and integrates information from long

-

term memory. The central executive is

theorized to be involved in tasks such as planning, decision

-

making, problem

-

solving, and

cognitive control.

Phonological Loop: The phonological loop is responsible for the temporary storage

and rehearsal of auditory and verbal information. It consists of two subcomponents:

Phonological Store: This component holds auditory information in a phonological or

auditory

-

based form for a brief duration. It is involved in the storage of spoken language

sounds.

Articulatory Control Process: This component is responsible for the rehearsal and

maintenance of verbal information through subvocal articulation or inner speech. It aids
in the refreshing of information stored in the phonological store, thereby preventing its
decay.

Visuospatial Sketchpad: The visuospatial sketchpad is responsible for the temporary

storage and manipulation of visual and spatial information. It allows individuals to
mentally visualize and manipulate images, objects, and spatial relationships. This
component is involved in tasks such as mental rotation, navigation, and spatial reasoning.


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika

Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика

Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Issue

2

3 (2024) / ISSN 2181-3701

118

Episodic Buffer: In later revisions of the model, Baddeley proposed the addition of

the episodic buffer, which serves as a temporary storage system capable of integrating
information from various sources, including the phonological loop, visuospatial
sketchpad, and long

-

term memory. The episodic buffer provides a mechanism for binding

together different types of information into coherent episodic memories, facilitating the
construction of mental representations of past events.

Baddeley's model of working memory has been influential in shaping our

understanding of cognitive processes involved in various tasks, including language
comprehension, production, and learning. In the context of second language acquisition
(SLA), Baddeley's model provides a theoretical framework for examining how working
memory capacity influences language learning outcomes. Specifically, the phonological
loop component of working memory is particularly relevant to language processing
tasks, as it is involved in the temporary storage and manipulation of linguistic
information, such as sounds, words, and syntax.

Research in SLA has explored the role of working memory, particularly the

phonological loop, in tasks such as vocabulary acquisition, grammatical processing, and
language production. Studies have shown that individuals with higher working memory
capacity tend to demonstrate better performance in language learning tasks, such as
vocabulary retention, sentence comprehension, and oral fluency. Furthermore,
interventions targeting working memory processes, such as rehearsal strategies and
attentional control exercises, have been shown to enhance language learning outcomes in
both classroom and experimental settings.

Overall, Baddeley's model of working memory provides a valuable framework for

understanding the cognitive processes underlying second language acquisition and offers
insights into how working memory capacity influences language learning success. By
incorporating working memory

-

based strategies into language instruction and pedagogy,

educators can optimize learning environments and facilitate more efficient language
learning for learners of all ages and proficiency levels.

Empirical studies investigating the relationship between WM and SLA have yielded

compelling evidence supporting their interdependence. Research employing various
methodologies, including behavioral experiments, neuroimaging techniques, and
longitudinal studies, consistently demonstrates a positive correlation between WM
capacity and language learning proficiency. Moreover, experimental interventions
targeting WM processes have been shown to enhance language learning outcomes,
underscoring the causal role of WM in SLA.

The recognition of WM's significance in SLA has profound implications for language

instruction and pedagogy. Educators can leverage WM

-

based strategies to optimize

language learning environments and facilitate learners' cognitive processing.
Incorporating activities that promote WM development, such as rehearsal, chunking, and
attentional control, can enhance learners' capacity to encode, store, and retrieve
linguistic information. Moreover, adaptive instructional approaches tailored to individual
learners' WM profiles can optimize learning outcomes and mitigate cognitive overload.

Conclusion. In conclusion, working memory emerges as a critical factor in second

language acquisition, influencing learners' ability to comprehend, produce, and retain
linguistic structures. Theoretical models, empirical research, and pedagogical strategies
converge to underscore the pivotal role of WM in shaping language learning trajectories.


background image

Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika

Зарубежная лингвистика

и лингводидактика

Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics

Issue

2

3 (2024) / ISSN 2181-3701

119

By integrating WM

-

based interventions into language instruction, educators can

empower learners to overcome cognitive constraints and achieve proficiency in a second
language. Thus, a deeper understanding of WM's role in SLA holds promise for advancing
theories of language learning and optimizing educational practices in multilingual
contexts.

REFERENCES:

1.

Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working

memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417

-

423.

2.

Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward.

Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829

-

839.

3.

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The

psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47

-

89). Academic Press.

4.

Gathercole, S. E., & Alloway, T. P. (2008). Working memory and learning: A

practical guide for teachers. SAGE Publications.

5.

Harrington, M. (1992). Working memory capacity as a constraint on L2

development. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals. Amsterdam: North
Holland.

6.

Hulstijn, J., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing

constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34, 23

-

43.

7.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension:

Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122

-

149.

8.

Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and

second language comprehension and production: A meta

-

analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin

& Review, 21(4), 861

-

883.

9.

McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning An

information

-

processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135

-

158.

10.

Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of

active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press.

11.

Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1995). Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning

in polyglots. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 48(1), 98-107.

12.

Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). An acquisition

-

based procedure for

second language assessment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 92

-

122.

13.

Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign

-

language learning.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 45(1), 21

-

50.

14.

Sun, C., & Wang, Y. (2019). The relationship between working memory and L2

vocabulary learning: A meta

-

analysis. International Journal of Bilingual Education and

Bilingualism, 22(2), 148

-

162.

15.

VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing.

Studies in Second Language Acquistion, 15, 225

-

243.

16.

Suleymanova, N., & Tuychiev, S. (2024, February). THE LINGUISTICS ASPECTS

OF THE SPEECH UNITS AND ITS NOMINATIVE FEATURES. In

Conference Proceedings:

Fostering Your Research Spirit

(pp. 292

-

294).

Библиографические ссылки

Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423.

Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). Academic Press.

Gathercole, S. E., & Alloway, T. P. (2008). Working memory and learning: A practical guide for teachers. SAGE Publications.

Harrington, M. (1992). Working memory capacity as a constraint on L2 development. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Hulstijn, J., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34, 23-43.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149.

Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861-883.

McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning An information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135-158.

Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press.

Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1995). Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 48(1), 98-107.

Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). An acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 92-122.

Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 45(1), 21-50.

Sun, C., & Wang, Y. (2019). The relationship between working memory and L2 vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 148-162.

VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.

Suleymanova, N., & Tuychiev, S. (2024, February). THE LINGUISTICS ASPECTS OF THE SPEECH UNITS AND ITS NOMINATIVE FEATURES. In Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit (pp. 292-294).